Annual Report 2024 KLP Group and KLPKLP Group and KLP
Annual report and sustainability report
1. This is KLP
KLP was founded 75 years ago as a partnership of small municipalities across the country wanting to offer occupational pensions to their employees. Today, we are Norway’s largest provider of public-sector occupational pensions, and KLP provides security in old age for almost one million Norwegians. Customers with public-sector occupational pensions are municipalities, county authorities, health trusts and companies affiliated to the public sector. Customers with public-sector occupational pensions own KLP. KLP’s vision is to be the best partner for the days ahead.
You can read more about KLP’s history on our website.
1.1. KLP’s core businessSBM-1
KLP’s principal product and core business is public-sector occupational pension provision. We aim to be a partner to Norwegian municipalities, county authorities, health trusts and companies with public-sector occupational pensions, for a sustainable transition. We aim to deliver secure pension savings and value-added services in a way that helps to achieve the ambition of the Paris Agreement and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. Overall, there are three aspects to our core business.
We ensure that each member receives the correct pension on time.
We enable individuals to make informed pension choices.
We generate returns through sound and effective management of the pension assets.
KLP has been doing this for its owners for 75 years, and we are looking ahead to the next 75 years.
As our customers with public-sector occupational pensions are also our owners, all wealth creation goes back to them. There are therefore overlapping interests between customers and owners, and the best interests of the customers are the guiding principles for the business. This sets us apart from other providers. Our members are employees of our customers with public-sector occupational pension schemes, and people who receive a pension from us.
1.2. SubsidiariesSBM-1
KLP has five subsidiaries, which are organised as wholly-owned limited companies.
KLP Eiendom acquires, develops and manages KLP's property investments, as part of KLP's management of customers' pension assets. By achieving competitive returns on the property investments in a cost-effective way, the company contributes to lower pension costs for KLP’s customers with public-sector occupational pensions.
KLP Kapitalforvaltning specialises in securities management. By achieving competitive returns on the pension assets invested in securities in a cost-effective manner, the asset management company contributes to lower pension costs for KLP’s customers with public-sector occupational pensions. The company also provides external customers with the same type of securities management that KLP itself uses to manage pension assets in public-sector occupational pension schemes. Economies of scale in the mutual fund and savings market mean that increasing capital under management helps to keep KLP’s operating costs low. The company also contributes to lower costs for KLP’s customers with public-sector occupational pensions by transferring returns to KLP’s equity.
KLP Banken is KLP’s channel for loan financing to KLP’s owners and their employees. The loans are financed from the management of the pension funds for KLP, the bank's own lending on favourable terms, and deposit facilities that the bank offers to employers and their employees with a pension scheme in KLP. These forms of financing, especially loans financed from KLP's pension assets, enable KLP Banken to be a stable provider of financing to the public sector even when other market participants have problems and have to withdraw, as we saw during the financial crisis.
By achieving competitive returns on the pension assets which are invested in lending in a cost-effective manner, the bank contributes to lower pension costs for KLP’s owners. The bank also offers other products and services on competitive terms which create value for KLP’s customers with public-sector occupational pensions and for their employees. In this way, the company also contributes to lower costs for KLP’s owners by transferring returns to KLP’s equity.
KLP Skadeforsikring is a major player in the area of insurance to municipalities and to companies affiliated to the public sector, as well as members of the Group's pension schemes. The company was established to provide retail insurance to our customers with public-sector occupational pensions, in line with their obligations under the collective agreement. Over time, the company has become a total provider of insurance solutions in this market, where it is useful to KLP’s owners. The company also contributes to lower costs for KLP’s owners by transferring returns to KLP’s equity.
The KLP Group has four main activities: pensions, investments, banking and non-life insurance. Each activity has its own value chain with links both upstream and downstream. The figure below illustrates the various value chains for the KLP Group as a whole, with the core activities in the middle of the value chain. Some links in the upstream and downstream value chains may be the same across core activities, and are therefore aggregated, such as IT providers. The same applies to the downstream value chain and customer link.
Our customers and owners – municipalities, county authorities, health trusts and undertakings with public-sector occupational pensions – are our most important stakeholders. One strength of the mutual ownership model is that the customers and owners are the same. So the needs of our owners and customers are always at the heart of our strategy and priorities.
1.4. Management
Board of directors GOV-1
The board of directors of KLP comprises eight members, including two employee representatives. There are also two deputies, one of them permanent. Two observers also attend. The management of KLP is not represented on the board, and the percentage of independent board members is therefore 100. The current board consists of four women and four men, i.e. 50 per cent of each gender.
The company's board of directors is chosen by the delegates to the corporate assembly elected by the general meeting.
The public-sector employees’ organisations are represented in the governing bodies of the company.
The board of directors of KLP comprises:
Tine Sundtoft, chair of the board, chief executive of Agder county authority
Terje Rootwelt, deputy chair, chief executive of Helse Sør-Øst regional health trust
Eli Arnstad, mayor of Stjørdal municipality
Kjerstin Fyllingen, chief executive of Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus
Torkild Varran, self-employed
Odd Haldgeir Larsen, deputy leader of the Fagforbundet trade union
Erling Bendiksen, employee-elected
Vibeke Heldal, employee-elected
Rune Simensen, 1st deputy member, is director of technology and digitalization at Helse Sør-Øst regional health trust.
Tone Ikdahl, 2nd deputy member, chief executive of Lovisenberg Diakonale Sykehus.
Erik Orskaug, observer, UNIO
Trond Ellefsen, observer, Delta/YS
The Board in KLP, from left:Trond Ellefsen (observer), Odd Haldgeir Larsen, Erik Orskaug (observer), Vibeke Heldal (employee-elected), Terje Rootwelt (deputy chair), Tine Sundtoft (chair of the board), Kjerstin Fyllingen, Erling Bendiksen (employee-elected), Eli Arnstad, Torkild Varran, Rune Simensen (1st deputy member).
Torkild Varran joined the board from 15 November 2024, being elected after Egil Matsen stepped down.
The board has established three sub-committees; the risk committee, the audit committee and the remuneration committee.
For further details, see section 2.3 Corporate governance and note 2 "Composition and competence of the board of directors and senior management”.
Group senior managementGOV-1
The composition of Group senior management is decided by the CEO, in consultation with the chair of the board of directors. Group senior management comrpises eight members in addition to the CEO. These are the managers of the Group’s core business and the managers of the Group’s support functions. The core activities are Life and Pension, Pension Operations and Finance. The Group’s support functions are Business Development, Corporate Governance, Communication and Markets, Technology, and People and Organisation. These last four are corporate functions that support all of the companies in the Group.
Group chief financial officer (CFO) is chair of the board in KLP Kapitalforvaltning and KLP Eiendom, while the CEO is chair of the board in KLP Banken, KLP Skadeforsikring and KLP Forsikringsservice.
Group senior management at KLP comprises:
Sverre Thornes, CEO
Aage E. Schaanning, Group chief financial officer/executive vice-president, Finance
Cathrine Hellandsvik, executive vice-president, Life and Pension
Ida Louise Skaurum Mo, executive vice-president, Corporate Governance
Gro Myking, executive vice-president, Communication and Markets
Kirsten Grutle, executive vice-president, People and Organisation
Jarl Nygaard, executive vice-president, Business Development
From the left: Rune Hørnes, Gro Myking, Jarl Nygaard, Ida Louise Skaurum, Sverre Thornes, Kirsten Grutle, Hege Hodnesdal, Aage E. Schaanning, Cathrine Hellandsvik.
The composition of Group senior management, and the organisation of the KLP Group, are shown in the figure below. Green represents the parent company of the Group, while grey shows the subsidiaries.
Managing directors of the subsidiaries:
KLP Skadeforsikring AS: managing director Tore Tenold
KLP Eiendom AS: managing director Ellen Langeggen (from August 2024), previously Gunnar Gjørtz
KLP Kapitalforvaltning AS: managing director Håvard Gulbrandsen
KLP Banken AS: managing director Marianne Sevaldsen
KLP Kommunekreditt AS: managing director Carl Steinar Lous
KLP Boligkreditt AS: managing director Christopher Steen
KLP Forsikringsservice AS: actuary/general manager Erik Falk
For further details, see note 2 “Composition and competence of the board of directors and senior management”. See section 2.3 “Corporate governance” for more information on the role of the board and Group senior management.
Notes to the sustainability report are appended to section 3, Sustainability report, and are signed jointly by the board.
2. Strategy and corporate governance
2.1. StrategySBM-3, E1 SBM-3
KLP was established to meet its owners’ needs for public-sector occupational pensions, and this is our core product. KLP sets out to provide its owners and their employees with secure pension savings that contribute to sustainable development. The Group’s main goal is to be the best provider of public-sector occupational pensions. Our strategy for being the best in public-sector occupational pensions is to make it worthwhile for public-sector customers to have their pension scheme with us. Everything we do in the Group should contribute to this. The key sustainability topics also support this. We are the pension company for the Norwegian local government and healthcare sector – a profitable community.
KLP is the leading provider of public-sector occupational pensions and achieves economies of scale to benefit customers in the form of good management and high levels of service at competitive prices. To achieve this, we depend on our employees; we need committed people.
The priority areas are interconnected. The people in KLP are our most important resource if we are to achieve our objectives. Good management is essential if we are to provide customers with the lowest possible pension costs over time. It is also important to customers for us to have the lowest prices, in both the short and long term. With good management and the lowest prices, our customers will get the lowest pension costs. That means they will have more resources to devote to their own responsibilities, such as running schools, hospitals, nursing homes and kindergartens. We also aim to provide market-leading service. That means providing services that deliver high customer value, while maintaining efficient operations and decreasing operating costs.
To deliver on the goals of lowest price and best service, technology development is crucial to KLP. In recent years, we have invested heavily in new solutions that enable self-service and automation for those applying for and drawing pensions. We have also established an excellent pension calculator, which allows more and more members to calculate their expected pensions. With new digital solutions and communication, these calculations now take just seconds.
We aim to be among the leaders in sustainability in our industry. Our double materiality analysis, which you can read more about in section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis”, is the basis for setting sustainability targets in the corporate strategy. Providing public-sector occupational pensions is what we are here for, and our social responsibility is to do so in a sustainable way. The sustainability goals in the corporate strategy are included in the priority areas of good management, best service and committed people:
We aim to be a partner to the Norwegian local government and healthcare sector for a sustainable transition.
We aim to deliver secure pension savings and value-added services while helping to achieve the ambition in the Paris Agreement and the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.
We aim to be a driver for a sustainable transition through our own operations.
In section 3, Sustainability, we say more about how we work to achieve these sustainability goals.
2.2. Secure and competitive pension savingsSBM-3
KLP’s investment strategy is designed to deliver competitive returns over time and contribute to sustainable development. To support this objective, KLP has established the following general principles for the asset management strategy:
A long-term investment perspective
Diversified portfolios
Focus on efficient markets and cost-effective management
Risk management adapted to the company’s regulatory framework and financial obligations
Responsible and sustainable investments
The principle of diversified portfolios means that KLP is invested in over 9,600 companies around the world, across most sectors and in both developed and emerging markets in order to spread the risk. KLP’s asset management strategy is to base its investments less on a short-term tactical market approach, and more on being able to harvest risk premiums in the market in the long term. KLP’s focus on cost-effective management means that our asset management in the liquid markets is mainly index-tracking.
The risk in fund management is adjusted to minimise the likelihood of the company failing to satisfy statutory solvency requirements. It is also important for us to maintain risk capacity over time to be able to harvest risk premiums in the various markets. Good financial strength through high buffer capital is therefore key to achieving the company’s goal of the lowest possible pension costs to our owners over time. This means that the company’s solvency is viewed in a longer-term perspective when determining the level of risk in its management of the pension assets. Through the year, risk is managed dynamically through a policy rule for handling large market movements.
If the value of the investments is to increase over time, the underlying economic activity must be responsible and sustainable. We therefore strive at all times for greater accountability in our investments and in the economy in order to reduce sustainability risk and to contribute to strong and effective capital markets. The work covers all sustainability topics. KLP constantly monitors its investments for serious and/or systematic violations of international norms and conventions published by the UN, ILO and OECD.
By being an active and committed owner, we seek to encourage companies to operate more sustainably, helping the world to achieve the global goals we have set together and the sustainability goals in KLP’s corporate strategy. KLP aims to align its investment portfolio with the ambitions in the Paris Agreement and to push companies to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals. In this work, we use four main tools:
We include sustainability factors and sustainability risk in investment analyses and decision-making at both portfolio and corporate levels.
We work to influence companies, industries and markets to create sustainable value through active ownership, including through:
Dialogue with companies’ boards of directors and management; KLP is mainly a passive index-tracking investor, so in practice almost all company dialogue is concerned with sustainability.
Voting and support for shareholder proposals at general meetings
Participation in and influence over corporate bodies
Contributing to the development of industry and market standards and cooperating with other investors.
We exclude companies that violate our criteria and do not display any ability or willingness to change.
We invest in solutions for a more sustainable society.
Active ownership
Our active ownership is based on an assessment and prioritisation of how and in what areas it can have the greatest effect. With over 9,600 companies in our portfolio, we direct our efforts at selected companies based on the size of the ownership interest, the geographical location, the sector affiliation, the size of the company, the risk of violations, and the subject of the dialogue. The choice of topics and companies may also be event-driven, and we prioritise based on future risk related to sustainability issues. We also specialise in some topics, including human rights in war and conflict situations, and climate change.
In 2024, the priority topics included climate change in high-emission sectors, deforestation, aquaculture and mining, human rights in war and conflict situations, and corruption. See examples of our work later in this section.
We have expectation documents covering all sustainability topics, including human rights, labour rights, climate, nature and corruption. The expectation documents describe KLP’s expectations of companies in the investment portfolio related to the various topics and are the basis for our active ownership.
The general meeting is an important arena for dialogue between the company’s management and shareholders, and we actively exercise our voting rights, both in Norway and abroad. We support shareholder proposals that take companies in a more sustainable and responsible direction, whether in terms of greater gender equality, reducing pay gaps between genders or ethnic groups, strengthening privacy or increasing transparency about the company’s operations. The times when we do not support sustainability-related proposals are, for example, where the proposal seeks to micro-manage the company in an undesirable way or is tabled expressly to counter the company’s sustainability efforts.
The table below gives an overview of KLP’s active ownership through company dialogue and voting. It also provides details of exclusions from KLP’s investment portfolio.
Note
2024
2023
2022
3
Company dialogues
Number
Proportion
Number of unique company dialogues on sustainability
255
243
259
Company dialogues on climate and nature
81
32%
Company dialogues on social matters
105
41%
Company dialogues on corporate governance
69
27%
3
Voting
Number
Proportion
General meetings of Norwegian companies at which KLP has voted
127
100.0%
132 / 99.2%
115 / 95.0%
General meetings of foreign companies at which KLP has voted
8,127
99.6%
8,472 / 99.6%
8,787 / 99.0%
Resolutions where KLP has voted against the management’s recommendations
17,932
20%
21%
20%
General meetings where KLP has voted against the board
5,341
65%
General meetings where KLP has voted against directors due to lack of gender balance
3,006
36%
General meetings where KLP has voted against the board and/or directors due to inadequate handling of sustainability issues
41
0.5%
Shareholder proposals KLP has supported on sustainability issues
437
74%
Shareholder proposals KLP has supported on climate and nature
101
17%
Shareholder proposals KLP has supported on social matters
220
37%
Shareholder proposals KLP has supported on other sustainability-related topics*
116
20%
5
Exclusions
At 31.12.2024
In 2024
Companies excluded from the investments
794
47
799
758
Companies excluded on behaviour-based criteria
200
10
Companies excluded on product-based criteria
594
37
Companies excluded from investments as of 31.12.2024, including subsidiaries**
835
Companies re-included in the investments
104
14
9
55
Share of companies excluded from the MSCI World index
5.5%
6.0%
6.8%
Share of companies excluded from the Bloomberg Barclays Global Corporates index
9.2%
9.0%
9.2%
* Shareholder proposals the ISS categorises under “E&S Blended” and “Corporate Governance”
** Total number of companies excluded as of 31.12.2024
See note 3 “Active ownership” for KLP’s product and behavior-based exclusion criteria.
In 2024, KLP worked on the following in relation to climate and nature:
KLP has particularly prioritised monitoring of Equinor, Yara and agri-businesses.
Restructuring plans: In 2024, KLP tightened the requirements for climate transition plans when purchasing bonds to be held to maturity. We have had dialogues with a number of companies to clarify KLP’s expectations for science-based restructuring plans. In 2023, KLP voted against the board of 46 companies in high-emission industries that were judged not to have satisfactory restructuring plans. By 2024, according to assessments made by the organisation Climate Action 100+, 15 of these had improved their strategies. During the year, we had or attempted to have conversations with the remaining companies, 17 of which were able to point to plans and ongoing processes aimed at improving their climate strategies. There were no Norwegian companies among the companies where we voted against the board according to KLP's criteria. Examples of companies that have been put on an observation list are Kikkoman, Bunge, Exxon Mobil, SAIC Motor, WH Group.
Deforestation: The progress related to goals and strategies for managing deforestation has been less encouraging. KLP had or tried to make contact with 22 companies where we voted against the board in 2023. Only four of these were able to point to improvements recognised by the Forest500 initiative. A few others were still considered to have limited deforestation risk, and KLP voted against the board in 10 companies.
Collaboration: KLP has been active in initiatives organised under Climate Action 100+, Nature Action 100 and PRI Spring, and supported initiatives organised by ChemSec (phasing out non-degradable chemicals) and FAIRR (environmental impact of cattle farming, and more sustainable protein production).
Transparency and reporting The Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility (ACCR), together with KLP and another investor, put forward a shareholder proposal calling for greater transparency in Shell’s reporting of lobbying activities to authorities in countries where it operates. Shell quickly acknowledged that there was room for improvement and stated publicly that it would strengthen its reporting. On this basis, the Group has held a number of conversations with Shell with a view to clarifying the scope of Shell’s reporting commitments. The talks resulted in significant concrete commitments from Shell to greater transparency and further cooperation with ACCR on the next report. KLP supported shareholder proposals at Amazon for the company will publish its scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions. KLP also supported shareholder proposals relating to third-party audits of the working environment and transparency around the company’s lobbying activities.
