Net costs subordinated loan and hybrid Tier 1 securities
-169
103
31
Operating expenses
-2 473
-2 278
32
Other expenses
-1 377
-1 292
Unit holder's value change in consolidated security funds
15 966
-19 802
Total expenses
-52 217
-86 377
Operating profit/loss
-21 502
39 200
20
To/from securities adjustment fund – life insurance
0
-21 646
20
To supplementary reserves – life insurance
24 063
-5 420
20
Assets allocated to insurance customers - life insurance
-909
-11 107
Pre-tax income
1 652
1 027
22
Cost of taxes 1
-801
-748
Income
851
279
27
Actuarial loss and profit on post employment benefit obligations
132
84
20
Adjustments of the insurance obligations
-21
-16
22
Tax on items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss
-17
-12
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss
94
56
Revaluation real property for use in own operation
-43
206
15
Currency translation foreign properites
148
-1 314
20
Adjustments of the insurance obligations
-148
1 314
22
Tax on items that will be reclassified to profit or loss
11
-52
Items that will be reclassified to income particular specific conditions are met
-32
155
Total other comprehensive income
62
211
Total comprehensive income
913
490
1 Unit holders share of taxes in consolidated security funds
-359
-296
Balance sheetKLP GROUP
NOTE
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
22
Deferred tax assets
48
52
24
Other intangible assets
1 049
797
21
Tangible fixed assets
2 633
2 714
17
Investments in associated companies and joint venture
5 456
4 934
7, 15
Investment property
93 992
89 535
6, 12
Debt instruments held to maturity
24 225
25 985
6, 12
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables
174 530
164 484
6, 7, 12, 14
Lending local government, enterprises & retail customers at fair value through profit / loss
0
79
6, 12, 14
Lending local government, enterprises and retail customers
121 360
118 024
6, 7, 12
Debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss
181 815
188 172
6, 7
Equity capital instruments at fair value through profit/loss
282 399
294 476
6, 7, 12, 13
Financial derivatives
6 820
3 253
6
Receivables
3 989
5 377
12
Cash and bank deposits
3 321
3 388
TOTAL ASSETS
901 636
901 270
Owners’ equity contributed
21 388
19 831
35
Retained earnings
21 482
20 901
TOTAL OWNERS’ EQUITY
42 870
40 732
6,16,18,19,36
Hybrid Tier 1 securities
1 428
1 604
6,16,19,36
Subordinated loan capital
3 147
3 000
27
Pension obligations
815
870
20
Technical provisions - life insurance
652 618
653 551
20
Premiums, claims and contingency fund provisions - non-life insurance
3 782
3 023
6,19,36
Covered bonds issued
32 430
31 015
6,19,36
Debt to credit institutions
6 683
4 199
6,19
Liabilities to and deposits from customers
13 779
12 901
6,7,13
Financial derivatives
3 158
4 740
22
Deferred tax
1 143
1 387
33
Other current liabilities
4 951
6 808
Unit holders`s interest in consolidated securites funds
134 831
137 440
TOTAL LIABILITIES
858 766
860 538
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES
901 636
901 270
34
Contingent liabilities
31 083
28 754
Changes in Owner’s equityKLP GROUP
2022 NOK MILLIONS
Owners' equity contributed
Retained earnings
Total equity contributed
Owners’ equity 31 December 2021
19 831
20 901
40 732
Change recognized directly in equity1
243
243
Owners’ equity 1 January 2022
19 831
21 144
40 975
Income
576
275
851
Items that will not be reclassified to income
94
94
Items that will be reclassified to income later when particular conditions are met
- 32
- 32
Total other comprehensive income
62
62
Total comprehensive income
576
338
913
Owners' equity contribution received (net)
982
982
Total transactions with the owners
982
982
Owners’ equity 31 December 2022
21 388
21 482
42 870
1 For more information see Note 2.1.1c
2021 NOK MILLIONS
Owners' equity contributed
Retained earnings
Total equity contributed
Owners’ equity 1 January 2021
18 194
21 222
39 416
Income
811
- 532
279
Items that will not be reclassified to income
56
56
Items that will be reclassified to income later when particular conditions are met
155
155
Total other comprehensive income
211
211
Total comprehensive income
811
- 321
490
Owners' equity contribution received (net)
826
826
Total transactions with the owners
826
826
Owners’ equity 31 December 2021
19 831
20 901
40 732
Statement of cash flowsKLP GROUP
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITES
Direct insurance premiums received
40 882
43 199
Reinsurance premiums paid
-97
-75
Direct insurance claims and benefits paid
-24 765
-23 000
Reinsurance settlement received for claims and insurance benefits
120
83
Payments made on transfer
-4 628
-8 287
Payments to other suppliers for products and services
-2 250
-2 382
Payments to staff, pension schemes, employer's social security contribution etc.
-1 236
-1 172
Interest paid
-1 270
-544
Interest received
10 398
10 790
Dividend received
1 278
7 925
Tax and public charges paid
-956
-1 593
Payments from property operations
4 107
3 794
Net receipts/payments of loans to customers etc.
-1 828
-2 415
Net receipts on customer deposits banking
878
1 119
Receipts on the sale of shares
151 621
67 799
Payments on the purchase of shares
-106 361
-114 494
Receipts on the sale of bonds and certificates
88 854
77 941
Payments on the purchase of bonds and certificates
-134 272
-84 480
Receipts on the sale of property
148
798
Payments on the purchase of property
-1 104
-4 461
Net cash flow from purchase/sale of other short-term securities
-4 958
8 412
Net cash flows from operating activities
14 562
-21 041
CASH FLOW FROM INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES
Receipts on the sale of tangible fixed assets etc.
0
6
Payments on the purchase of tangible fixed assets etc.
-349
-293
Net cash flows from investment activities
-349
-287
CASH FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
The minority's share of operational activities
-16 738
20 596
Payments on subordinated loan capital
0
0
Receipts on loans from credit institutions
7 150
9 300
Disbursements on loans from credit institutions
-5 690
-8 726
Receipts of owners’ equity contributions
1 120
1 101
Payments on repayment of owners’ equity contributions
-138
-275
Net cash flows from financing activities
-14 296
21 996
Net changes in cash and bank deposits
-83
668
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
17
-52
Holdings of cash and bank deposits at start of period
3 388
2 772
Holdings of cash and bank deposits at end of period
3 321
3 388
Notes to the accountsKLP Group
Note 1 General information
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse gjensidig forsikringsselskap (the company) and its subsidiaries (together the group) provide pension, financial, banking and insurance services to private individuals, municipalities and county administrations, health enterprises and to enterprises both in the public and private sectors.
The largest product area is group pensions insurance. Within pension insurance the group offers local government occupational pensions, defined benefit pensions and defined contribution pensions. In addition the group offers group life and non-life insurance, banking services, fund and asset management.
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse (KLP) is a mutual insurance company registered and domiciled in Norway. The company has its head office in Dronning Eufemias gate 10, Oslo.
The Group's annual financial statements may be accessed at www.klp.no.
The group has subordinated loans listed on the London Stock Exchange and part of the groups' issued covered bonds are listed on Oslo Stock Exchange
Note 2 Summary of the most important accounting principles
Below follows a description of the most important accounting principles used in the consolidated financial statements. These principles have been used consistently for all periods presented.
2.1 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
The consolidated financial statements for KLP have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) approved by the EU with certain supplements resulting from the Norwegian Accounting Act and the Regulations on annual accounts for insurance companies.
The annual financial statements have been prepared based on the principle of historic cost, with the following exceptions:
Investment properties valued at fair value through profit and loss
Investment property for own use is revalued to fair value
Financial assets and liabilities(including derivatives) are value at fair value through profit and loss
Financial assets and liabilities are valued in accordance with the rules on fair value hedging
In preparing the annual financial statements management must make accounting estimates and discretionary evaluations. This will affect the value of the Group's assets and liabilities, income and expenses recognized in the financial statements. Actual figures may deviate from estimates used. Areas in which discretionary valuations and estimates have been used that are of material significance for the Group are described in Note 3.
All sums are presented in NOK millions without decimals unless otherwise stated.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the going concern assumption
2.1.1 Changes in accounting principles and disclosures
a) New and changed standards adopted by the Company/Group in 2022
The ongoing IBOR reform has not led to any significant changes in value for the Group. A small number of interest rate swaps in USD-NOK have had their valuation method changed, with the base yield curve between the currencies changing in line with the new market practice. This change has to do with the methodology and has no material effect on value. USD
Libor will cease in June 2023, when four interest rate swaps will have to be terminated or changed. A change also has to be made to the valuation method for foreign exchange contracts. This will have no material impact on valuations. The Grouphas a fund bond denominated in Japanese yen with a fixed USD interest rate which can be redeemed in 2023. If KLP chooses not to exercise its right to redeem the loan, the credit margin on the loan will be based on a future JPY-LIBOR rate. The interest terms at the end of 2022 are unchanged; see Note 16 for more details of the fund bond issue.
There are no other new or amended IFRS standards or IFRIC interpretations that have entered into force for the 2022 accounts that significantly affect the grou’s accounts.
b) Standards, changes and interpretations of existing standards that have not yet entered into force and where the Group has not opted for early application
There are changes in standards and interpretations that will take effect for financial years beginning after 1 January 2023 which have not been used in these accounts. The most important changes that the Group has not adopted is stated below.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments entered into force on 1 January 2018; it covers the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and liabilities, and introduces new rules for hedge accounting and a new impairment model for financial assets.
Companies/Groups with insurance-dominated activities are allowed, but not obliged, to defer the implementation of IFRS 9 until the first financial year starting on or after 1 January 2023. The KLP Group has insurance- dominated activities and has deferred the implementation. The Group will adopt the standard for financial statements beginning after 01.01.2023. In the Groups’ note 37 the most important accounting principles according to the new standard are stated, and also include the transition effect for the Group as of 01.01.2023.
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
The new accounting standard for insurance contracts, IFRS 17, was published by the IASB in 2017 and approved by the EU on 23 November 2021. The standard will replace the current standard for insurance contracts, IFRS 4, and will be mandatory from 01.01.2023. The definition of what constitutes an insurance contract has not changed, but there have been some clarifications that limit the qualifying contracts to be handled according to IFRS 17. Unlike IFRS 4, IFRS 17 also contains rules on how insurance contracts should be assessed and presented, as well as extensive new note requirements.
Following amendments to the Annual Accounts Regulations for non-life insurance companies in August 2022, the Group’s non-life business was required to comply with IFRS 17 in its company accounts. Amendments were also made to the Annual Accounts Regulations for life insurance companies, where implementation of IFRS 17 was not permitted in the company accounts for the Group’s life business. This means that the principles applied in the company accounts for life insurance activities for consolidation purposes have changed to match the principles used in the consolidated financial statements.
Note 37 for the Group describes the key accounting principles under IFRS 17, along with the transitional effects the standard will have on the Group’s financial statements as of 1 January 2023.
There are no other IFRSs or IFRIC interpretations not yet in force that are expected to have a significant impact on the financial statements.
c) Other changes
Buffer fund
In the insurance business, rules on a merged buffer fund covering all customers were introduced for municipal pension schemes from 01.01.2022 together with some other changes for guaranteed pension products. The new buffer fund replaces the earlier supplementary reserves and securities adjustment fund and amounts to 126 NOK million as at 01.01.2022. The buffer fund is included in the accounting line “Technical provisions – life insurance” in the balance sheet. In addition, 554 NOK million was transferred from the security adjustment fund to the risk adjustment fund. The latter is included in retained earnings in the balance sheet.
Reserves for increased longevity
In 2021 and at the beginning of 2022, KLP was in discussions with the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway on certain allocations that were made in the annual accounts for 2020. The annual accounts for 2021 showed these changes, and the effects were incorporated into the figures. In February 2022, KLP again received a letter from the FSA stating that its equity must contribute 20 per cent of the amount from the risk result from 2020 used to boost the reserves for increased longevity. This amounted to NOK 229 million, and is recognised directly in the balance sheet, split between equity and premium funds.
If the tax effect of the items posted directly to the Group’s equity for buffer funds and reserves is taken into account, postings directly to equity amounted to NOK 243 million as of 01.01.2022.
Gross/net accounting for management remuneration in mutual funds
On 7 April 2021, the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway sent an identical letter to all life insurance companies and pension funds concerning pension providers’ treatment of remuneration paid to asset management companies and other managers of mutual funds. In the letter, the FSA stated that the management fee paid by a fund to the management company and other managers must be taken into account when determining the price tariff, and included in the pension provider’s expenses (gross accounting). The corresponding amount had to be added to the return on customer funds. This did not accord with the Group’s practice, which is net accounting.
The requirement for gross recognition has been disputed, and the industry therefore asked the Ministry of Finance to clarify the issue. On 9 January 2023, the Ministry of Finance explained that there is insufficient legal basis for requiring pension schemes to include such management remuneration in their price tariffs.
2.2 CONSOLIDATION PRINCIPLES
2.2.1 Subsidiaries
All entities in which the Group has decisive influence/control are considered subsidiaries. Control is normally achieved through ownership of more than half of the voting capital. The effect of potential voting rights that can be exercised or converted at the end of the reporting period is included in the assessment of control. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which the Group takes over control and they are omitted from consolidation when that control ceases.
In accordance with the changed definition of control in IFRS 10, a large portion of KLP's investments in securities fund are consolidated in the Groups financial statements. KLP/Group has laid wait upon the following factors in assessing whether there is an obligation to consolidate:
The Group takes the initiative for the securities fund and defines investment strategy, management fees etc. for the securities fund's byelaws
The Group undertakes the management within the operating scope of the securities fund's byelaws
The Group receives all management fees in the fund
The Group exploits synergies is by undertaking management itself (except for certain "funds of funds")
The Group has substantial ownership interest in the fund (usually more than 20 per cent)
Applying definition in IFRS 10 makes discretionary evaluations necessary. In the Group’s financial statements, such funds are 100 per cent consolidated in the balance-sheet where non-controlling ownership interests (minority shares in the Securities Fund) are included in the accounting item “Unit holders” interest in consolidated securities funds’. The minority's share of the mutual funds are in the financial statement classified as liabilities.
Purchase of subsidiaries is recognized in accordance with the purchase method. Acquisition cost is set at the same as fair value of assets provided by way of consideration for the purchase, equity instruments issued and liabilities assumed on transfer of control. The identifiable assets and liabilities of the acquired company are valued at fair value. If cost of acquisition exceeds fair value of identifiable net assets in the subsidiary, the excess is capitalized as goodwill. If the cost of acquisition is lower, the difference is taken to profit/loss on the date of acquisition.
Intercompany Group transactions and accounts between Group companies are eliminated. Where Group companies present accounts in accordance with principles other than those of the Group, these are converted to correspond to the Group's accounting principles before they are consolidated. The Group's accounts are presented in NOK and those of subsidiaries in foreign currency are translated to NOK at the exchange rate prevailing at the end of the reporting period. On consolidation of income statement items in foreign currency, average foreign exchange rates are used.
2.2.2 Associated companies
Associated companies are entities in which the Group has substantial influence without having control. If the Group is invested direct or indirect through a holding of 20 per cent or more, it is assumed that the Group has substantial influence unless stated otherwise. The following factors may be use to determine if the Groups has substantial influence:
Representation in the board or similar organs in the invested company
Participation in processes for determine principles, in ex. decisions regarding dividends
Material transactions between the Group and the invested company
Mutual exchange of key personnel, or
Deliverance of important technical information
On the date of acquisition investments in associated companies are taken to account at cost of acquisition. The equity capital method is used for accounting in subsequent periods. This means that the Group's share of profit or loss in associated companies is taken to profit/loss and is added to the capitalized value together with owners' equity changes not taken to profit/loss. The Group does not take a share of the loss to profit/loss if this involves the capitalized value of the investment becoming negative unless the Group has assumed liabilities on behalf of the associated company.
Where necessary accounting principles in associated companies are changed to achieve harmonization with the Group's accounting principles.
2.2.3 Joint arrangements
Joint arrangements are investments in which the Group has joint control with another company. "Joint control" is the contractually agreed sharing of control of a joint arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require unanimity between the parties sharing control.
According to IFRS 11, investments in joint arrangements are to be classified either as joint operating arrangements or joint ventures, depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each individual investor. The Group has considered its joint arrangements and reached the conclusion that they are joint ventures.
On the date of acquisition investments in joint arrangements are recognized at cost of acquisition. The equity capital method is used for accounting in subsequent periods. This means that the Group's share of profit or loss in joint arrangements is taken to profit/loss and is added to the capitalized value together with owners' equity changes not taken to profit/loss. The Group does not take a share of the loss to profit/loss if this involves the capitalized value of the investment becoming negative unless the Group has assumed liabilities on behalf of the joint arrangement.
Where necessary accounting principles in associated companies and joint ventures are changed to achieve harmonization with the Group's accounting principles.
2.2.4 Funds
Some funds have been consolidated in the Group's financial statement because they are considered to meet the definition of IFRS 10. These funds are in total owned by parent company KLP.
2.3 BUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Group's business segments have been defined in relation to business areas where risk and returns are differentiated from each other. The Group's business segments are Grouped into public sector occupational pension, non-life insurance, banking, asset management and other business. The segments are described in detail in Note 4.
2.4 TRANSLATION OF TRANSACTIONS IN FOREIGN CURRENCY
2.4.1 Functional currency and presentational currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in NOK, which is the functional currency of the parent company.
2.4.2 Transactions and financial position statement items
Transactions in foreign currency have been translated to NOK by using the exchange rate on the date of the transaction. Exchange-rate gains and losses on transactions in foreign currency are recognized through profit or loss. This also applies to translation of money items (assets and liabilities) at the end of the reporting period.
Translation differences on monetary items are included as part of the gain and loss on valuation at fair value. Translation differences associated with non-monetary items, such as shares at fair value through profit and loss, are included as an element of value change taken to profit/loss.
2.4.3 Group companies
Entities that are consolidated and have functional currency other than the presentation currency are treated as follows:
The financial position is translated at the exchange rate at the end of the reporting period.
The statement of income is translated at average exchange rate (if the average does not in general provide a reasonable estimate against use of the transaction rate, the transaction rate is used)
Translation differences are taken to other comprehensive income.
2.5 TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS
In the main, the Group's tangible fixed assets comprise office machinery, inventory, art and real estate used by the Group in its business.
Real estate used by the Group is revalued at fair value based on periodic valuations carried out by the Group, with deductions for depreciation. Valuation review is carried out regularly. The principles for valuation of properties are the same for investment property and are described in detail in connection with the principles for accounting treatment of investment property.
Other tangible fixed assets are recognized at cost of acquisition including costs that can be attributed directly to the fixed asset, with deduction for write-downs.
Subsequent costs relating to fixed assets are capitalized as part of the fixed asset if it is likely that the expenditure will contribute to future financial benefit for the Group and the cost can be measured reliably. Repair and maintenance are recognized through profit or loss during the period in which the expenses are incurred.
Depreciation is by straight-line so the acquisition cost of fixed assets or their reassessed value is depreciated to residual value over expected life, which is:
Buildings: 50 years
Office machinery: 3 - 5 years
Vehicles: 5 year
Inventory: 3 - 5 years
Buildings are divided into components if substantial parts have significantly different lifetimes. Each component is depreciated in accordance with that component's life.
The utilizable life of tangible fixed assets is assessed annually. Where there are indications of impairment in excess of residual value, the recoverable sum is calculated. If the recoverable sum is lower than the residual value, write-down is carried out to the recoverable sum.
2.6 INVESTMENT PROPERTY
Real estate not used by the Group is classified as investment property. If a property is partially used by the Group and partially leased to external tenants, the part that is leased to external tenants is classified as investment property if it can be subdivided out.
Investment property comprises buildings and sites, and is valued at fair value at the end of the reporting period. The Group uses a valuation model to estimate market value. The valuation method is based on discounting of the property's expected net cash flow by the market's return requirements.
In the first instance, the market rent at currently applicable terms is used in calculating net cash flow whereas for periods after the expiry of contracts an estimated market rent is used. In addition an income deduction is taken into account for expected vacancy, expected maintenance/improvement costs and normal operating costs.
The expected cash is discounted by a return requirement that is determined on the basis of the risk-free interest rate (10-year Norwegian Government Bond interest rate) adjusted by a supplement for estimated 20-year risk-free interest rate. The estimate on the 20-year interest rate corresponds to the slope of the swap curve between 10 and 20 years. The risk-free interest is then accorded a general property risk to find the return requirement for prime properties. Finally a risk premium is added that is determined on the basis of the willingness of the investors in the property market to accept risk taking account of matters specific to the property such as for example geography, property type, contracts, tenants and technical state of the property.
A set selection of the Group property stock, the pilot portfolio, is valued quarterly by external, independent and qualified valuers. In the event of significant deviation from our own valuation of fair value the differences are analysed and the valuation model’s parameters are adjusted if this proves necessary.
Changes in fair value are taken to profit/loss in the line "Net income from investment properties".
If an investment property is occupied by the Group, the property is reclassified as a tangible fixed asset. Fair value on the date of reclassification provides the cost price for the reclassified property.
If a property the Group has used is leased externally, the property is reclassified as investment property. Any difference between book value and fair value on the date of reclassification is taken to owners' equity as a revaluation.
2.7 INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Group's intangible assets mainly comprise capitalized IT systems. Directly attributable costs capitalized on the purchase of a new IT system comprise those paid to the system supplier, as well as external consultancy support and internally accrued costs of having the system installed and readied for use.
On further development of IT systems both external and internal costs are capitalized in accordance with the above. System changes regarded as maintenance are taken to expenses as they occur.
Once an IT system is operational the capitalized costs are depreciated by straight line over the expected life. In the event of subsequent capitalization because of further development this is depreciated over the originally set life unless the expenditure increases the total expected life of the system.
If there are indications that the book value of a capitalized IT system is higher than the recoverable sum an impairment test is carried out. If the book value is higher than the recoverable sum (present value on continued use/ownership), the asset is written down to the recoverable sum.
2.8 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
2.8.1 Classification
Financial instruments are classified on first recognition in one of the following categories:
Financial assets
a) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
b) Lending and receivables recognized at amortized cost
c) Investments held to maturity recognized at amortized cost
Financial liabilities
a) Financial liabilities at fair value through profit/loss.
b) Other financial liabilities recognized at amortized cost
Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Within this category it may be mandatory or chosen to recognize attribution at fair value with value changes through profit or loss.
Financial assets held for trading are assets acquired primarily with a view to providing a profit from short-term price fluctuations. The Group's derivatives are included in this category unless they are included as an element of accounting hedging in accordance with the rules on hedge accounting.
Financial instruments and liabilities opted to be recognized at fair value with value changes through profit or loss are classified in this category if the financial instruments are either managed as a Group, and where their earnings are assessed and reported to management on the basis of fair value, or if the classification eliminates or reduces accounting inconsistencies in measurement.
The financial assets include shares and units/holdings, bonds, certificates and lending whilst the financial liabilities cover debt to credit institutions and derivatives.
Lending and receivables recognized at amortized cost
Lending and receivables are financial assets, with the exception of derivatives, with set or determinable payments, and that are not traded in an active market, with the exception of:
Those which it is the Group’s intention to sell on a short-term basis or which it has earmarked at fair value via the income statement (profit/loss)
Those which the Group has earmarked as available for sale
Those from which the holder will probably not be able to recover its whole original investment, other than weakened creditworthiness, and which are to be classified as available for sale.
Lending and receivables at amortized cost comprise:
Loans and receivables linked to investment business
Other loans and receivables including receivables from policyholders.
Loans and receivables in the investment business include debt instruments classified as loans and receivables i.e. bonds that are not priced in an active market as well as lending to local authorities, enterprises and retail customers.
Financial assets held to maturity at amortized cost
Financial assets held to maturity comprise financial assets that are not derivatives and that have set or determinable payments and a defined date of maturity and that the Group has the intention and the ability to hold to maturity with the exception of:
Those the enterprise classifies on first recognition at fair value through profit or loss
Those that the enterprise has earmarked as being available for sale
Those that meet the definition of loans and receivables.
The category includes bonds recognized at amortized cost.
Other financial liabilities recognized at amortized cost
The category covers subordinated loans, covered bonds issued and debt to as well as deposits from customers.
2.8.2 Recognition and measurement
Purchases and sales of financial instruments are recognized at fair value on the trading date, i.e. when the Group has committed itself to buy or sell that financial instrument. Direct costs of purchase are included in acquisition cost except for purchase costs associated with financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss. For these instruments, purchase costs are taken to expenses directly. Recognition of financial assets ceases when the Group is no longer entitled to receive the cash flow from the asset or the Group has transferred all risk and entitlements associated with its ownership. Recognition of financial liabilities ceases when the underlying obligation in the contract has been met, been cancelled or expired.
a) Value measurement at fair value
The principles for calculating fair value related to the various instruments are shown in Note 6.
b) Value measurement at amortized cost
Financial instruments not measured at fair value are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. The internal rate of return is set through discounting contractual cash flows over expected duration. The cash flows include setting-up charges and direct transaction costs as well as any residual value on expiry of the expected duration. Amortized cost is the present value of these cash flows discounted by the internal rate of return.
c) Write-down of financial assets valued at amortized cost
In assessing whether there is impairment in value of a financial asset, weight is attached to whether the issuer/debtor has significant financial difficulties and whether there is breach of contract, including default. An assessment is made of whether it is probable the debtor will be bankrupted, whether there is an active market for the asset because of financial difficulties, or whether measurable reduction is being seen in expected cash flow from a Group of financial assets. The assessment is based exclusively on historical data: future events are not considered, regardless of the degree of probability.
If there is objective proof of impairment, write-down is carried out. The write-down is calculated by comparing the new, anticipated cash flows with the original cash flows discounted by the original effective interest rate (assets with fixed interest) or by the effective interest rate at the time of measurement (assets with variable interest). The write-down reduces the asset’s capitalized value and is included in the statement of income under "Current returns from financial assets".
Loss assessment and loss write-down is carried out quarterly on individual loans. Loans with unpaid repayments older than 90 days or credits with overdrafts older than 90 days are examined at the end of the reporting period. In addition, continuous assessment is carried out of other lending engagements where there is objective proof of impairment.
Lending is also assessed by Group. If there is objective proof of impairment in a Group of loans, write-down is carried out.
2.8.3 Presentation in the financial position statement and income statement
a) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in the financial position statement either as "Lending local government, enterprises & retail customers at fair value through profit/loss", "Debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss" or "Equity instruments at fair value through profit or loss". Interest income and share dividend are included in the line “Net return on financial assets". For the banking business, interest income is included in the line "Net interest income banking". Other value changes are included in the line "Net return on financial assets"
b) Loans and receivables at amortized cost
Loans and receivables at amortized cost are presented in the financial position statement either as "Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables", “Loans to local authorities, enterprises and retail customers", “Receivables" or "Cash and bank deposits". Interest income is included in the line “Net return on financial assets". For the banking business, interest income is included in the line "Net interest income banking". Value changes that can be linked to objective indications of impairment as well as foreign exchange changes are included in the line "Net return on financial assets".
c) Financial assets held to maturity
Financial assets held to maturity comprise bonds noted in an active market and are presented in the financial position statement as "Debt instruments held to maturity". Interest income in accordance with the effective interest rate method is included in the line "Net return on financial assets". Value changes that can be linked to objective indications of impairment as well as unrealized foreign exchange changes are included in the line "Net return on financial assets".
d) Liabilities to and deposits from customers
Liabilities to and deposits from customers are recognized at fair value in the financial position statement when the deposit has been recorded as transferred to the customer's account. In subsequent periods, liability to and deposits from customers with variable interest rates are accounted for at amortized cost in accordance with the effective interest rate method. The costs of interest are included in the line "Net interest income banking"
e) Subordinated loan issued
Subordinated loan is taken to account at fair value on subscription. On subsequent measurement subordinated loan is recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. The method is used to allocate the interest costs over a relevant period and is posted over income in the line "Interest costs and value change subordinated loan and hybrid Tier 1 securities". Subordinated loan in foreign currency is translated to NOK at the end of the reporting period. Value change as a result of the foreign exchange change is posted through income and included in the line "Interest costs and value change subordinated loan and hybrid Tier 1 securities".
f) Hybrid Tier 1 securities issued
Hybrid Tier 1 securities are recognized at nominal on date of issue and valued subsequently at amortized cost. For hybrid Tier 1 securities hedged against exchange and interest rate changes (fair value hedging), book value is adjusted on value change in hedged risk. The value change is posted through income in the line "Net costs subordinated loan and hybrid Tier 1 securities".
g) Covered bonds issued
In the first instance covered bonds issued are recognized at fair value, i.e. nominal adjusted for any premium/discount on issue. On subsequent valuation the bonds are valued at amortized cost by the effective interest method. The costs of interest are included in the line "Net interest income banking" in the income statement.
Bonds issued with fixed interest are recognized in accordance with the rules on fair value hedging inasmuch as they are hedged against change in interest rate level.
h) Liabilities to credit institutions
Liabilities to credit institutions are capitalized at market value on take-up. On subsequent measurement fair value is used when this eliminates or reduces accounting inconsistency. The interest costs are included in the line "Net interest income banking" whereas other value changes are included in the line "Net value change on financial instruments" in the income statement.
i) Unit holders' interest in consolidated securites funds
Minority unit holders in the consolidated securities fund may ask to redeem their holdings, and as a result, the minority share of the funds is classified as a debt on the accounting line ‘Unit holders’ interest in consolidated securities funds’. The minority portion of value changes in securities funds is posted through profit and loss and included in the line ‘Change of value for unit holders in consolidated securities funds’.
j) Derivatives and hedging
Financial derivatives are capitalized at fair value at the time they are contracted. On subsequent measurement the derivatives are recognized at fair value and are presented as an asset if the value is positive and a liability if the value is negative. Recognition of associated gains and losses depends on whether the derivative has been identified as an accounting hedge instrument and in which type of accounting hedge the derivative is included.
For derivatives not included in accounting hedge relationships, gains and losses are recognized through profit or loss as they arise in the line for "Net value change on financial instruments". These are included in the category "Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss".
In two cases the Group has used accounting hedging (hedge accounting). In one case the hedge accounting is used on hedging of hybrid Tier 1 securities issued (the hedging object) against value changes resulting from changes in interest rates and exchange rates (fair value hedging). The hedging instrument is a combined interest rate and currency swap (CIRCUS). The hedge relationship is documented, and the effectiveness of the hedging is measured continuously. In the second instance is fair value hedging of fixed interest lending. The hedge relationship is documented, and its effectiveness is measured continuously.
Change in fair value of the hedging instrument is included in the income statement at the line for "Net value change on financial instruments". Value changes in the hedging object that can be attributed to the hedge risk are booked as a correction of the hedging object's capitalized value and included in the income statement at the line for "Net costs subordinated loan and hybrid Tier 1 securities" and "Net interest income banking". In those instances, in which a security has inbuilt derivatives that are not separated out, the value of the derivative will be included in the security's value as a whole.
2.9 NETTING
Financial assets and financial liabilities are only netted to the extent there is a legal entitlement to net asset against liability, and that it is the intention to carry out netting, as well as the maturity date of the asset corresponding with the date the liability is due payment.
2.10 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and bank deposits are defined as receivables from credit institutions without termination date. The amount does not include receivables from credit institutions that are linked to purchase and sale of securities in the management of the securities portfolios.
2.11 THE GROUP'S OWNERS' EQUITY
The Group owners' equity is divided into two main elements:
2.11.1 Owners' equity contributed
The Group's parent company is a mutual company owned by its customers. This means that customers participating in KLP's “Fellesordninger" (Joint Pensions - schemes for public sector occupational pensions) pay an owners' equity contribution on registration. The owners' equity contribution is set in proportion to the relative size of the customer measured in premium reserves.
The owners' equity contribution may be used to cover losses or deficits in current operation. It may only be repaid in connection with transfer of a customer's business from the Company after approval by the board of directors and in advance from the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway. The member's share of the actual combined owners' equity contribution at the termination date calculated proportionately to the member's share of the Company's total premium reserves is subject to possible repayment.
Distribution of returns on owners' equity contributions depends on the Company's results.
The owners' equity contribution may not be traded.
2.11.2 Retained earnings
The Group's retained earnings comprise the risk equalization fund, the natural perils fund, the revaluation fund and other retained earnings.
Ordinary company law rules apply for any distribution or use of retained earnings. Use of the risk equalization fund must be according to the rules of The insurance act.
2.12 RECOGNITION OF INCOME
2.12.1 Premium income
Premium income is taken to income by the amount falling due during the accounting year. Accrual of premiums earned is dealt with through provisions against unearned premiums. Reserves transferred in for the year are recognized through the income statement and included in the premium income. The share of the period's gross premium income accruing to reinsurers in connection with reinsurance is shown as a deduction from gross premium income.
2.12.2 Interest income/expenses
Interest income and interest expenses associated with all interest-bearing financial instruments is and valued at amortized cost are taken to income using the effective interest rate method. Setting-up fees for lending are included in the amortization and taken to income over the loan's expected duration.
Interest income for fixed-income financial investments measured at fair value is classified as "Net return on financial assets". For the banking business the interest income is included in the line "Net interest income banking", whereas other value changes are classified as "Net value change on financial instruments".
2.12.3 Rental income and other income
Income from leasing of real estate is taken to income by straight line accrual over the duration of the lease. The income is included in the line "Net income from investment properties". Fees for asset management are taken to income in proportion to the management carried out for the period up to the end of the reporting period. The income is included in the line "Other income". Other services are taken to income by straight line over the contract period.
2.13 TAX
The Group conducts taxable business.
For the life insurance business, the taxation of income and expenses related to assets in the common portfolio and the investment option portfolio shall be made in accordance with accounting legislation. It will therefore be the technical result, as presented in accounting figures at year end, that will be the basis to taxation. No permanent or temporary differences for tax purposes for the customers portfolio will occur. The non-technical result is mainly related to management of the corporate portfolio and follows ordinary tax rules.
Deductions are not given for provisions for the natural disaster fund and guarantee scheme for the non-life insurance segment. These funds are subject to transitional rules, so that the total provisions for these funds at the end of the 2017 can be deposited in a separate account, where the account is first taxed on the liquidation of the non-life insurance business.
For other business in the Group, there have been no changes in the tax rules. Differences between accounting and tax valuations of assets and liabilities that will reverse at a later date provide the basis for calculating deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are netted inasmuch as they are assessed during the same period.
In presenting the consolidated financial statements, capitalization and of deferred tax is considered at Group level. Deferred tax and tax assets are calculated as differences between the accounting and taxation value of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax asset is capitalized to the extent it can be shown probable that the companies in the Group will have sufficient taxable profit to exploit the tax asset. In assessing the probability, emphasis is placed on historic earnings and expected future taxable income.
For foreign subsidiaries, tax payable and deferred tax/deferred tax assets are taken to account in accordance with local tax rules. The tax cannot be set off against the parent company's deficit to be carried forward using Group contributions with tax effect. In the consolidated financial statements’ financial position statement this tax is shown at the lines for "Deferred tax" and "Deffered tax assets". In the income statement the tax cost is shown as "Cost of taxes".
The Group includes some companies covered and some not covered by financial tax. In reporting deferred tax/tax assets in the consolidated financial statements, we therefore use the corporation tax rate applicable to the individual company within the Group.
The cost of taxes is further specified in Note 22.
2.14 INSURANCE CONTRACTS
In accordance with IFRS 4 significant insurance risk must be associated with the contract for it to be able to be defined as an insurance contract. The insurance products the Group offers satisfy the requirement for significant insurance risk and are recognized in accordance with IFRS 4. In accordance with IFRS 4, the insurance contracts are valued as a whole as an insurance contract even though this contains a financial element.
Adequacy testing has been carried out to check that the level of the liabilities on the insurance contracts recognized in the accounts is proportionate to the insurance customers' contractual entitlements. The Group's reserves satisfy the requirements of this test and IFRS 4 therefore imposes no further requirements for reserves. The Group has therefore used applicable Norwegian regulations to account for insurance contracts.
2.14.1 Sectors
The Group offers products to its customers in the following sectors:
Group pension
Group life
Non-life insurance
a) Public Group pensions predominantly comprise public service pension schemes that include retirement pensions, survivor pensions, disability pensions and a waiver of premiums during periods of incapacity for work.
All future retirement pension accruals for members born in 1963 or later will take place through a premium scheme in which each year of work results in pension contributions in a similar manner to the national insurance scheme. For these age Groups, flexible rules are also introduced from the same date concerning the withdrawal of the retirement pension and the right to combine work with pension payments without income reductions. Pensions accrued through the premium scheme are adjusted prior to the withdrawal of the pension in line with the changes to the basic pension. This is also in line with the regulations set down for the national insurance scheme. The premium scheme is also a performance-based pension scheme and premiums and provisions will be taken on the basis of an unchanged basis of calculation.
For the age Groups born before 1963, the gross scheme based on linear earnings will be continued. This means that the individual's earned benefits at all times constitute the proportionate part of the benefits he or she will be entitled to through continued service until retirement age. The proportionate portion is shown as the ratio between the person's service period that he or she has already earned and the total period of service he or she will obtain on continued service until retirement age, however, so that the latter size cannot exceed 40 years when calculating the proportionate portion. The schemes are based on the final pay principle. Adjustment of current pensions in line with the National Insurance Scheme and the regulation of defined rights in line with the basic amount are part of the defined benefit plan's defined benefit plan.
The scheme's benefits are determined in accordance with current public occupational pension rules, which include, among other things, coordination with the National Insurance benefits for the old age pension to ensure a defined gross pension level
The indexation of current pensions and accumulated pension entitlements is financed entirely by a special indexation premium. Some public sector peculiarities are not prefunded and are financed through single premiums at start-up and possibly through subsequent changes to the pension (guaranteed gross premium).
The net premium reserve in the pension schemes is set as a net single payment premium for the accumulated age, disability and survivors' pensions. In addition, an administration reserve has been set aside based on the Group’s actual costs involved in the payment of pensions.
The premium reserve also comprises allocations to insured events that have occurred but are not yet settled, including a qualifying-period provision for disability risks.
b) Group life is mainly concentrated on local government Group life and teacher Group life covering only mortality/whole of life risk. Other cover exists for a small number of customers. In addition there is debt Group life that covers whole life risk and for a large number of existing customers also covers disability risk.
The technical insurance provisions in Group life insurance are based on risk theory methods. The claims reserve includes provisions for the expected payments on insured events that have occurred but are not yet settled regardless of whether or not these have been reported.
c) In non-life insurance the following products are offered:
Occupational Injury, Personal Accident and Accident
Insurance contracts cover the customers' employees for occupational injury within the scope of the Occupational Injury Act and the Basic Collective Agreement for the Civil Service. In addition, insurance contracts are taken out covering employees for accidents during leisure time.
Fire-Combined
Insurance contracts covering damage to customers' property and any loss incurred by the customer in the event of damage to or loss of the property. The product also includes mandatory natural disaster cover. The risk for the Company is reduced through taking reinsurance contracts covering compensation in excess of a certain amount per claim.
Motor Vehicle
Insurance contracts covering damage occurring through use of the customers' motor vehicles. The risk for the Company is reduced through taking reinsurance contracts covering compensation in excess of a certain amount per claim.
Third-party liability and individual 3rd party personal insurance
Insurance contracts that cover damage incurred by third parties as a result of the customers' activities. The cover applies both for property claims and personal injuries.
Travel
Insurance contracts that cover customers for injury and loss arising during travel.
Child insurance
Insurance contracts that cover expenses related to accidents or serious illness and loss of income (disability pension).
Group life
Insurance contracts that cover the customer in the event of death and disability.
The risk for the Group is reduced by taking out reinsurance contracts covering payments in excess of a set amount per claim in all of the sectors mentioned above except for Group life.The Group is at all times to have technical reserves fully covering the technical liability and other risk emanating from the insurance business. In all cases and at all times, the Group’s reserves are to meet the minimum requirement for reserves under regulation or law.
2.14.2 Provisions in insurance funds
The Group's most important insurance funds are described below:
a) Premium reserve
The premium reserve represents the actuarial cash value of pension entitlements accumulated on the date of calculation. The premium reserve also includes administration reserve in accordance with the Group's calculation base, as well as provisions for incurred, not yet settled insurance claims, including waiting period provisions for disability risk.
b) Buffer fund
The buffer fund is recognised under “To(-)/from supplementary reserves and buffer allocation - life insurance” in the income statement, and as technical provisions in the balance sheet. The buffer fund is a customer-allocated fund. In the event of excess returns, provisions can be made to the Fund, which can then be used to cover any shortfall in periods with poor returns.
c) Premium fund
The premium fund contains premiums paid in advance and any surplus assets allocated to the individual customer’s premium fund accounts. Premium fund assets may be used to cover future premiums.
2.14.3 Base interest rate (returns guarantee)
For public service pension schemes, all new accruals will take place using the basic interest rate of 2.0 percent. Accruals prior to 1 January 2012 were made using a basic interest rate of 3.0 percent. The total average performance guarantee in the public Group pension sector amounted to 2.28 percent at the end of 2022.
2.14.4 Mortality and disability
The price tariffs for disability are determined based experience in the Groups own population.
The price tariffs for mortality are equal to the calculation base K2013 with safety margins in accordance with the minimum standard laid down by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway. When it comes to the Pension Scheme for Nurses and the Joint Scheme for hospital doctors, a somewhat stronger basis is used.
2.15 RESULT ELEMENTS - LIFE INSURANCE
2.15.1 Returns result
Returns result of varieties on insurance contracts with returns guarantee. Returns result comprises actual return achieved less guaranteed return (base interest rate). A positive returns result is credited to the customer, whereas a negative returns result must be covered from the customers' buffer fund and/or from owners' equity. The Group invoices a special premium element (interest guarantee premium) to guarantee the interest guarantee. This premium element is included in the Group's/company's results.
2.15.2 Risk result
The risk result is an expression of the difference between mortality and disability in the insured population during the period in question relative to what is assumed in the Company’s price tariff. A positive risk result is returned to the customers, but it is possible to withhold up to half of a positive risk result in risk equalization funds. The risk equalization fund may only be used to cover subsequent risk result losses and may amount to a maximum of 150 per cent of risk premium for the year.
Any negative risk result must be covered by the risk equalization fund or owners' equity.
2.15.3 Administration result
The administration result is a result of how the Company's actual expenses deviate from the premium tariff. The administration result is credited entirely to the Company.
2.16 SURPLUS FUNDS ALLOCATED TO CUSTOMERS
Profit to customers is added to premium funds and are included as part of the insurance obligations as the balance sheet date.
2.17 PENSION OBLIGATIONS - OWN EMPLOYEES
The Group's pension obligations are partially insurance-covered through KLP's public sector occupational pensions through membership of the joint pension scheme for municipalities and enterprises ("Fellesordningen"). Pension liability beyond these schemes is covered through operation. Pension costs are treated in accordance with IAS 19. The Company has a defined benefits based pension scheme for its employees
The accounting liability for defined benefit schemes is the present value of the obligation on the reporting date, with deduction for fair value of the pension assets. The gross obligation is calculated using the straight-line method. The gross obligation is discounted to present value using the interest rates on Norwegian high-quality bonds. Gains and losses arising on recalculation of the obligation as a result of known deviation and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged to owners' equity via other comprehensive income during the period in which they arise. The effect of changes in the scheme's benefits is taken to profit/loss immediately.
Presentation of the pension costs in the income statement is in accordance with IAS 1. This standard allows the option of classifying the net interest element either as an operating cost or as a financial cost. The option the Group adopts must be followed consistently for later periods. The Group has presented the pension cost under the accounting line “Operating expenses " and interest element under the accounting line "Current return on financial assets". The estimate deviation has been classified under "Items that will not be reclassified to income" in the accounting line "Actuarial gains and losses on defined benefits pension schemes".
The joint pension scheme (Fellesordningen) is a multi-enterprise scheme, i.e. the technical insurance risk is spread between all of the local authorities and enterprises participating in the scheme. The financial and actuarial assumptions underlying the calculation of net pensions liabilities are thus based on assumptions that are representative of the whole Group.
Note 3 Important accounting estimates and valuations
The group prepares estimates and assumptions on future circumstances. These are continuously evaluated and are based on historic data and expectations concerning probable future events considered on the basis of data available at the time of presentation of the financial statements.
It must be expected that the estimates will deviate from the final outcome and the areas where there is significant risk of substantial change in capitalized values in future periods are discussed below.
3.1 INSURANCE CONTRACTS
Life Insurance business
The biggest insurance risk in the group is the risk of incorrect estimation of life expectancy. In determining the premium tariffs, the group uses its own analyses of its policy-holders and analyses of the entire Norwegian population. Uncertainty over future life expectancy, which is based on estimates far ahead in time, provides a similar risk of a charge against equity capital because of the need for higher provisions, to cover payment over a longer period of time.
There will also be insurance risk linked to disability, but this risk is considerably lower. Uncertainty in calculating probabilities of disability may, as with increased longevity, result in decreased profit for owners, but here there is more scope for adjusting premiums, given that disability pensions have a shorter time horizon for the payments.
Insurance risks linked to mortality are considerably lower and must be seen in relation to insurance risks related to longevity. Increased mortality will result in a negative risk result for the risk of death, but will be counterbalanced by a positive risk result for longevity. The insurance benefits for spouse and child pensions, which make up the risk result for death, are also considerably lower than the benefits for old-age pensions (longevity risk).
Calculations of insurance provisions in the collective pension insurance sector are based on assumptions of disability risk based on KLP’s experience from its own insured population. For the other risk elements, including longevity risk, the assumptions from the K2013 calculation base are used with the contingency margins set by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway (FSA of N).
In calculating technical provisions in the public sector occupational pensions, provisions are made for claims incurred but not finally settled. The provisions are set using statistical models. The models take account of experience based on reported changes in the insurance population.
The trend in insurance risk has been relatively stable over the last decade. Although there is some unpredictability associated with annual fluctuations and long-term developments, we generally use the insights gained from analyses in the future pricing of risk. Since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, it has been less clear that insights from recent history can tell us anything about the normal state of affairs. In the early phase of the pandemic, there was lower mortality in the population, but this increased towards the end of 2021 and into 2022.
For disability, there are a number of pandemic factors that could come into play. Some people are touched directly by the long-term effects of Covid-19, while others have suffered extra stress through two years of pandemic, such as workers in the health and care sectors, schools and kindergartens.
There has not been made any extra ordinary provisions in connections with the pandemic, but the development, especially related to disability, is being closely monitored.
Non-Life business
In calculating technical provisions in the non-life insurance industry individual claim provisions are made for all reported but not settled claims (RBNS). The provisions are continuously adjusted as claims are processed. All open claims should have a special assessment at least once a year.
Provision for claims incurred but not yet reported to the Group (IBNR) is made using statistical models. The models take account of the historic reporting pattern in the different risk groups.
In non-life insurance, measurements and adjustments are also made of the total claim provisions (RBNS+IBNR) so the total level of provision is measured against changes in risk elements such as claim frequency, major claim occurrence, population mix and population size. The claims provisions are assessed at the expectation level, i.e. they contain no contingency margins. Claim provision is not discounted.
The claims reserve includes a provision for future indirect claims-handling expenses (also referred to as unallocated loss adjustment expenses - ULAE). This is estimated based on the magnitude of RBNS and IBNR.
The provision for unearned premiums constitutes the pro rata part of overdue premiums that is earned after closing the accounts.
The sensitivity overview is specified in detail in Note 8.
3.2 INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
Buildings and other real estate are valued at fair value as defined in IFRS 13. Fair value means the amount for which buildings and other real estate can be sold in an arm’s-length transaction between well-informed, voluntary parties. There is not considered to be an active market for trading the group's investment properties.
As at 31 December 2022 buildings and real estate were valued using the group's internal valuation model. The model is based on discounting of an estimated 20-year cash flow and the discounting rate used corresponds to the normal market's return requirement for similar properties. For the Norwegian properties as at 31 December 2022, a discounting factor was used in the interval 5.55 – 8.95 per cent: for the group's Swedish properties it was 5.50 – 7.35 per cent; and for the Danish properties, 5.80 - 8.15 per cent.
The following main components are included in future cash follows:
Currently applicable terms and conditions, contract expiry and assumed market rent
Vacant areas with assumed market rent
Parking income, parking area and number of places
Estimated annual inflation
Annual rent adjustment as a percentage of inflation
General vacancy
Normal annual operating costs
Normal annual communal costs per square metre
Upgrading costs per square metre on new lease
Any further upgrading costs (year and amount)
Number of months vacancy on each contract expiry
Assumed final value Year 20
Nominal return requirement
As part of the valuation, yield assessments are also carried out for the individual property and for the total portfolio. In addition to valuation using KLP Eiendom's value assessment model, external valuations are obtained for a selection of the properties. These are used to determine own calculation parameters and to quality-assure the internal valuations.
Minor changes in the return requirement will have relatively heavy impact on property values and it is also assumed that major changes in the “Assumed market rent" will also affect the accounting figures the most.
The sensitivity analysis below shows how the value of one of the group's centrally located office properties in Oslo changes with certain changes in key parameters in the group's valuation model. The analysis shows change in value (given as percentage change) for a given change in a parameter on the assumption that all other parameters stay unchanged. In reality there are interdependencies between several variables, so that a change in one parameter will be accompanied by change in one or more other parameters. The sensitivity figures given do not capture such relationships with other variables and are shown only for illustrative purposes. The effects of changes in parameters will vary somewhat from property to property.
Change in parameter
Change in value
Return requirement
+100 bps
-12 %
-100 bps
+15 %
Market rent
+10 %
+8 %
-10 %
-8 %
Exit yield
+100 bps
-11 %
-100 bps
+19 %
Inflation
+ 50 bps
+7 %
-50bps
-6%
In the analysis above the return requirement means the interest rate used in discounting future cash flows in the model. Market rent is understood as expected rent in the event of renegotiation of existing contracts or on change of tenant. Exit yield means the yield that is used to calculate the final value in the valuation model's final analysis period (Year 20).
When the Covid19 pandemic came, it brought great un uncertainty for commercial property market. However, the market quickly got used to the “new normal” and where the uncertainty for tenants, banks, investors and others has become known, accepted and handled such that various concerns have diminished significantly. The last couple of years a significant number of transactions have been carried out at sharp prices, and the risk premium has also fallen significantly in smaller cities and for somewhat more secondary locations. This has led to a strong pricing of objects that have been traded. At the same time, it is experienced that tenants write contracts on a large scale, and the length of the contracts is as it was before. To the extent that the tenants will need a different space requirement in the future, there are few signs so far that it has had a negative effect on the interest in writing contracts that are both long and for large areas - at strong prices.
Experience from earlier periods of financial turbulence and rapid changes in interest rates shows that the property market tended to “dry up” with few, if any, reference properties relevant to the Group’s portfolio being sold. It appears that parts of this history are repeating themselves, and there are far fewer reference transactions in the market that point with a reasonable degree of certainty to new and observable price levels for investment property of a type matching the Group’s portfolio. The external valuations in the marketplace also differ in their assumptions about the current prime yield, although most seem to congregate around roughly the same guesses as to the market picture. It is hard to believe that companies involved with offices, hotels and shopping centres will remain untouched by the economic situation. The immediate effect for landlords is a big upward movement in inflation-adjusted rents. The longer-term effect is uncertain.
3.3 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL ASSETS
The majority of the group’s assets recognised at fair value through profit and loss are assets traded on an active market, so the market value can be determined with a high degree of confidence.
In the case of the group’s pricing of unlisted securities, there will be uncertainty in this regard. This is especially true of securities which are priced on the basis of non-observable assumptions. Different valuation techniques are used to determine the fair value of these investments. Unlisted fixed-income securities are priced on the basis of a yield curve with a risk supplement that represents the market’s pricing of the issuer’s industry-specific risk. External prices for a significant proportion of these unlisted securities are collected regularly to test our own valuation models. The pricing methods and the accounts figures are discussed in more detail in Note 6.
3.4 LOSSES ON FINANCIAL ASSETS
Financial assets not measured at fair value are assessed for impairment at the end of the reporting period. The group's lending portfolio is valued individually for loans on which default has been observed. If there is an objective event at the end of the reporting period that has influence on future cash flows, the loan is written down. In addition, lending with uniform risk profile is valued quarterly by group. This is described in more detail in Note 2.
When it comes to the group’s portfolio of long-term bonds, including long-term bonds held to maturity, the need for write-down is assessed individually each quarter. The write-down requirements are calculated as the difference in value of the original expected cash flows and the new expected cash flows. For the group, no factors or events have been found that would indicate impairment due to a predominant risk of loss in the company's portfolio of long-term bonds.