KLP has strengthened its commitment to companies within the metals and mining industry and in particular followed up on companies registered in China. Mining companies are at high risk of contributing to climate and environmental damage. We believe they should present relevant data for climate emissions and environmental impact, and a strong risk management framework. We have had or tried to make contact and enter into dialogue with a number of companies to discuss transparency and strategies related to climate and nature risk.
In 2024, KLP worked with the following on human and labour rights:
In connection with legal proceedings against Lundin Energy, with which Aker BP merged in 2022, and their activities in South Sudan, Norwegian People’s Aid has asked Aker BP to explain its position and respond to the victims’ concerns. They also asked Aker BP to enter into dialogue with Ørron Energy (formerly Lundin Energy) and its shareholders on compensation to the victims if it should be convicted. KLP considers that this is in line with the Norwegian Transparency Act and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. We published our assessment and had discussions with Aker BP before the general meeting.
Scrapping of ships: We are continuing our annual work on reviewing the NGO Shipbreaking Platform lists of ships being cut up in high-risk areas such as India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Where we are invested, we follow up companies with questions about responsible scrapping policies and practices.
The right to unionise: Together with other investors, we have sent letters to the management of Tesla on respect for labour rights and supported shareholder proposals to flag our expectations on the freedom to unionise to the board. Together with two groups of investors, we have sent several letters to Amazon’s board of directors on the company’s respect for labour rights. We have put forward shareholder proposals together with SHARE and about 20 other institutional shareholders. This work is ongoing. We have set out our expectations for Tesla and Amazon in the media.
Human rights in war and conflict situations: Since the start of the Gaza war, we have followed up Cemex, Caterpillar and HP. After careful consideration, we decided in June to exclude Caterpillar from our investments. This is justified by unacceptable risk of the company contributing violations of human rights in war and conflict situations and breaches of international law in the occupied Palestinian territories.
Labour rights: For several years, we have been in dialogue with Volkswagen about its operations in Xinjiang, China. The main issue is the company’s measures to avoid forced labour in its value chains, especially in the Xinjiang region. It recently emerged, that following significant pressure from investors, including KLP, the company has sold its business in the region. KLP supported several shareholder proposals at Walmart related to third-party audits of the working environment, establishing guidelines for a living wage and assessing how the company complies with its obligations related to human rights in its supply chains.
Children’s rights: In collaboration with the Global Child Forum (GCF) and a number of Nordic investors (Swedbank, Danica Pension, SEB and others), we are following up on companies in the Food and Beverage and Information Technology and Telecommunications sectors on practices around the marketing of goods and services to children. KLP supported shareholder proposals at Mondelez International calling on the company to report targets for eradicating child labour in the cocoa supply chain. We also supported similar proposals related to child labour in supply chains at Tyson Foods, Ford Motor Company and General Motors.
Human rights: KLP supported two shareholder proposals at the Danish company A.P. Moller-Maersk related to improving its human rights policies and standards, as well as better reporting on the company’s work on human rights risks.
In 2024, KLP worked with the following in good corporate governance:
KLP continued its dialogue with several Norwegian companies (including Borregaard, Equinor and Kongsberg Automotive) on effective boards and directors’ fees.
Gender balance: For several years, KLP has voted against the election of certain board members due to a lack of gender balance. KLP votes against board members if the gender balance does not meet our expectations. The demands we make depend on the market the company is in. We expect at least a 40 per cent gender balance in developed markets and at least one woman on the board in emerging markets. We find that regulatory requirements have a much greater effect in Asia than non-binding demands. We have highlighted this in dialogue with the authorities in Japan, Korea and Malaysia. KLP has sent letters to 28 companies in Japan and South Korea that still do not have a proper gender balance in their boards. In the letter, we have called for clear plans for efforts to increase the proportion of women on the board and in management.
Independence: KLP has had several dialogues with companies in Singapore where we have raised our expectations for independence on the boards and the need for adequate control mechanisms to ensure that the directors safeguard the interests of all shareholders. Many Asian listed companies have controlling shareholders who are often family members and are heavily represented both in management and on the board of directors.
Risks associated with AI: KLP supported shareholder proposals at Alphabet calling on the company to report on risks associated with AI-generated misinformation and disinformation.
2.3. Corporate governanceGOV-1, GOV-2, G1 GOV-1
The figure below describes the corporate governance function and the role of the various governing bodies in KLP.
To ensure that KLP delivers secure and competitive financial and insurance services to its customers, and to safeguard the company’s assets and values, a system of risk management and internal control has been established. The board determines a risk appetite, i.e. how much risk KLP will accept in order to achieve its goals and ambitions. Our values, code of conduct and social mission are key to this. By identifying and analysing relevant risks, the company can take effective measures to manage and control them. This is an ongoing process, and feeds into all decisions on significant changes in the business.
The Norwegian Accounting Act lays down special requirements to report on the management of sustainability.
Sustainability is integrated into and aligned with the day-to-day division of roles and established strategy and management processes, including risk management. The overall guidelines adopted by the board determine how the Company should work on sustainability, taking account of our material impacts and opportunities in a satisfactory manner. An assessment of the company’s exposure to and management of sustainability risk is among the tasks handed down in the board instructions. Sustainability-related matters are included in the board’s annual cycle. The Policy for investment risk, the Policy for underwriting risk, and the Asset Management strategy are particularly relevant here The Policy for KLP as a responsible investor has been designed with both our impact and our risk in mind.
The CEO’s instructions include a duty to ensure that this policy is implemented, and to report to the board on compliance, risk and target attainment.
KLP’s work on significant sustainability issues and associated impacts, risks and opportunities is based on the targets in the corporate strategy. The targets are set out in the sustainability goals. Each goal has a dedicated owner in management (an executive vice president or the managing director of a subsidiary), who bears the ultimate responsibility for managing impacts, risks and opportunities. For a summary of the goals, see the overview of Policies under each ESRS topic.
The board adopts the sustainability strategy as an integral part of the corporate strategy. The goals are adopted by the individual goal owner but are presented to Group senior management for discussion. Group senior management receives quarterly reports on target attainment as part of the general scorecard reporting. The board is given a biannual briefing on target attainment.
Management is informed of the results of due diligence assessments and planned measures through appropriate forums, depending on the topic. Each year, the board discusses and adopts KLP's report on due diligence assessments (under the Transparency Act), which can be found here at klp.no. The same applies to KLP's report on gender equality, which can be found here at klp.no.
The statement on KLP’s compliance with the Norwegian Code of Practice for Corporate Governance (NUES) is given in an appendix.
The statements on due diligence assessments, and the report on gender equality are not part of the annual report and sustainability report and are reported separately.
2.4. Managing material risks
KLP is exposed to different types of risk. As a financial group, underwriting risk, financial market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and operational risk are particularly relevant. Sustainability risk is another relevant risk factor. KLP handles this risk factor as part of the risk factors listed above, and not as a separate area. Section 3 describes relevant risk factors related to sustainability.
Underwriting risk
Underwriting risk is linked to the Group’s contracts in the field of public-sector occupational pensions and products within non-life insurance. Underwriting risk is the risk of an insured event occurring for which KLP has to compensate the insured. In return for taking this risk, KLP calculates an insurance premium that the customer has to pay. This premium is based on expected claims payments. These are uncertain estimates, and there is a residual underwriting risk associated with the payments being higher than expected. This risk takes different forms with different risk mitigation measures:
Public-sector occupational pensions are a product that provides lifetime pension payments. The greatest underwriting risk is therefore linked to the insured living longer than expected, and KLP follows developments in longevity very closely.
Disability risk is another significant underwriting risk. Disability insurance makes payments to the disabled person either as a one-off amount (disability capital) or as annual pension payments. Higher rates of disability therefore pose a risk to the Group. A disability pension is paid until the disabled person becomes a retirement pensioner. An amount is set aside for this when the individual becomes disabled. The amounts set aside allow for the fact that a person may be fit for work again. There is a risk that fewer people than expected will be fit for work. Disability risk therefore depends on the disability rate and on how many of the disabled people are able to return to work.
Underwriting risk is also linked to the number of deaths (mortality risk), either in the form of a one-off amount or as annual pension payments to survivors. These products are limited in scope and the risk to the Group is considered to be small.
The Group provides non-life cover where the risk is related to compensation payments for occupational injury and material damage. Within material damage, property and motor insurance are the most significant areas. Changes in the climate and weather affect future payments related to material damage. The Group has reinsurance contracts that limit the Group’s share of payments in the case of major claims.
For public-sector occupational pensions, KLP may re-price underwriting risk arising from the accrual of new pension rights when these contracts are renewed. Risks related to previously accrued rights cannot be re-priced. For non-life insurance cover, KLP can re-price all of the risk associated with future periods.
Financial market risk
Financial market risk is the risk of loss due to changes in market variables such as share prices, interest rates and exchange rates. Public-sector occupational pensions contain a requirement for a minimum annual return on the amounts paid in. This guarantee has to be met every year. The return is achieved by investing the funds in the financial markets, so KLP is exposed to market risk. The risk is reduced by building buffer funds in years with good returns which can be used to cover any shortfall in periods with low returns. KLP also has the option to invoice an annual premium to cover the annual return guarantee. The board sets annual limits for market risk through the company’s asset management strategy. The company’s market risk is mainly managed by diversifying investments across different assets and dynamically adjusting the market risk in the portfolio in line with the established risk appetite.
KLP expects that financial market risk will be affected by climate risk. This is because developments in the global economy are affected by climate change. This could also result in a significant transition risk in the aftermath of the restructuring in the markets. KLP is consciously looking at how climate risk can affect returns through allocation and impact work aimed at limiting global warming.
In non-life insurance, the investment portfolio is divided into different assets, but the majority are invested in the fixed-income market. This evens out some of the effect of interest rate changes on the insurance commitments. The Group’s other investment portfolios are primarily invested in the fixed income market to obtain periodic returns from interest-bearing instruments.
Credit risk
The Group has substantial lending activities, and this raises the risk that borrowers may be unable to repay the loans. This risk is managed by securing loans with a public guarantee or against a home mortgage. For other fixed-income investments, an assessment of the issuer's creditworthiness is made within the credit lines established by the Group's credit committee.
Liquidity risk
The Group makes significant payments in the pension and insurance business. To ensure that the Group has enough free cash for this, there are assets in the investment portfolios that can be easily converted into cash at short notice.
Liquidity risk can also arise internally in the investment business where assets prove difficult to sell when needed. This risk is managed through limits for this type of business, borrowing programmes and negotiable securities that can be lodged as collateral.
Operational risk
Operational risk is the risk that we will not reach our goals as a result of internal errors and omissions or because of events outside KLP. KLP has a number of measures in place to manage this operational risk, including:
Processes to detect and follow up on errors and omissions.
Policies, procedures, processes and other guidelines to reduce the risk of errors and omissions occurring.
System controls to minimise errors in case handling.
Training activities and regular information about the risk of financial crime and cyber attacks to enable our employees to recognise and respond to such threats in their day-to-day work.
3. Sustainability report
In this section, we explain how KLP works on sustainability, the goals we have set and the results we have achieved.
Our sustainability report covers the whole of the KLP Group and rests on KLP’s core values: Open, Clear, Responsible and Committed. We aim to be as open and transparent as possible, because this enables an informative dialogue with our stakeholders which can help to improve our sustainability work and the industry’s sustainability efforts. We also believe that transparency can give our work greater influence and impact.
Section 3, Sustainability report, with accompanying notes in section 7. Notes to the sustainability report are signed by the board.
3.1. Disclosure requirements in the sustainability reportIRO-2
Disclosure requirements in ESRS standards
The table below outlines the disclosure requirements in the ESRS standards included in the report. The choice of disclosure requirements and data points is based on the key sub-topics identified in our double materiality analysis, with associated impacts, risks and opportunities.
Disclosure requirements
Description
Reference
ESRS 2 General information
Basis for preparation (BP)
BP-1
General basis for preparation of the sustainability statement
Section 3.1. Disclosure requirements in the sustainability statement
Section 3.2. About the sustainability report
BP-2
Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
Section 3.2. About the sustainability report
Governance (GOV)
GOV-1*
The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
Section 1.4. Management
Section 2.3. Corporate governance
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 2 Composition and competence of the board of directors and senior management
GOV-2*
Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies
Section 2.3. Corporate governance
Section 7. Note 2 Composition and competence of the board of directors and senior management – The board’s work on sustainability issues
GOV-3*, E1 GOV-3*
Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
Accounts for the KLP Group – note 20 Benefits and loans to executive personnel etc.
GOV-4
Statement on due diligence
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 6 Due diligence
GOV-5
Risk management and internal controls over sustainability
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 5 Organisation and implementation of reporting
Strategy, business model and value chain (SBM)
SBM-1*
Strategy, business model and value chain
Section 1.1. KLP’s core business
Section 1.2. Subsidiaries
Section 1.3. KLP Group – value chains
Section 2.1. Strategy
Section 3.3. KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities
SBM-2*
Interests and views of stakeholders
Section 1.3 KLP Group – value chains
Section 3.3. KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Stakeholder and stakeholder dialogue
SBM-3*
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Section 2.1. Strategy
Section 2.2. Secure and competitive pension savings
Section 3.3. KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities
Managing impacts, risk and opportunities (IRO)
Information about the process for assessing materiality
IRO-1
Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
Section 3.3. KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis – Double materiality analysis process
IRO-2
Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement
Section 3.1. Disclosure requirements in the sustainability statement
Section 3.2. About the sustainability report
Section 3.3. KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities
Minimum disclosure requirement on policies and actions (MDR)
MDR-P
Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Policies
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Policies
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Policies
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Policies
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection– Policies
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Policies
MDR-A
Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Climate change – Actions and results
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Actions and results
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Actions and results
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Property operation and development – Actions and results
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Equality and diversity – Actions taken
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Health, safety and environment – Actions taken
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection– Actions and results
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Actions and results
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Actions and results
Minimum disclosure requirement on metrics and targets
MDR-M
Metrics in relation to material sustainability matters
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 5 Organisation and implementation of reporting
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 15 Nature transition
MDR-T
Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Climate change – Transition plan and goals for climate change mitigation
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Climate change – Actions and results
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Targets relating to biodiversity and ecosystems
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Targets for resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Property operation and development – Targets for resource use and circular economy
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Equality and diversity – Targets
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Equality and diversity – Results
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Health, safety and environment – Targets
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection– Targets
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Targets
ESRS E1 Climate change
E1 GOV-3*
Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
Consolidated accounts – note 20 Benefits and loans to senior employees etc.
E1 SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with
Description of the processes for identifying and assessing material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities
Not included as it is not material for KLP. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities”.
ESRS E3 Water and marine resources
E3 IRO-1
Description of the processes to identify and assess
material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to water and marine resources
Not included as it is not material for KLP. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities”.
ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems
E4 SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Not included as it is not material for KLP.
E4 IRO-1
Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Section 3.3. KLP's material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 14 Nature risk
E4-1
Transition plan on biodiversity and ecosystems in the strategy and business model
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Transition plan and safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystems in the strategy and business model
Note 14 Nature risk
E4-2
Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Policies
E4-3
Actions and resources related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Actions and results
E4-4
Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Targets relating to biodiversity and ecosystems
E4-5
Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Results achieved in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems
E4-6
Anticipated financial effects from material risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 14 Nature risk
ESRS E5 Resource use and circular economy
Circular economy in non-life insurance
E5 IRO-1
Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.3. KLP's material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis
E5-1
Policies related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Policies
E5-2
Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Actions and results
E5-3
Targets related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Targets for resource use and circular economy
E5-4
Resource inflows
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Description of resource flows
Circular economy in the property portfolio
E5 IRO-1
Description of the processes to identify and assess material
impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.3. KLP's material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis
E5-1
Policies related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Policies
E5-2
Actions and resources related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlement – Actions and results
E5-3
Targets related to resource use and circular economy
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Targets for resource use and circular economy
E5-4
Resource inflows
Section 3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Claims settlements – Description of resource flows
ESRS S1 Own workforce
S1 SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Material impacts, risks and opportunities associated with own workforce
S1-1
Policies related to own workforce
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Policies
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Process for employee follow-up and involvement
S1-2
Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Policies
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Process for employee follow-up and involvement
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP's employees – Equality and diversity – Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity – Targets
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity – Actions taken
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Results
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Targets
S1-3
Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Policies
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Processes for whistleblowing and remediation
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Processes related to financial crime
S1-4
Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity – Actions taken
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Results
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Actions taken
S1-5
Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP employees – Equality and diversity – Targets
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Results
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Targets
S1-6
Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees
Note 16 Own workforce – Employee statistics
S1-9
Diversity metrics
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Equality and diversity – Results
S1-11
Social protection
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees
S1-15
Work-life balance metrics
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Results
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 16 Own workforce – Equality and diversity
S1-16
Compensation metrics (pay gap and total compensation)
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – About KLP’s employees – Health, safety and environment – Results
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 16 Own workforce – Equality and diversity
S1-17
Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Processes for whistleblowing and remediation
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Processes related to financial crime
ESRS S4 Consumers and end-users
Data protection
S4-SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Privacy
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Material impacts, risks, and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection– Material impacts, risks, and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
S4-1
Policies relevant to consumers and end-users
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection– Policies
S4-2
Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
S4-3
Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
S4-4
Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection – Actions and results
S4-5
Targets related to managing material impacts on consumers and end-users
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Data protection – Targets
Sustainable working life
S4-SBM-3
Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Material impacts, risks, and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
S4-1
Policies relevant to consumers and end-users
Section 3.6. Social matters– Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Policies
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
S4-2
Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
S4-3
Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
S4-4
Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Processes for customer involvement and remediation
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Actions and results
S4-5
Targets related to managing material impacts on consumers and end-users
Section 3.6. Social matters – Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life – Targets
ESRS G1 Business conduct
G1.GOV-1
The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 3 Composition and competence of the board of directors and senior management – The board's work on sustainability issues
G1-1
Business conduct policies and corporate culture
Section 3.6. Social matters – Own workforce – Processes for whistleblowing and remediation
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Policies
G1-3
Management of relationships with suppliers
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Processes related to financial crime
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Actions and results
G1-4
Prevention and detection of corruption and bribery
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Processes related to financial crime
Section 3.7. Business conduct – Business conduct – Actions and results
*This disclosure requirement falls wholly or partly outside the sustainability report and associated notes
** E1-6: section 53 “Location and market-based emission intensity based on net revenue” – Net revenue as the denominator gives a misleading picture of the emission intensity for KLP. KLP therefore reports different intensities, adapted to the different asset classes. Refer to the table in the section on “Actions and results”, under “Climate change”, and note 11 Financed emissions.