Note 4 Segment information
NOK MILLIONS
Group pensions pub. sect. & group life
Non-life insurance
Banking
Asset management
Other
Eliminations
Total
2022
2021
2022
2021
2022
2021
2022
2021
2022
2021
2022
2021
2022
2021
Premium income for own account from external customers 1
50 523
50 161
2 105
1 865
0
0
0
0
0
0
-27
-25
52 601
52 001
Net financial income from investments
-7 013
50 228
-91
259
345
277
0
2
0
0
-16 811
21 263
-23 569
72 029
Other income
1 784
1 999
7
2
84
78
607
608
12
12
-811
-1 151
1 684
1 547
Total income
45 294
102 388
2 021
2 125
429
355
607
610
12
12
-17 649
20 086
30 715
125 577
Claims for own account
-27 663
-30 438
-1 685
-1 417
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-29 348
-31 855
Insurance provisions for own account
-34 799
-31 246
-16
-7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-34 816
-31 253
Costs borrowing
-169
103
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-169
103
Operating costs excluding depreciation
-1 329
-1 147
-305
-298
-241
-229
-595
-548
-11
-10
110
182
-2 370
-2 050
Depreciation
-81
-162
-5
-5
-2
-5
-7
-6
0
0
-8
-50
-103
-228
Other expenses
-1 507
-1 425
0
0
-6
-5
0
0
0
0
136
138
-1 377
-1 292
Unit holder's value change in consolidated security funds
15 966
-19 802
15 966
-19 802
Total expenses
-65 548
-64 315
-2 011
-1 728
-249
-239
-602
-554
-11
-10
16 204
-19 531
-52 217
-86 377
Operating profit/loss
-20 255
38 074
10
398
180
116
5
56
2
2
-1 445
555
-21 502
39 200
Funds credited to insurance customers 2
21 172
-37 786
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 982
-388
23 154
-38 173
Pre-tax income
918
288
10
398
180
116
5
56
2
2
537
167
1 652
1 027
Cost of taxes
-115
125
-22
-68
-14
0
-2
-13
0
0
-647
-791
-801
-748
Income
803
413
-13
329
166
116
3
43
1
1
-109
-624
851
279
Change in other comprehensive income
94
56
14
8
8
5
11
2
0
0
-65
140
62
211
Total comprehensive income
897
469
1
337
174
121
14
45
2
2
-175
-484
913
490
Assets
710 268
706 748
6 571
5 976
50 511
47 482
635
636
11
9
133 641
140 419
901 636
901 270
Liabilities
667 468
666 070
4 302
3 710
47 544
44 961
241
256
3
3
139 206
145 537
858 766
860 538
¹ Premium income covers premiums earned for own account including savings premium and transferred premium reserves from other companies.
² Funds transferred to the insurance customers include transfers to the premium fund, provisions to the securities adjustment fund, provisions to supplementary reserves and other provisions of surplus funds to the insurance customers.
The KLP Group’s business is divided into the five areas: Group pensions public sector & group life, non-life insurance, banking, asset management and other. All business is directed towards customers in Norway.
PUBLIC SECTOR OCCUPATIONAL PENSION AND GROUP LIFE
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse offers group public sector occupational pensions.
NON-LIFE INSURANCE
KLP Skadeforsikring AS offers property and personal injury products to employers within the public and private sectors. In addition a broad specter of standard insurance products is offered to the the retail market.
BANKING
KLP’s banking business embraces the companies KLP Banken AS and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: KLP Kommunekreditt AS and KLP Boligkreditt AS. The banking business covers services such as deposits and lending to the retail market, credit cards, as well as lending with public sector guarantee.
ASSET MANAGEMENT
Asset management is offered from the company KLP Kapitalforvaltning AS. The company offer a broad selection of securities mutual funds both to retail customers and to institutional customers. The securities management has a socially responsible profile.
OTHER
Other segments comprises KLP Forsikringsservice AS which offers a broad specter of services to local authority pension funds.
Note 5 Net income from financial instruments
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Interest income bank deposits
213
-31
Interest income derivatives
438
125
Interest income debt instruments fair value
2 794
2 418
Total interest income financial assets at fair value
3 445
2 511
Interest income fixed-income securities amortized cost
6 332
6 126
Interest income lending amortized cost
1 883
1 171
Total interest income financial assets at amortized cost
8 215
7 297
Dividend/interest shares and holdings/units
6 531
5 051
Oher income and expenses
-338
-47
Total other current expenses and income
6 193
5 004
Net return on financial assets
17 853
14 813
Interest income lending fair value
57
160
Total interest income financial assets at fair value
57
160
Interest income lending amortized cost
999
459
Total interest income financial assets at amortized cost
999
459
Interest costs debt to credit institutions
-46
-27
Interest costs covered bonds
-622
-191
Interest costs debt to and deposits from customers
-126
-65
Other income and expenses
108
-27
Total other income and expenses banking
-686
-310
Net interest income banking ¹
371
309
Value changes shares and units
-34 446
37 176
Value change derivatives
1 616
-9 687
Value change debt instruments at fair value
-14 025
-4 961
Value change lending fair value
-10
29
Total value change financial instruments at fair value
-46 865
22 556
Value change loans at amortized cost
268
-167
Other unrealized values
-1 565
-710
Total other unrealized values
-1 297
-877
Net unrealized gain on financial instruments
-48 162
21 680
Realized shares and holdings/units
14 258
12 082
Realized derivatives
-21 027
12 236
Realized debt instruments at fair value
4 526
2 190
Total realized financial instruments at fair value
-2 244
26 508
Realized bonds at amortized cost ²
2 096
248
Realized loans at amortized cost
1
1
Total realized financial instruments at amortized cost
2 096
249
Other financial income and costs
-41
-72
Total other financial income
-41
-72
Net realized gain on financial instruments
-188
26 685
Net value changes on financial instruments
-48 350
48 365
Total net income from financial instruments
-30 127
63 487
¹ Net interest income banking is income and costs linked to banking activity.
² Realized values on bonds at amortized cost come from realized gain/loss on foreign exchange. Securities denominated in foreign
currency are hedged, resulting in minimal net effect of exchange rate changes (reflected in value change/realized derivatives).
See Notes 8 and 11 for more information.
Note 6 Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
Fair value is to be a representative price based on what the equivalent assets or liabilites would be sold for under normal market terms and conditions. A financial instrument is considered as being listed in an active market if listed prices are easily and regularly accessible from a stock exchange, dealer, broker, commercial group, pricing service or regulatory authority, and such prices represent actual transactions that occur regularly at arm’s length. If the market for the security is not active, or the security is not listed on a stock exchange or similar, the Group uses valuation techniques to determine fair value. These are based on information on transactions recently carried out on business conditions, reference to the purchase and sale of similar instruments and pricing by means of externally obtained interest-rate curves and interest-rate differential curves. Estimates are based to the greatest possible extent on external observable market data, and to a small degree on company-specific information.
This note contains information on the three different categories of financial instruments: balance sheet classification, accounts classification and type of instrument. For the latter information is also provided on how fair value is derived.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT AMORTISED COST
This category includes:
Investments held to maturity
Bonds classified as loans and receivables
Other loans and receivables
Liabilites to and deposits from customers
Subordinated loan capital (liabilities)
Other debt issued (liabilities)
Financial instruments not measured at fair value are measured at amortised cost by using the effective interest rate method. The internal rate of exchange is determined by discounting contractual cash flows over their expected term. The cash flows include arrangement/up-front fees and direct transaction costs as well as any residual value on the expiry of the expected term. Amortised cost is the present value of these cash flows discounted by the internal rate of interest. This note contains information about the fair value of the financial instruments that are measured at amortised cost.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
This category includes:
Equity instruments
Debt instruments at fair value
Derivatives (assets and liabilites)
Debt to credit institutions (liabilites)
Below is a list of which types of financial instrument come under the various accounts categories, and how fair value is calculated.
- INVESTMENTS HELD TO MATURITY
- BONDS CLASSIFIED AS LOANS AND RECEIVABLES
- DEBT INSTRUMENTS MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
a) Foreign fixed-income securities
Foreign fixed-income securities are generally priced based on prices obtained from an index provider. At the same time, prices are compared between several different sources to spot any errors.
The following sources are used:
Bloomberg Barclays Indicies
Bloomberg
Bloomberg Barclays Indicies have first priority (they cover foreign government and foreign credit respecitvely). Then comes Bloomberg based on Bloomberg’s pricing service Business Valuator Accredited in Litigation (BVAL). BVAL has verified prices from Bloomberg.
b) Norwegian fixed-income securities – government
Nordic Bond Pricing is used as the primary source for pricing Norwegian Government Bonds. Prices are compared with prices from Bloomberg in order to uncover any errors.
c) Norwegian fixed-income securities – other than government ones
Norwegian fixed-income securities except government are mainly priced directly based on prices from Nordic Bond Pricing. Securities that are not covered by Nordic Bond Pricing are priced theoretically. The theoretical price is based on the assumed present value on the sale of the position. A zero-coupon curve is used for discounting. The zero-coupon curve is adjusted upwards by means of a credit spread, which is to take account of the risk the bond entails. The credit spread is calculated on the basis of a spread curve taking into account the duration of the bond. Nordic Bond Pricing is the main source of spread curves. They provide company-specific curves and curves for Norwegian savings banks, municipalities and energy. Savings banks have various spread curves based on total assets.
d) Fixed-income securities issued by foreign enterprises but denominated in NOK
Fair value is calculated on the same general principles as those applied on Norwegian fixed-income securities described above.
e) Receivables on credit institutions
The fair value of these are considered as being approximately the same as the book value since the terms and conditions of the contract are continually revised in accordance with changes in the market rates.
f) Loans to municipalities and enterprises with municipal guarantee
Receivables are valued by means of a valuation model using relevant credit premium adjustments obtained in the market. For guaranteed loans fair value is calculated as discounted cash flow based on the same interest-rate curves as direct loans, but the credit margin is adjusted to market values for the appropriate combination of guarantee category and type of guarantee. The guarantor is either a state, municipality or a bank.
g) Loans secured by mortgage
The principles for calculating fair value are subject to the loans having fixed-interest rates or not. Fair value of fixed-rate loans is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows by the market rate including a relevant risk margin on the reporting date. The fair value of loans with no fixed rate is approximately equal to book value since the terms and conditions of the contract are continually revised in accordance with changes in the market rates.
EQUITY INSTRUMENTS
h) Shares (listed)
Liquid shares are generally valued on the basis of prices from an index provider. In addition prices are compared between different sources in order to spot any errors.
The following sources are used for Norwegian shares:
Oslo Børs/Oslo Stock Exchange (primary source)
Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI)
Bloomberg
The following sources are used for foreign shares:
Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) (primary source)
Bloomberg
i) Shares (unlisted)
As far as possible, The Group uses the Norwegian Mutual Funds Association’s industry recommendations. This basically means the following:
The last price traded has key priority. If the last price traded is outside of the bid/offer price in the market, the price is adjusted accordingly. This means that if the last price traded is below the offer price, the price is adjusted upward to the offer price. If it is above the bid price, it is adjusted downward to the bid price.
In cases where there is very little information about the shares, a discretionary assessment is carried out, such as a fundamental analysis of the company, or a broker assessment.
j) Private Equity
Most of the investment in Private Equity goes through funds. The funds’ fair value is to be based on reported market values that follow from the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines (’IPEV Guidelines). These guidelines are established by the European Venture Capital Association (EVCA) and are based on the principle of approximate market assessment of the companies. Fair value is calculated on the basis of the funds’ reported market value adjusted for payments in and out during the period between the fund’s last reported market value and the period being reported on for the Group. Direct investments in Private Equity are treated in the same way as with current stocks, but valuation can be daily, quarterly or yearly. In cases where it's possible to obtain information on what co-investments are priced within the funds, it will be considered in the valuation process. Other direct investments are valued based on either cost prices, reported market values from companies or available trading prices.
DERIVATIVES
k) Futures/FRA/IRF
All futures contracts for KLP are traded on the stock exchange. Bloomberg is used as a price source. Prices are also obtained from another source in order to check that Bloombergs’ prices are correct. Reuters acts as a secondary source.
l) Options
Bloomberg is used as a source for pricing options traded on the stockmarket. Reuters is a secondary source.
m) Interest-rate swaps
Interest-rate swaps are valued in a model that takes observable market data such as interest-rate curves and relevant credit premiums into account .
n) FX-swaps
FX-swaps with a one-year maturity or less are priced based on curves that are built up from FX swap-points obtained from Reuters. The market is not considered particularly liquid for FX-swaps with a maturity of more than one year and basis-adjusted swap curves are used for pricing purposes.
DEBT TO CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
o) Placements with credit institutions and deposits
Placements with credit institutions are made as short-term deposits. Fair value is calculated by discounting contractual cash flows by market rate including a relevant risk margin on the reporting date. Deposits are priced based on swap curves.
SUBORDINATED LOAN CAPITAL, OTHER DEBT ISSUED, AND DEPOSITS FROM CUSTOMERS
p) Fair value of subordinated loans
The observable price is used as the fair value of loans listed on an active stock exchange. In the case of other loans that are not part of an active market the fair value is based on an internal valuation model based on observable data.
q) Fair value of subordinated bond/perpetual bond issued
Fair value in this category is determined on the basis of internal valuation models based on external observable data.
r) Covered bonds issued
Fair value in this category is determined on the basis of internal valuation models based on observable data.
s) Deposits from customers
All deposits are without fixed-rate interest. The fair value of these is considered as approximately equal to book value since the contractual terms are continually revised in accordance with the market rate.
The tables below give a more detailed specification of the content of the different classes of assets and financial liabilities.
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Book value
Fair value
Book value
Fair value
DEBT INSTRUMENTS HELD TO MATURITY - AT AMORTIZED COST
Norwegian hold-to-maturity bonds
3 180
3 199
4 071
4 477
Foreign hold-to-maturity bonds
21 045
20 376
21 915
23 289
Total debt instruments held to maturity
24 225
23 575
25 985
27 766
DEBT INSTRUMENTS CLASSIFIED AS LOANS AND RECEIVABLES– AT AMORTIZED COST
Norwegian bonds
62 681
59 555
53 339
54 373
Foreign bonds
111 841
104 898
111 136
115 067
Other receivables
8
8
9
9
Total debt instruments classified as loans and receivables
174 530
164 461
164 484
169 448
LENDING LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENTERPRISES & RETAIL CUSTOMERS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT/LOSS
Loans to local government sector or enterprises with local government guarantee
0
0
79
79
Total loans to local government, enterprises & retail customers
0
0
79
79
LENDING TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT, ENTERPRISES & RETAIL CUSTOMERS – AT AMORTIZED COST
Loans secured by mortgage
26 107
24 701
25 078
25 085
Loans to local government sector or enterprises with local government guarantee
89 743
88 342
86 486
86 629
Loans abroad secured by mortage and local government guarantee
5 352
5 352
6 413
6 413
Loans creditcard
44
44
44
44
Other loans
115
115
3
3
Total loans to local government, enterprises & retail customers
121 360
118 553
118 024
118 174
DEBT INSTRUMENTS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
Norwegian bonds
58 922
58 922
56 354
56 354
Norwegian certificates
7 648
7 648
7 805
7 805
Foreign bonds
72 565
72 565
87 026
87 026
Foreign certificates
420
420
405
405
Investments with credit institutions
42 259
42 259
36 582
36 582
Total debt instruments
181 815
181 815
188 172
188 172
EQUITY CAPITAL INSTRUMENTS AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
Shares
238 730
238 730
260 001
260 001
Equity funds
37 155
37 155
30 328
30 328
Property funds
6 514
6 514
4 147
4 147
Total equity capital instruments
282 399
282 399
294 476
294 476
RECEIVABLES
Receivables related to direct business
1 908
1 908
1 725
1 725
Receivables related to reinsurance agreements
704
704
304
304
Reinsurance share of gross claims reserve
0
0
0
0
Receivables related to securites
900
900
2 727
2 727
Prepaid rent related to real estate activites
55
55
245
245
Other receivables
422
422
374
374
Total other loans and receivables including receivables from policyholders
3 989
3 989
5 377
5 377
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES - AT AMORTIZED COST
Hybrid Tier 1 securities
1 428
1 428
1 604
1 586
Subordinated loan capital
3 147
3 093
3 000
3 310
Debt to credit institutions
1 055
1 055
897
897
Covered bonds issued
32 430
32 402
31 015
31 088
Liabilities and deposits from customers
13 779
13 779
12 901
12 901
Total financial liabilities
51 839
51 757
49 417
49 781
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES - AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
Debt to credit institutions
5 628
5 628
3 302
3 302
Total financial liabilities
5 628
5 628
3 302
3 302
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES - AT FAIR VALUE THROUGH PROFIT OR LOSS
Forward exchange contracts
5 024
1 570
2 019
3 077
Interest rate swaps
1 077
194
223
1 664
Interest rate and currency swaps
583
1 393
732
0
Share option
135
0
279
0
Total financial derivatives
6 820
3 158
3 253
4 740
Note 7 Fair value hierarchy
31.12.2022 NOK MILLIONS
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
ASSETS BOOKED AT FAIR VALUE
Land/plots
0
0
1 377
1 377
Buildings
0
0
92 615
92 615
Investment property
0
0
93 992
93 992
Lending at fair value
0
0
0
0
Certificates
2 254
5 815
0
8 069
Bonds
21 099
110 390
0
131 489
Fixed-income funds
0
8 129
9 835
17 964
Bonds and other fixed-income securities
23 353
124 333
9 835
157 521
Loans and receivables
23 459
835
0
24 294
Shares
229 463
5 131
3 378
237 972
Equity funds
2 067
0
60
2 127
Property funds
0
2 165
4 349
6 514
Special funds
0
0
0
0
Private Equity
0
0
35 785
35 785
Shares and units
231 530
7 297
43 572
282 399
Financial derivatives
0
6 820
0
6 820
Total assets at fair value
278 342
139 285
147 399
565 026
LIABILITIES BOOKED AT FAIR VALUE
Financial derivatives
0
3 158
0
3 158
Debt to credit institutions ¹
4 326
1 302
0
5 628
Total financial liabilities at fair value
4 326
4 460
0
8 786
¹ The line «Debt to credit institutions» includes liabilities measured at fair value and amortized cost. This line is therefore not reconcilable against the Balance sheet. The liabilities measured at amortized cost amounted to NOK 1 055 million per 31.12.2022.
31.12.2021 NOK MILLIONS
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Total
ASSETS BOOKED AT FAIR VALUE
Land/plots
0
0
983
983
Buildings
0
0
88 552
88 552
Investment property
0
0
89 535
89 535
Lending at fair value
0
79
0
79
Certificates
2 046
6 164
0
8 210
Bonds
24 164
102 021
0
126 186
Fixed-income funds
17 199
7 431
6 227
30 858
Bonds and other fixed-income securities
43 410
115 616
6 227
165 253
Loans and receivables
21 472
1 447
0
22 919
Shares
246 170
10 962
2 869
260 001
Equity funds
2 316
0
50
2 366
Property funds
0
1 133
3 013
4 147
Special funds
0
0
0
0
Private Equity
0
0
27 962
27 962
Shares and units
248 486
12 096
33 895
294 476
Financial derivatives
0
3 253
0
3 253
Total assets at fair value
313 367
132 491
129 657
575 515
LIABILITIES BOOKED AT FAIR VALUE
Financial derivatives
0
4 740
0
4 740
Debt to credit institutions ¹
2 061
1 241
0
3 302
Total financial liabilities at fair value
2 061
5 981
0
8 042
Changes in Level 3, Investment Property
Book value 31.12.2022
Book value 31.12.2021
Opening balance 1 January
89 535
81 485
Sold
-148
-723
Bought
1 139
4 636
Unrealised changes
3 486
4 130
Other changes
-20
7
Closing balance 31.12.
93 992
89 535
Realised gains/losses
0
59
Changes in Level 3, Shares
Book value 31.12.2022
Book value 31.12.2021
Opening balance 1 January
2 869
2 704
Sold
-166
-186
Bought
487
163
Unrealised changes
188
189
Closing balance 31.12.
3 378
2 869
Realised gains/losses
9
7
Changes in Level 3, Equity funds
Book value 31.12.2022
Book value 31.12.2021
Opening balance 1 January
50
55
Sold
0
0
Bought
0
0
Unrealised changes
9
-5
Closing balance 31.12.
60
50
Realised gains/losses
0
0
Changes in Level 3, Private Equity and additional funds
Book value 31.12.2022
Book value 31.12.2021
Opening balance 1 January
37 203
20 662
Sold
-5 583
-4 441
Bought
14 036
13 704
Unrealised changes
4 313
7 278
Closing balance 31.12.
49 969
37 203
Realised gains/losses
2 313
2 236
Closing balance 31.12.
147 399
129 657
Unrealised changes and realized gains / losses are reflected on the line "Net value changes on financial instruments" in the consolidated income statement.
The tables "Changes in level 3" shows changes in level 3 classified instruments in the period indicated.
Fair value shall be a representative price based on what a corresponding asset or liability would have been traded for on normal market terms and conditions. Highest quality in regard to fair value is based on listed prices in an active market. A financial instrument is considered as noted in an active market if noted prices are simply and regularly available from a stock market, dealer, broker, industry grouping, price setting service or regulatory authority, and these prices represent actual and regularly occurring transactions at arm’s length.
Level 1:
Instruments at this level obtain fair value from listed prices in an active market for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has access to at the reporting date. Examples of instruments at Level 1 are stock market listed securities.
Level 2:
Instruments at this level obtain fair value from observable market data. This includes prices based on identical instruments, but where the instrument does not maintain a high enough trading frequency and is corresponding therefore not considered to be traded in an active market, as well as prices based on assets and price-leading indicators that can be confirmed from market information. Example instruments at Level 2 are fixed income securities priced on the basis of yields curves.
Level 3:
Instruments at Level 3 contain no observable market data or are traded in markets considered to be inactive. The price is based generally on discrete calculations where the actual fair value may deviate if the instrument were to be traded. The instruments covered at Level 3 in the Group include unlisted shares and Private Equity.
No sensitivity analysis has been carried out on securities included in Level 3. A sensitivity analysis for investment property can be found in note 3. A change in the variables of the pricing is considered of little significance. On a general basis, a 5 percent change in the pricing would produce a change of NOK 7 370 million as of 31.12.2022 and NOK 6 483 million as of 31.12.2021. Everything related to investment property is included in Level 3. A sensitivity analysis of investment property is found in note 3.
During the period from 01.01.2022 to 31.12.2022, a net movement of NOK 2 009 millions in stocks has been moved from Level 1 to Level 2, NOK 24 millions moved from Level 1 to Level 3, NOK 1 814 million moved from level 2 to level 1, NOK 4 million moved from level 2 to level 3 and NOK 14 million from level 3 to level 1. This is due to changes in liquidity, based on the guidelines above. There have been no other movements between the different levels in 2022.
The general principles related to the distribution between levels basically concern whether the asset or liability is listed or not and whether the listing can be stated to be in an active market. As regards shares, there is a further distinction between trading days and amount of trading which separates out listed securities that do not form part of an active market. The values at the end of the reporting period provide the basis for any movement between the levels.
Valuations related to items in the various levels are described in Note 6, investment property is described in note 3.
Fair value of assets and liabilities measured at amortized cost are given in note 6. The level placements for these debt instruments are as follows: assets classified as held to maturity would be level 1 and loan and receivables would be level 2. Liabilities measured at amortized cost, subordinated loan would be level 1 and hybrid tier 1 capital would be level 2 and debt to credit institutions would be level 1. Information on pricing of these liabilities can be found in note 6.
Note 8 Risk management
Through its activity, The group is exposed to both insurance risk and financial risk. The aim of the overarching risk management for The group is that the financial risk is managed in such a way that The group is able at all times to meet the liabilities the insurance contracts impose on the business. The Board of Directors sets the overarching risk strategies that are put into practice at the senior management level.
Risk strategy is implemented and monitored by the line organization, with periodic reporting. Any breaches in risk lines and limits are reported as they occur, with a description of measures taken to regularize the situation. Units outside the line organization monitor that the risk-taking is carried out within the authorisations the line has.
8.1 INSURANCE RISK
An insurance contract according to IFRS 4 is defined as "A contract under which one party (the insurer) accepts significant insurance risk from another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the policyholder if a specified uncertain future event (the insured event) adversely affects the policyholder". The uncertainty at the portfolio level is additionally affected by factors such as changes in law and court decisions. Insurance results will be more stable and predictable the more contracts there are in the portfolio.
The group's insurance business is divided into the following sectors: group pension public sector and non-life insurance. As described in Note 2, the weightiest risks in group pension are disability risk and longevity risk, whereas risk of death/whole life is somewhat less weighty. Guidelines have been prepared for non-life insurance for regarding the kind of risks the Company accepts in its portfolio. Basically, it accepts risks from customers who are within The group's primary target groups in non-life insurance provided the scope of the insurance lies within the standard products The group offers. The total insurance risk will also be less diversified where the portfolio has geographical dispersion and is spread over different insurance products.
In non-life insurance, insurance risk is generally managed through provisions for future expected claims under existing contracts, pricing of the risk element in insurance premium, and through reinsurance contracts. In addition, more specific measures have been taken according to the insurance cover offered.
Insurance risk is generally managed through close monitoring of the risk incidence and if appropriate subsequent change in the tariffs.
8.1.1 Insurance provisions
The insurance provisions are set at the right level of expectation, with addition of safety margins. In group pension public sector, The group can add up to a half year’s risk result to the risk equalization fund. This fund can be used to meet unexpected fluctuations in risk results.
For disability risks in the collective pension sector, assumptions are used based on The group's disability experience. For other risk elements in the collective pension sector, the assumptions from the calculation basis K2013 are used, with safety margins, according to the minimum standard set by the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway in 2013. For men, The group uses its own life expectancy assumptions that assume a greater life expectancy improvement than K2013. In the Pension Scheme for Nurses, the same formulas and parameters are used but with an enhanced safety margin due to significantly longer life spans in these schemes. For the Pension Scheme for Hospital Doctors, K2013 is used with an enhanced safety margin for both genders.
The trend in insurance risk has been relatively stable over the last decade. Although there is some unpredictability associated with annual fluctuations and long-term developments, we generally use the insights gained from analyses in the future pricing of risk. Since the start of the coronavirus pandemic, it has been less clear that insights from recent history can tell us anything about the normal state of affairs. In the early phase of the pandemic, there was lower mortality in the population, but this increased towards the end of 2021 and into 2022.
For disability, there are a number of pandemic factors that could come into play. Some people are touched directly by the long-term effects of Covid-19, while others have suffered extra stress through two years of pandemic, such as workers in the health and care sectors, schools and kindergartens.
In the non-life insurance business, claims provisions have expected future inflation for the next few years baked in. If inflation deviates from expectations, it will result in a settlement difference for previous years’ provisions and a profit difference on future years’ insurance results. The premium level for the Company’s insurance contracts will be adjusted upwards at the next renewal, to take account actual inflation and any new estimates of future inflation. As non-life insurance has a relatively short settlement period and the contracts are of no more than one year’s duration, inflation risk is limited.
If actual inflation differs one year by +/- 100 bp from expectations,
the settlement difference for previous claims years will be around +/- NOK 11 million.
the profit difference for the coming claims year will be around +/- NOK 13 million.
A total of +/- NOK 24 million.
8.1.2 Setting the premium
Development in The group's insurance risk is continuously monitored. Risk result and future expectations of development in insured risk are based on observations and prognoses set by the SSB (Statistic Central Bureau). These create the basis for pricing of the risk element in the premium.
In the sector for group pension, public sector The Group has a large population, which provides a high degree of predictability and stability in its tariffs. Normally they will therefore stay the same for several years at a time.
In the non-life insurance business, guidelines have been drawn up for the types of risk that the Group accepts in its portfolio. Risks are generally accepted from customers from within the Group’s primary target groups, provided that the scope of the cover falls within the standard products the Group offers. Premiums are differentiated based on the individual customer’s risk. In borderline cases, special decision procedures are followed before the risk can be taken on.
8.1.3 Reinsurance and reinsurance program
a) Group pension public sector
The way the insurance contracts have been established, the current risk is generally within the framework of The group's risk-bearing capacity. Collective Pension Public only has products without the possibility to choose the scope of the insurance cover for the individual insured. Based on this limitation, the size of the company and resulting great risk-bearing ability, the overall assessment is that the need to have reinsurance in The group is small. There is no reinsurance cover for collective pensions in The group today.
b) Non-life insurance
The company reduces its underwriting risk, including concentration risk, by reinsurance cover that limits the company's retention per claim. In order to reduce credit risk towards reinsurers, only reinsurance companies with a satisfactory credit rating are used. In addition, each individual reinsurance contract is distributed between several independent reinsurers.
8.1.4 Sensitivity calculations
8.1.4.1 Sensitivity calculations in group public sector pensions
The effect of an immediate 20 per cent increase in the incidence of disability would, with current numbers be NOK 443 million on the risk result for the year. The effect on the premium reserve of a corresponding permanent change in the incidence of disability would be an increase of NOK 770 million.
An immediate 10 per cent reduction in mortality would, with current numbers, mean a negative effect of NOK 328 million on the risk result for the year. The effect on the premium reserve of a corresponding permanent change in mortality would be an increase of NOK 11.519 million.
The group's large numbers within group public sector pensions help to stabilize the insurance risk and the claim estimates. Deviations are related primarily to non-insurable magnitudes that do not affect the result.
8.1.4.2 Sensitivity calculations in non-life insurance
The table below shows the profit/loss effect of a 1 per cent change in costs, premium levels, claim payments and claims reserve:
P/L EFFECT NOK MILLION
1 % change in costs
4.3
1 % change in premium level
22.0
1 % change in claims payment
13.2
1 % change in claim reserves
21.8
8.2 FINANCIAL RISK
The group's financial goal is to achieve a competitive and stable return, at the same time as solvency satisfies external and internal requirements. The group has a long-term investment strategy in which risk-taking is at all times matched to The group's ability to bear risk. The focus in asset management is cost effectiveness, a long-term perspective and broadly diversified portfolios with the goal of achieving competitive and stable returns for our customers and owners over time.
The group's financial risk comprises liquidity risk, market risk and credit risk.
8.2.1 Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that The group does not have sufficient liquidity to cover short-term debt, uncalled residual liabilities that may fall due and current operations without substantial extra costs arising in the form of price falls on assets that have to be realized. The liquidity strategy contains various requirements and limits in order to comply with the desired liquidity risk profile. In addition division of responsibilities and contingency planning are covered. The liquidity strategy is operated at the senior management level and the liquidity is managed internally in accordance with mandates.
Uncalled residual liability of NOK 31.083 million comprises mainly committed, not paid in sums against private equity, real estate funds and approved loans that have not been paid out. The total is specified in detail in Note 34 Contingent liabilities. The agreements govern solvency requirements among other things, so that the drawing can be approved for payment.
8.2.2 Market risk
Market risk is the risk of losses resulting from changes in market prices of various assets such as shares, bonds, property and other securities. The market risk depends on how large an exposure there is to the various assets and on the volatility in the market prices. Developments in the Norwegian and international securities markets generally have major significance for The group's results.
Risk of a fall in the value of various assets is the biggest financial risk in the short term. Of the risk concerning assets, equity exposure is the largest financial risk factor, but also the market risk associated with interest, credit (spread) and property has a significant loss potential. The group's interest rate risk is however limited. With the current formulation of the rules, technical provisions are not affected by changes in market interest rates. On the liabilities’ future transition to market value, annual pricing of the interest rate guarantee will mean that the customers will bear the risk of the interest rate level being lower than the base interest rate. Since The group mainly provides pension schemes to the public sector, The group will price the interest rate guarantee right up until the insured dies, which means the interest rate risk arising from the insurance obligations is limited.
The group exchange rate hedges the majority of international exposure. Financial hedging of currency exposure is done through derivatives. As a rule, all of The group's fixed-income investments and property investments in foreign currency are hedged back to NOK. For equity investments in foreign currencies, the hedging ratio in 2022, was about 60 per cent with permissible fluctuations between 50 and 70 per cent.
All equity and interest rate exposures are included in a risk measurement system that enables simulation and monitoring of equity and interest rate risk across the portfolios. Active risk is managed through specifying a benchmark with the index for each portfolio.
To reduce the risk of negative results from asset management, The group uses CPPI rules for customer portfolios for daily monitoring the market risk. This strategy helps to ensure that the risk is adjusted to The group's risk capacity. The CPPI rules gives a return profile, which fits the overall target to have a satisfactory solvency margin and preserve the risk capacity over time. In addition, The group has a high proportion of long-term (hold-to-maturity) bonds and fixed-interest lending that contributes to stability in returns.
Derivatives are principally used for risk reduction for cost and time-effective implementation of changes in risk and for currency hedging.
8.2.2.1 Sensitivity analysis - market risk
In connection with the parent company’s ( KLP) own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA), several scenario analyzes and forecasts for capital adequacy have also been carried out this year Analysis shows that KLP will be well capitalized through the whole forecast period (2025). In scenarios with negative market development it is presumed that KLP according to internal rules will reduce the allocation in shares in the common portfolio. These scenarios also show how the ancillary own funds (Group 2) will contribute in situations with low reserves so that the capital adequacy not will be reduces below the target ratio of 150 per cent.
8.2.2.2 Calculation of solvency margin (SCR ratio)
The main purpose of the European prudential framework for insurance companies, Solvency II, is to protect and safeguard the interests of insurance customers. The Group carries out quarterly calculations of financial strength in accordance with the provisions in the solvency regulations.
Details of Group’s solvency capital requirement, regulatory capital and solvency capital coverage are provided in Note 26. The solvency capital coverage ratio is well above the Company’s target of at least 150 per cent.
Several sensitivity analyses relating to solvency capital coverage have been carried out. It is estimated that the solvency capital coverage will increase by 6 percentage points if interest rates rise by 50 basis points, and fall by 10 percentage points if the rates fall by 50 basis points. A 25 per cent fall in the equity market reduces solvency capital coverage by slightly less than 4 percentage points. Here, the effect on solvency capital coverage is limited by the size of the buffer fund.
8.2.3 Credit- and concentration risk
Emphasis is placed on diversification of credit exposure to avoid concentration of credit risk against individual debtors. To monitor credit risk in lending and investments a special credit committee has been established, meeting regularly. The limits for credit risk against the individual debtor are set by the committee. Changes in debtors' credit assessments are monitored and followed up.
The group has good balance between Norwegian bonds and international bonds and has a portfolio of exclusively good credit notes. 38 per cent of The group's total credit exposure is invested with issuers with an AA- rating or better. The group has a separate international government bonds portfolio and the element of government bonds is also substantial in the Norwegian bonds portfolio.
The group has a lending portfolio of high quality, with limited credit risk and historically very low losses. In the main, The group provides loans secured on housing with a loan-to-value ratio of less than 80 per cent, loans to local authorities and loans with local authority guarantees. Lending secured through mortgages on housing amounts to NOK 26.1 billion. The value of the mortgages represents a greater value than the lending since a large part of the mortgages were established earlier in time and the price rise in housing in recent years has been substantial.
The group has limited concentration risk. Because no exposures exceed the threshold values defined in the Solvency II regulations, The group has no capital requirements for concentration risk under the standard method. The way in which the fixed interest and equity portfolios are managed will generally help to limit concentration risk through extensive use of index management. The group sets explicit limits for lending which restrict concentration on specific individuals and groups. Sector concentration is monitored via monthly and quarterly reporting.
Although The group’s investments are well diversified, there is a clear preponderance of investments in Norway. This is a deliberate and a natural consequence of dealing mainly with public-sector occupational pensions.
8.3 TOTAL MAXIMUM EXPOSURE TO CREDIT RISK FOR THE GROUP
The group's total maximum exposure to credit risk comprises book values of financial assets and liabilities as well as approved not paid out loan pledge (see note 12 and 34 for more information regarding The group's credit risk). The book classes of securities are specified in detail in Note 6 Fair value of financial assets and liabilities.
Note 9 Liquidity Risk
The table below specifies the company’s financial obligations ranked by maturity. The amounts given are non-discounted contractual flows of cash.
31.12.2022 NOK MILLIONS
Within 1 month
1-12 months
1-5 years
5-10 years
Over 10 years
Total
Subordinated loan ¹
0
131
608
690
4 815
6 245
Perpetual hybrid Tier 1 securities ¹
0
72
287
359
1 215
1 933
Debt to and deposits from customers (without defined maturity)
13 779
0
0
0
0
13 779
Covered bonds issued
0
5 542
28 862
940
0
35 343
Payables to credit institutions
1 499
339
778
0
0
2 616
Financial derivatives
3 370
2 085
670
751
612
7 488
Accounts payable
36
0
0
0
0
36
Contingent liabilities (without defined maturity)
31 083
0
0
0
0
31 083
Total
49 766
8 170
31 204
2 740
6 642
98 523
If the minority interests are taken out of account, derivatives maturing within one month are reduced with NOK 72 million and derivatives maturing between 1 to 12 months are reduced with NOK 140 million. In addition, payables to credit institutions maturing within one month are reduced with NOK 23 million. Derivatives maturing within between 1 to 5 years increase by NOK 12 million. Total amount of the financial liabilities for the Group are after these adjustments NOK 98 299 million.
31.12.2021 NOK MILLIONS
Within 1 month
1-12 months
1-5 years
5-10 years
Over 10 years
Total
Subordinated loan ¹
0
125
573
658
4 725
6 082
Perpetual hybrid Tier 1 securities ¹
0
64
257
321
1 298
1 941
Debt to and deposits from customers (without defined maturity)
12 901
0
0
0
0
12 901
Covered bonds issued
0
3 921
26 930
1 003
0
31 855
Payables to credit institutions
1 685
312
608
0
0
2 605
Financial derivatives
3 739
3 366
248
295
216
7 864
Accounts payable
42
0
0
0
0
42
Contingent liabilities (without defined maturity)
28 754
0
0
0
0
28 754
Total
47 121
7 788
28 616
2 277
6 240
92 043
1 Some of the hybrid capital are perpetual. Estimated cash flows are based on expected maturity at the interest adjustment date.
If the minority interests are taken out of account, derivatives maturing within one month are reduced with NOK 754 million, payables to credit institutions maturing within one month are reduced with NOK 335 million and derivatives maturing between 1 to 12 months are reduced with NOK 237 million. Total amount of the financial liabilities for the Group are after these adjustments NOK 90 716 million.
The table above shows financial liabilities the Group has, grouped by interest payments and repayment of principal, based on the date payment falls due. The banking business contains the largest proportion of the financial liabilities in the Group.
The risk that the Group would not have adequate liquidity to meet its current liabilities and current operations is very small since a major part of the Group’s assets is liquid. The Group has significant funds invested in the money market, bonds and shares that can be sold in the event of a liquidity requirement. The Group’s liquidity strategy involves the Group always having adequate liquid assets to meet the Group’s liabilities as they fall due without accruing significant costs associated with releasing assets.
Asset composition in the Group’s portfolios should be adequately liquid to be able to cover other liquidity needs that may arise. KLP Kapitalforvaltning has the day-to-day responsibility and reports on the Group’s liquidity. Internal parameters have been established for the size of the liquidity holding. The Group’s risk management unit monitors and reports developments in the liquidity holding continuously. The Group Board determines an asset management and liquidity strategy for the Group annually. The liquidity strategy includes parameters, responsibilities, risk measurement and an emergency plan for liquidity management.
The biggest obligations in the Group are those related to insurance, essentially applying to pension obligations. These obligations are fully founded and the liquidity management is handled in the same way as other obligations.
The table below shows the expected payment profile based on the assumptions for the period.
EXPECTED PAYMENT PROFILE PENSION OBLIGATIONS
2022 NOK MILLIONS
Year
1 year
2-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21-30 years
31-40 years
41-50 years
51-80 years
Total
Amount
24 163
100 033
164 857
360 841
328 584
241 348
144 095
112 100
1 476 021
2021 NOK MILLIONS
Year
1 year
2-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21-30 years
31-40 years
41-50 years
51-80 years
Total
Amount
22 535
91 830
155 037
351 614
330 305
251 699
154 457
125 833
1 483 310
The payment profile for insurance liabilities is based on non-discounted values and applies to life insurance and non-life insurance. Insurance liabilities related to the life insurance businesses are discounted in the financial statements and show the present value at the end of the reporting period. The claims reserves are not discounted in the non-life insurance financial statements.
Note 10 Interest rate Risk
31.12.2022 NOK MILLIONS
Up to 3 months
From 3 months to 12 months
From 1 year to 5 years
From 5 years to 10 years
Over 10 years
Changes in cash flow 01.01.2022 -31.12.2022
Total
Adjusted for the unit holders' interests in consolidated securities funds
ASSETS
Financial derivatives classified as assets
29
-1
8
63
-153
5
-48
-32
Debt instruments classified as loans
and receivables – at amortised cost
0
0
0
0
0
13
13
13
Bonds and other fixed-return securities
-44
-76
-1 223
-1 578
-1 339
282
-3 979
-3 101
Fixed income fund holdings
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Lending and receivables
0
0
0
0
0
197
197
178
Lending
0
0
0
0
0
884
884
884
Cash and bank deposits
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Contingent liabilities ¹
0
0
0
0
0
37
37
37
Total assets
-15
-77
-1 215
-1 516
-1 492
1 418
-2 897
-2 022
LIABILITIES
Deposit
0
0
0
0
0
-142
-142
-142
Liabilities created on issue of securities
0
0
0
0
0
-335
-335
-335
Financial derivatives classified as liabilities
-3
0
-15
1
0
-8
-25
-24
Hybrid capital, subordinated loans
0
0
0
34
57
0
91
91
Debt to credit institutions
0
0
0
0
0
-52
-52
-52
Total liabilities
-3
0
-15
35
57
-536
-463
-462
Total before tax
-18
-77
-1 230
-1 481
-1 435
882
-3 359
-2 484
Total after tax
-14
-58
-922
-1 111
-1 076
661
-2 520
-1 863
31.12.2021 NOK MILLIONS
Up to 3 months
From 3 months to 12 months
From 1 year to 5 years
From 5 years to 10 years
Over 10 years
Changes in cash flow 01.01.2021 -31.12.2021
Total
Adjusted for the unit holders' interests in consolidated securities funds
ASSETS
Financial derivatives classified as assets
33
-1
-1
53
-209
2
-122
-99
Debt instruments classified as loans
and receivables – at amortised cost
0
0
0
0
0
16
16
0
Bonds and other fixed-return securities
-46
-55
-1 128
-1 553
-2 018
293
-4 508
-3 780
Fixed income fund holdings
-1 321
0
0
0
0
0
-1 321
-1 321
Lending and receivables
0
-1
0
0
0
85
84
187
Lending
0
0
0
0
0
819
819
819
Cash and bank deposits
0
0
0
0
0
34
34
34
Contingent liabilities ¹
0
0
0
0
0
41
41
41
Total assets
-1 334
-57
-1 129
-1 501
-2 227
1 290
-4 957
-4 119
LIABILITIES
Deposit
0
0
0
0
0
-133
-133
-133
Liabilities created on issue of securities
0
0
0
0
0
-318
-318
-318
Financial derivatives classified as liabilities
1
1
20
26
0
14
62
48
Hybrid capital, subordinated loans
0
0
0
43
77
0
119
119
Debt to credit institutions
0
0
0
0
0
-41
-41
-41
Total liabilities
1
1
20
69
77
-479
-311
-325
Total before tax
-1 334
-55
-1 109
-1 432
-2 150
811
-5 268
-4 444
Total after tax
-1 000
-41
-831
-1 074
-1 612
609
-3 951
-3 333
¹ Contingent liabilities are lending agreements that are not yet materialized.
The note shows the effect on profits if market interest rates were to increase by one percent, for fair value risk and variable interest risk.
Change in fair value (fair value risk) is shown in the first five columns and is calculated by the change in fair value of interest bearing instruments if interest rates had been one percent higher at the end of the period. The column change in cash flow shows the change in cash flows if the interest had been one percent higher over the year being reported on. The sum of these results reflects the overall effect that the scenario had given the group during the period being reported on.
The fair value risk applies to fixed interest securities were the market value of the securities is affected by market interest rates. Floating rate risk applies to securities with floating interest rates, where a change in market interest rates affects the cash-flow from the interest bearing securities.
The following securities are included in the note; securities measured at fair value through profit or loss (floating and fixed interest rates), investments held to maturity (only those with floating interest rates) and loans and receivables (only those with floating interest rates). The group has no securities classified as available for sale.
The Groups total interest rate risk is limited as a significant portion of the investments are bonds with fixed interest rates that are classified as held to maturity and loans and receivables, or fixed rate lending, measured at amortized cost. A change in market interest rate does not affect profit or loss for these assets.
Insurance contracts with guaranteed return does not change the accounting value even if interest rates change. Changes in interest rates also has no impact on the guaranteed return, but will have an impact on the achieved return to cover the guaranteed return. This is because the insurance funds are partly invested in debt instruments whose cash flows should help to meet the guaranteed return.
Net position in NOK adjusted for the minorities share
NOK MILLION/ FOREIGN CURRENCY ¹
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
Currency/NOK
Assets
Liabilities
NOK
NOK
US dollar
20 936
-53
9 587
-22 639
8,818
30 523
-22 692
69 053
37 041
Euro
5 732
-185
3 556
-7 572
10,028
9 288
-7 758
15 344
9 671
Swedish krone
27 381
0
22 488
-42 909
0,974
49 869
-42 909
6 779
2 106
Japanese yen
200 259
-295
89 745
-210 275
0,077
290 004
-210 569
6 083
3 146
British Pound
1 644
0
1 085
-2 362
11,944
2 728
-2 362
4 373
2 386
Danish kroner
12 544
-69
9 384
-19 064
1,348
21 928
-19 133
3 769
1 170
Canadian dollar
1 332
0
491
-1 305
6,981
1 823
-1 305
3 611
2 212
Hong Kong dollar
5 044
0
1 925
-4 104
1,131
6 969
-4 104
3 241
1 517
Swiss franc
701
0
227
-603
9,678
928
-603
3 145
1 461
Indian rupi
18 768
0
0
0
0,119
18 768
0
2 226
1 479
Taiwan new dollar
9 462
0
0
-3 423
0,319
9 462
-3 423
1 925
961
Australian dollar
709
0
333
-756
6,411
1 041
-756
1 826
989
Korean won
313 470
0
0
-122 730
0,007
313 470
-122 730
1 415
651
Chinese Yuan
675
0
0
0
1,384
675
0
934
656
Brazilian real
438
0
0
0
1,583
438
0
694
455
South African rand
1 036
0
0
0
0,553
1 036
0
573
378
Other currencies
2 751
1 845
Total short-term foreign currency positions
128 730
68 853
Swedish krone
3 014
0
0
-2 957
0,974
3 014
-2 957
56
56
Korean won
0
0
0
0
0,007
0
0
0
0
Australian dollar
0
0
0
0
6,411
0
0
0
0
Danish kroner
14
0
0
0
1,348
14
0
19
19
Swiss franc
0
0
0
0
9,678
0
0
0
0
British Pound
173
0
2
-169
11,944
175
-169
70
70
Euro
1 477
-301
0
-854
10,028
1 477
-1 155
3 235
3 235
US dollar
3 506
-82
0
-3 159
8,818
3 506
-3 241
2 340
2 340
Japanese yen
15 875
-11 529
0
0
0,077
15 875
-11 529
333
333
Canadian dollar
0
0
0
0
6,981
0
0
0
0
Total long-term foreign currency positions
6 053
6 053
Total pre-tax currency positions
134 783
74 906
Total currency positions after tax
101 087
56 179
¹ The table shows total financial position statement items for each individual currency, divided between short and long-term positions. The net position shows the actual currency risk the KLP Group had at the end of the period in NOK. The net position exclued the minority share shows the real currency risk the Group has at the end of the period, because the column is directly related to actual ownership and risk in the Group. Other sums are in local currency. The table shows a hedging ratio for foreign currency at 81 and 77 per cent for 2022 and 2021 respectively.
The Group currency-hedges the majority of investments made in foreign currency. Financial hedging of currency exposure is done through derivatives. In principle all of the Group’s fixed-income investments and property investments in foreign currency are hedged back to NOK with the objective of 100 per cent hedging.
As of 31 December 2021, the hedging ratio for equities in developed markets and the most liquid currencies in emerging markets was 60 percent with possible fluctuations between 50-70 percent. Other currencies, i.e., less liquid currencies in developed markets and currencies in emerging markets with the exception of the most liquid currencies, are not currency hedged. The reason for this is that these currencies do not have a large enough market and / or liquidity that it is appropriate to hedge currency. This reduction in the hedging of shares, as well as unsecured foreign equity funds, increases the net positions in foreign currencies.
If all currency positions were to change by 1 per cent at the same time and in the same direction this would affect the pre-tax result by NOK 1 210 million. For 2021 the effect on the pre-tax result of a 1 per cent change in the foreign exchange rates would have been NOK 1 348 million.
Note 12 Credit risk
31.12.2022 NOK MILLIONS
Investment grade AAA to BBB
Lower rating
Public sector guarantee
Bank and finance
Mortgage < 80% ¹
Mortgage > 80% ¹
Other
Total
Adjusted for the unit holders' interest in consolidated securites funds
Debt instruments held to maturity at amortized cost
22 828
0
0
0
0
0
1 396
24 225
24 225
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables at amortized cost
159 435
0
551
2 784
0
0
11 761
174 530
174 530
Debt instruments at fair value - fixed-return securities
124 085
2 688
6 755
4 813
0
0
9 346
147 686
122 448
Fixed-income funds
0
0
0
0
0
0
9 835
9 835
9 835
Loans and receivables
22 971
0
0
1 323
0
0
0
24 294
20 582
Financial derivatives classified as assets
6 820
0
0
0
0
0
0
6 820
5 501
Cash and bank deposits
3 248
0
0
73
0
0
0
3 321
3 321
Lending
0
0
92 617
0
25 055
1 623
2 066
121 360
121 360
Total
339 388
2 688
99 923
8 992
25 055
1 623
34 403
512 071
481 801
SPECIFICATION OF INVESTMENT GRADE NOK MILLIONS
AAA
AA
A
BBB
Total Investment grade
Debt instruments held to maturity at amortized cost
10 600
2 843
6 352
3 033
22 828
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables at amortized cost
29 894
22 160
62 752
44 628
159 435
Debt instruments at fair value - fixed-return securities
31 336
13 962
38 088
40 699
124 085
Fixed-income funds
0
0
0
0
0
Loans and receivables
0
13 269
8 216
1 486
22 971
Financial derivatives classified as assets
0
3 541
3 266
13
6 820
Cash and bank deposits
0
2 802
446
0
3 248
Lending
0
0
0
0
0
Total
71 830
58 577
119 121
89 860
339 388
31.12.2021 NOK MILLIONS
Investment grade AAA to BBB
Lower rating
Public sector guarantee
Bank and finance
Mortgage < 80% ¹
Mortgage > 80% ¹
Other
Total
Adjusted for the unit holders' interest in consolidated securites funds
Debt instruments held to maturity at amortized cost
24 553
36
0
0
0
0
1 396
25 985
25 985
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables at amortized cost
142 017
0
377
1 683
0
0
20 406
164 484
164 484
Debt instruments at fair value - fixed-return securities
117 047
1 454
5 295
3 835
0
0
14 196
141 827
116 454
Fixed-income funds
0
0
0
0
0
0
23 426
23 426
23 426
Loans and receivables
21 934
0
0
985
0
0
0
22 919
15 955
Financial derivatives classified as assets
3 253
0
0
0
0
0
0
3 253
2 908
Cash and bank deposits
3 320
0
0
67
0
0
0
3 388
3 388
Lending
-
0
90 582
0
23 025
2 329
2 167
118 103
118 103
Total
312 124
1 490
96 253
6 570
23 025
2 329
61 592
503 384
470 702
¹ These two columns provide information on the proportion of loans with mortgage security within 80% of base value and loans that exceed 80% mortgage of base value.
SPECIFICATION OF INVESTMENT GRADE NOK MILLIONS
AAA
AA
A
BBB
Total Investment grade
Debt instruments held to maturity at amortized cost
11 168
2 797
6 989
3 598
24 553
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables at amortized cost
20 632
25 034
60 915
35 437
142 017
Debt instruments at fair value - fixed-return securities
33 523
14 839
34 861
33 823
117 047
Fixed-income funds
0
0
0
0
0
Loans and receivables
0
9 433
11 881
621
21 934
Financial derivatives classified as assets
0
706
2 545
2
3 253
Cash and bank deposits
0
2 672
648
0
3 320
Lending
0
0
0
0
0
Total
65 323
55 481
117 840
73 480
312 124
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss due to the Group's counterparties not being able to meet their obligations. The table above displays the credit risk based on rating agencies estimates of the creditworthiness of the various counterparties. Non-rated assets are placed in the category that best reflects the credit risk based on sector, guarantees etc.
Emphasis is placed on diversification of credit exposure to avoid concentration of credit risk against individual debtors. To monitor credit risk in lending and investments a special credit committee has been established, meeting regularly. The limits for credit risk against the individual debtor are set by the committee. Changes in debtors’ credit assessments are monitored and followed up by KLP Kapitalforvaltning AS.
The Group has good balance between Norwegian bonds and international bonds and has a portfolio of exclusively good credit notes.
The Group can be said to have a high concentration of debt instruments directed at the Norwegian public sector, however this does not imply concentration risk in the ordinary meaning since the counterparty risk is considered to be minimal.