KLP has generally taken the phasing-in option for the data points where possible. KLP has not omitted any sustainability information based on intellectual property, innovation or competition considerations.
The table above shows what the sustainability report (section 3) includes. We refer also to “This is KLP” (section 1) and “Strategy and corporate governance” (section 2), for a full response to ESRS 2 General Disclosures. References to the notes provide further information on calculation methods, estimates and uncertainty, and any changes from previous years. Note that “Management of material risks” (Section 2.4) is not part of the sustainability report.
Overview of omissions from the ESRSsBP-1
Data point
ESRS
Rationale for removal
Alternative solution, if any
In general
We currently do not have sufficient data or analytical models to quantify the financial impact of risks and opportunities
This is something we will continue to work on.
E1-9_07
Percentage of assets at material physical risk addressed by climate change adaptation actions
ESRS E1
KLP is invested in a global portfolio of 9,600 companies. Our climate risk modelling is not designed to respond to this in a way that provides meaningful information. We do not have an overview of sectors that are particularly exposed, but we have scenarios to estimate how much climate change could affect the value of the portfolio.
In the investment portfolio, we have not made any allocations relating to climate change adaptation to reduce physical climate risk. We make such assessments before acquiring properties, but have not analysed the proportion of properties covered.
S1-14_06, 07
Number of cases of recordable work-related ill health of employees
ESRS S1
Under Norwegian law, KLP cannot differentiate between work-related and non-work-related absences due to illness. This is information that is not available to KLP as an employer.
We therefore report on our own custom indicator “total sickness absence”
S4.MDR-T_01-13 with associated data points S4-5_01-03
Targets set to manage material impacts, risks and opportunities related to consumers and end-users
ESRS S4 (Data protection)
We do not have defined targets for Data protection.
We therefore report on S4.MDR-T_14-19, see section on targets under “Customers and end-users – Privacy”.
S4.MDR-P_01-06 (S4 Sustainable working life)
Policies to manage material impacts, risks and opportunities related to consumers and end-users
ESRS S4 (Sustainable working life)
There is no policy for this type of work
Sustainable working life is anchored in KLP’s corporate strategy under “customer value”. The services we provide must be of sufficient quality to meet the need within public-sector occupational pensions. We also aim to provide services that add value and can help address the challenges facing customers. One of the points is that we should help to promote a sustainable working life in the Norwegian local government and healthcare sector.
Data points derived from other EU legislation
The table below provides an overview of data points derived from other EU legislation: the Disclosure Regulation (SFDR), Pillar 3 (P3), the Benchmarks Regulation (BRR) and the European Climate Law (ECL). It provides a reference to where the information can be found in KLP’s annual report, in line with the requirements in IRO-2.
Disclosure requirements
Para.
Data point
Reference to other Regulations
Assessment
Reference
ESRS 2 GOV-1
21 d)
Gender distribution on the board
SFDR, BRR
Material
1.4 Management
ESRS 2 GOV-1
21 e)
Percentage of board members who are independent
BRR
Material
1.4 Management
ESRS 2 GOV-4
30
Statement on due diligence
SFDR
Material
Section 7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 6 Due diligence
ESRS 2 SBM-1
40 d) i
Involvement in activities related to fossil fuel
SFDR, P3, BRR
Material
7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 4. Exposure in the investment portfolio
ESRS 2 SBM-1
40 d) ii
Involvement in activities related to chemical production
SFDR, BRR
Material
7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 4. Exposure in the investment portfolio
ESRS 2 SBM-1
40 d) iii
Involvement in activities related to controversial weapons
SFDR, BRR
Not applicable – excluded from KLP’s investments
ESRS 2 SBM-1
40 d) iv
Involvement in activities related to the cultivation and production of tobacco
BRR
Not applicable – excluded from KLP’s investments
ESRS E1-1
14
Transition plan to achieve climate neutrality by 2050
ECL
Material
3.5. Climate change – Transition plan and goals for climate change mitigation
ESRS E1-1
16 g)
Undertakings excluded from the EU Paris-aligned benchmarks;
P3, BRR
Material
3.2 About the sustainability report
ESRS E1-4
34
GHG emission reduction targets
SFDR, P3, BRR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Climate change – Transition plan and goals for climate change mitigation
ESRS E1-5
38
Energy consumption from fossil sources divided by sources (high climate impact sectors only)
SFDR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Climate change – Energy consumption and mix
ESRS E1-5
37
Energy consumption and mix
SFDR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Climate change – Energy consumption and mix
ESRS E1-5
40-43
Energy intensity associated with activities in high climate impact sectors
SFDR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Climate change – Energy consumption and mix
Removed. KLP calculates emission intensity for different asset classes based on the unit of measure we believe is most relevant. See note 11 “Financed emissions” for more information
ESRS E1-7
56
GHG removals and carbon credits
ECL
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Climate change – Carbon removal and credits
ESRS E1-9
66
Reference portfolio exposure to climate-related physical risks
P3
KLP has taken the phasing-in option for this data point
ESRS E1-9
66 a)
Disaggregate monetary amounts by acute and chronic physical risk
P3
KLP has taken the phasing-in option for this data point
ESRS E1-9
66 c)
Location of significant assets exposed to material physical risk
P3
KLP has taken the phasing-in option for this data point
ESRS E1-9
69
Degree of exposure of the portfolio to climate-related opportunities
BRR
KLP has taken the phasing-in option for this data point
ESRS E2-4
28
Amounts of each pollutant listed in Annex II of the EPRTR Regulation (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register )emitted to air, water and soil
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E3-1
9
Water and marine resources
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E3-1
13
Specific policy
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E3-1
14
Sustainable seas and oceans
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E3-4
28 c)
Total water recycled and reused
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E3-4
29
Total water consumption in m3 per unit of net revenue on own operations
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E4 SBM-3
16 a) i
Activities that have a negative impact on areas sensitive to biodiversity
SFDR
Not relevant as the disclosure requirement covers our own operations, and not the value chain
ESRS E4 SBM-3
16 b)
Significant negative impacts with regard to land degradation, desertification or soil sealing
SFDR
Not relevant as the disclosure requirement covers our own operations, and not the value chain
ESRS E4 SBM-3
16 c)
Activities that affect threatened species
SFDR
Not relevant as the disclosure requirement covers our own operations, and not the value chain
ESRS E4-2
24 b)
Sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies
SFDR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Biodiversity and ecosystems – Policies
ESRS E4-2
24 c)
Sustainable oceans/seas practices or policies
SFDR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Biodiversity and ecosystems – Policies
ESRS E4-2
24 d)
Policies to address deforestation
SFDR
Material
3.5. Climate, environment and nature - Biodiversity and ecosystems – Policies
ESRS E5-5
37 d)
Non-recycled waste
SFDR
Not material
ESRS E5-5
39
Hazardous waste and radioactive waste
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S1 SBM-3
14 f)
Risk of incidents of forced labour
Not material
ESRS S1 SBM-3
14 g)
Risk of incidents of child labour
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S1-1
20
Human rights policy commitments
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Own workforce – Policies
ESRS S1-1
21
Guidelines for due diligence in matters addressed in Fundamental Conventions 1–8 from the International Labor Organization (ILO)
BRR
Not applicable
ESRS S1-1
22
Processes and measures to prevent human trafficking
SFDR
Not applicable
ESRS S1-1
23
Workplace accident prevention policy or management system
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Own workforce – Process for employee follow-up and involvement
ESRS S1-3
32 c)
Grievance/complaints handling mechanisms
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Own workforce – Processes for whistleblowing and remediation
ESRS S1-14
88 b) and c)
Number of fatalities and number of and rate of work-related accidents
SFDR, BRR
Not material
ESRS S1-14
88 c)
Number of days lost due to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S1-16
97 a)
Unadjusted pay gap between the sexes
SFDR, BRR
Material
Appendix 2 PAI reporting for the KLP Group
ESRS S1-16
97 b)
Excessive remuneration paid to the managing director
SFDR
Material
7. Notes to the sustainability report – note 16. Own workforve - Equality and diversity
ESRS S1-17
103 a)
Incidents of discrimination
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Own workforce – Processes for whistleblowing and remediation
ESRS S1-17
104 a)
Non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines
SFDR, BRR
Not material
ESRS S2 SBM-3
11 b)
Significant risk of child or forced labour in the value chain
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S2-1
17
Human rights policy commitments
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S2-1
18
Policies in relation to workers in the value chain
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S2-1
19
Non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines
SFDR, BRR
Not material
ESRS S2-1
19
Guidelines for due diligence in matters addressed in Fundamental Conventions 1–8 from the International Labor Organization (ILO)
BRR
Not material
ESRS S2-4
36
Human rights issues and incidents connected to the upstream and downstream value chain
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S3-1
16
Human rights policy commitments
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S3-1
17
Non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines
SFDR, BRR
Not material
ESRS S3-4
36
Human rights issues and incidents
SFDR
Not material
ESRS S4-1
16
Policies relevant to consumers and end-users
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users – Data protection - Policies 3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life - Policies
ESRS S4-1
17
Non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and OECD Guidelines
SFDR, BRR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users – Data protection - Policies 3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users – Sustainable working life - Policies
ESRS S4-4
35
Human rights issues and incidents
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users – Data protection - Actions and results
ESRS G1-1
10 b)
UN Convention on Corruption
SFDR
Material
3.7. Business conduct - Business conduct - Policies
ESRS G1-1
10 d)
Protection of whistleblowers
SFDR
Material
3.6. Social matters - Own workforce - Processes for whistleblowing and remediation
ESRS G1-4
24 a)
Fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws
SFDR, BRR
Material
3.7. Business conduct - Business conduct – Processes related to financial crime
ESRS G1-4
24 b)
Standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery
SFDR
Material
3.7. Business conduct - Business conduct – Processes related to financial crime
3.2. About the sustainability report BP-1, BP-2, IRO-2
This is the first year that KLP has been covered by the new rules for sustainability reporting, cf. Section 2-3 of the Accounting Act on the requirement to produce a sustainability report. The structure of the annual report and sustainability report has been amended to take account of the requirements of the legislation.
KLP is publishing a consolidated report for the KLP Group for the financial year 2024, as we have done on a voluntary basis in past years. Sustainability reporting is based on our double materiality analysis and covers the companies included in the consolidated financial statements: the KLP Banken Group, the KLP Eiendom Group, KLP Kapitalforvaltning and KLP Skadeforsikring. The reporting covers the main activities of the KLP Group (pensions, investments in securities and property, lending, and non-life insurance) and the principal upstream and downstream value chains, mainly our own operations, investments, suppliers and customers. See “Section 1.3 KLP Group - KLP’s value chains” for a more detailed description of these.
Reporting errors in past periods
KLP has not identified any material errors in previously reported figures, so no corrections have been made.
Time horizons
KLP has used the same definition of medium and long-term time horizons given in ESRS 1, namely medium term from 1 to 5 years and long term over 5 years.
Estimates and sources of uncertainty
To increase the coverage of data used in sustainability reporting, KLP uses estimates for some data points. These are both estimates we calculate internally and estimates calculated by external third parties. We use estimates for the following data points:
Financed emissions, see note 7 “Financed emissions”
Emissions from fuel consumption, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 1
Emissions from energy consumption, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 2
Emissions from procurement, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 3
Emissions from claims settlement, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 3
Emissions from fuel and energy-related activities, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 3
Emissions from flights, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 3
Emissions from waste, see note 11 “Climate accounts” and scope 3
Energy mix, see note 11 "Climate accounts" and scope 2, note 12 "Energy mix and guarantees of origin"
Statistics for employees in Denmark and Sweden, see section 7 "Notes to the sustainability report" and note 16 "Own workforce."
Data derived from other legislation or generally recognised statements on sustainability reporting
KLP has not included any data derived from other legislation or standards for sustainability reporting.
3.3. KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities SBM-3, IRO-2
The basis for KLP’s sustainability strategy and reporting is a double materiality analysis; an analysis of how KLP affects sustainability concerns and is affected by sustainability concerns in terms of risks or opportunities for KLP’s operations. The figure below provides a summary of the sustainability issues judged to be material for the various activities in the KLP group. All of the impacts, risks and opportunities are covered by defined disclosure requirements in ESRS. A detailed description of each individual impact, risk and opportunity is given in the table below.
ESRS
Type of IRO
IRO (Impacts, Risks, Oportunities)
Activity
KLPs Sustainability Goals
E1 Climate change
Positive impacts
Contribute to faster climate transition in portfolio companies and greater expertise on climate in municipalities
Securities
Non-life incsurance
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Be a partner for climate adaptation and transition in municipalities
Contribute to the development of renewable energy and energy efficiency, as well as claims prevention
Investments Banking
Non-life insurance
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Negative impacts
Financed emissions from investments and lending
Securities
Investments Banking
Property
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Emissions from purchasing, property operation and development, and claims settlement
Pensions
Property
Non-life insurance
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Do sustainable procurement
Energy consumption in property management and operation
Property
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Risks
Climate risk such as systemic market risk, as well as company-specific risk due to slow climate transition
Securities
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Climate change could lead to increased claims costs and physical damage to buildings from natural events
Property
Non-life insurance
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Increased costs due to stricter regulations and changes to procurement procedures
Porperty
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
Unpredictability in the way climate is weighted in procurement procedures and in future expectations from customers
Pensions
Securities
Property
Reach net zero emissions in the investment portfolio
E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems
Negative impact
Contribute to financing of nature loss through investments and changes in land use resulting from property development
Securities
Investments Banking
Property
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Risks
Restrictions on land use for new buildings
Porperty
Nature loss as a part of systemic market risk, and reputational loss associated with financing environmental degradation
Securities
Investments Banking
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Opportunity
Restrictions on land use for new buildings produce good returns on existing buildings in a central location
Securities
Investments Banking
E5 Resource use and circular economy
Positive impact
Offer products that provide incentives for re-use in claims settlements
Non-life insurance
Contribute to a circular economy
Negative impact
Material and resource use in claims settlements and property operation and development
Non-life insurance
Property
Contribute to a circular economy
Risks
Reduced access or increased price of input factors
Non-life insurance
Contribute to a circular economy
Ensure reuse of residual assets in the event of damage to property
Non-life insurance
Contribute to a circular economy
S1 Own workforce
Positive impact
Offer flexible working hours to employees
Hele konsernet
Equality and diversity
Negative impacts
Long-term sickness absence makes it hard to come back to work
Group
Gender balance in executive posts and higher-paid positions
Group
Equality and diversity
Risk
Challenging to recruit women into some positions and disciplines, because fewer women are qualified and many firms are competing for the same resources
Group
Equality and diversity
Opportunity
Flexible working hours can increase satisfaction and reduce employee stress
Group
Equality and diversity
S4 Consumers and end-users
Positive impact
Share information so members can make conscious choices and stay at work longer
Pensions
Contribute to a sustainable working life in Norwegian municipalities and the health care sector
Negative impact
Possible breaches of privacy and release of sensitive information
Pensions
Risk
Release of sensitive information can lead to extensive reputational damage, loss of customers and fines
Pensions
G1 Business conduct
Positive impacts
Help detect, combat and reduce the facilitation of financial crime
Investments banking
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Fight financial crime
Active ownership which drives sustainable development
Securities
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Fight financial crime
Negative impact
Enable financial crime through investments and own transactions
Verdipapirer
Investeringer bank
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Fight financial crime
Risk
Involvement in fraud, money laundering or other financial crime through own transactions or in the investment portfolio which could result in financial losses
Influence companies to reach the UN Sustainability Development Goals
Fight financial crime
The sustainability goals included in KLP’s corporate strategy cover and are based on the significant topics with associated material impacts, risks and opportunities.
The sustainability objectives are further specified in goals, which are made up of short and long-term targets with associated KPIs and actions. These clarify the sustainability ambitions for the various activities in the Group. The topics covered by the goals broadly coincide with sustainability headings in the ESRS.
The goals have been defined in collaboration between different disciplines across the Group, based partly on input from stakeholders. Stakeholders have not generally been directly involved in defining the goals.
Follow-up of the goals follows the normal corporate governance process at KLP, and regular assessments are made to ensure that KLP has appropriate and sufficient measures in place. Our assessment is that KLP is well equipped to manage and leverage identified material impacts, risks and opportunities.
Stakeholders and stakeholder dialogueSBM-2, IRO-1
KLP has carried out a stakeholder analysis to identify our internal and external stakeholders. Our customers and owners – municipalities, county authorities, health trusts and companies with public-sector occupational pensions – along with KLP’s own employees, are our most important stakeholders. One strength of the mutual ownership model is that the customers and owners are the same. So the needs of our owners and customers are always at the heart of our strategy and priorities. There are also other stakeholders we strive to have a good relationship with. All are discussed in more detail in the table below.
How the stakeholder dialogue is organised
Purpose of the dialogue
Example outcomes from the dialogue
Consideration of stakeholders’ views
Information flow to management and the board on stakeholders’ views
Customers and owners – these are municipalities, county authorities, health trusts and companies that have their pension schemes in KLP, and are thereby also co-owners of the mutual company
Customers and owners are represented in all governing bodies, so are involved in all decisions made.
KLP hosts owner meetings and election meetings every two years.
Ongoing contact through customer work and events.
KLP runs occasional stakeholder surveys by way of interviews. The last one on the subject of sustainability was in spring 2021.
KLP is a mutual company where our customers are also our owners, and this puts them in a good position to influence things.
These are forums where the management of municipalities and county authorities are invited to share their views on KLP's activities.
This close customer dialogue provides an arena for discussion, where the account manager is open to opinions.
Establish trust in us to handle their data correctly and securely.
The significant area, called “Sustainable working life”, as described under ESRS S4, is a direct result of KLP’s owners judging the work to be important and so incorporating it into the strategy.
The board of KLP, on which customers and owners are represented, has highlighted this topic and wants KLP to assist our customer-owners in addressing the challenges they face. This led to KLP changing its strategy, and focusing on the “sustainable working life” strategy as this is part of the goal for this topic.
This group is represented in all governing bodies, and the flow of information goes on in board meetings, among other things. It also happens in other well-established meeting places where customers and owners are represented, and where there is open dialogue. These include owner meetings, resource group meetings, and county assemblies.