The rating above are gathered from Standard & Poor's, Moody's, Fitch, Scope Ratings and Nordic Credit Rating. The rating is converted to S&P's rating table, where AAA is linked to securities with the highest creditworthiness. The lowest rating of the five is used and all five rating agencies are equal as the basis for investments in fixed income securities. "Other" is mainly securities issued by power companies and other corporate bonds; this amounted to NOK 34 billion per 31.12.2022. KLP Group has strict guidelines for investments in fixed-income securities, which also apply to investments falling into the "Other" category.
The lines in the note coincide with the financial position statement layout. The exceptions are debt instruments at fair value, which are divided into three categories in the note and lending which is shown combined in the note, but is shown in two lines in the financial position statement (fair value and amortized cost).
The consolidated accounts includes all the units that KLP Group is considered to have control over. This gives an impression of a higher risk than the actual one, since the risk that the Group does not actually carry appears in the accounts. The outer column includes actual ownership and credit risk of the Group companies and investment funds held by KLP Group at the end of the period.
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Consolidated
Adjusted for the unit holders' in consolidated securites funds
Consolidated
Adjusted for the unit holders' in consolidated securites funds
10 LARGEST COUNTERPARTIES
Counterparty 1
14 317
12 155
15 032
11 995
Counterparty 2
13 605
11 215
14 514
11 891
Counterparty 3
9 332
9 007
10 578
7 482
Counterparty 4
8 095
8 296
8 586
6 660
Counterparty 5
7 689
6 734
7 828
6 377
Counterparty 6
6 844
6 061
7 706
5 830
Counterparty 7
6 764
5 549
6 377
5 548
Counterparty 8
6 461
4 698
5 878
4 928
Counterparty 9
6 061
4 403
5 548
4 698
Counterparty 10
5 549
4 361
4 698
4 506
Total
84 718
72 480
86 745
69 916
The table above shows the 10 largest counterparties to which the KLP Group has exposure. The amounts stated are book value. "Adjusted for the minority holding" includes only that which is in the Group’s ownership and where the Group retains actual credit risk. The majority of the 10 largest counterparties are either finance institutions or counterparties covered by a public sector guarantee (central or local government guarantee).
PREMIUM RECEIVABLES AND RECEIVABLES IN CONNECTION WITH REINSURANCE
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Premium receivables
2 196
1 484
Write-downs of premium receivables
0
0
Total
2 197
1 484
KLP’s premium receivables are primarily in regard to the public sector and the credit risk is considered low. In addition the main group pension/public sector industry is linked to the “Transfer agreement for the public sector“. This transfer agreement has a security scheme intended to help to secure pension rights accrued with employers who cease to exist or do not pay premiums when due in accordance with detailed rules. The Group may thus apply for cover for unpaid demands in this industry from the security arrangement if the demand falls within the security arrangement’s regulations.
CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE AS A RESULT OF CHANGE IN CREDIT RISK
NOK MILLIONS
100% ownership in funds
Adjusted to real ownership in funds
Change in fair value as a result of change in credit risk
-1 121
-712
This is not an accurate calculation, but our best estimate. Actual change in fair value depends on both changes in risk-free interest rates and credit spreads. This estimate is an attempt to isolate the change in fair value due to the fact that the credit spread on the bonds has changed during the year. The estimate is calculated by looking at the change in credit spread for each individual bond throughout the year and the bond's cash flow weights remaining maturity (duration) for the bond at the time of reporting. There are many reasons why the credit spread changes, like for example that the credit spread becomes lower when the bond matures, that an issuer is considered more or less risky or that the market demands a higher or lower risk premium for credit bonds in general. If the change in fair value is positive (negative), it indicates that the duration- and value-weighted credit spread has decreased (increased).
The calculation is based on owned assets per. 31.12.22, and is made for bonds that are valued at fair value. Government funds and government portfolios have been removed from the calculation basis.
Note 13 Presentation of assets and liabilities that are subject to net settlement
31.12.2022 NOK MILLIONS
Related amounts not presented net
Gross financial assets/ liabilities
Gross assets/ liabilities presented net
Book value
Financial instruments
Security in cash
Security in securities
Net amount
Adjusted for the unit holders' interest in consolidated securities funds
ASSETS
Financial derivatives
6 820
0
6 820
-1 861
-3 879
-1 796
470
437
Repos
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
6 820
0
6 820
-1 861
-3 879
-1 796
470
437
LIABILITIES
Financial derivatives
3 158
0
3 158
-1 861
-63
-235
1 256
1 256
Repos
1 304
0
1 304
0
0
0
1 304
1 304
Total
4 462
0
4 462
-1 861
-63
-235
2 560
2 560
31.12.2021 NOK MILLIONS
Related amounts not presented net
Gross financial assets/ liabilities
Gross assets/ liabilities presented net
Book value
Financial instruments
Security in cash
Security in securities
Net amount
Adjusted for the unit holders' interest in consolidated securities funds
ASSETS
Financial derivatives
3 253
0
3 253
-2 375
-1 753
-709
281
281
Repos
1 200
0
1 200
-1 200
0
0
0
0
Total
4 453
0
4 453
-3 575
-1 753
-709
281
281
LIABILITIES
Financial derivatives
4 740
0
4 740
-2 375
-367
-669
1 363
1 301
Repos
1 241
0
1 241
0
0
0
1 241
41
Total
5 982
0
5 982
-2 375
-367
-669
2 605
1 342
The purpose of the note is to show the potential effect of netting agreements at the KLP Group; what possibilities the KLP Group has to net bilateral agreements against other counterparties should the latter go bankrupt and the remaining amount if all such netting agreements are materialized.
The note shows derivative positions and repo agreements in the financial position statement. Repos are a part of the line "Debt to credit institutions" in the balance sheet.
The consolidated figures include all entities the KLP Group is considered to have control over. In addition, the outer line shows which de facto net amount remains if all the Groups netting agreements are set off; which only includes subsidiaries and entities, where the Group carries the risk.
Note 14 Mortgage loans and other lending
NOK MILLIONS
Local government administration
State and local authority owned enterprises ¹
Private organizations and enterprises
Employees, pensioners and similar
Total 31.12.2022
Total 31.12.2021
Agder
4 710
226
3
868
5 807
5 315
Innlandet
8 576
117
226
1 698
10 618
10 410
Møre og Romsdal
5 510
327
120
857
6 814
6 806
Nordland
7 104
618
37
1 118
8 877
8 359
Oslo
448
0
1 448
2 735
4 631
4 300
Rogaland
3 722
173
104
1 913
5 913
5 983
Svalbard
80
0
0
0
80
95
Troms og Finnmark
6 106
1 126
412
1 325
8 970
8 152
Trøndelag
10 322
330
419
1 467
12 537
12 248
Vestfold og Telemark
5 125
311
68
2 365
7 869
7 417
Vestland
8 383
1 295
159
2 486
12 324
11 850
Viken
19 621
599
1 508
9 288
31 015
30 440
Foreign
0
0
5 357
6
5 363
6 423
Not allocated
0
0
4
38
42
36
Accrued interests
426
25
14
35
501
269
Value adjustment
0
0
Total
80 134
5 147
9 879
26 199
121 360
118 103
¹ This category covers local authority business operations, as well as enterprises owned by central and local government
The Group has a lending portfolio of high quality, with limited credit risk and historically very low losses. In the main the Group provides loans secured on housing with a loan-to-value ratio of less than 80 per cent, loans to local authorities and loans with government (central/local) guarantees. Lending secured through mortgages on housing amounts to about NOK 26.2 billion. The sector diversification of Group lending is very small, since a very high proportion of the loans are provided for the public sector. However the concentration risk this suggests can hardly be perceived as a real risk since the loans are covered by government (central/local) guarantee, representing an extremely low counterparty risk.
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
INDIVIDUAL WRITE-DOWNS ON LOANS AT AMORTIZED COST
Number of loans 1
4
5
Total principal before write-downs
2,9
3,9
Write-downs
0,4
1,7
Total principal after write-downs
2,5
2,2
INDIVIDUAL WRITE-DOWNS
Write-down on individual loans 01.01.
1,7
1,5
Known losses for the period where individual write-down has been carried out previously
0,7
-0,5
Write-down on individual loans for the period
0,3
1,3
Reversal of write-down on individual loans for the period
0,8
-0,6
Write-down on individual loans 31.12.
0,5
1,7
GROUP WRITE-DOWNS
Write-down on group of loans 01.01.
5,0
5,5
Write-down on group of loans for the period
0,2
-0,5
Write-down on group of loans 31.12.
5,2
5,0
1 The numbers are absolute figures, the amounts are given in NOK million. Defaulted loans are loans measured at amortized cost. All write-downs are in regard to housing mortgage lending.
NOK MILLIONS
2022 Remaining debt
2021 Remaining debt
LOANS OVERDUE, NOT WRITTEN DOWN
Overdue
30-90 days
40
34
over 90 days
44
61
Total overdue loans
84
95
Note 15 Investment property
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Net rental income
3 213
3 037
Net finance income
6
3
Net value adjustment
3 338
5 444
Realised gains
0
59
Net income from investment properties
6 558
8 543
Currency translate foreign properties (taken to other comprehensive income)
148
-1 314
Net income from investment properties included currency translate
6 706
7 229
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Investment property 01.01.
89 535
81 485
Addition through purchase
0
3 723
Addition through activation
1 118
919
Reductions through sale
- 148
- 723
Additions through reclassification
0
0
Net write-up/down resulting from change in fair value including currency translation
3 486
4 130
Investment property 31.12.
93 992
89 535
Note 16 Subortinated loan capital and hybrid tier 1 securities
2022 NOK MILLIONS
Loan amount currency ²
Loan amount NOK
Book value 31.12.2022
Due date
BORROWINGS ¹
June 2015:
EUR 294
2 530
3 147
2045
Total subordinated loan capital
2 530
3 147
April 2004:
JPY 15 000
984
1 428
Perpetual
Total hybrid tier 1 securites
984
1 428
Total subordinated loan capital and hybrid Tier 1 securities
3 513
4 575
2021 NOK MILLIONS
Loan amount currency ²
Loan amount NOK
Book value 31.12.2022
Due date
BORROWINGS ¹
June 2015:
EUR 294
2 530
3 000
2045
Total subordinated loan capital
2 530
3 000
April 2004:
JPY 15 000
984
1 604
Perpetual
Total hybrid tier 1 securites
984
1 604
Total subordinated loan capital and hybrid Tier 1 securities
3 513
4 604
2022 NOK MILLIONS
Nominal currency ²
Acquisition cost NOK
Accrued interest 3
Unrealized currency
Book value 31.12.2022
Due date
Bonds
EUR 292
2 524
16
540
3 081
2025
Total hedging transactions
2 524
16
540
3 081
2021 NOK MILLIONS
Nominal currency ²
Acquisition cost NOK
Accrued interest 3
Unrealized currency
Book value 31.12.2021
Due date
Bonds
EUR 292
2 524
16
396
2 936
2025
Total hedging transactions
2 524
16
396
2 936
¹ Interest costs on the two subordinated loans were NOK 131 million (NOK 124 million) and NOK 72 million (NOK 64 million) for the hybrid tier 1 securities in 2022. Figures in brackets are 2021 figures.
² Amount in local currency (millions)
3 Accrued intrest not due
EUR 294: The interest on the loan is fixed at 4.25 per cent p.a. The loans was issued the 10th of June 2015 and is due in 2045. The loan can be redeemed by KLP after 10 years, and at every interest payment date that follows. The loan is currency hedged with EUR denominated bonds as shown in the table above. This arrangement is not subject to hedge accounting.
JPY 15 000: The interest on the loan is fixed USD interest of 5.07 per cent p.a. The loan is perpetual but the Group has the right to redeem the loan on 28 April 2034. If KLP does not exercise its redemption right in 2034, the loan will switch to variable interest. The credit margin then increases by 1 percentage point to 6-month JPY LIBOR-interest + a margin of 3.30 per cent p.a. To hedge the interest and exchange risk associated with the loan a combined interest rate and currency swap has been agreed in which KLP pays 3-month NIBOR-interest + a margin of 2.65 per cent p.a. and receives USD-interest of 5.07 per cent p.a. This hedging arrangement is shown in Note 18.
Note 17 Investments in associated companies and joint ventures
NOK MILLIONS
Office and business address
Organization number
Holding %
Owners equity on first aquisition
Aquisition cost
Book value 31.12.2021
Additions/ disposals
Value adjustment
Profit / loss share
Equity transactions
Dividend
Book value 31.12.2022
Norfinance AS
Fridtjof Nansens plass 4
912764729
46.5%
92
490
690
8
0
51
0
-5
744
0160 Oslo
Norsk Pensjon AS
Hansteens gate 2
890050212
25.0%
5
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
2
0253 Oslo
Fylkeshuset AS
Fylkeshuset,
930591114
48.0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6404 Molde
KLP Norfund Investments IS
Fridtjof Nansens plass 4
999548636
49.0%
0
700
879
225
0
38
0
-224
918
0160 Oslo
KLP Norfund Investments India AS
Fridtjof Nansens plass 4
926888455
49,0 %
0
207
0
207
0
0
0
0
207
0160 Oslo
Tensio AS
Kjøpmannsgata 7A
922828172
20.0%
1 653
1 353
1 050
0
0
49
0
0
1 099
7500 Stjørdal
Odal Vind AS
Pausvegen 6
924824905
41.5%
330
456
422
31
0
51
0
0
504
1927 Rånåsfoss
Runde Holdco AS
Vestre Strømkaien 7
923101284
20.6%
400
184
421
-216
0
66
0
0
270
5008 Bergen
Neas AS
Industriveien 1
960684737
33.3%
357
348
337
0
0
9
0
-5
341
6517 Kristiansund N
SR Energy AB
Rosenlundsg.3 Box 7123
30.0%
600
1 295
1 073
248
0
-2
0
0
1 319
402 33 Göteborg
Skaftåsen Bidco AB
BOX 16285
23.2%
86
86
61
0
0
-10
0
0
51
103 25 Stockholm
Total in associated companies and joint ventures
5 120
4 934
502
0
252
0
-234
5 456
All shares have equal voting proportions.
KLP Norfund Investment IS is a joint venture, while the remaining companies are associated companies.
Note 18 Hedge accounting
31.12.2022 NOK MILLIONS
Nominal value
Changed value in hedged risk
Book value 31.12.2022
KOMMUNAL LANDSPENSJONSKASSE
HEDGED OBJECT
Hybrid tier 1 securities
-984
-445
-1 428
HEDGING INSTRUMENT
Combined interest rate and currency swap (CIRCUS)
984
465
465
Hedge effectiveness as at 31.12.2022
102 %
Hedge effectiveness through the year
102 %
KLP BANKEN GROUP
HEDGED OBJECT
Loan
1 789
-98
1 702
Debt
1 700
19
1 700
HEDGING INSTRUMENT
Interest rate swap loan
1 789
72
97
Interest rate swap debt
1 700
9
16
Hedge effectiveness as at 31.12.2022
101 %
Hedge effectiveness through the year
101 %
31.12.2021 NOK MILLIONS
Nominal value
Changed value in hedged risk
Book value 31.12.2021
KOMMUNAL LANDSPENSJONSKASSE
HEDGED OBJECT
Hybrid tier 1 securities
-984
-621
-1 604
HEDGING INSTRUMENT
Combined interest rate and currency swap (CIRCUS)
984
620
620
Hedge effectiveness as at 31.12.2021
100 %
Hedge effectiveness through the year
100 %
The note shows the financial instruments in the Group subject to hedge accounting, with associated hedging instruments. The hedge effectiveness stands at approx. 100 per cent on the hedge relationships as at 31 December 2022, which means relatively small effects on everything subject to hedge accounting in the Group.
Hybrid Tier 1 securities in foreign currency with fixed interest
The hybrid Tier 1 securities loan is hedged against changes in interest rates and exchange rates through purchase of a combined interest rate and currency swap (CIRCUS). The hedging is brought to account in accordance with the rules on fair value hedging. In practice the hedging involves a swap of currency terms (JPY 15 billion against NOK 0.984 billion) and interest terms (fixed interest at 5.07 per cent against NIBOR +2.6475 per cent) on the borrowing and the combined interest and currency swap respectively. The hedge effectiveness is measured by looking at the change in fair value of the hedged object and the hedging instrument.
The hedge effectiveness is valued retrospectively each month and is then considered effective if the change in fair value between hedged object and hedging instrument lies within the bracket 80 per cent to 125 per cent.
Other hedging relationships
There are two hedging relationship in KLP Kommunekreditt AS. The hedged objects are fixed rate loans and debt, which are hedged with the use of interest rate swaps.
General
Fair value hedging means that the hedged value development of the hedged object is recognized through profit or loss. Correspondingly the value change on the hedging instrument is recognized in profit/loss. See also Note 2 for a detailed description of the hedge accounting in the accounts.
Note 19 Borrowing
NOK MILLIONS
Nominal in NOK
Currency
Interest
Due date
Book value 31.12.2022
Book value 31.12.2021
FIXED – TERM SUBORDINATED LOAN
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse
2 530
EUR
Fixed ¹
2045
3 147
3 000
Total subordinated loan capital
2 530
-
-
-
3 147
3 000
HYBRID TIER 1 SECURITIES
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse
984
JPY
Fixed ²
2034
1 428
1 604
Total hybrid Tier 1 securities
984
-
-
-
1 428
1 604
COVERED BONDS
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
0
NOK
Floating
2022
0
1 999
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
2 968
NOK
Floating
2023
2 985
5 009
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
5 000
NOK
Floating
2024
5 021
5 006
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
5 000
NOK
Floating
2025
5 010
5 003
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
5 000
NOK
Floating
2026
5 036
1 002
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
1 000
NOK
Fixed
2027
1 012
508
KLP Kommunekreditt AS
700
NOK
Fixed
2029
706
0
KLP Boligkreditt AS
0
NOK
Floating
2022
0
1 904
KLP Boligkreditt AS
1 600
NOK
Floating
2023
1 603
2 501
KLP Boligkreditt AS
2 500
NOK
Floating
2024
2 501
2 500
KLP Boligkreditt AS
2 500
NOK
Floating
2025
2 501
2 500
KLP Boligkreditt AS
3 500
NOK
Floating
2026
3 521
2 504
KLP Boligkreditt AS
2 500
NOK
Floating
2027
2 512
501
Other
-
-
-
-
22
78
Total covered bonds
32 268
-
-
-
32 430
31 015
DEBT TO CREDIT INSTITUTIONS
KLP Banken AS
0
NOK
Floating
2022
0
300
KLP Banken AS
300
NOK
Floating
2023
300
300
KLP Banken AS
450
NOK
Floating
2024
300
300
KLP Banken AS
300
NOK
Floating
2025
303
0
KLP Fond
0
NOK
Floating
2022
0
385
KLP Fond
0
NOK
Fixed
2022
0
1 241
KLP Fond
1 302
NOK
Floating
2023
1 302
0
KLP Fond
1 540
NOK
Fixed
2023
1 540
0
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse
0
NOK
Floating
2022
0
1 651
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse
2 678
NOK
Floating
2023
2 678
0
Other
-
-
-
-
110
21
Total liabilities to credit institutions
6 570
-
-
-
6 683
4 199
LIABILITIES AND DEPOSITS FROM CUSTOMERS 3
Retail
11 212
NOK
-
-
11 722
11 212
Business
2 021
NOK
-
-
2 021
1 650
Foregin
37
NOK
-
-
37
39
Liabilities to and deposits from customers
13 779
-
-
-
13 779
12 901
Total financial liabilities
56 130
-
-
-
52 457
52 719
1 The loan has an interest change date in 2025.
2 The loan has an interest change date in 2034.
3 There is no contractual maturity date on deposits.
This note shows the financial liabilities that the Group had at the end of the reporting period; where the majority is funding for KLP Bank Group. The companies listed above are the issuers of the financial debt. Deposits belongs to KLP Banken AS.
Note 20 Technical matters
Insurance liabilities distributed by main sectors
NOK MILLIONS
Group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
Accident insurance and other non-life sectors
Group life
Total 31.12.2022
Total 31.12.2021
Change 2022
Premium reserve and pension capital
518 530
0
0
518 530
486 276
32 254
Bufferfund
100 518
0
0
100 518
0
100 518
Supplementary reserves
0
0
0
0
48 812
-48 812
Securities adjustment fund
0
0
0
0
77 194
-77 194
Premium fund
33 570
0
0
33 570
41 268
-7 698
Other technical provisions for the non-life insurance operation
0
3 575
207
3 782
3 023
760
Total insurance liabilities 31.12.2022
652 618
3 575
207
656 401
656 573
-172
Total insurance liabilities 31.12.2021
653 551
2 863
160
656 573
INSURANCE LIABILITIES PER SUBSEGMENT
Subsegment of group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
NOK MILLIONS
Occupational pension schemes without investment options
Occupational pensions schemes with investment options
Total 31.12.2022
Total 31.12.2021
Change 2022
Premium reserve and pension capital
516 525
2 005
518 530
486 277
32 253
Supplementary reserves
100 456
61
100 518
48 812
51 706
Securities adjustment fund
0
0
0
77 194
-77 194
Premium fund
33 024
547
33 570
41 268
-7 698
Total insurance liabilities 31.12.2022
650 005
2 613
652 618
653 551
-933
Total insurance liabilities 31.12.2021
651 316
2 234
653 551
Insurance liabilities in main sector accident insurance and other non-life sectors, and group life
NOK MILLIONS
Accident insurance and other non-life sectors
Group life
Total 31.12.2022
Total 31.12.2021
Change 2022
Premium reserve
639
70
709
603
107
Claims reserve
2 936
137
3 073
2 420
653
Total technical provisions for the non-life insurance operation 31.12.2021
3 575
207
3 782
3 023
760
Total technical provisions for the non-life insurance operation as at 31.12.2021
2 863
159
3 023
Changes to insurance liabilities during the period in question for coverage of the undertaking's liabilities under contracts with contractual obligations
NOK MILLIONS
Premium reserve
Supplementary reserves
Premium fund
Technical provisions for the non-life insurance operation
Total 2022
Total 2021
Insurance liabilities 01.01
484 728
125 819
40 769
3 023
654 339
595 702
Changes in insurance liabilities taken to income
Net reserves taken to profit/loss
31 751
-22 196
718
760
11 033
49 739
Surplus on returns result
0
-2 585
2 585
0
0
14 721
Risk result assigned to insurance contracts
0
0
648
0
648
588
Release of premium reserves related to new public pension
0
0
0
0
0
3 502
Total changes taken to profit/loss
31 751
-24 781
3 951
760
11 681
68 549
Changes in insurance liabilities not taken to profit/loss
Transfer between funds/allocated to premium payment
45
-582
-11 253
0
-11 790
-9 420
Receipts/payments on transfer
0
0
-414
0
-414
-493
Total changes not taken to profit/loss
45
-582
-11 697
0
-12 234
-9 913
Total changes in insurance liabilities
31 796
-25 363
-7 746
760
-553
58 636
Insurance liabilities 31.12
516 525
100 456
33 024
3 782
653 787
654 338
Changes to insurance liabilities during the period in question for coverage of the undertaking's liabilities related to the value of a particular portfolio of investment options
NOK MILLIONS
Premium reserve
Supplementary reserves
Premium fund
Total 2022
Total 2021
Insurance liabilities 01.01
1 549
186
499
2 234
2 077
Changes in insurance liabilities taken to income
Net reserves taken to profit/loss
455
-117
8
346
81
Surplus on returns result
0
-7
7
0
136
Risk result assigned to insurance contracts
0
0
3
3
1
Other assignment of surplus
0
0
0
0
4
Total changes taken to profit/loss
455
-124
18
349
223
Transfer between funds/allocated to premium payment
1
-1
0
0
-65
Receipts/payments on transfers
0
0
30
30
-1
Total changes not taken to profit/loss
1
-1
30
30
-65
Total changes in insurance liabilities
456
-125
48
379
158
Insurance liabilities 31.12
2 005
61
547
2 613
2 234
Changes to insurance liabilities during the period in question for coverage of the undertaking's liabilities related to the value of a particular portfolio of investment options continued
NOK MILLIONS
Technical provisions for the non-life insurance operation
Accident insurance and other non-life sectors
Group life
Total 2022
Total 2021
Insurance liabilities 01.01
2 863
159
3 023
2 729
Changes in insurance liabilities taken to income
Net reserves taken to profit/loss
712
48
760
294
Surplus on returns result
0
0
0
0
Risk result assigned to insurance contracts
0
0
0
0
Other assignment of surplus
0
0
0
0
Total changes taken to profit/loss
712
48
760
294
Changes in insurance liabilities not taken to profit/loss
Transfer between funds/allocated to premium payment
0
0
0
0
Receipts/payments on transfers
0
0
0
0
Total changes not taken to profit/loss
0
0
0
0
Total changes in insurance liabilities
712
48
760
294
Insurance liabilities 31.12
3 575
207
3 782
3 023
Technical accounts by main sectors
NOK MILLIONS
Group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
Accident insurance and other non-life sectors
2022
2021
2022
2021
Premium income
50 523
50 161
1 788
1 601
Net income from investments
-7 628
49 951
0
0
Other insurance-related income
1 358
1 274
8
3
Claims
-28 517
-30 438
-1 428
-1 232
Change insurance liabilities
-12 123
-58 713
Funds assigned to insurance contracts
-651
-9 415
0
0
Insurance-related operating expenses
-1 487
-1 372
-264
-258
Other insurance-related costs
-1 368
-1 286
0
-6
Technical result
107
162
104
107
Technical accounts by main sectors continued
NOK MILLIONS
Group life
Total
2022
2021
2022
2021
Premium income
290
239
52 601
52 001
Net income from investments
0
0
-7 628
49 951
Other insurance-related income
0
0
1 366
1 276
Claims
-257
-185
-30 201
-31 855
Change insurance liabilities
0
0
-12 123
-58 713
Funds assigned to insurance contracts
0
0
-651
-9 415
Insurance-related operating expenses
-42
-36
-1 793
-1 666
Other insurance-related costs
0
0
-1 368
-1 292
Technical result
-9
18
203
287
Technical accounts by sub-sectors - main sector accident insurance and other non-life sectors and main sector group llife and has no sub-sectors
Subsegments of group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
NOK MILLIONS
Occupational pension schemes without investment options
Occupational pension schemes with investment options
Total
2022
2021
2022
2021
2022
2021
Premium income
49 974
50 026
548
135
50 523
50 161
Net income from investments
-7 570
49 770
-58
181
-7 628
49 951
Other insurance-related income
1 354
1 272
3
2
1 358
1 274
Claims
-28 410
-30 358
-106
-81
-28 517
-30 438
Change insurance liabilities
-11 731
-58 536
-392
-177
-12 123
-58 713
Funds assigned to insurance contracts
-648
-9 369
-3
-46
-651
-9 415
Insurance-related operating expenses
-1 482
-1 361
-5
-11
-1 487
-1 372
Other insurance-related costs
-1 365
-1 283
-3
-2
-1 368
-1 286
Technical result
122
160
-15
2
107
162
Result analysis by main sectors
NOK MILLIONS
Group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
Accident insurance and other non-life sectors
Group life
Total 2022
Total 2021
Returns result to customers
Returns result
-20 099
0
0
-20 099
14 857
Risk result excluding profit element - customer share
558
0
0
558
588
Total result to insurance customers
-19 399
0
0
-19 399
15 446
Transferred to supplementary reserves
-19 956
0
0
-19 956
5 999
Allocated to the customers’ premium fund
558
0
0
558
9 447
Total result allocated to customers
-19 399
0
0
-19 399
15 446
Result to insurance providers
Share of returns result
0
0
0
0
277
Risk result excluding profit element
0
0
0
0
0
Administration result
-17
0
0
-17
35
Consideration for interest guarantee and profit element
266
0
0
266
251
Other
0
131
-9
122
150
Rebooking from equity
-142
0
0
-142
-1 304
Result to insurance provider
107
131
-9
229
-592
Group elimination
Technical result Group
107
104
-9
203
287
Result analysis by sub segments - main sector accident insurance and other non-life sectors and main sector group life and has no sub-sectors
Subsegments of group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
NOK MILLIONS
Defined contribution pension schemes with investment options
Pension capital certificates with investment options
Total 2022
Total 2021
Returns result to customers
Returns result
-19 969
-130
-20 099
14 857
Risk result excluding profit element - customer share
555
3
558
-721
Other
127
16
142
1 313
Total result to insurance customers
-19 288
-112
-19 399
15 446
Transferred to/from supplementary reserves
-19 843
-114
-19 956
5 999
Allocated to the customers’ premium fund
555
3
558
9 447
Total result allocated to customers
-19 288
-111
-19 399
15 446
Result to insurance providers
Share of returns result
0
0
0
277
Risk result excluding profit element
0
0
0
0
Administration result
-17
0
-17
35
Consideration for interest guarantee and profit element
265
1
266
251
Rebooking from equity
-127
-16
-142
-1 304
Result to insurance provider
122
-15
107
-742
Group elimination
0
0
0
903
Technical result Group
122
-15
107
162
Claims by main sectors
NOK MILLIONS
Group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
Accident insurance and other non-life sectors
2022
2021
2022
2021
Claims paid in accordance with insurance agreements
-23 858
-22 092
-1 428
-1 232
Claims paid in under repurchase
0
0
0
0
Total
-23 858
-22 092
-1 428
-1 232
Claims by main sectors continued
NOK MILLIONS
Group life
Total
2022
2021
2022
2021
Claims paid in accordance with insurance agreements
-257
-185
-25 543
-23 509
Claims paid in under repurchase
0
0
0
0
Total
-257
-185
-25 543
-23 509
Transfer by main sectors
NOK MILLIONS
Group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
2022
2021
Funds transferred in
Premium reserve
386
0
Funds received taken through profit or loss
386
0
Premium fund
0
0
Supplementary reserves to fund
0
0
Total funds received
386
0
Number of contracts
1
0
Funds transferred out
Premium reserve
3 805
6 882
Strengthening reserves
0
23
Bufferfund
854
0
Supplementary reserves
0
611
Securities adjustment fund
0
830
Funds paid out taken through profit or loss
4 659
8 346
Premium fund
445
494
Total funds paid out
5 103
8 840
Number of contracts
29
32
New subscription
NOK MILLIONS
Group pension insurance for municipalities, including institutions with similar pension plans
Unit holders value change in consolidated securities funds
-15 001
19 802
Reversal of value reduction, financial assets
43 822
-23 757
Reversal of value increase financial assets
-617
-55
Accounting loss on realization of shares and other securities
6 731
2 947
Book gain on realization of shares and other securities
-23 184
-18 743
Tax gain on realization of shares and other securities
1
2
3% tax base after the exemption method
58
43
Share of taxable income in partnerships
29
25
Liquidation of security reserve
54
54
Other permanent differences
-1 906
-1 392
Correction of carryforward deficit that can not be compensated
7 474
-1 864
Correction of pay-as-you-earn tax
-16 814
30 278
Change in differences affecting relationship between book and taxable income
-86
-7 796
Taxable income
2 283
844
Taxable income, bacic for payable tax
2 283
844
Deficit carryforward allowable from previous years
-6 308
-8 172
Change for the year in carryforward deficit
-7 474
1 864
Total carryforward deficit and allowance 31.12.
-13 782
-6 308
RECONCILIACTION OF BASIS OF DEFERRED TAX
TAX-INCREASING TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES:
Gains and losses account
1 098
1 373
Buildings and other real estate
10 960
10 442
Risk equilization fund
4 154
4 154
Natural disaster fund
164
164
Guarantee scheme
49
49
Reinsurance
2
3
Security reserve
270
324
Securities
1 130
1 477
Securing loans
17
21
Shares in partnerships
320
309
Lending to customers and credit enterprises
0
0
Claims provisions
37
45
Total tax-increasing temporary differences
18 202
18 361
TAX-REDUCING TEMPORARY DIFFERENCES:
Fixed assets
1
0
Long-term receivables
-948
-982
Financial instruments
-39
-29
Lending to customers and credit enterprises
-86
0
Pension obligation
-210
-224
Other liabilities
-70
-56
Adjusted for 20% of transition regulation 01.01.2018
-18
-21
Hedging
-9
0
Total tax-reducing temporary differences
-1 380
-1 313
Net temporary differences
16 822
17 048
Difference not included in the basis for deferred taxes 1
-4 369
-4 370
Other differences that are not included in the calculation of deferred tax
-7 902
-7 036
Carryforward deficit
-13 782
-6 308
Basis for deferred tax and tax assets
-9 231
-665
25% deferred tax assets
-2 308
-166
Write-down of deferred tax assets
3 403
1 501
Net deferred tax and tax assets
1 095
1 335
BOOK DEFERRED TAX/ -TAX ASSETS
- Of which deferred capitalized tax assets
48
52
- Of which capitalized referred tax assets extempt from equalisation
1 143
1 387
Change in deferred tax assets taken to profit/loss
-4
-8
Change in deferred tax taken to profit/loss
244
38
Wealth tax
-6
-8
Tax payable taken to profit/loss
-571
-531
Residual tax
-27
0
Withholding tax taken to profit/loss
-443
-302
Cost of taxes
-807
-812
Taxes taken ti equity
-82
0
THE TAX COST IS ENTERED AGAINST THE FOLOOWING ITEMS
Cost of taxes
-801
-748
Tax on items that will not be reclassified against the comprehensive income statement
-17
-12
Tax on items that will be reclassified to income later
11
-52
Equity
-82
0
Total tax taken to profit/loss
-888
-812
1Accordning to the new rules deductions will no longer be made for provisions for risk equilization fund, natural disaster fund and guarantee scheme. These funds are subject to transitional rules, so that the total provisions for these funds at the end of the 2017 income year can be deposited in a separate account, where the account is first taxed on the liquidation of the non-life insurance business. The group presents the accounts during continued operations, and assumes that the present value of the liability will be 0.
Note 23 Transferred assets with restrictions
Transferred assets that are still capitalized
All assets transferred are recognised in the financial position statement if the Group is still exposed to changes in the fair value of the asset. This applies to repurchase agreements and agreements concerning securities lending.
Repurchase agreements are a form of borrowing with collateral, whereby the Group sells securities with an agreement to repurchase those securities at a predetermined price. Cash received is recognised as a deposit (debt). Securities transferred in connection with the repurchase agreement are not deducted in the financial position statement.
Agreements regarding securities lending are transactions whereby the group lends securities to a counterparty and receives a commission for it.
Since both repurchase agreements and securties lending result in the securities being returned to the Group, the risk of value changes rests with the Group. However, the securities are not available to the Group while being transferred.
The securities still reported in the financial position statement, and related debt, are assessed at fair value.
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Certificates and bonds
1 304
1 258
Paid in by credit institutions
0
1 200
SECURITIES LENDING
Shares
8 399
11 578
Total assets transferred that are still capitalised
9 702
14 036
LIABILITIES RELATED TO THE ASSETS
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS
Paid in by credit institutions
1 304
1 241
SECURITIES LENDING
Paid in by credit institutions
289
219
Certificates and bonds
4 263
5 555
Shares
4 302
6 547
Total liabilities
10 159
13 562
All the assets in the table above are subject to resale or collateral with the counterparty.
ASSETS TRANSFERRED THAT ARE NOT DEDUCTED, AND RELATED LIABILITIES
The Group receives collateral under reverse repurchase agreements and agreements related to securities borrowing, which it is permitted to sell or pledge under the agreement.
Transactions are carried out in accordance with standard agreements employed by the parties in the financial market. The agreements normally require additional collateral if the values fall below a predetermined level.
According the agreements, the recipient of the collateral has the unlimited right to sell or pledge the collateral in return for providing corresponding collateral on the date of settlement.
SECURITIES RECEIVED THAT ARE PERMITTED TO BE SOLD OR PLEDGED
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
SECURITIES BORROWING
Shares
511
563
Of which sold or pledged
511
563
Total assets transferred and still capitalised
511
563
Adjusted for the unit holders’ interests in consolidated securities funds, meaning that only the KLP Group de facto ownership and risks are taken into account; assets are reduced by NOK 5 241 million and liabilities associated to the assets are reduced by NOK 3 539 million as of 31.12.2022.
Note 24 Intangible assets
NOK millions
IT-systems
Other
2022
IT-systems
Other
2021
Book value 01.01.
785
12
797
669
18
684
Acquisition cost 01.01.
2 293
22
2 315
2 002
25
2 028
Total additions
339
0
339
290
0
290
of which internally developed
0
0
0
0
0
0
of which bought
339
0
339
290
0
290
Disposals
0
0
0
0
-4
-4
Acquisition cost 31.12.
2 631
22
2 653
2 293
22
2 315
Accumulated depreciation and write-dows prev.years
-1 508
-10
-1 517
-1 334
-8
-1 343
Ordinary depreciation for the year 1
-85
-2
-87
-97
-2
-99
Impairment
0
0
0
-75
0
-75
Accumulated depreciation and write-downs 31.12.
-1 593
-12
-1 604
-1 508
-10
-1 517
Book value 31.12.
1 039
10
1 049
785
12
797
Depreciation period
3 to 20 years
Intangible assets contains IT-systems
1 At the end of 2021 there were identified several IT-systems where the book value exceeded the estimated recoverable amount. Estimated recoverable amount is calculated by estimating future earnings with book value. Essentially, some of the investments have no longer value. There are several reasons for this. Among other things, linking it to the outdated functionality due to rule changes and/or technological developments. This resulted in the following assessment:
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Book value before impairment
0
534
Recoverable amount
0
459
Impairment
0
75
The impairment is included in "Operating costs" in the financial statement.
Note 25 Return on capital for life insurance segment
COLLECTIVE PUBLIC PENSION
PERCENT
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
TOTAL OF COMMON PORTOFOLIO
Return on capital ¹
-1.1
8.4
4.2
8.5
1.5
SUB-PORTOFOLIOS OF THE INVESTMENT OPTION PORTOFOLIO
Balanced portfolio 1
Return on capital ¹
-1.1
8.4
4.2
8.6
1.4
Balanced portfolio 2
Return on capital ¹
N/A
8.3
4.2
8.5
1.5
Moderate portfolio
Return on capital ¹
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.7
INVESTMENT OPTION PORTOFOLIO
Return on capital ¹
-2.5
8.9
4.2
9.9
0.6
CORPORATE PORTOFOLIO
Return on capital ¹
2.8
3.4
3.1
4.3
4.2
¹ Return on capital, formerly known as value-adjusted return, includes all realized and unrealized income from investments in accordance with the current account principles KLP is following.
The Moderate portfolio was closed at the end of june 2019 and was included in the Balanced portfolio 1 from July 2019 and onwards. Balanced portfolio 2 was closed at the end of 2021, and was included in the Balanced portfolio 1 from the beginning of 2022
Note 26 SCR Ratio
The Solvency II balance sheet includes assets and liabilities at fair value. For assets that have a different value in the accounts change in balance value are added. There are no observable market values for KLP’s insurance liabilities, which are thus calculated by way of a best estimate based on actuarial assumptions. In addition there is a risk margin that is to reflect a third party’s capital costs by taking over these liabilities.
Tier 1 capital appears from the Solvency II balance sheet and Hybrid Tier 1 securities. Tier 2 capital consist of subordinated loans and ancillary own funds. Starting 30.09.2022 the risk equalization fund will also be considered tier 2 own funds. The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway has accepted that KLP’s right to call in further member contribution if necessary, which is laid down in the Company’s articles of association, can be counted as ancillary own funds, the amount corresponding to 2.5 per cent of the Company’s premium reserve. Capital that may be included in Tier 2 capital is limited upwards to 50 per cent of SCR.
Without the use of the transitional measure on technical provisions the Company’s SCR ratio is 288 per cent, which is well over the Company’s target of at least 150 per cent. With the transitional measure on technical provisions the SCR ratio is 288 per cent.
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Solvency II - SCR ratio
288 %
287 %
NOK BILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Simplified Solvency II Financial Position Statement
Assets, book value
713
710
Added values - hold-to-maturity portfolio/loans and receivables
-13
6
Added values - other lending
-2
0
Other added/lesser values
0
0
Deferred tax asset
0
0
Total assets - solvency II
699
716
NOK BILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Simplified Solvency II Financial Position Statement
Best estimate
632
649
Risk margin
12
13
Hybrid Tier 1 securities/Subordinated loan capital
5
5
Other liabilities
9
12
Deferred tax liabilities
0
1
Total liabilities - solvency II
657
679
Excess of assets over liabilities
42
36
- Deferred tax asset
0
0
- Risk equalization fund (tier 2 own funds starting 30.09.2022)
-5
0
+ Hybrid Tier 1 securities
1
2
Tier 1 basic own funds
38
38
Total eligible tier 1 own funds
38
38
Subordinated loans
3
3
Risk equalization fund (tier 2 own funds starting 30.09.2022)
5
0
Tier 2 basic own funds
8
3
Ancillary own funds
13
12
Tier 2 ancillary own funds
13
12
Deduction for max. eligible tier 2 own funds
-14
-8
Total eligible tier 2 own funds
7
7
Deferred tax asset
0
0
Total eligible tier 3 own funds
0
0
Solvency II total eligible own funds
46
45
Market risk
7
7
Diversification market risk
-2
-2
Counterparty risk
0
0
Life risk
14
13
Diversification life risk
-3
-2
Non-life risk
1
0
Diversification non-life risk
0
0
Health risk
0
0
Diversification health risk
0
0
Diversification general
-4
-3
Operational risk
3
3
Loss absorbing capacity deferred tax
-2
-2
Capital requirement for other financial sectors
1
1
Solvency capital requirement (SCR)
16
16
Minimum consolidated group solvency capital requirement
5
5
Solvency II- SCR ratio
288 %
287 %
Note 27 Pensions obligations, own employees
The majority of the pension obligation is covered through KLP’s joint pension scheme for local authorities and enterprises (“Fellesordningen“)
The Group also offers a pension scheme in addition to "Fellesordningen". This obligation is covered through operation. "Fellesordningen" is a defined-benefits-based pension scheme that satisfies the requirements for mandatory occupational pensions (obligatorisk tjenestepensjon or OTP).
The Group has a contractual early retirement (AFP) scheme.
The accounting treatment of pension obligations is described in more detail in Note 2.
NOK MILLIONS
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
PENSION COST
Present value of accumulation for the year
167
11
179
149
10
159
Administration cost
3
0
3
3
0
3
Planchanges
3
0
3
0
0
0
Social security contributions - Pension costs
22
2
23
21
1
23
Corporate activity tax - Pension costs
7
0
8
7
0
7
Pension costs incl. social security, corporate activity tax and administration cost taken to income
202
13
215
180
12
192
NET FINANCIAL COSTS
Interest cost
53
6
59
43
5
48
Interest income
-43
0
-43
-33
0
-33
Management costs
2
0
2
2
0
2
Net interest cost
12
6
18
12
5
16
Social security contributions - net interest cost
2
1
3
2
1
2
Corporate activity tax - net interest cost
1
0
1
1
0
1
Net interest cost including social security contributions and corporate activity tax
15
7
21
14
5
20
ESTIMATE DEVIATIONS PENSIONS
Actuarial gains (losses)
-99
-12
-111
-88
16
-71
Social security contributions
-14
-2
-16
-12
2
-10
Corporate activity tax
-4
0
-5
-4
1
-3
Actuarial gains (losses) including social security contributions and corporate activity tax
-117
-14
-132
-103
20
-84
Total pension costs including interest costs and estimate deviation
99
6
105
90
37
127
NOK MILLIONS
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
PENSION OBLIGASTIONS
Gross accrued pension obligations
2 683
281
2 964
2 664
283
2 946
Pension assets
2 276
0
2 276
2 212
0
2 212
Net liability before social security costs
406
281
687
451
283
734
Social security contributions
53
36
89
59
36
95
Corporate activity tax
22
16
38
25
16
41
Gross accrued obligations incl. social security costs and corporate activity tax
2 758
333
3 091
2 747
335
3 082
Net liability incl. social security costs and corporate activity tax
482
333
815
535
335
870
NOK MILLIONS
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
RECONCILIATION PENSION OBLIGASTIONS
Capitalized net liability/(assets) 01.01.
535
335
870
628
305
934
Pension costs taken to profit/loss
202
13
215
180
12
192
Financial costs taken to profit/loss
15
7
21
14
5
20
Actuarial gains and losses included social security contributions and corporate activity tax
-117
-14
-132
-103
20
-84
Social security contributions paid in premiums/supplement
-24
-2
-25
-29
-2
-31
Capital activity tax contribution paid in premiums/supplement
-6
0
-6
-7
0
-7
Premium/supplement paid-in including admin
-123
-5
-128
-148
-5
-153
Capitalized net liability/(assets) 31.12. this year
482
333
815
535
335
870
NOK MILLIONS
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
CHANGE IN PENSION OBLIGASTIONS
Gross pension assets 01.01. after planchanges
2 747
335
3 082
2 489
305
2 794
Present value of accumulation for the year
167
11
179
149
11
159
Interest cost
53
6
59
43
5
47
Actuarial losses (gains) gross pension obligation
-183
-14
-198
100
20
119
Social security contributions - pension costs
24
2
26
21
1
23
Social security contributions - net interest cost
2
1
3
2
1
2
Social security contributions paid in premiums/supplement
-18
-1
-19
-22
-1
-23
Corporate activity tax - pension costs
7
0
8
7
0
7
Corporate activity tax - net interest cost
1
0
1
1
0
1
Corporate activity tax paid in premiums/supplement
-6
0
-6
-7
0
-7
Payments
-37
-6
-43
-34
-6
-41
Gross pension obligation 31.12.
2 758
333
3 091
2 747
335
3 082
NOK MILLIONS
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
CHANGE IN PENSIONS ASSETS
Pension assets 01.01
2 212
0
2 212
1 860
0
1 860
Interest income
43
0
43
33
0
33
Actuarial (loss) gain on pension assets
-66
0
-66
203
0
203
Administration cost
-3
0
-3
-3
0
-3
Financing cost
-2
0
-2
-2
0
-2
Premium/supplement paid-in including admin
129
6
135
155
6
162
Payments
-37
-6
-43
-34
-6
-41
Pension assets 31.12
2 276
0
2 276
2 212
0
2 212
NOK MILLIONS
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
PENSION SCHEME'S OVER-/UNDER-FINANCING
Present value of the defined benefits pension obligation
2 758
333
3 091
2 747
335
3 082
Fair value of the pension assets
2 276
0
2 276
2 212
0
2 212
Net pensions liability
482
333
815
535
335
870
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS (COMMON TO ALL PENSION SCHEMES)
Discount rate
3.00%
1.90%
Salary growth
3.50%
2.75%
The National Insurance basic amount (G)
3.25%
2.50%
Pension increases
2.60%
1.73%
Social security contribution
14.10 %
14.10 %
Corporate activity tax
5.00 %
5.00 %
The assumptions as at 31 December 2021 have been applied to measurement of the cost of pension for 2022, whilst for calculation of the pension obligation on 31 December 2022, the assumptions and membership numbers as at 31 December 2022 have been applied. The assumptions are based on the market situation as at 31 December 2022 and are in accordance with the recommendations of the Norwegian Accounting Standards Board (NASB).
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
KLP’s joint pension scheme for local authorities and enterprises (“Fellesordningen”):
An important part of the basis of pension costs and pension obligations is how mortality and disability develop amongst the members of the pension scheme.
KLP uses best estimate based on mortality and disability figures in KLPs customer base.
Withdrawal of contractual early retirement (AFP) (per cent in relation to remaining employees):
The costs of AFP depend on how many in each year-group take AFP. On reaching 62 years there are 42.5 per cent who retire with an AFP pension.
It is only those who are employed and working right up to retirement who are entitled to AFP. This is taken into account in the calculation of the AFP obligation.
Voluntary termination for “Fellesordning” (in %)
Age (in years)
<24
24-29
30-39
40-49
50-55
>55
Turnover
25%
15%
7.5%
5%
3%
0 %
PENSIONS VIA OPERATIONS
AFP/early retirement is not relevant to this scheme. In regard to mortality the same estimates have been used as for “Fellesordningen".
Number
Joint scheme
Via operation
2022
Joint scheme
Via operation
2021
MEMBERSHIP STATUS
Number active
1 080
43
1 123
1 041
49
1 090
Number deferred (previous employees with deferred entitlements)
943
32
975
875
31
906
Number of pensioners
321
55
376
307
58
365
2022
2021
Composition of the pension assets:
Property
14.7%
13.8%
Lending
12.0%
11.9%
Shares
30.2%
30.9%
Long-term/HTM bonds
29.0%
27.7%
Short-term bonds
12.2%
13.8%
Liquidity/money market
1.9%
1.9%
Total
100.0 %
100.0 %
The pension funds are based on KLP’s financial funds in the common portfolio. The table shows percentage placing of the pension funds administered by KLP at the end of the year. Value-adjusted return on the assets was -1,14 per cent in 2022 and 8,36 per cent in 2021.
Expected payment into benefits plans after cessation of employment for the period 1 January – 31 December 2023 is NOK 271 million.
Sensitivity analysis as at 31 December 2022
The discount rate is reduced by 0.5 %
Increase
Gross pension obligation
10.2%
Accumulation for the year
16.3%
Salary growth increases by 0.25%
Increase
Gross pension obligation
0.5%
Accumulation for the year
1.3%
Mortality is strengthened by 10 %
Increase
Gross pension obligation
2.8%
Accumulation for the year
2.1%
The sensitivity analysis above is based on all other assumptions being unchanged. In practice that is an unlikely scenario and changes in some assumptions are correlated. The calculation of gross pension obligation and accumulation for the year in the sensitivity analysis has been done using the same method as in calculating gross pension obligation in the financial position statement.
The duration in the Joint scheme is estimated at 18.9 years.
Note 28 Number of employees
2022
2021
Number of permanent employees 31.12.
1 093
1 048
Number of temporary employees 31.12.
52
34
Total number of employees 31.12.
1 145
1 082
Number of full time equivalents permanent employees 31.12.
1041
999
Number of full time equivalents temporary employees 31.12.
20
31
Total number of full time equivalents 31.12.
1 061
1 030
Note 29 Salary and obligations towards senior management etc.
The KLP Board of Directors has laid down principles and guidelines for remuneration that apply for the entire Group and set up a remuneration committee as a subcommittee of the Board. The committee reports on and carries out checks that the remuneration schemes in the Group are in line with the Board's principles and guidelines.
Senior employees are defined as the senior management team of the Kommunal Landspensjonskasse Group. This comprises the Group Chief Executive Officer, the KLP Group executive vice presidents and managing directors of certain subsidiaries.
Senior employees who were members of the Group senior management before 1 May 2013, are pensionable at the age of 65, but may choose to canage this to aged 70. None of those senior management have chosen to avail themselves of the opportunity to change the retirement age as of 31.12.2022. Persons who were appointed to Group senior management as of 1 May 2013, are pensionable at the age of 70.
All employees of the KLP Group in Norway are registered in KLP's pension scheme for municipalities and companies. The employees earn pension rights in this scheme for salaries up to 12G.
Employees in the KLP Group with salaries above 12 G and for employees with lower retirement age than 67 years, also earn pension benefits for salaries above 12G if they were employed before 2 May 2013 and had a salary above 12G at that time. Full retirement pension in this additional cover amounts to 66% of salary above 12G, and is achieved after at least 30 years of earnings in the scheme. Employees with a special agreement for a lower pension age than 67 years are ensured an old-age pension corresponding to 66% of all pensionable salary up to 67 years. This add-on was closed May 2, 2013 and does not apply to employees who started after that date. Nor does the scheme apply to employees who were employed at this time in KLP, but who only receive salary above 12G after this date.
The Group CEO has severance pay corresponding to one year's salary including supplementary benefits in the event of termination of employment. There are no obligations to provide the Chairman of the Board special consideration or other benefits on termination or change of the appointment. KLP pays directors' liability insurance for members of its Board of Directors.
No member of senior management has performance pay ( bonus).
The KLP Group offers loans for various purposes. There are seperate loan terms for employees, and no senior executeves have terms that deviate from this. Loans to external members of the Board of Directors and external members of the Corporate Assembly are only granted under ordinary loan terms.
Fees to Board members are determined by the Corporate Assembly. Fees to deputies and observers are not stated. The Board’s substitutes and observers, and any benefits and loans to them, are not listed in this note unless they were elected as ordinary Board members during the year. A total of NOK 391.000 was paid to observers and substitutes in 2022. This covers four people.
All benefits are shown without the addition of social security contributions and capital activity tax. For Board members elected by and among the employees stated that only about compensation and loans that can be linked to their directorship.
Attention is drawn otherwise to the description of the main principles on determination of remuneration in the KLP Group that may be found at klp.no.
2022
NOK THOUSANDS
Salary, fees etc.