Employees -– in the KLP Group
Represented on the board and in the corporate assembly.
Formal and informal forums for cooperation between management, staff representatives, safety officers and employees where employee survey results are presented, for example.
Information from management with a chance for employees to ask questions directly both in the general meeting and on the intranet.
KLP runs occasional stakeholder surveys in which the employees are involved. The last took the form of a questionnaire on dyslexia-friendly workplaces in 2023.
Dialogue on the company strategy – both for input and to create understanding.
Empower employees to influence matters that affect them.
Identify challenges and provide for a good working environment.
Increased trust and collaboration through open and honest dialogue.
Establish trust in KLP to handle employees’ data correctly and securely.
ESRS S1, “Process for employee follow-up and involvement”
Members – Employees of our customers with public-sector occupational pensions, and those who receive pensions from us.
Information at klp.no.
Public reports, newsletters.
Direct contact and members’ area.
Information meetings.
Open channels for contact.
Provide them with information, but also a chance to discuss which choices are best for the individual.
Establish trust in us to handle their data correctly and securely.
Dialogue about the value of staying at work as a result of changes in the pension system
Feedback from members is logged in CRM and should be passed on from account managers through their managers to top management
Employer and employee organisations in our owners’ workplaces – An employer organisation is an association of employers working to safeguard their interests vis-à-vis employees and authorities. While an employee organisation, also called a trade union, represents the employees
Represented on the board and in the corporate assembly, etc.
Dialogue on the rules on public-sector occupational pensions
Discuss and adopt strategies.
Discuss issues, and “see their side of the question”.
Dialogue with the parties on the value of staying in work as a result of changes in the pension system
These are represented on KLP’s board of directors
Authorities, supervisory bodies, politicians, NGOs, the industry and society in general
Dialogue with political leaders, NGOs, etc.
Participation in various industry forums.
Public consultations.
Create a shared understanding of sustainability issues.
Establish trust.
Dialogue with the parties on the value of staying in work as a result of changes in the pension system
Companies we are invested in – these are companies in which KLP has invested the pension money and is a shareholder
Dialogue with companies
Attendance at general meetings.
Attendance at seminars and conferences.
Compliance with our policies.
Driving a green transition
Suppliers – these are companies that provide goods and services to KLP
Supplier meetings
Compliance with our principles.
Driving a green transition .
Establish trust.
Dialogue on what they are doing to reduce their impact on the environment, nature, and people
The table provides an overview of the dialogue, which stakeholders are involved, the stakeholders’ views, and how these are passed on to the board and management. We listen to our owners, customers, employees, members and organisations to understand their views and needs. This is what we use to design our strategy. Key stakeholders influence our priorities and direction. We also take account of feedback from stakeholders in the preparation of Policies, where relevant; see tables in section 3.4 “Policies”, and under all ESRS headings for concrete examples of dialogue. The Policies at the top of the document hierarchy are adopted by the board.
Stakeholder involvement is mostly through established forums: board meetings, collaborative forums, group meetings, etc. Interviews and questionnaires are also used.
The basis for KLP’s sustainability strategy and reporting is the double materiality analysis carried out in 2024. This is a revision of the analysis from 2023.
The most important changes from the analysis in 2023 are:
Each value chain is analysed. Separate analyses have been carried out for each core activity/value chain in the Group.
Weighting based on the consolidated balance sheet To weight the results from the individual value chains at the Group level, we have taken the proportion of the consolidated balance sheet derived from each value chain.
Custom scoring model. To assess each impact, risk and opportunity, we have used the probability and impact assessment matrix in the “Rules for risk management and internal control in KLP”; see scoring matrix below.
Materiality thresholds. Specific thresholds have been set for each value chain to prioritise the impacts, risks and opportunities which are material.
Assessment at a more detailed topic level. We have taken the most detailed topic level (“sub-sub-topics”), and not included any custom topics.
“Responsibility in the investments” is not highlighted as a separate topic, but is assessed as an aspect of the different sustainability topics, as well as being linked to SBM-3; see section 2.2 “Secure and competitive pension savings”
“Employees in the value chain” is not prioritised as a significant topic. KLP does not have a complicated value chain in relative terms. This does not mean that no work is being done on this, and “Sustainable procurement” is part of the group strategy. KLP is also subject to the activity and reporting requirements in the Norwegian Transparency Act. KLP reports on this on separately, outside the sustainability statement in the annual report.
Double materiality analysis process (IRO 1)
KLP's materiality analysis looked at materiality across all value chains in the Group. The analysis is based on guidance from the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) and was led by a project group of members from all business areas. The figure below shows the overall steps in the analysis work.
Identification of impacts, risks and opportunities
The analysis is based on established procedures for due diligence and risk assessments. Several types of input were used:
Stakeholder input through general stakeholder dialogue (described above)
Due diligence assessments on human and labour rights
Internal topic-specific analysis work, such as climate and nature risk analyses
Assessments as part of the Group’s risk management and internal control process
External analyses and expectation documents
Analyses and risk assessments by the HR function related to our own employees
Interviews with stakeholders in the non-life company, the property company and the bank, including key suppliers and customers
Dialogue with selected sustainability and risk experts in the KLP Group
Voluntary survey among employees in the Group, and dialogue with and questionnaire circulated to employees of the non-life company, the property company and the bank
Review of the value chains, including key suppliers and input factors, for claims settlements and building construction activities for the non-life company and the property company.
Assessment of impacts, risks and opportunities
To assess each impact, risk and opportunity, we have used the following scoring matrix. The matrix is the same across the Group with the exception of financial losses, which take account of the amount of the assets in the various companies.
Score
Severity
Likelihood
Financial impact
Scale
Scope
Reversibility
How big is the impact?
How widespread is the impact?
Is it possible to recover the damage?
5
Catastrophic
Critical mental or physical injuries, multiple fatalities, grave damage to the environment or society
Global/total
Large parts of the population affected. Impact everywhere or throughout the value chain
Irrecoverable
Irrecoverable
Almost certain
Occurs with 70-100% probability, once or more than once a year
Very serious financial loss/gain, prolonged and extensive reputational damage or lengthy and far-reaching suspension of operations
4
Serious
Serious mental or physical injury, permanent disability, or death. Serious damage to the environment or society
Widespread
More than 500 people affected. Widespread impact across a region or large parts of the value chain
Very hard
Very hard to repair, or need for long-term measures
Likely
Occurs with 30-70% probability, every 2 to 5 years
Serious financial loss/gain, prolonged reputational damage or lengthy suspension of operations
3
Moderate
Mental or physical injury requiring sick leave, moderate damage to the environment or society
Middling
Less than 500 people affected. Impact in one city/area or single link in the value chain
Difficult
Hard to recover or need for action in the medium term
Possible
Occurs with 10-30% probability, every 5 to 10 years
Moderate financial loss/gain, short-term negative publicity or reputational damage or suspension of operations
2
Small
Minor mental or physical injuries, minor damage to the environment or society
Concentrated
Less than 50 people affected. Impact is local or affects one supplier
Possible
Possible to recover with effort (time and cost)
Unlikely
Occurs with 5-10% probability, every 10 to 25 years
Small financial loss/gain, limited negative publicity or reputational damage or brief suspension of operations
1
Insignificant
No physical or mental injury to people, negligible damage to the environment or society
Limited
Individuals affected. Impact limited and local
Relatively easy
Relatively easy to recover in the short term
Unlikely
Occurs with 0-5% probability, less than once every 25 years
Insignificant financial loss/gain, reputational damage or suspension of operations
For each impact, risk and opportunity, an impact score or risk score is calculated based on the severity (average of scale, scope and recoverability) and likelihood of impacts, and the financial impact and likelihood of risks and opportunities. After scoring all impacts, risks and opportunities, a materiality threshold is set to determine which of them are material. This is calibrated and quality-checked by reviewing the list of impacts, risks and opportunities that do not exceed the materiality threshold, with a particular focus on those that fall just below.
For human rights impacts, a special assessment has been made of impacts that fall below the materiality threshold, recognising that severity should be weighted more heavily than probability. This is a qualitative assessment.
We have used the following time horizons in the assessment:
Short: Within 1 year
Medium: Between 1 and 5 years
Long: Over 5 years
Material sustainability risks identified are followed up through established risk management procedures. Sustainability risk follows the same principles for prioritisation and risk appetite as other risks. In 2024, the identification and assessment of sustainability risk formed part of the materiality analysis, but in the future it will be integrated into the annual review of risk management and internal control. This process will then provide input to the double materiality analysis, and the material risks will be systematically integrated into the risk monitoring system in line with other risks. Identification, assessment and follow-up of sustainability-related opportunities will be an integral part of monitoring strategy and goals in each business area.
Results of the materiality analysis
The materiality analysis identified the following material climate-related risks and opportunities:
Risk factor
Type of service affected
Type of climate risk
Global warming leads to systemic market risk associated with lower global productivity
Public-sector occupational pensions
Physical climate risk
Climate change could lead to increased claims costs and physical damage to buildings from natural events.
Public-sector occupational pensions
Physical climate risk
Company-specific risk arising from slow climate transition.
Public-sector occupational pensions
Transition risk
Increased costs due to stricter regulations
Public-sector occupational pensions
Transition risk
KLP invests in development and scaling of climate solutions
Public-sector occupational pensions
Transition risk
Unpredictability in the way climate is weighted in procurement procedures and in future expectations from customers
Public-sector occupational pensions
Transition risk
KLP contributes to energy efficiency
Property management and banking
Transition risk
KLP contributes to claims prevention
Non-life insurance
Transition risk and physical risk
Emissions from purchasing, property operation and development, and claims settlement
KLP’s operations
Transition risk
See also section 3.5 Climate, environment and nature - climate change - climate risk.
The material impacts, risks and opportunities that we have identified under the other headings are covered in the sections on “Material impacts, risks and opportunities” under each ESRS topic (Biodiversity and ecosystems; Resource use and circular economy; Own workforce; Consumers and end-users; and Business conduct).
For the sustainability topics of Pollution (ESRS E2), Water and marine resources (ESRS E3) and Resource use and circular economy (ESRS E5), we have followed the procedure described in the process diagram above. Each business area has looked at its value chain and identified impacts, risks and opportunities based on stakeholder input. Through the double materiality analysis, it was judged that the sustainability topics of pollution and water and marine resources are not material for the KLP Group overall.
In the materiality analysis for the investment portfolio, two impacts were identified that were judged to be material at the Group level; “trade union rights in portfolio companies” under ESRS S2 (Workers in the value chain) and “human rights in war and conflict situations” under ESRS S3 (Affected communities). Human rights are a priority area for KLP’s active ownership, where our work helps to develop best practice in the industry. KLP aims to be transparent about its work, but finds that the disclosure requirements in ESRS S2 and ESRS S3 do not cover active ownership in an adequate and relevant manner. We have determined that ESRS S2 and S3 are not material for KLP at the Group level. We describe our work on human rights in the investment portfolio in section 2.2 “Secure and competitive pension savings”, and in the statement according to the Transparency Act published at klp.no.
The table below provides an overview of which sustainability topics are considered material or not.
Topic and sub-topic
Materiality analysis
ESRS E1
Climate change
Material
Climate change adaptation
Material
Climate change mitigation
Material
Energy
Material
ESRS E2
Pollution
Not material
Pollution of air
Not material
Pollution of water
Not material
Pollution of soil or bedrock
Not material
Pollution of living organisms and food resources
Not material
Substances of concern
Not material
Substances of very high concern
Not material
Microplastics
Not material
ESRS E3
Water and marine resources
Not material
Water
Not material
Marine resources
Not material
ESRS E4
Biodiversity and ecosystems
Material
Direct Influencing factors for loss of biodiversity
Material
Effects on the condition of species
Not material
Effects on the scope and condition of ecosystems
Not material
Impacts and dependencies on ecosystem services
Not material
ESRS E5
Resource use and circular economy
Material
Resource inflows, including resource use
Material
Resource outflows related to products and services
Not material
Waste
Not material
ESRS S1
Own workforce
Material
Working conditions
Material
Equal treatment and equal opportunities for all
Material
Other work-related rights
Not material
ESRS S2
Workers in the value chain
Not material
Working conditions
Not material
Equal treatment and equal opportunities for all
Not material
Other work-related rights
Not material
ESRS S3
Affected communities
Not material
Economic, social and cultural rights of communities
Not material
Civil and political rights of communities
Not material
Rights of indigenous peoples
Not material
ESRS S4
Consumers and end-users
Material
Information-related impacts on consumers and/or end-users
Material
Personal safety of consumers and/or end-users
Not material
Social inclusion of consumers and/or end-users
Not material
ESRS G1
Business conduct
Material
Corporate culture
Not material
Protection of whistleblowers
Not material
Animal welfare
Not material
Political engagement and lobbying
Not material
Management of relationships with suppliers, including payment practices
Not material
Corruption and bribery
Material
3.4. Policies on sustainability MDR-P
KLP has several Policies addressing sustainability issues and undertakes to manage material impacts, risks and opportunities. The table below provides an overview of the most important ones. Topic-specific Policies are also described in the section for each topic. In the table below, all references to notes relate to “Notes to the sustainability report”.
Governing document
Relevant ESRS
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
KLP’s corporate strategy
E1, E4, E5, S1, S4
See “Strategy and corporate governance” and “Sustainability”
Whole of the Group
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals
See table in note 4
Internal strategy document, business-sensitive.
Summary given in section 2.1
Asset management strategy
All
Describes investment principles, strategy and limits for allocation, and approach to sustainability.
All investments by the life company KLP
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals, UN Global Compact
See table in note 4
Internal strategy document, business-sensitive.
Summary given in section 2.2
Goals for sustainability
E1, E4, E5, S1, S4, G1
KLP’s goals and measures to meet the sustainability targets in the Group strategy and the asset management strategy.
Whole of the Group
Defined EVP or MD of a subsidiary
Defined manager
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of goals is given under each topic in section 3.3
Policy for investment risk.
All
Establishes requirements for managing investment risk, including sustainability risk. It defines fundamental principles, processes, risk appetite, and roles and responsibilities.
KLP (the life company)
Board of directors
CEO
Not applicable
Internal governance document
Policy for underwriting risk
All
Lays down requirements for managing underwriting risk and defines principles, processes, risk appetite, and roles and responsibilities. Discusses sustainability as a factor that has to be included in assessments of underwriting risk.
KLP (the life company)
Board of directors
CEO
Not applicable
Internal governance document
Policy for KLP as a responsible investor
E1, E4, E5, S4, G1
KLP’s approach to accountability and sustainability in investments
Investments
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals
UN Global Compact
PRI
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Code of Conduct
S1, G1
Sets out principles for the way in which employees are expected to do their jobs and perform their roles for KLP.
All employees
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Rules for whistleblowing
S1, G1
The regulations describe how employees should go about reporting their concerns, and the employer's case-handling process for notifications. Emphasises that reprisals are not allowed, so whistleblowers can feel safe and protected.
All employees
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Working Environment Act, Chapter 2A
Not applicable
Internal document, no public interest
Information on whistleblowing can be found at klp.no
Principles for socially responsible supplier conduct
E5, G1
Expectations placed on KLP’s suppliers
Purchasing
CEO
Group chief financial officer/executive vice-president, Finance
UN Sustainable Development Goals
ILO Conventions
Ethical Trade Norway
City of Oslo and the “Oslo Model”
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
KLP’s expectations as owner
All ESRSs
Companies should have profitable business models that are not harmful to people or the environment, and which contribute towards the achievement of globally adopted goals for a sustainable future.
Investments
CEO
Group chief financial officer, managing director of KLP Kapitalforvaltning
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Rules for how KLP reduces its impact on the environment
E1, E4, E5
Describe the approach and framework for KLP to reduce the environmental impact from its own operations
Own operations
CEO
Executive vice-president, Corporate Governance
Eco-Lighthouse
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
3.5. Climate, environment and nature
EU taxonomy
The EU taxonomy is a classification system used to define sustainable economic activities. The taxonomy plays a key role in the EU’s climate strategy and efforts to meet its climate targets, with the aim of making it clear to investors and customers which activities are sustainable and helping to move capital in their direction. In order for an economic activity to be classified as sustainable and consistent (“aligned”) with the taxonomy, it must meet three criteria:
make a substantial contribution to at least one environmental objective (technical criteria)
do no significant harm to any other environmental objective (“DSFH” criteria)
comply with minimum social safeguards (minimum safeguards)
KLP aims to help the world achieve the goals in the Paris Agreement. As a group, we have several ways to contribute to the climate transition and we are actively working both to reduce our climate footprint and to increase our positive contribution to the transition. Our climate strategy sets out specific targets and actions to reduce emissions from the investment portfolio, and goals have been defined that specify how the various business areas in the Group should work on climate issues.
KLP is constantly working to integrate sustainability into business processes and product development. The taxonomy is a natural standard to use in this work. We see standardisation as a strength in our global climate work and apply definitions and criteria from the taxonomy to investments and product development whenever possible and appropriate.
KLP’s climate strategy focuses on reducing financed emissions from its investment portfolio and increasing the proportion of companies that have a science-based restructuring plan according to SBTi’s “near term” standard for science-based climate targets for financial institutions. It is reasonable to assume that measures that support these goals over time will also increase the share of investments that are aligned with the taxonomy, as companies’ activities turn in a more sustainable direction.
In selecting with external managers and companies, and in dialogue with them, the taxonomy is a good starting point for understanding how they approach sustainability across the board and how sustainable the investments are according to the taxonomy. Through dialogue, we seek to persuade managers and companies to make their activities more sustainable and to report in line with the requirements in the taxonomy.
We are constantly working to make the buildings in our property portfolio more sustainable and energy-efficient. We want to increase the share of properties that are sustainable according to the taxonomy, so we will increasingly prioritise measures to enhance properties that are close to meeting the taxonomy criteria, and can therefore be aligned with the taxonomy.
In 2024, KLP launched a new insurance product for municipal property. This was developed in light of the criteria in the taxonomy and will incentivise municipalities to make more circular choices in insurance settlements. In the future, KLP will continue its efforts to ensure that this and other property insurance products are compatible with the criteria in the taxonomy.
Municipalities and county authorities can apply for green loans for projects with a clear and documented climate and environmental impact. After a revision of the criteria for green loans at the end of 2024, we have introduced requirements for documentation of land use for new buildings. This gives us a better basis for assessing whether green loans for new buildings are compatible with the criteria in the taxonomy.
We assume that all of KLP's activities meet the minimum social and governance requirements in the taxonomy. In the KLP Group, we promote fundamental human rights and decent working conditions as an investor, employer and buyer. Our due diligence assessments on human rights and decent working conditions follow the OECD’s due diligence guide.
Investor: We strive at all times for greater accountability in our investments and in the economy in order to reduce sustainability risk and contribute to strong and effective capital markets. KLP monitors its investments for violations of international norms and conventions from the UN, ILO and OECD, as described in our “Policy for KLP as a responsible investor”, and use our active ownership to push companies in a more sustainable direction. See section 2.2 “Secure and competitive retirement savings” for more on KLP’s work as a responsible investor.
Employer: We have a strong focus on being a responsible employer and safeguarding fundamental human rights, privacy, the environment and health and safety for our employees. See “Own workforce” for more information on how we ensure good working conditions.
Buyer: The ILO conventions are central to our principles for socially responsible supplier conduct. We carry out annual due diligence checks on all established and significant suppliers, with a risk-based approach:
Level 1: Automated assessment based on industry and location.
Level 2: Detailed assessment for high risk or high value, or places on the high-risk list. The supplier responds to a standard questionnaire.
Level 3: Direct assessment for high risk according to level 2, or special circumstances. We communicate with suppliers about high risks related to human rights and follow up on their work.
Financial crime We have zero tolerance for financial crime See “Business conduct” for more information on how we combat financial crime.
As a group, we have several different activities that may be aligned with the taxonomy. We report taxonomy ratios, which show the proportion of our activities that are taxonomy-aligned, for the Group and each of the Group companies separately. KLP is invested in more than 9,600 companies worldwide and therefore relies on figures from data providers to analyse and report in line with the taxonomy. As maturity and awareness of the EU taxonomy increase, and more companies are covered by the CSRD, we expect to see better data quality and access as there the number of reporting companies grows.
KLP has reported in accordance with the taxonomy since 2022, although it was not required to do so until the 2023 financial year. We then calculated the Group’s taxonomy ratio based on the Group’s balance sheet. For the 2024 financial year, KLP, through the CSRD, is required to include the taxonomy in the sustainability statement in the Group’s annual report. The calculation of the taxonomy ratio for the Group has been changed so it is based on the Group’s revenue, and not its balance sheet. This gives some evidence of how the different activities in the group are weighted in calculating the Group's taxonomy ratios. Of the KLP Group’s total revenues, 5.3 per cent are consistent with the taxonomy, and 2.3 per cent are consistent with taxonomy based on investment expenditure. This is a small change from 2023, but the ratios are not directly comparable because last year’s ratios were based on the balance sheet. The change may therefore be down to the change of method alone, but could also reflect increased access to data from investments and the fact that several activities have become sustainable in accordance with the taxonomy. The diagram “Companies' Contributions” shows the extent of each company's contribution to the Group-level KPI.
Method for taxonomy calculations
This section describes how the various taxonomy ratios included in the KLP Group’s taxonomy reporting are calculated.
Securities investments
Listed securities
In the taxonomy calculation for listed securities, we mostly use data from MSCI, but we use data from Nordic Trustee for Nordic bond issuers.
Covered by the taxonomy (“taxonomy-eligible”)
According to the Regulation, the assessment and reporting of the taxonomy-eligibility and alignment of an investment should be based only on data from companies subject to the EU Accounting Directive (Directive (EU) 2013/34), Articles 19a and 29a. These companies make up a limited portion of KLP’s total investment portfolio, as a large proportion of the investments are in non-European companies. As yet, only a small proportion of companies covered by the reporting requirement are reporting taxonomy data. For companies that have not reported taxonomy data, MSCI calculates taxonomy ratios based on an assessment of whether any of a company's revenue comes from activities covered by the taxonomy and, if so, how much. We include these taxonomy ratios in our calculations, and to increase data coverage, we use estimates prepared from MSCI to say whether a company has activities that are subject to the taxonomy criteria or not. To prepare the estimates, MSCI assesses whether and, if so, how much of a company's revenue comes from activities that are taxonomy-eligible.
The proportion of the market value that is eligible is calculated by weighting each company with its share of the portfolio multiplied by the share of that company’s earnings that is eligible.
Compatible with the taxonomy (“taxonomy-aligned”)
In assessing whether securities investments are compatible with the taxonomy, we rely on reported data and not estimates. Where it is available, we collect data on the company’s earnings (turnover) and investment expenditure (capex) that are taxonomy-aligned. Investments where no data is available are not considered to be taxonomy-aligned.
The proportion of the market value that is taxonomy-aligned is calculated by weighting each company with its share of the portfolio multiplied by the share of that company’s earnings that is covered.
In order to report in line with the templates for taxonomy reporting, we also calculate the total market value that is aligned based on the company’s investment expenditure (capex).
To classify companies according to the categories in the template in Annex III (to EU Regulation 2021/2178), we have made the following assumptions:
Financial and non-financial companies: Classification based on sector codes such as GICS, NACE or other sector codes
Companies in the EU and outside the EU: The classification is based on where the company is registered for tax purposes
Companies subject to the Accounting Directive (EU 2013/34), Articles 19a and 29a: The classification is based on data from MSCI or on our own assessment of earnings data from the companies. In our own assessment, we assume that companies with net revenues of NOK 580 million are subject to the Accounting Directive. All of the companies are exchange-listed and will be public-interest entities, but we have not checked whether they have over 500 employees. This will lead to over-reporting of companies that are taxonomy-eligible. As some of the companies are not actually covered and so do not report in line with the taxonomy, they will contribute zero values in the numerator in the “aligned” ratios. We are working with our data providers to improve data coverage on this point.
The basis for the taxonomy tables for investments is based on the companies' reported figures to our data providers. The data basis is characterized by partially incomplete reporting, as some companies have reported on the proportion of the companies' activities that are compatible with the taxonomy, without specifying which environmental objectives the companies' activities are compatible with. We want to take a cautious approach to the reported figures and assume that underlying companies in the investment portfolio that have not specified environmental objectives for their activities are considered to be "eligible" by the taxonomy, and not "aligned" with the taxonomy in our calculations. This creates discrepancies in the section "Other additional information: specification of the numerator in the KPI" in the taxonomy tables for KLP Skadeforsikring, KLP Kapitalforvaltning, and KLP Livselskapet.
Unlisted securities
Unlisted securities include unlisted equity and debt funds, and investments classified as affiliated companies and joint ventures in the financial statements. There is relatively little data available for these investments, and KLP is in regular discussions with asset managers to gain access to more and better quality data. To be included in the calculation of the taxonomy ratios, companies must be subject to the NFRD, which most unlisted investments are not. KLP has therefore assumed that these investments are not covered by the taxonomy, and they will therefore count as zero in the numerator part of the ratios.
Lending
KLP provides two main types of loans that are relevant according to the taxonomy: mortgages to private individuals resident in Norway and loans to Norwegian municipalities, county authorities, health trusts and undertakings affiliated to the public sector. The following assumptions form the basis for the taxonomy calculation for lending:
All mortgages are included.
In line with Article 7 of the Supplementary Provisions to the Taxonomy Regulation (2021/2178), we have excluded all exposures to governments and central banks from the denominator and the numerator, while derivatives, cash and other financial instruments are included in the denominator but excluded from the numerator.
All exposure to municipalities, both through loans and securities, is included in the denominator.
We assume that green loans as a product for municipalities may be covered by the taxonomy and include these in the calculation of taxonomy-aligned activity, as they have a defined purpose.
The assessment of whether green loans to municipalities are taxonomy-aligned is limited to loans for new buildings and renovations. These two purposes make up the majority of green loans, so this is this category where we have data to assess whether we meet the technical criteria.
Green loans to municipalities
This lending category covers loans for projects with positive climate or environmental effects. Green loans are made to municipalities, county authorities and entities with a public-sector affiliation. Examples of projects include refurbishment of buildings, investments in water and drainage, and investments in charging infrastructure. The project must meet predefined criteria.
In the taxonomy assessment, the loans are divided into different loan categories to be viewed against the technical criteria in the EU taxonomy. The majority of the green loans are in the category "new buildings", and significant contributions to environmental goal 1 are assessed against the technical criteria for taxonomy activity "7.1 Construction of new buildings". The criteria for doing no significant harm to any other environmental objective are also assessed by mapping physical climate risk related to buildings in addition to the criteria for the other environmental objectives.
For 2024, we consider that 0 per cent of green loans to municipalities are taxonomy-aligned. This is mainly due to a lack of documentation to ensure that the loans meet the technical criteria. After a revision of the criteria for green loans at the end of 2024, we have introduced requirements for documentation of land use for new buildings. This gives us a better basis for assessing whether green loans for new buildings are in line with the taxonomy going forward.
Mortgages
Mortgages to the retail market finance the purchase of homes and are therefore covered by taxonomy under activity 7.7. “Acquisition and ownership of buildings”. In the technical screening process, the mortgage is assessed against the technical criteria for the objective of a significant contribution to “Climate change mitigation”. We consider that all mortgages for small houses and apartments in energy band A or rated among the top 15% most energy-efficient homes nationally contribute to a significant positive impact. To assess the top 15% most energy-efficient homes nationally, we rely on data from Eiendomsverdi AS. For homes built before 31.12.2020, Eiendomsverdi collects data on energy efficiency for homes in Norway, analyses energy usage data for a large group of homes, and identifies the limit for the top 15%. The thresholds are set at 140 kWh/m2 per year for small houses and 120 kWh/m2 per year for apartment blocks.
In order to assess the ‘do no significant harm’ (DNSH) criteria for the environmental target of ‘climate change adaptation’, we have carried out a climate risk assessment in line with the requirements in Annex A to the Taxonomy Regulation (EU 2021/2139). The climate and vulnerability analysis is based on the entire mortgage portfolio. The data basis is obtained from Eiendomsverdi AS and contains risk figures for flooding, landslides, and sea level rise for the properties in the portfolio. For the mortgages that are assessed to significantly contribute to "Climate Change Mitigation", very few of these are exposed to significant physical climate risk. KLP Banken will continue to consider possible measures for the homes in the mortgage portfolio that are exposed to physical climate risk.
For homes exposed to physical climate risk, a fall in the house price has been factored in see how the loan-to-value ratio for these loans is affected. The various price drop scenarios apply the LTV ratio at current price levels, and at 10 per cent, 20 per cent and 30 per cent down. This is done to reveal how the climate risk-prone homes that we finance will cope with a fall in price.
In 2024, we gained access to data on the risk of stormwater for the mortgage portfolio. Along with more mapping and better data quality, this has now led to a larger share of the portfolio being judged to be exposed to some form of physical climate risk. In total, around 40 per cent of the total mortgage portfolio is more or less exposed to the physical climate risks we have assessed (also including due diligence areas). The analysis also shows that climate-risk-prone homes that suffer a fall in house prices get a higher LTV (lending secured against the home as a percentage of a prudent valuation). Price drops in the event of a climate-related event can cause the bank's collateral to be impaired, which increases the bank's risk of loss if the customer defaults on the mortgage and the bank no longer has security for the loan. Possible risk mitigation measures for this risk could be to impose a lower debt-to-asset ratio on homes that are exposed to climate risk, or place a shorter repayment period on the loan.
All mortgages in energy band A, or included in the top 15% of the most energy efficient homes and, and who meet the "do no significant harm" criterias, are therefore considered to be taxonomy-aligned.
Property
In practice, the majority of the activities of KLP Eiendom will be taxonomy-eligible. Based on an assessment of activities and projects in 2024, only "7.7 Acquisition and ownership of buildings” is relevant for this year's calculation. For the other activities within the category "Construction and real estate activities", i) there have been no activities or projects this year that we believe to be taxonomy-aligned, and ii) we cannot obtain the necessary data to assess whether the activities or projects are taxonomy-aligned.
We have assumed that only rental income is taxonomy-eligible, and not other operating income. This means that 99 per cent of earnings are taxonomy-eligible.
Rental income
Activity 7.7 “Acquisition and ownership of buildings” may be sustainable where it contributes significantly to the environmental goals of “Climate change mitigation” and “Climate change adaptation”. As with mortgages, fulfilment of the technical criteria for climate change mitigation is assessed by assessing the primary energy requirements or energy band of the buildings, is based on limit values measured in kWh/m2 of heated GFA per year.
Buildings constructed before 31.12.2020 can meet the criterion if they are in energy band A or are among the top 15 per cent of all buildings within the same nation or region. We have used different sources to define the threshold value for the top 15 per cent for buildings in different countries:
Norway: In a memo to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy from 2023, the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) calculated threshold values for energy consumption per square metre to define the top 15 and top 30 per cent. We use the threshold values for the top 15 per cent for different building categories in our calculations.
Sweden: The interest group "Fastighetsägarna" has specified its own limits to define the top 15 per cent. These are also based on energy consumption per square metre, and the threshold value is 80 kWh/m2 for the office buildings in the portfolio.
Denmark: In Denmark, the interest group “Rådet for Bæredyktig Byggeri” has prepared guides for assessing taxonomy activities which are used for reporting on the Danish properties. It is considered that buildings constructed before 31.12.2020, and in energy band C or better, meet the criteria.
For buildings constructed after 31.12.2020, the calculation is based on the energy supplied according to the energy labelling scheme. Buildings that are within the different threshold values are considered to contribute significantly to the environmental goal of “Climate change mitigation”.
In order to assess the criteria for “doing no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives”, a climate risk assessment has been carried out in line with the requirements in Annex A (to EU Regulation 2021/2178). The assessments are based mainly on information obtained over time from the operating organisation about incidents and damage related to natural perils. We also carry out a portfolio assessment based on mapping tools and models which give an indication of future risks related to climate change. See chapter 3.5 "Climate, environment and nature - climate change - climate risk” for more details of KLP Eiendom’s climate risk analysis.
KLP Eiendom is covered by general guidelines in the Group that document compliance with the taxonomy requirement for minimum social safeguards. We also assume that all buildings that KLP owns, but does not itself operate, are not taxonomy-aligned because we cannot guarantee that they meet the minimum social and governance requirements. This applies mainly to hotels. By entering into dialogue with tenants, it may also be possible in the future to document compliance with these criteria for properties where we do not have our own operations.
Investment expenditure
In the denominator for the ‘investment expenditure’ ratios, facilities under construction are included in the balance.
The most relevant activities for KLP Eiendom related to investment expenditure are “7.1 Construction of new buildings”, “7.2 Renovation of existing buildings” and “7.7 Acquisition and ownership of buildings”. As of now, there is no investment expenditure shown to be associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities, so we believe that none of our ongoing projects meets the taxonomy criteria.
Operating costs
The denominator in the ratio for operating costs includes direct, uncapitalised costs related to
renovation, maintenance and repairs as well as all other direct expenses related to ongoing maintenance of property, plant and equipment carried out by the company or by a third party. The extract from the accounts includes the account type “maintenance costs”.
For example, current taxonomy-aligned economic activities relevant to KLP Eiendom could include CCM "7.3 Installation and operation of energy efficiency equipment" and "7.5 Installation and operation of instruments for measuring the energy performance of buildings" and 7.7 “Acquisition and ownership of buildings”. For 2024, it is not possible in the company's accounts to separate the share of operating expenses related to activities that might meet the environmental criteria. It is also unclear how the component requirements for energy-efficient equipment should be interpreted, as these refer to the 2010 Building Energy Directive which has not been introduced in Norway. As these activities cover a small portion of the items that make up the company’s operating expenses, it is expected that the proportion that might represent taxonomy-aligned economic activities would be small compared to the total operating expenses. In the reporting for 2024, a numerator is therefore set to 0.
Insurance income
The following assumptions form the basis for the taxonomy calculation for insurance income:
The denominator in theratiois total insurance income minus insurance income from life policies.
We assume that all of the insurance categories that we offer, apart from general liability and life insurance, may be covered by the taxonomy
Our assessment is that all of the insurance products that we offer within these categories provide cover for at least one climate-related risk and are therefore taxonomy-eligible.
According to the EU Commission guidance from 2023, only those parts of the premium income that can be directly attributed to cover for climate-related events may be taken into account in the calculation of taxonomy-eligible and taxonomy-aligned insurance income. This guidance text has been interpreted very differently by different insurance companies, and a working group set up by Finance Norway has tried to arrive at a common Norwegian interpretation of the guidance. This was completed in December 2024, and we have not yet been able to establish a methodology for calculating the climate-related share of premiums for all the relevant insurance categories. In the reporting of premium income covered by the taxonomy for 2024, we therefore only include the “natural peril” premium, which covers a number of causes of damage mentioned in the list of climate-related events given in the Taxonomy Regulation.
There are a number of criteria at different levels that must be met for premium income to count as taxonomy-aligned. Some of the criteria relate to pricing models and terms and conditions for the insurance products, while others are assessed at the overall level for the company as a whole. All of the criteria are about arranging the non-life insurance activity to enhance society’s ability to adapt to climate change.
We consider that we meet the more high-level criteria. Among other things, we have a comprehensive programme for claims prevention, aimed particularly at customers in the public sector and corporate markets. We offer insurance cover for most nature and climate-related damage our customers may suffer today, and we constantly assess the need for new or extended cover. We place great emphasis on providing good and effective support to our customers when they suffer damage, as shown by the good results we get in satisfaction surveys after claims settlement processes. We also share claims data from natural and water-related claims with municipalities and other relevant authorities in collaboration with Finance Norway, so those responsible for regulation, climate change adaptation and enhancement of public infrastructure can use the claims history in their decision-making processes.
Weather and climate-related risks are included in the company’s overall risk assessments. Through the claims history, this risk also feeds into the premium-setting for each customer.
In 2024, we worked on several measures which also help to meet the criteria relating to the individual insurance products. We are strengthening the climate risk assessment at the object level by incorporating a stormwater factor into the tariff for key property products from 1 January 2025. The work on climate risk analysis is part of a more extensive product development programme which will do more to incorporate climate risk and sustainability into key insurance products.
As the these changes to terms and conditions and tariffs for individual products only came into effect on 1 January 2025, we consider that none of our insurance products met all of the technical criteria for non-life insurance in the EU taxonomy at the end of the 2024 reporting year. We follow the guidance that only the climate-related portion should be taken into account in calculating the premium income that is consistent with the taxonomy. However, this does not have any practical bearing on the calculation for this reporting year. The proportion of insurance income that is taxonomy-aligned is therefore set at 0 for 2024.