Other benefits
Annual pension accumulation
Loan
Interest rate as at 31.12.2022
Paymentsplan 1
SENIOR EMPLOYEES
Sverre Thornes, Group CEO
4 733
220
1 556
20 000
3,50
HC
Cathrine Hellandsvik, as of 1 August
647
112
207
6 873
3,50
A50
Aage E. Schaanning
3 912
144
1 377
9 600
3,50
HC
Gro Myking
2 869
169
362
7 710
3,50
A41
Rune Hørnes
2 923
156
317
-
-
-
Kirsten Grutle
1 794
146
246
-
-
-
Tore Tenold
3 297
153
1 244
6 400
3,40
HC
Håvard Gulbrandsen
3 566
179
1 163
7 500
3,50
HC
Gunnar Gjørtz
3 514
170
1 222
6 000
3,50
HC
Marianne Sevaldsen
3 042
172
1 289
3 864
3,50
A43
Leif Magne Andersen, until 1 August
1 474
99
474
4 820
3,30
A51
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2)
Egil Johansen, Chair until May (5 of 5)
200
Tine Sundtoft, Chair as of June (5 of 5)
207
Jenny Følling (5 of 5)
178
Odd Haldgeir Larsen (10 of 10)
268
1 874
4,15
A35
Øyvind Brevik (10 of 10)
301
Cecilie Dae (7 of 10)
233
Egil Matsen (10 of 10)
327
Ingunn Trosholmen (5 of 5)
148
Vibeke Heldal, elected by and from the employees (10 of 10)
301
Erlig Bendiksen, elected by and from the employees (10 of 10)
233
CORPORATE ASSEMBLY
Total Corporate Assembly, including employee representatives
804
40 208
EMPLOYEES
Loan to employees in the Group at subsidiezed interest rate
2 102 732
Loan to employees in the Group at ordinary terms and conditions
92 141
1) A=Annuity loand, last peyment, HC = Housing Credit
2) The numbers in brackets represents the number of meetings attended by the total number of meetings held during the period in which the person has been on the board.
2021
NOK THOUSANDS
Salary, fees etc.
Other benefits
Annual pension accumulation
Loan
Interest rate as at 31.12.2021
Paymentsplan 1
SENIOR EMPLOYEES
Sverre Thornes, Group CEO
4 383
240
1 485
20 000
1,00
HC
Marianne Sevaldsen
2 925
184
1 182
4 021
1,00
A43
Aage E. Schaanning
3 758
165
1 269
6 390
1,00
HC
Gro Myking
2 749
188
357
7 669
1,00
A30/A41
Rune Hørnes
2 801
156
296
-
-
-
Kirsten Grutle
1 075
114
61
-
-
-
Tore Tenold
3 175
162
1 175
3 000
0,90
HC
Håvard Gulbrandsen
3 427
213
1 086
6 177
1,00
HC
Gunnar Gjørtz
3 375
157
1 163
6 000
1,00
HC
Leif Magne Andersen
2 268
174
765
4 952
1,00
A51
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2)
Egil Johansen, Chair (9 of 10)
392
Jenny Følling (10 of 10)
297
Odd Haldgeir Larsen (9 of 10)
242
1 924
1,55
A35
Karianne Melleby (9 of 9)
316
Øyvind Brevik (10 of 10)
291
Cathrine M. Lofthus (5 of 5)
172
Cecilie Dae (1 of 1)
0
Susanne Torp-Hansen, elected by and from the employees (5 of 5)
133
Freddy Larsen, elected by and from the employees (5 of 5)
172
Vibeke Heldal, elected by and from the employees (5 of 5)
119
Erlig Bendiksen, elected by and from the employees (5 of 5)
100
CORPORATE ASSEMBLY
Total Corporate Assembly, including employee representatives
765
92 663
EMPLOYEES
Loan to employees in the Group at subsidiezed interest rate
1 968 767
Loan to employees in the Group at ordinary terms and conditions
65 077
1) A=Annuity loand, last peyment, HC = Housing Credit
2) The numbers in brackets represents the number of meetings attended by the total number of meetings held during the period in which the person has been on the board.
NOK THOUSANDS
2022
2021
The period costs related to lending terms and conditions for employees.
15 041
11 639
Note 30 Auditor’s fee
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Ordinary audit
10,1
7,2
Certification services
0,8
0,6
Tax advisory services
0,1
0,4
Non-audit services
0,6
0,4
Total auditor’s fee
11,7
8,7
The sums above include VAT.
Note 31 Operating expenses
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Personnel costs
1 401
1 248
Depreciation and writedowns
149
228
Other operating expenses
923
802
Total operating expenses
2 473
2 278
Note 32 Other income and expenses
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Supplement contractual early retirement scheme (ERS)
1 354
1 265
Other income 1
330
282
Total other income
1 684
1 547
1 Other income includes investment from associated and joint ventures companies, so the results can be both negative and positive.
NOK MILLIONS
2022
2021
Supplement contractual early retirement scheme (ERS)
1 354
1 265
Other expenses
23
27
Total other expenses
1 377
1 292
Note 33 Other current liabilities
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
Short-term payables trade in securities
1 699
3 645
Incurred not assessed taxes
727
560
Advance tax-deduction pension scheme
522
491
Accounts payable
240
226
Pre-called contribution to insurance
516
699
Other current liabilities
1 248
1 187
Total other current liabilities
4 951
6 808
Note 34 Contigent Liabilities
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2022
31.12.2021
KLP guarantee liability
2
2
Committed, not subscribed investment in private equity and property funds
27 405
24 615
Approved, not paid out KLP Group loan pledge
3 676
4 136
Total contingent liabilities
31 083
28 754
Note 35 Retained earnings
NOK MILLIONS
Revaluation fund
Risk equilization fund
Nat.per.pool fund
Other retained earnings
Retained earnings
Capitalized value 01.01.2021
1 625
5 404
66
14 127
21 222
Income
-1 034
39
463
-532
Other comprehensive income:
Items that will not be later reclassified to income
56
56
Items that will be reclassified to income later when particular conditions are met
206
-52
155
Capitalized value 31.12.2021
1 831
4 370
105
14 595
20 901
Change recognized directly in equity
415
-172
243
Income
-142
32
386
275
Other comprehensive income:
Items that will not be later reclassified to income
94
94
Items that will be reclassified to income later when particular conditions are met
-43
11
-32
Capitalized value 31.12.2022
1 789
4 643
137
14 913
21 482
Note 36 Change in liabilities from financing activities
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2021
Cash flow from financing activities
Cash flow from operating activities
Non-cash changes1
31.12.2022
Subordinated loan capital
3 000
1
0
146
3 147
Hybrid Tier 1 securities
1 604
0
0
-176
1 428
Debt to credit institutions
4 199
1 460
1 024
0
6 683
Covered bonds issued
31 015
0
1 415
0
32 430
39 818
1 461
2 439
-30
43 689
¹ Non-cash flow changes are mainly unrealized currency.
NOK MILLIONS
31.12.2020
Cash flow from financing activities
Cash flow from operating activities
Non-cash changes
31.12.2021
Subordinated loan capital
3 135
0
0
-135
3 000
Hybrid Tier 1 securities
1 764
0
0
-159
1 604
Debt to credit institutions
14 216
574
-10 591
0
4 199
Covered bonds issued
24 997
0
6 018
0
31 015
44 112
573
-4 573
-294
39 818
Note 37 New accounting policies and transitional effects
There are two new international accounting standards which enter into force for the financial year starting 01.01.2023, and which must be adopted by the Group. They are IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts and IFRS 9 Financial Instruments.
For insurance contracts, the principles in the standard require the exercise of discretion, and the areas in which the Group’s exercise of discretion has been most significant are listed below:
Contract boundary for public- sector occupational contracts (see section 37.1.6)
Best estimate related to cash flows within the contract boundary (see section 37.1.7.1)
Risk adjustment (see section 37.1.7.3)
The standard also requires a number of other interpretations, including the definition of who the policy holder is and whether issued insurance contracts contain investment components.
37.1 Summary of the main accounting principles under IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts
The introduction of the new standard for insurance contracts does not change the definition of what constitutes an insurance contract, although there have been some clarifications that limit the scope of qualifying contracts to be handled according the standard. These clarifications have had no effect on the Group’s issuance of insurance contracts.
The Group’s life insurance business has only one type of insurance contract, public-sector occupational pensions (OfTP). There are three parties to such an insurance contract; insurer, employer and employee. All of the rights and obligations of the insurer under the insurance contract are matched by the obligations and rights of the policyholder. According to the standard, policyholders is the person who is entitled to benefits in the event of an insured event. The Group interprets that this will include both the respective beneficiary (employee/pensioner) and the employer (who is compensated by the insurance company for its obligation to the employee for OfTP.
The Group’s non-life insurance business has different types of insurance contracts; refer to section 37.1.3 for a more detailed description of these.
37.1.1 Mutual status
IFRS 17 has special rules for mutual entities. KLP is a mutual insurance company, defined by the fact that the policyholders, current og future, are entitled to the residual value of the business. The residual value is equal to the sum of all assets minus all liabilities. The insurance contracts KLP has issued also meet the requirement for risk sharing between policyholders. A risk adjustment for non- financial risk is calculated in the usual way.
The Group has also issued ordinary insurance contracts, i.e. contracts that do not entitle the policyholder to the residual value of the business. These are contracts in the non-life insurance area. However, these contracts form part of the residual value owned by the policyholders with public-sector occupational pensions.
Since the residual value for the business is added to current or future policyholders, there is normally no equity in mutual entities under IFRS 17. According to this standard, the capital paid into the Group, which is defined as equity in other regulations, is part of the cash flows resulting from performance of the insurance contract. Note 37.1.7.1 discusses this in more detail.
The residual value should be measured at fair value and included in the liability to the policyholders. However, some asset and liability items included in the residual value are not recognised at fair value, either because this is not permitted under IFRS, or because the Group has chosen a different valuation method. Any measurement differences on assets and liabilities that have not been measured at fair value will be recognised as reported equity, even though they are not equity in a regulatory or economic sense. Changes in equity will constitute total comprehensive income.
Mutual entities also do not have a contractual service margin (CSM), as there is no service margin or profit to the enterprise. Instead of equity and CSM, the Group shows a residual value on the balance sheet which represents the policyholder’s capital in excess of the value of liabilities including risk adjustment (adjustment for non-financial risk). Changes in residual value represent the profit to policyholders in excess of the expected allocation to the premium fund.
In a mutual entity where the policyholder receives and is unconditionally liable for all residual value in the enterprise, all cash flows for performance of the insurance contract are ordinary probability-weighted expectations. An exception is the right of the enterprise to collect payments from policyholders with residual value in the business. This is a contingent cash flow from policyholders who are entitled to residual value. The effect of this right is included in the probability weighting of the cash flow for performance of the insurance contract related to ordinary capital contributions.
37.1.2 Definition and classification
The Group’s life insurance business has a single product, public-sector occupational pensions (OfTP); this is a package covering old-age pension, disability pension, spouse’s pension, child pension and contractual pension (AFP). The OfTP is classed as an insurance contract under the standard as each contract carries a significant insurance risk associated with longevity, death or disability.
The insurance contract for OfTP is the sum of the agreements within a risk group that the policyholder has entered into with the Group’s life insurance business. The insurance contract will then include the agreements on ordinary occupational pensions, AFP and equity contributions, and associated provisions in articles of association, terms and conditions, transfer agreements, collective agreements and laws.
The Group’s non-life insurance business has several different products in different segments, and all contracts satisfy the requirement for significant insurance risk according to the standard.
37.1.3 Separation of contracts
An insurance contract may contain components such as a) derivatives, b) deposits/investments, c) obligations to provide goods and non-insurance services. If such components are distinct from the insurance components of the contract, the standard requires the different components in the contract to be separated from the insurance contract itself, for measurement and recognition under other accounting standards than IFRS 17, preferably IFRS 9 (Financial Instruments) or IFRS 15 (Revenue from Contracts from Customers).
If the cash flow and the risks associated with the components are mutually dependent on the cash flow and risk in the insurance contract, and cannot be measured separately, the components are not separated from the insurance contracts (not distinct).
Derivatives
The insurance contracts for OfTP contain a derivative in the form of an annual interest guarantee tied to the premium reserve which is calculated according to the provisions of the Insurance Act
As the OfTP contracts are contracts with claims to the residual value of the business, and because IFRS 17 reflects this mutual status by including all cash flows associated with the contracts as a debt, there is in reality no interest guarantee related to the insurance contract when it is to be measured under IFRS 17. So there is no derivative built into the insurance contract that we need to think about separating. A mutual company can provide equivalent or more tailored risk management for the policyholder by holding derivatives with the market as counterparty in the underlying assets.
The insurance contracts within non-life insurance do not contain derivatives either.
Deposits/investments
An investment component is defined as the amount that the insurer undertakes to pay back to a policyholder whether or not an insured event occurs.
A public-sector occupational pension contract obliges the insurer to refund all payments from the policyholder that are intended to cover insurance risk. However, there is no requirement to repay the amount to the same policyholder; it may go to the whole population of current and future policyholders. The crucial factor in assessing whether or not there is an investment component in the contract is whether it is to be assessed from the point of view of the insurer or of the individual policyholder. Looking at it from the insurer’s point of view, there is an investment component. If we look at it from the perspective of the individual policyholder, there is no investment component.
IFRS 17 is not precise on the perspective from which this is to be assessed, but the wording used in several places in the standard indicates that the insurer’s perspective should form the basis for measuring an insurance contract. It seems most natural to consider this from the insurer’s point of view, as the IFRS 17 standard regulates the recognition and measurement of insurance contracts by the issuers of the contracts. The standard is not clear on which perspective this should be viewed from, and the group therefore takes the insurer’s perspective as a basis. The conclusion is then that the contracts for public-sector occupational pensions contain an investment element associated with insurance risk. The investment component represents the main component of the insured risk, and cannot be sold separately. The investment component is therefore non-distinct and should be measured as part of the contract. One consequence of the risk coverage being a non-distinct investment component is that receipts and payments related to the investment component should not be included in the insurance result.
Non-life insurance contracts do not contain any obligation to refund an amount to the policyholder in the absence of an insurance event.
Provision of services related to the insurance contracts which are not insurance.
The Group collects membership dues on behalf of the Pension Office for the OfTP contracts, and pays occupational pensions on behalf of the employer. Services are also provided in the form of NRS calculations to employers with a public sector occupational pension contract in the Group, and some guidance is given to policyholders, but these have no specific cash flows associated with them.
It has to be confirmed whether any of the services described in c) are distinct and are not to be separated from the insurance contract and measured separately, or whether they are non-distinct and so should be measured together with the insurance contract.
Insurance contracts issued by the Group’s life insurance business should not be separated. Dues for the Pension Office and service pensions are excluded as they would have no effect on income or expenses in any case, simply involving the collection of amounts to be repaid, so they are assessed under IFRS 15.
The standard neither requires nor explicitly refuses further separation of the legal contract, but if different coverages are combined in one legal contract only for practical reasons, the coverages must be treated separately.
OfTP consists of a product package set down in law and collective agreements, and the policyholder has to purchase the whole package. Individual cover is not available in the market, nor can it be transferred It is therefore no requirement to separate the different coverages and they are assessed together.
37.1.4 Grouping of the contracts and onerous (loss-making) contracts
Under IFRS 17, insurance contracts have to be grouped into portfolios. A portfolio consists of a set of contracts subject to the same type of insurance risk and managed together. The Group’s OfTP contracts are divided into seven different pension schemes. The contracts included in the various pension schemes have similar risks, and the profitability of each pension scheme is monitored. The different pension schemes each form a separate portfolio under IFRS 17.
According to the standard, the portfolios must be divided into three groups:
a group of contracts that are onerous at initial recognition, if any;
a group of contracts that at initial recognition have no significant possibility of becoming onerous subsequently, if any; and
a group of the remaining contracts in the portfolio, if any
A contract is considered to be onerous if the sum of the present values of the cash flows, including risk adjustment, associated with the contract is a net cash outflow from the enterprise.
If, during the coverage period, an insurance contract is judged to be onerous, the negative difference between unearned premium income and expected claims costs should be recognised in the income statement and added to the liability for remaining coverage (LRC). The view taken on recognition is that the Group’s life insurance business does not have any onerous (loss-making) contracts. All contracts in the portfolio are considered to be profitable with the possibility of becoming onerous.
Contracts issued more than one year apart cannot be included in the same group. However, an exception to this requirement has been introduced in the EU/EEA whereby insurance contracts within life insurance issued more than one year apart can still be included in the same portfolio.
These contracts are therefore included in the same portfolio. The contracts are considered to be covered by the exception that applies to grouping by years in the EU/EEA in that the contracts have direct participating characteristics (see 37.1.1) and there is equalisation between the contracts over time. The Group has chosen to make use of the exception for the OfTP contracts.
The Group’s non-life insurance business has produced a portfolio classification whereby a portfolio cannot contain elements from two different industries. However, one and the same portfolio may contain two or more homogenous risk groups, provided that they belong to the same industry. This reflects the way in which the business is monitored. Moreover, the company’s offering is such that one set of products is offered to public-sector and corporate customers, while another set of products is offered to retail customers.
The table below shows the division of the non-life insurance business into portfolios, and this division reflects the risk characteristics of the products:
IFRS 17 Portfolio
Segment group
PB Third party individual insurance
Public and Business
PB Fire -combined
Public and Business
PB Group life
Public and Business
PB Motor vehicle
Public and Business
PB Travel
Public and Business
PB Accident
Public and Business
PB Safety
Public and Business
PB Occupational Injury
Public and Business
PM Fire -combined
Privat Market
PM Boat
Privat Market
PM Motor vehicle
Privat Market
PM Travel
Privat Market
PM Accident
Privat Market
PM Death
Privat Market
PM Disability
Privat Market
No onerous contracts have been identified in the non-life business, and the contracts are grouped by years with a maximum of 12 months between the issue dates of contracts included in the same group.
37.1.5 Recognition of the contracts
The Group recognises its groups of insurance contracts from the earlier of the following dates:
The start of the coverage period for the group of contracts
The date of the first payment from a policyholder in the group
If there is no agreed due date, the first payment from the policyholder will be deemed to have fallen due when received.
37.1.6 Contract boundary
The standard requires all future cash flows that are within the contract boundary to be included when measuring the value of the insurance contract. To assess the boundary for the contract, all substantive rights and obligations arising from the contract itself and from laws and regulations must be taken into account. The boundary for the contract ends at the time when there is a practical possibility of re-pricing all of the risk arising from the contract.
The insurance contracts for public-sector occupational pensions entitle the policyholder to renew the contract each year. The insurer cannot terminate the contract. If and when it is renewed, the insurer can re-price future entitlements, but not those accrued previously. So the Group’s life insurance business cannot re-price all risk, and OfTP contracts are considered to have (infinitely) long contract boundaries.
With a few exceptions, the Group’s contracts within non-life insurance have a contractual period of 12 months with the option to extend. The Group has no obligation to renew the contracts and may re-price all risk if they are renewed.
37.1.7 Measurement of insurance contracts
The standard describes a general model for valuing insurance contracts. This model specifies that the insurance contract should be measured on initial recognition at an amount equal to the sum of the cash flows expected to arise in performance of the contract. Cash flows are probability-weighted estimates of future receipts and disbursements, and should be discounted to the value on the balance sheet date. After this, an adjustment for non-financial risk has to be calculated. The discounted cash flows and risk adjustment should be split into two: one part that relates to the liability for remaining coverage (LRC) and the other to the liability for incurred claims (LIC). The residual value should be set aside as a contractual service margin reflecting entitlements for future periods.
The standard allows for a simplified method as an alternative to the general model if this is expected to give roughly the same value as the general model, or if the coverage period is one year or less. The simplified method, also called the premium allocation approach, simplifies the calculation of the liability related to the remaining coverage on the contract. This is equal to the unearned payed premiums, and no discounting is required. These contracts will not have a contractual service margin (CSM), but they do require an adjustment for non-financial risk for liabilities related to incurred claims, and onerous test.
Insurance contracts with so-called direct participating features are contracts which gives the policyholder a right to a return based on an underlying item. Such contracts should be measured at the variable fee approach (VFA). The contract states that the policyholder must participate in an identifiable pool of underlying items, that the insurer must expect to pay to the policyholder an amount equal to a substantive share of the fair value of the underlying items, and that the insurer must expect a substantial proportion of the amount paid to the policyholder to vary with the fair value of the underlying items. For such contracts, the contractual service margin has to be adjusted to reflect the variable fee. Changes in the obligation to pay the policyholder an amount corresponding to the change in the fair value of the underlying item do not reflect future entitlements and should not affect the contractual service margin (CSM). Changes in the insurer’s share of any change in the fair value of the underlying item will relate to future entitlements and adjust the CSM.
37.1.7.1 Contracts for public-sector occupational pensions
The contracts for public-sector occupational pensions are entitled to the residual value of the business measured at fair value. The residual value of a business qualifies as an underlying item. The requirements for an expectation that a substantial share of the fair value of the underlying item will be transferred are also met, as no one other than policyholders, current or future, is entitled to these sums due to that KLP is a mutual company. Over time, the requirement for variability will also be met. These contracts should therefore be measured in line with the variable fee approach.
The contracts for public-sector occupational pensions will consist of liabilities for remaining coverage and the residual value of the business. There are no liabilities associated with the occurrence of insured events as these are settled immediately.
The liability for remaining coverage without the residual value is calculated by discounting expected future cash flows for remaining service associated with the contract and applying a risk adjustment for non-financial risk. The discount curve used must be consistent with the market. The liability for remaining coverage thus consists of the following 3 elements:
Best estimates of future cash flows
An adjustment to reflect the time value (present value) of cash flows and financial risks associated with future cash flows
A risk adjustment for non-financial risk
The residual value is calculated as the net assets of the enterprise measured at fair value.
37.1.7.2 Non-life insurance contracts
Contracts issued within non-life insurance are not contracts with direct participation and will normally be measured according to the general model. However, the contracts have a maximum coverage period of 1 year, so the Group has chosen to use the simplified premium allocation approach. Purchased reinsurance contracts also have a coverage period of up to 1 year and are valued according to the same method. There are a few contracts with coverage periods exceeding 1 year, but these will not have any significant impact on the accounts and also satisfy the requirement for the simplified premium allocation approach. This approach has therefore been chosen for these contracts too.
Under the simplified method, the insurance liabilities consist of:
1) Liability for remaining coverage (LRC)
2) Liability for incurred claims (LIC)
Liability for remaining coverage (LRC)
LRC is calculated as the portion of premiums received but not recognised, adjusted for any amortisation of acquisition costs and any financing component (not required for coverage periods of one year or less). The Group recognises acquisition costs as expenses when they are incurred. The calculations are based on premiums paid, and the date when the premium is paid should govern the calculations rather than the due date of the contracts.
Liability for incurred claims (LIC)
LIC is calculated by discounting future cash flows for claims incurred and applying a risk adjustment for non-financial risk. The discount rate used must be consistent with the market. LIC thus consists of the following 3 elements:
Estimates of future cash flows
An adjustment to reflect the time value of cash flows and financial risks associated with future cash flows
A risk adjustment for non-financial risk
The sum of the first two items is called “best estimate liability” (BEL).
37.1.7.3 Cash flows within the contract boundary
For the life business, cash flows within the contract boundary are defined partly from KLP’s articles of association and partly from the wording of the OfTP contract. Cash flows for the fulfilment of the insurance contract can be divided into
Expected premiums
Expected costs
Expected future allocation to the premium fund
Intrinsic value of the premium fund
Expected future payout to policyholders
The expected premium contains elements referred to in other regulations as the interest guarantee premium, the administrative premium and equity contributions related to rights already accrued. It also includes the expected premium related to future entitlements as the contract has a long boundary. Future insurance premiums for new entitlements and regulatory premiums represent the future value of cash flows related to future disbursements, discounted at the invoicing date by the expected future base rate.
The intrinsic value of the premium fund is available to the policyholder. Its value corresponds to the present value of future withdrawals of previous allocations to the premium fund. Expected future allocations to the premium fund constitute a further cash flow to the policyholder via the premium fund.
The expected disbursement to policyholders includes payment of new entitlements in addition to payments from entitlements already accrued.
OfTP is pension schemes without any expected termination date. The Group has chosen a final modelling horizon of 80 years for cash flows related to future entitlements. This is further forward in time than cashflows, after correction for estimate risk, and has a consequence for the residual value today, see description below in Risk adjustment. The future entitlements for which a premium is agreed in 80 years’ time will result in payments for a further 110 years. The last payment included in present values on the current balance sheet is therefore just under 200 years ahead.
All fulfilment cash flows are estimated with respect to their full range of outcomes and without any bias in the probability weighting behind the expectation, in accordance with the criteria in the standard. As there is no risk-sharing between policyholders and holders of equity in a mutual entity, and as no cash flows are contingent claims against parties outside the group of policyholders, expectations can be calculated as simple probability-weighted averages without the use of stochastic techniques.
For non-life insurance activities, cash flows contain expected compensation payments and claims settlement costs. The business will use traditional statistical methods to model expected cash flows for claims payments. These models capture characteristics of the best estimate and include parameters such as exposure, claims rate, settlement factors, etc. The modelling is mainly based on the company’s own claims history but may also be based on data from the whole industry. Modelling of LIC cash flows will be based on claims years and estimated for all available years.
37.1.7.4 Discount curve
Expected cash flows are discounted using a yield curve defined by the bottom-up method in the standard. This is based on swap rates for sufficiently liquid points on the swap curve. The last liquid point is the 10-year interest rate. The source is the same basis that EIOPA uses for calculating the Sovency II discount curve. An estimated illiquidity premium is added to reflect the degree of liquidity in the insurance contracts. The illiquidity premium is estimated from a benchmark portfolio of Norwegian government and credit bonds as a residual after estimating. the credit premium. These interest rate points are combined with a long-term liquid interest rate to form a complete yield curve. The long-term level is derived from historical data for real interest rates and Norges Bank’s inflation target.
There is estimate uncertainty in the assessment of illiquidity in insurance products, illiquidity and credit premiums in the benchmark portfolio, the estimates of long-term interest rates and the rate of convergence with the long-term level.
37.1.7.5 Risk adjustment
Risk adjustment for non-financial risk measures the degree of variability from non-financial risk in expected future cash flows and uses a reservation price for this risk. This price reflects the attitude to risk, is differentiated by time horizon and makes the life business indifferent to whether such risk is reflected in the residual value. This turns the residual value from a risky expectation into a confidence-equivalent value with respect to non-financial risk. The reason for holding a residual value in the balance sheet is to even out the consequences of financial risk for policyholders.
Non-financial risk is insurance risk, cost risk, business risk - particularly in the part of the contract for which premiums have not yet been agreed - and estimate risk. The estimate risk is especially high for the part of the contract associated with new entitlements far into the future. The risk adjustment is calculated for each expected cash flow and aggregated into a present value. For cash flows related to the marginal effect of new entitlements many decades into the future, the risk adjustment is so large that the amount does not affect the current residual value.
A mutual entity does not make a profit and does not enter into contracts with a view to earning risk-adjusted revenues; the purpose is to deliver consistently low pension costs for policyholders. The overall risk adjustment is 8.47 percent of liabilities and corresponds to a confidence level of 91 percent. Because a mutual entity has nothing to gain from bearing non-financial risk, the confidence level is expected to be higher than one sees in non-mutual companies.
The non-life business has developed a method for calculating the risk adjustment, based on a statistical model of insurance risk. The company has chosen to use the confidence level method, and the statistical model provides results in a distribution/outcome space for the non-life insurance results. The risk adjustment chosen by the business represents the 75th percentile in the distribution.
37.1.7.6 Acquisition costs
Acquisition costs is costs incurred in selling, underwriting and initiating a group of insurance contracts. Public-sector occupational pensions are a defined market without much new business. The Group’s life insurance business treats expenses normally considered as acquisition costs as expenses primarily used to maintain and strengthen the brand and the KLP name. On this basis, we do not consider that we have any significant direct acquisition costs in the life insurance business.
For insurance contracts where the coverage period is less than one year, the standard provides for an option to recognise acquisition costs when they occur.
37.1.8 Modification and derecognition of contracts
If the terms of an insurance contract are changed, the original contract is derecognised when the amended contract is recognised in line with the standard. This is done in cases where one of the following conditions is met:
If the amended terms had been included at the time of signing the contract, the Group would have concluded that the amended contract:
Was outside the scope of IFRS 17;
Resulted in a different insurance contract because components were separated;
Resulted in a significantly different contract boundary;
Would be included in another group of insurance contracts;
If the original contact conformed to the definition of an insurance contract with elements of direct participation features, but the amended contract does not meet the definition
If the original contract was measured by the premium allocation approach, but the changes mean that it no longer satisfies the conditions this method to be used
For modifications where the initial contract is not derecognized, the liabilities for remaining coverage is updated.
The Group derecognises an insurance contract when it expires, i.e. when the obligation stated in the insurance contract runs out, is fulfilled or terminated, or when it is amended in line with one of the change criteria listed above.
37.1.9 Presentation
Balance sheet
On the balance sheet, the Group will present the carrying value of:
Insurance contracts issued that are assets;
Insurance contracts issued that are liabilities
Reinsurance contracts held that are assets;
Reinsurance contracts held that are liabilities.
Income statement
In the income statement, the Group will show the following items related to the insurance contracts measured under IFRS 17:
Insurance service result (profit from the services provided in the period in relation to the insurance contracts)
Insurance finance costs (empirical adjustment related to future service, effect of financial risk and changes in financial risk, and any change in the value of the net assets in the business measured at fair value and passed on to policyholders with direct participating insurance contracts)
According to the standard, reinsurance income/expenses may be presented either gross or net. The Group has chosen to present these net. There is also a requirement for the income statement to itemise financial income/expenses from insurance and reinsurance contracts.
37.1.10 Contracts that existed at the transition date
37.1.10.1 Contracts that entitle the policyholder to the residual value of the mutual company KLP
IFRS 17 should normally be implemented retrospectively, i.e. as if it had always been applicable. This is not practicable for the Group’sinsurance contracts issued on the product OfTP, and the standard allows the use of a modified or fair value method at the date of transition. The Group has used fair value approach ontransition.
At the time of transition, a best estimate was made of the cash flows resulting from the contracts. The contracts has a undefined end point.(see 37.1.6), but no new entitlement has been calculated for periods beyond 80 years into the future. After 80 years, therefore, only the outflow of accrued rights is calculated.
The cash flows have been discounted using an artificial yield curve as there are no sufficiently long yield curves available. This is described in more detail in section 37.1.3.7.2.
A risk adjustment for non-financial risk has also been calculated as described in section 37.1.7.3.
These insurance contracts entitle current and future policyholders to the residual value. The residual value will thus be part of the insurance liability under IFRS 17. The insurance liability then consists of discounted best estimates of fulfilment cash flows, a risk premium for non-financial risk, and the residual value of the enterprise. The residual value for the Group is calculated as net assets at fair value at transition.
The difference between the fair value and book value of net assets constitutes a reported equity.
Refer also to the discussion of mutual status in section 37.1.1. Mutual status and 37.1.7 Measurement method.
37.1.10.2 Other contracts
37.1.10.2.1 Insurance contracts related to non-life insurance activities
These contracts have been recognised retrospectively, and the value of the opening balance has been determined as if the new valuation rules always existed.
The insurance contracts that existed at the date of the transition were tested for profitability, and no unprofitable contracts were identified. The contracts were grouped as described in section 37.1.4. Grouping of the contracts and onerous contracts, is valued based on the principles described in section 37.1.7 Measurement.
37.1.10.2.2 Reinsurance contracts held
The Group has purchased reinsurance contracts related to the non-life insurance business. The reinsurance contracts held at the date of transition are valued at the best estimate of fulfilment cash flows associated with the contracts determined in the same way as the best estimate for the underlying non-life insurance contracts. The contracts are measured according to the principles described in section 37.1.7 Measurement.
37.1.11 Transitional effects
The IFRS 17 standard will be implemented on 01.01.2023, but with a requirement for comparative figures for 2022. The following transitional effects have therefore been calculated from 01.01.2022 as a result of implementing the standard for the Group. This is preliminary calculations and can be subject to changes in the final determination:
NOK MILLION
31.12.2021
Net migration and other changes 01.01.2022
Effect of new classification IFRS 17
Effect due to new measurement method IFRS 17
Balance 01.01.2022 IFRS 17
Loans and receivables, other, incl. claims on insurance contracts
5 377
-304
-318
0
4 755
Reinsurer’s share of provisions
0
304
0
37
341
Other assets
895 893
-
-
-
895 893
ASSETS
901 270
0
-318
37
900 989
Technical provisions - life insurance
653 551
-4 930
-648 621
-
0
Premiums, claims and contingency fund provisions - non-life insurance
3 023
0
-3 023
-
0
Contracts that entitle the policyholder to the residual value of the business
-
-
648 621
49 063
697 684
Other insurance contracts
-
-
2 705
-117
2 588
Deferred tax
1 387
0
-
10
1 397
Other current liabilities
6 808
4 930
-
0
11 738
Other liabilities
195 769
-
-
0
195 769
Equity
40 732
-
-
-48 919
-8 187
DEBT AND EQUITY
901 270
0
-318
37
900 989
The calculated transitional value of the insurance contracts is based on extensive use of discretion and estimates. Small changes in key parameters can have a big impact on the calculations.
As previously described, the equity consists of the difference between the book value and the fair value of the Group’s net assets. This difference is added to the insurance liability for contracts with a right to the residual value. When the fair value for the net assets is surplus values, reported equity will thus be negative because the debt to the policy holders has been increased by non- accounted surplus values. The effect will be opposite if the fair value of the net assets contains unaccounted impairment. Then the liability to the policyholders is reduced and the reported equity will be positive.
At the time of transition, the equity consists of the following:
NOK MILLION
Book value
Fair value
Measurement difference
Deferred tax assets
52
52
0
Cash and bank deposits
3 388
3 388
0
Other intangible assets
797
1 217
-420
Tangible fixed assets
2 714
2 679
35
Investments in associated companies and joint venture
4 934
6 208
-1 274
Investment property
89 535
89 535
0
Assets realted to reinsurance contracts
341
341
0
Debt instruments held to maturity
25 985
27 766
-1 781
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables
164 484
169 449
-4 965
Lending local government, enterprises & retail customers at fair value through profit / loss
79
79
0
Lending local government, enterprises and retail customers
118 024
118 170
-146
Debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss
188 172
188 172
0
Equity capital instruments at fair value through profit/loss
294 476
294 476
0
Financial derivatives
3 253
3 253
0
Loans and receivables
4 755
4 755
0
Contracts that entitle the policyholder to the residual value of the business
-697 684
-697 684
0
Other insurance contracts
-2 588
-2 588
0
Hybrid Tier 1 securities
-1 604
-1 585
-19
Subordinated loan capital
-3 000
-3 310
310
Covered bonds issued
-31 015
-31 088
73
Debt to credit institutions
-4 199
-4 199
0
Debt to and deposit from customers
-12 901
-12 901
0
Pension obligations
-870
-870
0
Financial derivatives
-4 740
-4 740
0
Deferred tax
-1 397
-1 397
0
Other current liabilities
-11 738
-11 738
0
Minority share of the liabilities
-137 440
-137 440
0
Equity
-8 187
0
-8 187
The Group will implement IFRS 9 from 1 January 2023. This will affect the measurement difference as a significant proportion of the Group’s interest-bearing securities, which were previously measured at amortised cost, will be measured at fair value with fair value changes in over profit/loss in line with the fair value option under IFRS 9. The Equity is therefore expected to be redused after implementing IFRS 9. There is no reliable estimate of the overall effect on 01.01.2023 of the transition to IFRS 9 + 17 as no IFRS 17 balance sheet has been calculated at this date yet. Refer also to the equity effects of the transition to IFRS 9 in section 37.2.5.
37.2 Summary of the main accounting principles under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments originally entered into force on 1 January 2018, replacing IAS 39 for classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and liabilities. The new standard also includes amended rules for hedge accounting and a new impairment model for financial assets. Special transitional rules for insurance companies have allowed them to postpone implementation until 01.01.2023. KLP has chosen to make use of this option in the consolidated accounts and will therefore apply the standard for accounting periods beginning after 01.01.2023. As permitted in the transitional provisions for IFRS 9, the Group will not restate comparative figures for previous periods when it implements the standard.
37.2.1 Recognition and derecognition
Financial instruments are recognised in the balance sheet from the date when the Group becomes a party to the contractual terms for the instrument. Regular purchases and sales of investments are recognised on the date of the contract. Financial assets are removed from the balance sheet when the rights to receive cash flows from the investment expire or when these rights have been transferred and the Group has transferred most of the risk and all of the potential gain from ownership. Financial liabilities are derecognised when the rights to the contractual conditions have been fulfilled or cancelled or have expired.
37.2.2 Classification and subsequent measurement
37.2.2.1 Financial assets
Under IFRS 9 financial assets are classified into the following categories:
Amortized cost
Fair value with changes in value through profit/loss
Fair value with changes in value through other comprehensive income
The measurement category is determined at the time of initial recognition.
Derivatives and equity instruments
Under IFRS 9 derivatives have to be recognized at fair value with changes in value through profit/loss. However, derivatives classified as hedging instruments must comply with the hedge accounting rules referred to in section 37.2.3. As a general rule, equity instruments should be measured at fair value with changes in value through profit/loss, unless they are not held for trading purposes and are specifically recognized at fair value with changes in value through other comprehensive income. In the Group, all equity instruments are measured at fair value with changes in value through profit/loss.
Debt instruments
The classification and measurement of debt instruments under IFRS 9 apart from equity instruments and derivatives, are based on a combination of the entity’s business model for managing the assets and the contractual cash flow characteristics.
A debt instrument is measured at amortized cost if both of the following criteria are met and the financial asset has not been reported at fair value through profit/loss (the “fair value option”):
The financial asset is held in a business model whose purpose is to keep financial assets in order to receive the contractual cash flows (the “business model criterion”), and
The contractual terms of the financial asset lead at certain times to cash flows that only include repayments and interest on the outstanding principal amount (the “cash flow criterion”).
The business model criterion
The Group assesses the target with a business model in which an asset is held at the portfolio level, because this best reflects the way in which the Group is managed, and this information is given to management. In this context, a portfolio is defined as a group of financial instruments that are managed together. The information that is assessed includes:
Explicit guidelines and goals for the portfolio and operation of these guidelines in practice. In particular, whether the management’s strategy and goal is to keep the asset in order to collect the contractual cash flows, maintain a specific interest profile, and match duration between financial assets and the corresponding financial liabilities used to finance these assets or realise cash flows through the sale of the assets
How the return on the portfolio is assessed and reported to management
The risks that affect the business model (and the financial assets held within this business model) and how these risks are managed
How the managers are compensated, e.g. whether the compensation is based on the fair value of the managed assets or the total contractual cash flows
Frequency, volume and date of sales in previous periods, the reasons for such sales and expectations of future sales activity. Information about the sales activities is not however assessed in isolation, but as part of an overall assessment of how the Group’s stated goals for managing the financial assets are achieved and how the cash flows are realized.
Assessment of the business model is based on reasonable future scenarios without regard to ‘worst case’ or ‘stress case’ scenarios. If cash flows after initial recognition are realized in a way that is different from the Group’s original expectations, the classification of the remaining financial assets in the relevant business model does not change, but the information is incorporated into the assessment of the newly issued or acquired financial assets in the future.
The cash flow criterion
In this evaluation the principal amount is defined as the fair value of the financial asset on initial recognition. ‘Interest’ is defined as payment for the time value of money and for credit risk related to outstanding principal in a specific period of time and for other basic lending risks and costs (e.g. liquidity risk and administrative expenses), along with a profit margin.
In assessing whether the contractual cash flows are only repayments and interest on the outstanding principal amount, the Group considers the contractual terms of the instrument. This includes assessing whether the financial asset contains a contractual clause that could change the date or the amount of the contractual cash flows so that it will not meet this condition. Among other things, the Group considers the following:
Contingent events that would change the amount and the date of the cash flows
Advance payments and extended terms
Terms that limit the Group’s claim to cash flows from specific assets (e.g. “nonrecourse asset arrangements”)
Terms that change the assessment of the time value of money - e.g. periodic resetting of interest rates.
Choice of measurement method
Each portfolio is analyzed based on the business model used, the types of cash flow that exist and the purpose of the investments.
If the purpose of the business model is to receive contractual cash flows consisting only of interest and principal, the financial asset will be measured at amortized cost. This is provided that the SPPI test (“solely payments of principal and interest”) is passed, which means that the cash flows consist only of interest and principal.
According to IFRS 9 if the business model is to hold the financial assets to recover contractual cash flows and to sell, the asset has to be measured at fair value with changes in value through other comprehensive income, with interest income, currency conversion effects and any impairments presented in profit from ordinary activities. Changes in value recognized through other comprehensive income have to be reclassified as profit/loss when the assets are sold or otherwise disposed of.
Financial assets included in other types of business model are measured at fair value through profit/loss on ordinary activities.
The Group may designate a debt instrument that meets the criteria to be measured at amortized cost to be reported at fair value through profit/loss if this eliminates or significantly reduces inconsistencies in measurement.
IFRS 9 allows the fair value option to be used if this significantly eliminates any accounting mismatch that would otherwise have occurred. This means that, on initial recognition, financial assets and liabilities can be measured at fair value with changes in value through profit/loss. This earmarking is irrevocable after initial recognition. In its accounts, the Group has chosen to use the fair value option for investments that are measured at amortized cost in the life insurance business. The rationale for this is that the implementation of IFRS 17 entails recognizing liabilities at fair value. Using the fair value option will then avoid an accounting mismatch.
Impairment model
The implementation of the standard brings in a new impairment model for financial assets measured at amortized cost. Under the new standard, loss provisions have to be recognized according to the expected credit loss (ECL). This contrasts with the old rules for financial instruments, IAS 39, where a loss provision was only raised once the loss event had occurred. The measurement of provisions for expected losses depends on whether the credit risk has increased substantially since initial recognition. The estimated losses are calculated based on a 12-month and a lifetime probability of default (PD), loss given default (LGD) and exposure at default (EAD). The loss provisions are made quarterly and presented in three steps:
Step 1: Expected loss over the next 12 months for all assets not transferred to step 2 or 3.
Step 2: Expected losses over the whole lifetime of assets that have had a significant increase in credit risk since initial recognition, but no objective impairment.
Step 3: Expected loss for the remaining lifetime of assets that have objective evidence of impairment.
Loss = EAD x PD x LGD
Below is a description of how loss calculations have been made for the different financial instruments.
Impairment model for interest-bearing securities at amortized cost
This category of securities includes bonds and certificates.
Step 1: A financial instrument that is not credit-impaired at the time of initial recognition is classified in step 1. In step 1, the expected credit loss is calculated over the next 12 months, or to maturity if it is within a year.
Step 2: In the event of a significant increase in credit risk since the date of acquisition, the instrument is moved to step 2. The expected credit loss is then calculated for the remaining lifetime of the instrument. A significant increase in credit risk is defined as a fall of at least 3 risk classes (e.g. AAA (1) to A- (4)). Risk classes are divided as shown in the table below.
Rating
Risk class
Rating
Risk class
Rating
Risk class
AAA
1
BBB+
5
B+
11
AA+
1
BBB
6
B
12
AA
2
NR
6
B-
13
AA-
2
BBB-
7
CCC+/-
14
A+
3
BB+
8
D
15
A
3
BB
9
A-
4
BB-
10
Step 3: Expected loss for the remaining lifetime of assets that have objective evidence of impairment. In the event of default, we will depart from automatic calculation of expected credit losses in the portfolio system and instead make an individual assessment of the expected credit loss.
For steps 1 and 2, the following model is used for calculating ECL:
Expected credit loss = exposure at default (EAD) x probability of default (PD) x loss given default (LGD).
Exposure at default (EAD): EAD is an estimate of the total loss incurred in the event of a possible default.
For financial assets in steps 1 and 2, effective interest is calculated based on the gross book value, while for step 3, amortised cost is used. This is shown in the table below.
Credit risk
ECL calculation
Effective interest calculation
Step 1
Immaterial increase
12 months
Gross book value
Step 2
Material increase
Remaining lifetime
Gross book value
Step 3
Defaults
Remaining lifetime
Amortised cost
Probability of default (PD): PD is calculated based on annual, historically observed default rates for each individual rating (S&P). This is based on 25 years of rolling data. PD is updated annually, or when significant changes are observed.
Loss given default (LGD): LGD is based on historically observed repayment rates on loans in default for defined sectors (2000-2021). These are annual reports published by Global Credit Data. The report is used for the relevant sectors and mapped against the investments. The figures are updated annually, and in the event of significant changes. The table shows LGD per sector, and a breakdown of the Group’s interest-bearing securities measured at amortised cost as of 01.01.2023.
Sector
LGD
Portion invested
Banks and financial institutions
25 %
41 %
Companies
21 %
31 %
Central banks and local authorities
6 %
13 %
Covered bonds
2 %
15 %
The table below shows the loss provisions as of 01.01.2023, broken down into the different steps.
NOK THOUSANDS
Held to maturity
Lending and receivables
Step 1
1
260
Step 2
-
42
Step 3
-
-
Impairment model for residential mortgage loans
Loss calculations for residential mortgages are administered by the Group’s banking business, which has developed PD and LGD models for the mortgage portfolio. One PD model has been developed for new mortgage customers and another for existing mortgage customers. The first model uses data that is available at the time of application and is valid for 3 months after the mortgage is granted. The second model begins after 3 months, and also uses data that depends on the customer’s behaviour profile. Explanatory variables in the base data are age, income, number of reminders sent in the last 12 months, number of overdrawn days in the last 12 months, loan-to-value ratio, co-borrower, default in the last 12 months and product type. The PD model is based on logistic regression, and the factors are reviewed annually and updated as needed. The method gives results that can easily be interpreted and analysed, as well as great explanatory value provided that certain conditions are met. The PD model also makes it possible to combine pure quantitative analyses with expert assessments. A five-year rolling window is used so that the emphasis is on recent and relevant observations. Exposure at default (EAD) is calculated as a function of the probability of the contract not being repaid by the specified date. An important part of the loss estimation is to look at the proportion of customers in default whose accounts recover. Loss given default (LGD) depends on several factors. The recovery rate is a significant element in the calculation, i.e. the proportion of customers in default who recover. The observed recovery rate has to be calculated and revalidated each year.
As well as calculating ECL, a probability weighting is applied to various defined scenarios whereby ECL is assessed against optimistic, expected and pessimistic developments. The sum of the weighted scenarios constitutes the expected credit loss. KLP Banken’s risk forum assesses these different scenarios and their weighting on a quarterly basis, based on changes in macro or other factors that may affect the write-downs.
The most important driver for a significant change in credit risk for home mortgage loans is a change in the probability of default (PD) from initial recognition up to the reporting date. A relative change in PD of more than 2.5 over 12 months is considered to be a significant change in credit risk. The change in PD must also be at least 0.6 percentage points over 12 months for the change to be considered significant. Commitments that have been in default for more than 30 days will automatically be placed in step 2, and commitments in default for more than 90 days will be placed in step 3. The loans go back to step 2 and step 1 when the criteria for significant change in credit risk and default are no longer fulfilled. A loan in step 3 will stay in quarantine for three months before it can be moved back to step 2 or 1.
The table below shows how the loss provisions for mortgages measured at amortised cost are divided between the different steps as of 01.01.2023.
NOK THOUSANDS
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Mortgages
144
207
422
Simplified loss ratio method
A simplified loss ratio method is used for some types of lending where no separate PD and LGD models have been developed. In the consolidated accounts, this applies to senior loans and credit cards in the retail market, and to public-sector lending.
Senior loans: Senior loans are loans that in practice cannot be defaulted. The risk is only related to a big drop in house prices, and the situation where the outstanding amount on the customer’s death or move into a nursing home exceeds the value of the home at the date of sale. Based on the very low probability of losses on these loans, a simplified loss ratio has been chosen whereby 0.001% of the balance on senior loans is set aside for expected losses. No senior loans will end up in step 2 or step 3.
Credit cards: For credit cards, the Group has calculated a loss ratio based on the average estimated PD for the credit card portfolio obtained from the external credit rating agency and the average LGD for credit cards for the period 2006-2018 calculated by the debt collection agency.
Public lending: For public lending, the probability of a loss on these loans is considered to be low. It has therefore been decided to use a simplified loss ratio, with the exception for low credit risk, whereby 0.001% of the balance on public loans has been set aside for expected losses.
The table below shows the loss provisions as of 01.01.2023 for loans using a simplified loss ratio method.
NOK THOUSANDS
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Senior loans
21
-
-
Public lending
184
-
-
Credit card
2 040
1 883
516
Total
2 245
1 883
516
37.2.2.2 Financial liabilities
Accounting for financial liabilities is largely unchanged under IFRS 9 except that for liabilities specifically recognized at fair value, changes in fair value due to own credit risk are recognized through other income and expenses without reclassification. This applies unless applying the changes in the credit risk on the liability would cause or worsen the accounting mismatch in the result.
The Group will use the fair value option for the hybrid tier 1 securities and subordinated loans. To prevent an accounting mismatch, these loans will be earmarked at fair value through profit/loss. Changes in credit risk associated with these liabilities will also be measured at fair value through profit/loss, as a mismatch could otherwise occur. Financial liabilities related to non-life insurance and banking activities will still be measured at amortized cost in the consolidated accounts.
37.2.3 Hedge accounting
Hedge accounting is an accounting method that allows companies to align their accounting for financial instruments and hedging activities more closely with the underlying transactions.
The main differences in the use of hedge accounting from the previous standard (IAS 39) to the new standard (IFRS 9) are:
Simplified rules to qualify for hedge accounting: IFRS 9 provides a more flexible approach to hedging efficiency. The assessment of hedging efficiency has to be forward-looking and must be updated on each balance sheet date, and in the event of significant changes. The need to demonstrate that the hedge is expected to be very efficient throughout the lifetime of the hedging contract has been eliminated under IFRS 9; this was required under IAS 39.
More flexibility in measuring efficiency: Under IAS 39, the efficiency of a hedge had to be measured by the “critical terms match” method, which required the cash flows or fair values of the hedging instrument and the hedged item to match perfectly. IFRS 9 allows for a more flexible measurement of efficiency, using a “proportional measurement” method. Another change is that inefficiencies are measured on discounted cash flows.
More flexibility in accounting for hedging inefficiency: According to IAS 39, any inefficiency in a hedge had to be posted to profit/loss immediately. Inefficiencies are recognized through profit or loss. There is an initial possibility of including inefficiencies in other comprehensive income, but inefficiencies will hit profit on ordinary activities later even if “cost of hedging” is chosen.
Better match of fair value hedges: IFRS 9 simplifies accounting for fair value hedges by allowing companies to recognize the changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item at the same place in the income statement.
There are a number of requirements for the use of hedge accounting under IFRS 9. These include identifying the security and the specific risk to be eliminated by hedge accounting. The Group has to assess efficiency on an ongoing basis and have the necessary documentation in place to describe the purpose and implementation of the hedge accounting. For more information, see Note 18, Note 2 and the IFRS 9 standard.
As of 01.01.2023, the Group has three cases of hedge accounting. One relates to hedging of the hybrid tier 1 securities loan (the hedged item) using a combined interest rate and currency swap (the hedging instrument), while the other two relate to hedging of borrowing and lending with associated interest rate swaps. The practical effect of the transition to IFRS 9 will be minimal and we expect to retain the current practice for this hedging situation. Refer also to Note 18 for more information on the specific hedging position in the Group and Note 2 for more detailed information on hedge accounting in general.
37.2.4 Presentation, classification and measurement
Based on the above, the table below shows how the different financial assets and liabilities will be recognized under IFRS 9.
Financial assets
Measurement method IAS 39
Measurement method IFRS 9
Reason for reclassification
Debt instruments helt to maturity¹
Amortised cost
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value option
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables²
Amortised cost
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value option
Debt instruments helt to maturity¹
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Business model
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables²
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Business model
Loans to local government, enterprises & retail customers
Amortised cost
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value option
Loans to local government, enterprises & retail customers
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Business model
Debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Business model
Equity capital instruments
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Business model
Receivables
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Business model
Financial derivatives
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Business model
Financial liabilities
Measurement method IAS 39
Measurement method IFRS 9
Reason for reclassification
Hybrid tier 1 securities loan
Amortised cost
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value option
Subordinated loan capital
Amortised cost
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value option
Debt to credit institutions (amortised cost)
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Business model
Covered bond issued
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Business model
Liabilities and deposits from customers
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Business model
Debt to credit institutions (fair value)
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Business model
Financial derivatives
Fair value through profit/loss
Fair value through profit/loss
Business model
¹ related to life insurance business
² related to non-life insurance business
37.2.5 Implementation effect
The table below shows the implementation effect of IFRS 9 in the consolidated accounts for KLP. The difference is mainly due to reclassification at fair value (MNOK -13,608), along with loss provisions (MNOK -6) calculated according to the new impairment model. The implementation effect of NOK -13.6 billion, adjusted for tax effects, will be taken to the Group’s equity on 01.01.2023. These are preliminary calculations that may be subject to changes.
NOK MILLIONS
Book value IAS39
Effect of change in measurement method
Effect of change in ECL
Book value IFRS 9
Implementation effect
Financial assets
Debt instruments helt to maturity
24 225
-650
-
23 575
-650
Debt instruments classified as loans and receivables
174 530
-10 069
-
164 461
-10 069
Loans to local government, enterprises & retail customers
121 360
-2 807
-5
118 548
-2 812
Debt instruments at fair value through profit or loss