KLP Group
For the Group, we report the share of income covered by and aligned with the criteria in the taxonomy. The taxonomy ratio is calculated based on the “mixed-group table” in Appendix II to the Commission notice (2024/6691).
The KLP Group’s taxonomy ratios and associated taxonomy tables are based on taxonomy ratios for the parent company and the subsidiaries respectively. These will be presented separately in this section.
The assets included in the Group ratio are calculated from the financial activities of the parent company and the subsidiaries. To calculate the proportion of each economic activity to be included in the Group’s green ratios, we use the ratio of revenues for each activity compared to the Group’s total revenues.
Mandatory taxonomy tables
Revenue
Proportion of total group revenue (A)
KPI turnover based (B)
KPI CapEx based (C)
KPI turnover based weighted (A*B)
KPI CapEx based weighted (A*C)
A. Financial activities
42 516 967 392
88 %
Life insurance*
36 766 972 202
76 %
2,2 %
2,7 %
1,7 %
2,0 %
KLP Banken
2 648 902 330
5 %
4,0 %
4,0 %
0,2 %
0,2 %
KLP Skadeforsikring**
3 067 681 324
6 %
0,4 %
0,5 %
0,0 %
0,0 %
KLP Kapitalforvaltning
33 411 536
0 %
3,2 %
3,4 %
0,0 %
0,0 %
B. Non-financial activities
5 914 971 596
12 %
KLP Eiendom
5 914 971 596
12 %
27 %
0 %
3,3 %
0,0 %
Total revenue on the group
48 431 938 988
100 %
Average KPI turnover based
Average KPI CapEx based
Average KPI of the Group
5,3 %
2,3 %
* Real estate investments and investments in subsidiaries are not included in the ratio for Life Insurance in the mixed-group table.
** The ratio for Skadeforsikring is weighted according to the proportion of compatible income from the investment portfolio compared to total income for Skadeforsikring.
KLP
The parent company KLP (the life company) is required to report the share of investments that are covered by and aligned with the criteria in the taxonomy. This is described in Article 6 and Annex IX to the Supplementary Provisions to the Taxonomy Regulation (2021/2178) on reporting requirements for insurance and reinsurance.
The assets included in the numerator in KLP’s taxonomy ratio are:
Property investments For investment property, we have used the ratio from rental income from the buildings. We have derived the value of KLP’s eligible and aligned property investments by the life company by multiplying the ratios by the balance sheet value of property investments.
Lending Here, the lending categories include "residential loans" and "green loans to municipalities and county authorities" on KLP's balance sheet.
Securities investments All securities investments on KLP's balance sheet are included in the assessment.
Ownership interests in the subsidiaries. To calculate the value from ownership in the subsidiaries to be included in the numerator for KLP, we have used the subsidiaries’ own ratios and multiplied them by the balance-sheet value of the subsidiaries.
For KLP Banken, we have used the banking group’s green ratio (GAR).
For KLP Skadeforsikring, we have used the company’s ratio for insurance income, as this gives the most descriptive picture of the company’s business.
For KLP Kapitalforvaltning, we have used the company’s ratios, which only includes capital under management on the company’s own balance sheet and excludes KLP’s assets and those of external customers.
Mandatory taxonomy tables
Investments
Share in per cent
Values in NOK millions
Weighted average value of all investments by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking that are related to financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities, relative to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI, with the following weights for investments in undertakings
Weighted average of the value of all investments by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking that are related to financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities, with the following weights for investments in undertakings
Based on turnover
5.12%
Based on turnover
42,181
Based on investment spend
2.35%
Based on investment spend
19,260
Percentage of the assets covered by the KPI, relative to the total investments of the insurance or reinsurance undertakings (total assets under management). Excluding investments in public-sector entities.
95.42%
Monetary value of the assets covered by the KPI. Excluding investments in public-sector entities.
824,368
Other additional information: specification of the denominator in the KPI
Percentage of derivatives in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI. Coverage ratio
-0.53%
Monetary value of the derivatives.
-4,387
The proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
30.50%
For non-financial undertakings
251,425
For financial undertakings
2.66%
For financial undertakings
21,948
Proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
17.19%
For non-financial undertakings
141,726
For financial undertakings
7.90%
For financial undertakings
65,104
Proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
17.23%
For non-financial undertakings
142,076
For financial undertakings
10.54%
For financial undertakings
86,874
Proportion of exposures to other counterparties in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
14.51%
Value of exposures to other counterparties
119,600
Proportion of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
100.00%
Proportion of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
824,368
Value of all investments that finance financial activities not covered by the taxonomy, in relation to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI
63.75%
Value of all investments that finance economic activities not covered by the taxonomy
525,523
Value of all investments that finance economic activities that are covered by the taxonomy but are not taxonomy-aligned, in relation to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI
31.13%
Value of all investments that finance economic activities that are covered by the taxonomy but are not taxonomy-aligned
256,664
Other additional information: specification of the numerator in the KPI
Proportion of taxonomy-aligned exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of taxonomy-aligned exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
For non-financial undertakings
Based on turnover
1.84%
Based on turnover
15,183
Based on investment spend
2.33%
Based on investment spend
19,249
For financial undertakings
For financial undertakings
Based on turnover
0.02%
Based on turnover
194
Based on investment spend
0.00%
Based on investment spend
19
Proportion of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
Value of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
Based on turnover
1.86%
Based on turnover
15,321
Based on investment spend
2.35%
Based on investment spend
19,366
Proportion of taxonomy-aligned exposures to other counterparties relative to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of taxonomy-aligned exposures to other counterparties in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Based on turnover
0.01%
Based on turnover
69
Based on investment spend
0.01%
Based on investment spend
113
Specification of the numerator in the KPI by environmental goal
Taxonomy-aligned activities – provided that the activities are considered to do no significant harm (DNSH) and the social guarantees are considered to be positive
1) Climate change mitigation
Turnover
5.10%
Transition activities
0.12%
Enabling activities
0.76%
Investment spend
2.34%
Transition activities
0.16%
Enabling activities
1.12%
2) Climate change adaptation
Turnover
0.01%
Transition activities
0.00%
Enabling activities
0.00%
Investment spend
0.01%
Transition activities
0.00%
Enabling activities
0.00%
3) Sustainable use of water and marine resources
Turnover
0.00%
Enabling activities
0.00%
Investment spend
0.00%
4) Transition to a circular economy
Turnover
0.00%
Enabling activities
0.00%
Investment spend
0.00%
5) Pollution prevention and mitigation
Turnover
0.00%
Enabling activities
0.00%
Investment spend
0.00%
6) Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
Turnover
0.00%
Enabling activities
0.00%
Investment spend
0.00%
Gas and nuclear
Templates for gas and nuclear power are intended for KLP liv and KLP Skadeforsikring together, both of which report as insurance undertakings.
Template 1 – Revenue
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
YES
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
YES
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
YES
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilities that produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
Template 2 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3 256 540
0,00 %
3 256 540
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
210 001 193
0,04 %
210 001 193
0,04 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
7 613 642 781
1,53 %
7 613 642 440
1,53 %
341
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
20 379
0,00 %
20 379
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity EN 3 EN referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
73 029 781
0,01 %
40 594 121
0,01 %
32 435 660
0,01 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3 654 079
0,00 %
3 654 079
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
7 647 663 584
0,89 %
7 418 233 677
0,86 %
229 429 908
0,03 %
8.
Total applicable KPI
15 551 268 338
2,47 %
15 289 402 429
2,44 %
261 865 908
0,03 %
Template 3 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
25 949
0,00 %
25 949
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 EN 4 EN of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
109 035 748
0,70 %
109 035 748
0,70 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
1 125 057 262
7,23 %
1 125 057 262
7,23 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
74 280
0,00 %
74 280
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
7 440 844
0,05 %
3 752 597
0,02 %
3 688 247
0,02 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
299 603
0,00 %
299 603
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the applicable KPI
14 309 334 652
92,01 %
11 140 536 280
71,64 %
3 168 798 372
20,38 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the applicable KPI
15 551 268 338
100,00 %
12 378 781 719
79,60 %
3 172 486 619
20,40 %
Template 4 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1 699 836
0,00 %
1 699 836
0
0
0
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1 828 987
0,00 %
1 828 987
0
0
0
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
5 492 597
0,00 %
5 492 597
0
0
0
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
2 727 915 046
0,53 %
2 727 914 940
0
106
0
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
6 564 004 879
1,24 %
6 531 569 220
0
32 435 659
0
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated EN 6 EN Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
289 026 738
0,06 %
289 026 738
0
0
0
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
170 830 628 374
26,83 %
169 149 615 090
26,57 %
1 681 013 284
0,27 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
180 420 596 457
28,67 %
178 707 147 408
28,40 %
1 713 449 049
0,27 %
Template 5 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount
Percentage
1.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 1 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
183 962
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 2 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
4 376 789
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 3 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
150 731 146
0,04 %
4.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 4 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
75 711
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 5 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of EN 7 EN the applicable KPI
32 374 038
0,01 %
6.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 6 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
184 022
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-noneligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
433 140 651 761
68,81 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-noneligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
433 328 577 429
68,86 %
Template 1 – Investment costs
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
YES
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
YES
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
YES
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
Template 2 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
222 061
0,00 %
222 061
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3 628 238 289
0,70 %
3 628 238 289
0,70 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1 832 115 345
0,42 %
1 832 115 345
0,42 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
641 078
0,00 %
641 078
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity EN 3 EN referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
32 683 552
0,01 %
32 683 552
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
44 242 688
0,01 %
44 242 688
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
14 102 162 343
1,99 %
14 102 162 343
1,99 %
0
0,00 %
8.
Total applicable KPI
19 640 305 355
3,12 %
19 640 305 355
3,12 %
0
0,00 %
Template 3 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
62 803
0,00 %
62 803
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 EN 4 EN of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
2 406 078 276
12,25 %
2 406 078 276
12,25 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
1 940 157 337
9,88 %
1 940 157 337
9,88 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
669 504
0,00 %
669 504
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
3 156 500
0,02 %
3 156 500
0,02 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
438 120
0,00 %
437 952
0,00 %
168
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the applicable KPI
15 289 742 816
77,85 %
11 071 973 697
77,85 %
4 217 769 119
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the applicable KPI
19 640 305 355
100,00 %
15 422 536 068
100,00 %
4 217 769 287
0,00 %
Template 4 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
473 622
0,00 %
473 622
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
274
0,00 %
274
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1 395 456
0,00 %
1 395 456
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
75 390 518
0,02 %
82 296 249
0,02 %
539 270
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
4 325 388 897
0,83 %
4 317 383 729
0,83 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated EN 6 EN Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
541 456 043
0,12 %
541 451 015
0,12 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
13 566 303 335
6,25 %
13 454 842 377
6,19 %
129 005 399
0,06 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
45 445 496 251
7,22 %
45 315 951 582
7,16 %
129 544 669
0,06 %
Template 5 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount
Percentage
1.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 1 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 2 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
227 404 804
0,12 %
3.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 3 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
71 518 776
0,02 %
4.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 4 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
6 365
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 5 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of EN 7 EN the applicable KPI
32 516 398
0,01 %
6.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 6 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
66
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-noneligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
9 569 223 279
89,51 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-noneligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
564 214 640 617
89,66 %
KLP Kapitalforvaltning
For KLP Kapitalforvaltning, we report the share of the capital under management that is “taxonomy-eligible” and “taxonomy-aligned”. This is described in Article 3 and Annex III (Annex IV for the taxonomy table) to the Supplementary Provisions to the Taxonomy Regulation (2021/2178) on reporting requirements for asset managers. The taxonomyratiofor KLP Kapitalforvaltning is based on the assets on the subsidiary’s own balance sheet.
Share in per cent
Values in NOK millions
Weighted average value of all investments that are related to financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities, relative to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI, with the following weights for investments in undertakings:
Weighted average of the value of all investments that are related to financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities, with the following weights for investments in undertakings:
Based on turnover
3.2%
Based on turnover
19
Based on investment spend
3.4%
Based on investment spend
20
Percentage of the assets covered by the KPI, relative to all investments (total assets under management). Excluding investments in public-sector entities.
100.0%
Monetary value of the assets covered by the KPI. Excluding investments in public-sector entities.
584
Other additional information: specification of the denominator in the KPI
Percentage of derivatives in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI. Coverage ratio
0.0%
Monetary value of the derivatives.
0
The proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
24.1%
For non-financial undertakings
141
For financial undertakings
4.3%
For financial undertakings
25
Proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
4.7%
For non-financial undertakings
27
For financial undertakings
1.2%
For financial undertakings
7
Proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
20.1%
For non-financial undertakings
117
For financial undertakings
43.1%
For financial undertakings
252
Proportion of exposures to other counterparties in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
2.6%
Value of exposures to other counterparties
15
Value of all investments that finance financial activities not covered by the taxonomy, in relation to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI
88.9%
Value of all investments that finance economic activities not covered by the taxonomy
519
Value of all investments that finance economic activities that are covered by the taxonomy but are not taxonomy-aligned, in relation to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI
7.3%
Value of all investments that finance economic activities that are covered by the taxonomy but are not taxonomy-aligned
46
Other additional information: specification of the numerator in the KPI
Proportion of taxonomy-aligned exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of taxonomy-aligned exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
For non-financial undertakings
Based on turnover
3.2%
Based on turnover
19
Based on investment spend
3.4%
Based on investment spend
20
For financial undertakings
For financial undertakings
Based on turnover
0.0%
Based on turnover
0
Based on investment spend
0.0%
Based on investment spend
0
Proportion of taxonomy-aligned exposures to other counterparties relative to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of taxonomy-aligned exposures to other counterparties in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Based on turnover
0.0%
Based on turnover
0
Based on investment spend
0.0%
Based on investment spend
0
Specification of the numerator in the KPI by environmental goal
Taxonomy-aligned activities – provided that the activities are considered to do no significant harm (DNSH) and the social guarantees are considered to be positive
1) Climate change mitigation
Turnover
3.2%
Transition activities
0.3%
Enabling activities
0.9%
Investment spend
3.4%
Transition activities
0.4%
Enabling activities
1.3%
2) Climate change adaptation
Turnover
0.0%
Transition activities
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
Transition activities
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
3) Sustainable use of water and marine resources
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
4) Transition to a circular economy
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
5) Pollution prevention and mitigation
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
6) Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
Gas and nuclear power
Template 1 – Revenue
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
YES
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
YES
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
YES
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
Template 2 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
4
0,00 %
4
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
5 320
0,00 %
5 320
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
194 079
0,03 %
194 079
0,03 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity EN 3 EN referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
64
0,00 %
27
0,00 %
37
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
18 635 859
3,19 %
18 635 552
3,19 %
306
0,00 %
8.
Total applicable KPI
18 835 325
3,22 %
18 834 982
3,22 %
343
0,00 %
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
4
0,00 %
4
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
5 320
0,00 %
5 320
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
194 079
0,03 %
194 079
0,03 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity EN 3 EN referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
64
0,00 %
27
0,00 %
37
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
18 635 859
3,19 %
18 635 552
3,19 %
306
0,00 %
8.
Total applicable KPI
18 835 325
3,22 %
18 834 982
3,22 %
343
0,00 %
Template 3 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 EN 4 EN of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
2 659
0,00 %
2 659
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
14 877
0,08 %
14 878
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
4
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the applicable KPI
18 817 788
100,00 %
18 774 612
99,99 %
43 176
0,01 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the applicable KPI
18 835 325
100,00 %
18 792 149
99,99 %
43 180
0,01 %
Template 4 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2
0
0
0
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2
0
0
0
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3
0,00 %
3
0
0
0
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
61 172
0,01 %
61 172
0
0
0
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
164 890
0,03 %
164 853
0
37
0
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated EN 6 EN Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0
0
0
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
46 024 017
7,88 %
46 023 695
7,88 %
323
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
46 250 086
7,92 %
46 249 727
7,92 %
359
0,00 %
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2
0
0
0
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2
0
0
0
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3
0,00 %
3
0
0
0
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
61 172
0,01 %
61 172
0
0
0
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
164 890
0,03 %
164 853
0
37
0
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated EN 6 EN Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0
0
0
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
46 024 017
7,88 %
46 023 695
7,88 %
323
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
46 250 086
7,92 %
46 249 727
7,92 %
359
0,00 %
Template 5 – Revenue
Economic activities
Amount
Percentage
1.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 1 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 2 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 3 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 4 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 5 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of EN 7 EN the applicable KPI
36
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 6 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-noneligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
519 201 449
88,86 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-noneligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
519 201 487
88,86 %
Economic activities
Amount
Percentage
1.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 1 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 2 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 3 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 4 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 5 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of EN 7 EN the applicable KPI
36
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 6 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-noneligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
519 201 449
88,86 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-noneligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
519 201 487
88,86 %
Template 1 – Investment costs
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
YES
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
YES
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
YES
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
YES
Template 2 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
93 061
0,02 %
93 061
0,02 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
42 539
0,01 %
42 539
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
4
0,00 %
4
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity EN 3 EN referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
36
0,00 %
36
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3
0,00 %
3
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
19 993 946
3,42 %
19 993 639
3,42 %
307
0,00 %
8.
Total applicable KPI
20 129 590
3,45 %
20 129 590
3,45 %
341
0,00 %
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
93 061
0,02 %
93 061
0,02 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
42 539
0,01 %
42 539
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
4
0,00 %
4
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity EN 3 EN referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
36
0,00 %
36
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
3
0,00 %
3
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
19 993 946
3,42 %
19 993 639
3,42 %
307
0,00 %
8.
Total applicable KPI
20 129 590
3,45 %
20 129 283
3,45 %
307
0,00 %
Template 3 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 EN 4 EN of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
62 159
0,01 %
62 159
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
40 488
0,01 %
40 488
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the applicable KPI
20 026 941
100,00 %
20 026 621
99,98 %
321
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the applicable KPI
20 129 590
100,00 %
20 129 590
100,00 %
321
0,00 %
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 EN 4 EN of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
62 159
0,01 %
62 159
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
40 488
0,01 %
40 488
0,01 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
2
0,00 %
2
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the numerator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the numerator of the applicable KPI
20 026 941
100,00 %
20 026 621
99,98 %
321
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the numerator of the applicable KPI
20 129 590
100,00 %
20 129 590
100,00 %
321
0,00 %
Template 4 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0
0
0
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0
0
0
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0
0
0
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0
0
0
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
93 079
0,02 %
93 079
0
0
0
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated EN 6 EN Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0
0
0
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
20 860 873
3,57 %
20 860 552
3,57 %
321
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
20 953 954
3,59 %
20 953 634
0,00 %
321
0,00 %
Economic activities
Amount and proportion
CCM + CCA
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Amount
%
Amount
%
Amount
%
1.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
93 079
0,02 %
93 079
0,02 %
0
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activity referred to in Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated EN 6 EN Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
1
0,00 %
1
0,00 %
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
20 860 873
3,57 %
20 860 552
3,57 %
321
0,00 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy eligible but not taxonomy-aligned economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
20 953 954
3,59 %
20 953 634
3,59 %
321
0,00 %
Template 5 – Investment costs
Economic activities
Amount
Percentage
1.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 1 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 2 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 3 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 4 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 5 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of EN 7 EN the applicable KPI
37
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 6 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-noneligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
543 203 317
92,97 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-noneligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
543 203 354
92,97 %
Economic activities
Amount
Percentage
1.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 1 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.26 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
2.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 2 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.27 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
3.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 3 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.28 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
4.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 4 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.29 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
5.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 5 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.30 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of EN 7 EN the applicable KPI
37
0,00 %
6.
Amount and proportion of economic activity referred to in row 6 of Template 1 that is taxonomy-non-eligible in accordance with Section 4.31 of Annexes I and II to Delegated Regulation 2021/2139 in the denominator of the applicable KPI
0
0,00 %
7.
Amount and proportion of other taxonomy-noneligible economic activities not referred to in rows 1 to 6 above in the denominator of the applicable KPI
543 203 317
92,97 %
8.
Total amount and proportion of taxonomy-noneligible economic activities in the denominator of the applicable KPI
543 203 354
92,97 %
KLP Eiendom
KLP Eiendom is a non-financial company engaged in the purchase, sale, ownership and management of property.
For KLP Eiendom, we report the share of the income and capital and operating expenditure that is “taxonomy-eligible” and “taxonomy-aligned”. This is described in Article 2 of the Taxonomy Regulation (EU 2021/2178) on reporting requirements for non-financial companies, and Annex I.
The reporting covers the whole property portfolio, regardless of ownership within the KLP Group (KLP's share capital, KLP's common portfolio, KLP Skadeforsikring). It does not include property funds managed by external managers, which are investments posted to KLP's balance sheet.
Rental income
Criteria for significant contribution
Criteria to show that the activity does no significant harm (DNSH)
Economic activity (1)
Code (2)
Absolute turnover in NOK millions (3)
Share of revenue, 2024 (4)
Climate change mitigation (5)
Climate change adaptation (6)
Water and marine resources (7)
Pollution (8)
Circular economy (9)
Biodiversity and ecosystems (10)
Climate change mitigation (11)
Climate change adaptation (12)
Water and marine resources (13)
Pollution (14)
Circular economy (15)
Biodiversity and ecosystems (16)
Minimum guarantees (17)
Share of taxonomy-aligned (A.1) or eligible (A.2) revenue, 2023 (18)
Operating expenses for environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned) activities (A.1)
0
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Y
0.0%
Of which: enabling
Of which: transition
A.2 Activities covered by the taxonomy but not environmentally sustainable (non-taxonomy-aligned activities)
Installation and operation of energy efficiency equipment
CCM 7.3
0
0.0%
N
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Installation, maintenance and repair of instruments and devices for measuring, regulation and controlling energy performance of buildings
CCM 7.5
0
0.0%
N
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
Acquisition and ownership of buildings
CCM 7.7
0
0.0%
N
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
0.0%
Operating expenses for activities covered by taxonomy but not environmentally sustainable (non-taxonomy-aligned activities) (A.2)
0
0.0%
N
N
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
0.0%
Operating expenses for activities covered by the taxonomy (A.1 + A.2)
0
0.0%
100.0%
0.0%
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
N/EL
0.0%
B. ACTIVITIES NOT COVERED BY THE TAXONOMY
Operating expenses for activities not covered by the taxonomy (B)
278
100.0%
Total
278
100.0%
Gas and nuclear power
Template 1 – applies to both income and investment costs
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
No
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
No
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
No
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
KLP Banken
For KLP Banken, we report the share of the assets that are covered by and aligned with the criteria in the taxonomy. This is described in Article 4 and Annex V in the Supplementary Provisions to the Taxonomy Regulation (2021/2178) on reporting requirements for credit institutions. KLP Banken’s taxonomy ratio covers lending and securities investments. KLP Banken does not have any exposure to nuclear power or fossil gas in its lending and will therefore only report on Template 1 based on Annex XII (to EU Regulation 2021/2178).
Mandatory taxonomy tables
Template no.
Designation
0
Summary of KPIs
1
Assets included in the calculation of GAR
2
GAR – sectoral Information
3
GAR – KPI for holdings
4
GAR – KPI for asset flows
5
KPI for off-balance-sheet exposures
6
CPI for fee and commission income from services other than lending and asset management
7
KPI for the trading portfolio
Summary
Total environmentally sustainable assets
KPI****
KPI*****
Degree of coverage in % (of total assets)***
% of assets not included in the numerator in the GAR (Article 7, nos 2 and 3 and Section 1.1.2 of Appendix V)
% of assets not included in the denominator in the GAR (Article 7 no 1 and Section 1.2.4 of Annex V)
Main KPI
Greenratio(GAR) for holdings
2,039,565
4.0%
4.0%
98.6%
37.7%
1.4%
Total environmentally sustainable activities
KPI
KPI
Degree of coverage in % (of total assets)***
% of assets not included in the numerator in the GAR (Article 7, nos 2 and 3 and Section 1.1.2 of Appendix V)
% of assets not included in the denominator in the GAR (Article 7 no 1 and Section 1.2.4 of Annex V)
Other KPIs
Greenratio(asset flows)
502,546
1.0%
1.0%
1.0%
0%
0%
Trading portfolio*
I/A
Financial guarantees
I/A
Assets under management
I/A
Fee and commission income**
I/A
1. Assets included in the calculation of GAR
2024
NOK thousands
Total gross book value
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: in taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: environmentally sustainable (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition/adaptation
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition/adaptation
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition/adaptation
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition/adaptation
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition/adaptation
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition/adaptation
Of which: enabling
GAR – assets covered in both numerator and denominator
1
Loans and advances, debt instruments and equity instruments that are not held for trading purposes and are included in the calculation of GAR
2
Financial undertakings
3
Credit institutions
4
Loans and advances
1,196,476
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
6,187,238
81,914
0
0
0
0
0
81,914
0
6
Equity instruments
7
Other financial undertakings
8
of which: investment firms
9
Loans and advances
10
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
11
Equity instruments
12
of which: asset management companies
13
Loans and advances
14
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
15
Equity instruments
16
of which: insurance companies
17
Loans and advances
18
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
19
Equity instruments
20
Non-financial undertakings
21
Loans and advances
22
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
23
Equity instruments
24
Households
25
of which: loans secured against residential properties
24,148,383
24,148,383
2,039,565
2,039,565
2,039,565
0
0
0
0
0
0
24,148,383
2,039,565
2,039,565
2,039,565
0
26
of which: loans for building renovation
27
of which: car loans
28
Financing for local authorities
29
Home financing
30
Other financing by local authorities
19,450,530
31
Securities taken: residential and commercial properties
32
Assets not to be included in the numerator when calculating GAR (included in the denominator)
33
Financial and non-financial undertakings
34
SMEs and non-financial undertakings (which are not SMEs) not subject to the reporting obligation in the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD)
35
Loans and advances
36
of which: loans secured against commercial properties
37
of which: loans for building renovation
38
Debt instruments
39
Equity instruments
40
Counterparties from non-EU countries not subject to the reporting requirement in the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
41
Loans and advances
42
Debt instruments
43
Equity instruments
1,853
44
Derivatives
83,852
45
Interbank loans on demand
46
Cash and cash-related assets
47
Other assets (e.g., goodwill, goods, etc.)
28,607
48
Total GAR for assets
51,096,939
24,230,298
2,039,565
2,039,565
2,039,565
24,230,298
2,039,565
2,039,565
2,039,565
0
49
Other assets not included in the calculation of GAR
50
Central authorities and supranational issuers
237,846
51
Exposures to central banks
467,829
52
Trading portfolio
53
Total assets
51,802,614
Off-balance-sheet exposures – Companies subject to the reporting requirement in the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
54
Financial guarantees
55
Assets under management
56
of which: debt instruments
57
of which: equity instruments
2. GAR – sectoral information
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of actio(BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Specification by sector – 4-digit level in the NACE classification (code and designation)
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Non-financial undertakings (covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive)
SMEs and other non-financial undertakings not covered by the Non-Financial Reporting Directive
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
Gross book value
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable (definition)
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
NOK millions
Of which: environmentally sustainable
1
2
3
4
3. GAR – KPI for holdings based on investment expenditure (capex)
2024
% (relative to total covered assets in the denominator)
Climate change mitigation (CCM)
Climate change adaptation (CCA)
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
GAR – assets covered in both numerator and denominator
1
Loans and advances, debt instruments and equity instruments that are not held for trading purposes and are included in the calculation of GAR
2
Financial undertakings
3
Credit institutions
4
Loans and advances
2.3%
0
2.3%
5
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
12.1%
0
12.1%
6
Equity instruments
7
Other financial undertakings
8
of which: investment firms
9
Loans and advances
10
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
11
Equity instruments
12
of which: asset management companies
13
Loans and advances
14
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
15
Equity instruments
16
of which: insurance companies
17
Loans and advances
18
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
19
Equity instruments
20
Non-financial undertakings
21
Loans and advances
22
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
23
Equity instruments
24
Households
25
of which: loans secured against residential properties
47.3%
4.0%
4.0%
47.3%
4.0%
4.0%
26
of which: loans for building renovation
27
of which: car loans
28
Financing for local authorities
29
Securities taken: residential and commercial properties
30
Other financing by local authorities
31
Secured against assets from: private and commercial property
32
Total GAR for assets
47.4%
4.0%
4.0%
47.4%
4.0%
4.0%
3. GAR – KPI for holdings, based on revenue (turnover)
2024
% (relative to total covered assets in the denominator)
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Share of total covered assets
GAR – assets covered in both numerator and denominator
1
Loans and advances, debt instruments and equity instruments that are not held for trading purposes and are included in the calculation of GAR
2
Financial undertakings
3
Credit institutions
4
Loans and advances
2.3%
2.3%
5
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
12.1%
12.1%
6
Equity instruments
7
Other financial undertakings
8
of which: investment firms
9
Loans and advances
10
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
11
Equity instruments
12
of which: asset management companies
13
Loans and advances
14
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
15
Equity instruments
16
of which: insurance companies
17
Loans and advances
18
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
19
Equity instruments
20
Non-financial undertakings
21
Loans and advances
22
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
23
Equity instruments
24
Households
25
of which: loans secured against residential properties
47.3%
4.0%
4.0%
47.3%
4.0%
4.0%
26
of which: loans for building renovation
27
of which: car loans
28
Financing for local authorities
29
Securities taken: residential and commercial properties
30
Other financing by local authorities
31
Secured against assets from: private and commercial property
32
Total GAR for assets
47.4%
4.0%
4.0%
47.4%
4.0%
4.0%
4. GAR – KPI for flows based on investment expenditure (capex)
2024
% (relative to the flow of all assets covered by the taxonomy)
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Share of new total assets covered
GAR – assets covered in both numerator and denominator
1
Loans and advances, debt instruments and equity instruments that are not held for trading purposes and are included in the calculation of GAR
2
Financial undertakings
3
Credit institutions
4
Loans and advances
5
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
6
Equity instruments
7
Other financial undertakings
8
of which: investment firms
9
Loans and advances
10
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
11
Equity instruments
12
of which: asset management companies
13
Loans and advances
14
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
15
Equity instruments
16
of which: insurance companies
17
Loans and advances
18
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
19
Equity instruments
20
Non-financial undertakings
21
Loans and advances
22
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
23
Equity instruments
24
Households
25
of which: loans secured against residential properties
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
26
of which: loans for building renovation
27
of which: car loans
28
Financing for local authorities
29
Securities taken: residential and commercial properties
30
Other financing by local authorities
31
Secured against assets from: private and commercial property
32
Total GAR for assets
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
0.0%
0.0%
4. GAR – KPI for streams based on revenue (turnover)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
2024
% (relative to the flow of all assets covered by the taxonomy)
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Share of new total assets covered
1
Assets covered by GAR included in both numerator and denominator
1
Loans and advances, debt instruments and equity instruments that are not held for trading purposes and are included in the calculation of GAR
2
Financial undertakings
3
Credit institutions
4
Loans and advances
5
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
6
Equity instruments
7
Other financial undertakings
8
of which: investment firms
9
Loans and advances
10
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
11
Equity instruments
12
of which: asset management companies
13
Loans and advances
14
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
15
Equity instruments
16
of which: insurance companies
17
Loans and advances
18
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
19
Equity instruments
20
Non-financial undertakings
21
Loans and advances
22
Debt instruments, including use of proceeds
23
Equity instruments
24
Households
25
of which: loans secured against residential properties
5.5%
1.0%
1.0%
5.5%
1.0%
1.0%
26
of which: loans for building renovation
27
of which: car loans
28
Financing for local authorities
29
Securities taken: residential and commercial properties
30
Other financing by local authorities
31
Secured against assets from: private and commercial property
32
Total GAR for assets
5.5%
1.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
1.0%
1.0%
0.0%
5. KPI for off-balance-sheet exposures based on investment expenditure (capex)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
l
m
n
2024
% (relative to total off-balance-sheet assets covered by the taxonomy)
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
1
Financial guarantees (KPI for FinGuar)
2
Assets under management (KPI for AuM)
5. KPI for off-balance-sheet exposures based on revenue (turnover)
a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
2024
% (relative to total off-balance-sheet assets covered by the taxonomy)
Climate change mitigation
Climate change adaptation
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources (WTR)
Transition to a circular economy (CE)
Pollution prevention and control (PPC)
Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems (BIO)
TOTAL (CCM+CCA+WTR+CE+PPC+BIO)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-eligible)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Share of total covered assets financing taxonomy-related sectors (taxonomy-aligned)
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
Of which: loans for special purposes
Of which: transition
Of which: enabling
1
Financial guarantees (KPI for FinGuar)
2
Assets under management (KPI for AuM)
Gas and nuclear power
Template 1 for KLP Banken
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
No
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
No
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
No
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
No
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
No
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
No
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
KLP Skadeforsikring
For KLP Skadeforsikring, we report the share of insurance income and investments that are covered by and aligned with the criteria in the taxonomy. This is described in Article 6 and Annex IX to the Supplementary Provisions to the Taxonomy Regulation (EU 2021/2178) on reporting requirements for insurance and reinsurance. KLP Skadeforsikring’s taxonomyratiocovers revenue from non-life insurance products and investments in securities and property.
Insurance income
Economic activity (1)
Absolute premiums, 2024 (2)
Share of premiums, 2024 (3)
Share of premiums, 2023 (4)
Climate change mitigation (5)
Water and marine resources (6)
Circular economy (7)
Pollution (8)
Biodiversity and ecosystems (9)
Minimum guarantees (10)
A.1 Non-life insurance and reinsurance activities that match the criteria in the taxonomy (taxonomy-aligned)
0
0
0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A.1.1 Of which: reinsured
0
0
0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A.1.2 Of which: derived from reinsurance activities
0
0
0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A.1.2.1 Of which: reinsured (retrocession)
0
0
0
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
A.2 Non-life insurance and reinsurance activities that are covered by but do not match the criteria in the taxonomy (not included in A.1)
89
4%
4%
Total A (A.1 + A.2)
89
4%
4%
B. Non-life insurance activities and reinsurance not covered by the taxonomy (non-taxonomy-eligible)
2,296
96%
96%
Total A.1+A.2
2,384
100%
100%
Absolute premiums = insurance income according to IFRS 17.
For 2024, item A.2 only includes insurance income from natural perils cover.
Life insurance is excluded from the whole calculation.
Investments
Share in per cent
Values in NOK millions
Weighted average value of all investments by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking that are related to financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities, relative to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI, with the following weights for investments in undertakings
Weighted average of the value of all investments by the insurance or reinsurance undertaking that are related to financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned economic activities, with the following weights for investments in undertakings
Based on turnover
3.8%
Based on turnover
230
Based on investment spend
4.5%
Based on investment spend
269
Percentage of the assets covered by the KPI, relative to the total investments of the insurance or reinsurance undertakings (total assets under management). Excluding investments in public-sector entities.
98.8%
Monetary value of the assets covered by the KPI. Excluding investments in public-sector entities.
6,019
Other additional information: specification of the denominator in the KPI
Percentage of derivatives in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI. Coverage ratio
-0.7%
Monetary value of the derivatives.
-39
The proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
23.1%
For non-financial undertakings
1,391
For financial undertakings
2.2%
For financial undertakings
134
Proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings not covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
16.6%
For non-financial undertakings
1,000
For financial undertakings
12.1%
For financial undertakings
729
Proportion of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
27.5%
For non-financial undertakings
1,653
For financial undertakings
18.0%
For financial undertakings
1,083
Proportion of exposures to other counterparties in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
1.1%
Value of exposures to other counterparties
68
Proportion of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
100.0%
Value of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
6,019
Value of all investments that finance financial activities not covered by the taxonomy, in relation to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI
60.2%
Value of all investments that finance economic activities not covered by the taxonomy
3,624
Value of all investments that finance economic activities that are covered by the taxonomy but are not taxonomy-aligned, in relation to the value of the total assets covered by the KPI
33.2 %
Value of all investments that finance economic activities that are covered by the taxonomy but are not taxonomy-aligned
2,165
Other additional information: specification of the numerator in the KPI
Proportion of taxonomy-aligned exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU, in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of taxonomy-aligned exposures to financial and non-financial undertakings covered by Articles 19a and 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU
For non-financial undertakings
For non-financial undertakings
Based on turnover
3.8%
Based on turnover
230
Based on investment spend
4.5%
Based on investment spend
269
For financial undertakings
For financial undertakings
Based on turnover
0.0%
Based on turnover
0
Based on investment spend
0.0%
Based on investment spend
0
Proportion of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
Value of investments by insurance or reinsurance undertakings other than investments related to life insurance contracts where the investment risk is borne by policyholders, which are aimed at financing or are associated with taxonomy-aligned financial activities
Based on turnover
3.8%
Based on turnover
230
Based on investment spend
4.5%
Based on investment spend
269
Proportion of taxonomy-aligned exposures to other counterparties relative to the total assets covered by the KPI
Value of taxonomy-aligned exposures to other counterparties in relation to the total assets covered by the KPI
Based on turnover
0.0%
Based on turnover
0
Based on investment spend
0.0%
Based on investment spend
0
Specification of the numerator in the KPI by environmental goal
Taxonomy-aligned activities – provided that the activities are considered to do no significant harm (DNSH) and the social guarantees are considered to be positive
1) Climate change mitigation
Turnover
3.8%
Transition activities
0.2%
Enabling activities
1.3%
Investment spend
4.4%
Transition activities
0.3%
Enabling activities
2.0%
2) Climate change adaptation
Turnover
0.0%
Transition activities
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
Transition activities
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
3) Sustainable use of water and marine resources
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
4) Transition to a circular economy
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
5) Pollution prevention and mitigation
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
6) Protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems
Turnover
0.0%
Enabling activities
0.0%
Investment spend
0.0%
Nuclear power and gas
Template 1 for KLP Skadeforsikring based on insurance income.
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
No
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
No
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
No
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
Nuclear energy related activities
1.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to research, development, demonstration and deployment of innovative electricity generation facilities that produce energy from nuclear processes with minimal waste from the fuel cycle.
No
2.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction and safe operation of new nuclear installations to produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production, as well as their safety upgrades, using best available technologies.
No
3.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to safe operation of existing nuclear installations that produce electricity or process heat, including for the purposes of district heating or industrial processes such as hydrogen production from nuclear energy, as well as their safety upgrades.
No
Fossil gas related activities
4.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction or operation of electricity generation facilitiesthat produce electricity using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
5.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment, and operation of combined heat/cool and power generation facilities using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
6.
The undertaking carries out, funds or has exposures to construction, refurbishment and operation of heat generation facilities that produce heat/cool using fossil gaseous fuels.
No
Climate changeESRS E1
Material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate changeSBM-3
The table below provides an overview of the material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate change. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
Table: overview of the material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate change.
Description of impact, risk or opportunity
Time horizon
Relevant activity in KLP
Stage in the value chain
Climate change adaptation
Positive impact
Contribute to faster climate transition in portfolio companies and greater expertise on climate in municipalities
Medium/long
Securities investments
Non-life insurance
Downstream – Investments
Downstream – Customers
Risk
Climate risk such as systemic market risk, as well as company-specific risk due to slow climate transition.
Energy consumption in property management and operation
Short
Property investments
Own operations
Policies E1-2
The table below provides an overview of the key Policies for KLP’s work on climate and managing the material impacts, risks and opportunities described in the table above. KLP’s climate work is primarily focused on asset management, which is where the principal greenhouse gas emissions and climate risk and opportunities lie. See also “Policies on sustainability” for an overview of overarching sustainability guidelines.
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
KLP’s climate strategy
Goals and measures to manage the investment portfolio in line with the goals in the Paris Agreement
All investments
Board of directors
CEO
SBTi
IPCC
Dialogue with SBTi. Dialogue with customers and owners through the board of directors
Available at klp.no
Goal “Reach net zero in the investment portfolio”
Goals and measures to implement the climate strategy
All investments
Group chief financial officer
Director for strategic asset allocation
SBTi
IPCC
EU taxonomy
As above
Internal strategy document. A summary of the goal is given in this section.
KLP’s expectations for companies with respect to climate change and the natural environment
Expectations for companies KLP is invested in with respect to a sustainable impact on climate and nature.
All investments
CEO
Group chief financial officer, managing director KLP Kapitalforvaltning
UN Sustainable Development Goals
UNFCCC
CBD
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Transition plan and goals for climate change mitigationE1-1, E1-4
KLP’s transition plan focuses on the investment portfolio, which is where KLP’s principal greenhouse gas emissions come from. We also have goals and measures in place to reduce emissions from our own operations. We use the term “climate strategy” in relation to our restructuring plan because we believe a strategy is a wider concept than a plan, and because we believe “climate” provides a more precise description of the topic than “transition”.
KLP’s ambition level is high and is based on what is scientifically necessary to meet KLP’s and Norway’s long-term goal of limiting global warming as set out in the Paris Agreement.
The strategy is based on the fact that failure to meet climate targets carries a very high cost to society, and hence a high systemic market risk. We believe that there is significant transition risk in falling behind in the restructuring of the markets
KLP regards climate risk as a key source of investment risk for the pension capital in the future, and believes that pension costs will increase if further global warming is not limited.
If we are to achieve the climate targets and stop global warming, the whole of the global economy has to move towards zero emissions. In this perspective, all actors may be regarded as small players with limited individual power to change things. In the absence of global regulation, KLP’s view is that everyone needs to contribute to the transition by taking whatever action they can, right now. Through our climate targets and associated initiatives, KLP will help to accelerate the pace of change, but we depend on everyone moving in the same direction to achieve our goals.
KLP’s climate targets are summarised in the table below. All climate targets are science-based. The overall ambition, the emissions target for property and the emissions target for own operations up to 2030 have also been verified by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) according to their “near-term criteria” standard for financial institutions (version 2.0, published in May 2024). KLP’s climate targets cover scope 1, 2 and scope 3 category 15 (financed emissions). Scope 3 categories 1 to 14 are not covered by KLP’s quantitative science-based climate targets. These emissions account for less than 0.2 per cent of the emissions in KLP’s greenhouse gas accounts.
The relevant goal in the sustainability strategy is “Reach net zero in the investment portfolio”.
KLP’s climate goals
KLP’s climate targets are structured into the following subcategories. For further explanation of these, and the corresponding table, see below.
Emission target
The target is in line with the median greenhouse gas emissions reduction path from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2023) to limit global warming to 1.5°C with over 50 per cent probability. The percentage reduction in emissions achieved will be adjusted for changes in KLP’s share of the capital markets. This means that if KLP’s investment portfolio grows more than the capital markets, the growth rate for financed emissions will be adjusted downwards by the factor for “added growth”, and will be adjusted upwards if the capital markets grow more than the portfolio.
The inclusion of portfolio companies’ scope 3 emissions when calculating financed emissions is in line with recommended best practice from the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) and the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi). See note 11 “Financed emissions” for the calculation method.
Ambition
The target is based on a linear projection between the level in the base year (2022) and 100 per cent in 2040, in line with the SBTi’s requirement for a “near-term” science-based climate target for financial institutions (SBTi, 2024). In this context, we use the approved definition from the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) as the criterion for “science-based climate targets”. See note 13 “Science-based transition plans (SBTi)”.
Investments in climate and nature solutions
According to the path to net-zero in 2050 from the IEA (2023)in line with the 1.5°C target from the Paris Agreement, annual global investments in clean energy solutions (low-emission energy, electricity grids, batteries and “energy efficiency”) should be around USD 4,500 billion a year in 2030. KLP’s investment portfolio accounts for an estimated 0.015 per cent of global capital markets. If KLP is to contribute its “share” of the capital markets, this implies investments of NOK 7 billion a year in clean energy solutions. KLP's target of at least 6 billion a year in net new climate and nature solutions covers most of this. KLP also contributes through its holdings in listed companies and investments in bonds to financing clean energy solutions which are not captured by the NOK 6 billion target, so KLP’s actual investments are well over NOK 7 billion a year.
The category of “Climate and nature solutions” captures activities that contribute to necessary solutions to climate and nature-related challenges. This mostly concerns investments in new projects or new technology, but it can also include the purchase of shares and bonds in the secondary market related to renewable energy, for example.
Property
The emissions target up to 2030 for the property portfolio is set in line with the SBTi’s requirements for science-based climate targets for property (“SDA tool for commercial real estate and residential mortgages”).
The targets include scope 1 and scope 2, calculated with the Nordic energy mix.
Mortgages
The target path for KLP’s mortgage portfolio from 2020 to 2050 is based on a linear projection towards a target of net zero emissions in 2050. KLP’s 2050 target is in line with the 2050 emissions level for the CRREM path for housing. KLP’s target trajectory for emissions reductions from housing by 2030 is less ambitious than CRREM’s, which means faster cuts up to 2030. We have chosen to deviate from the CRREM target path for home mortgages because we do not think it is realistic to achieve it given that it requires significant energy efficiency measures outside KLP’s control.
Target
Scope
Benchmark value in 2022 (base year):
2030
2035
2040
2045
2050
Status of target attainment (2022-24)
KLP’s investment portfolio
Emission targetReduce financed emissions, measured in tonnes of CO2e
In the short term, we expect financed emissions to fluctuate as a result of changes in data quality and the fact that we prioritise companies in transition with high emissions. However, as the companies with climate targets and restructuring plans implement measures and reduce emissions, KLP’s financed emissions will also fall.
Whole portfolio of securities investments
Included in KLP’s scope 3 emissions, category 15
Includes scope 1-3 emissions from investments
19.1 million tonnes of CO2e
–45%
–60%
–70%
-85%
–95%
-5.2%
Ambition: Increase the proportion of companies in the portfolio with science-based climate targets
The expressed ambition will help to stimulate restructuring, while KLP will gradually arrive at a portfolio of companies adapted to the global transition, with falling emissions in line with our own emissions targets. KLP’s climate work is directed at the companies and sectors where emissions are the greatest. KLP will help to stimulate real restructuring and emission reductions, rather than allocating funds away from sectors with high emissions.
Whole portfolio of securities investments
12% of the investment portfolio, weighted by financed emissions
55%
75%
100%
100%
100%
+19 pp.
Investments in climate and nature solutions:Invest a further NOK 6 billion each year.
Investments in climate and nature solutions help to accelerate the adoption of solutions for the transition to a sustainable society.
Whole portfolio of securities investments
NOK 6 bn.
NOK 6 bn.
Same as 2030 target
Same as 2030 target
Same as 2030 target
Same as 2030 target
NOK 6.0* bn
Property:Reduce emissions per square metre
The construction and operation of property results in large greenhouse gas emissions, both directly as part of energy use and indirectly through material use.
Property investments managed by KLP Eiendom
Scope 3 category 15 (incl. scope 1-2)
3.2 kg CO2e per sqm (location-based method)
–37%
–60%
Not quantified
Not quantified
Not quantified
-28%
Mortgages:Reduce emissions per square metre
Emissions from the mortgage portfolio constitute a relatively small proportion of KLP’s total financed emissions, but a significant portion of KLP Banken’s emissions.
Whole mortgage portfolio
Scope 3 category 15 (incl. scope 1-2)
3.06 kg CO2e per sqm*
–33%
–50%
–67%
-85%
–100%
-7.3%
KLP’s operations
Direct emissions from KLP’s operations
KLP Group
Scope 1
2.2 tonnes CO2e
-50%
-50%
Indirect emissions from purchased energy
Emissions from the operation of KLP's office buildings
Scope 2
66.8 tonnes CO2e (location-based method)
-35%
-12%
Share of renewable energy from purchased electricity
Emissions from the operation of KLP's office buildings
Scope 2
14% (market-based method)
Increase the share of renewable electricity to 100%
100%
*Average annual investment in climate and nature solutions from 2022.
To capture all significant emissions through the value chains, and the associated climate risk, KLP also aims to include scope 3 emissions in our reporting on financed emissions. The inclusion of scope 3 is in line with the recommended best practice from the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) and the SBTi. See note 7 “Financed emissions” for the calculation method. The exception is the mortgage portfolio where we have currently only included scope 2 emissions, and property investments where for scope 3 we have only included emissions related to waste. The challenge with scope 3 emissions is that this involves greater use of estimated values. At the same time, the inclusion of scope 3 provides a more realistic picture of the value chain, and the associated risks that businesses are exposed to.
The work of establishing science-based goals has been a gradual process of maturation, with involvement and input from internal and external resources. In 2021, KLP established the “Roadmap to Paris” – a science-based climate target for the investment portfolio. This was revised in 2024 to develop a clearer climate strategy with short and medium term targets also, and the establishment of measures that make goal attainment a realistic possibility. The strategy for the investment portfolio has been adopted by the board of directors of KLP. The climate target for property operation has been adopted by the board of KLP Eiendom and the target for the mortgage portfolio has been adopted by the board of KLP Banken. The climate targets for KLP's operations have been adopted by KLP's Group management. The individual sub-targets are followed up at the line management level, and the overall goals are followed up by Group senior management and the board of KLP.
The targets for the investment portfolio apply to pension capital managed on behalf of KLP’s customer-owners. Capital managed on behalf of external customers is not covered by the targets. In total, KLP’s climate target covers 73 per cent of the financed emissions in the base year 2022. This is calculated as financed emissions for customer owners divided by the total financed emissions (cf. the table in the Climate Accounts for Scope 3 emissions, category 15 – investments). The base year for the climate strategy is set to 2022 because this is judged to be the first year after the pandemic when economic activity was back to representative normal levels. Developments in financed emissions will be adjusted for changes in KLP’s share of the capital markets. See section 3.5 "Climate, environment and nature - climate change - KLPs climate goals" for more on climate targets and calculations.
Actions and resultsE1-3, MDR-A
Action plan to reach the targets for the investment portfolio by 2030
To make an effective and targeted contribution to the climate transition, KLP’s climate strategy has two focus areas: 1) Restructuring of risk sectors and 2) Financing of climate and nature solutions. The goal is concrete results, either in the form of companies setting science-based climate targets and realising emissions cuts, or by scaling new climate and nature solutions. To achieve the 2030 goals, KLP has the following action package:
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Impact work for restructuring:
Influencing companies towards restructuring (including setting science-based climate targets) through dialogue and voting, as well as communicating our expectations regarding conditions for sustainable business development to authorities and other stakeholders.
All asset classes
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Prioritisation of companies with science-based restructuring plans:
Prioritise companies with science-based transition plans approved by the SBTi and adapted to 1.5°C emission paths.
New investments in bonds held to maturity (long-term bonds)
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Climate-based divestment from high-emission sectors:
Make climate-based divestments from companies in high-emission sectors that are poorly adapted to the climate transition and display no ability or willingness to improve.
Equities and short-term bonds:
Planned for 2025
Medium:
Invest in climate and nature solutions:
Investments in the development of new projects or technology, and purchase of shares and bonds in the secondary market related to renewable energy.
All asset classes
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Energy-efficient and low-emission property portfolio:
Reduce the use of energy and materials, increase re-use and installation of renewable energy.
Property portfolio
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Green loans
Offer better interest terms on loans for projects with a clear positive environmental and climate impact.
Lending portfolio
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
The measures cover all asset classes in KLP’s investment portfolio, and are designed to actively contribute to the pace of the global transition. KLP evaluates the sum of actions that are necessary and sufficient for us to achieve KLP’s climate targets in the short and long term. KLP’s climate strategy does not include compensatory measures aimed at actors who have been exposed to climate change. The strategy also does not include measures for adaptation to climate change.
KLP’s allocation measures will be implemented gradually and build on market changes that are also driven by actions by other players. This means that the measures will be implemented regardless of external conditions, while the scope and speed of them will depend on developments in climate policy and the degree of market movements pulling in the same direction. The targets for 2030 are considered to be realistic, even given current global climate policy. KLP’s climate strategy needs to be re-evaluated by 2030 at the latest. If it should turn out that climate policy and the markets are standing still, or are moving in the opposite direction to what the climate targets would indicate, there will be a limit to how far KLP’s investment portfolio can be tilted in the direction of climate transition compared to the rest of the market. Although the principle of retaining a diversified portfolio across sectors is unchanged, the measures involve clear climate-related priorities and adaptations in KLP’s portfolio. However, the measures taken in KLP’s portfolios do not involve any significant investment expenditure (capex) on KLP’s balance sheet.
The exception is KLP’s property portfolio, where investments are made in energy efficiency measures on KLP’s balance sheet. All properties belonging to KLP Eiendom have a target to reduce energy consumption by 3 per cent per year, a waste sorting ratio of at least 65 per cent and water consumption of less than 0.35 cubic metres per square metre. KLP conducts annual maintenance and environmental inspections to identify potential measures that could help to achieve these targets in the properties. In each budget period, the results of these inspections are reviewed and measures are prioritised to achieve the targets. For properties with tenants on long-term contracts, an additional contract is entered into which stipulates cost-sharing of investments in energy efficiency between KLP Eiendom and the tenant. KLP aims to get as many properties as possible taxonomy-aligned, to confirm that the properties are in line with future climate and energy requirements. KLP Eiendom will therefore increasingly prioritise properties that are close to being taxonomy-aligned, to bring a larger number into line with the requirements from the taxonomy.
The restructuring work is integrated into KLP’s business in a way that makes all employees involved in asset management a part of the effort. KLP’s view is that there is no need for significant operating expenses (opex) to implement the restructuring plan. If there is a need for increased staffing, KLP will still adapt this resource allocation as and when needed.
Expected results from the restructuring plan
The figure below shows how KLP expects to achieve its climate targets up to 2030 with respect to financed emissions from the investment portfolio. Based on projections from the Climate Action Tracker (CAT), we assume that about a third of the cuts in financed emissions during this period (-15 per cent) will take place in the market without any active allocation measures, shown as a reference path in the figure below, while the majority of the other emissions cuts will follow active investment decisions.
KLP’s plan for reducing financed emissions (2022-2030)
Figure 2. KLP’s plan for cuts in financed emissions from the investment portfolio in line with the target for 2030.
There are different degrees of alignment between cuts in KLP’s financed emissions and expected cuts in greenhouse gas emissions in the real economy for the various measures presented in Figure 1. This makes it hard to estimate accurately what reductions in greenhouse gas emissions we can expect from the measures, and which have actually been realised. The goal is for the measures to contribute to a positive dynamic in the markets that results in emissions cuts beyond KLP’s own financed emissions. However, these effects are difficult, or impossible, to quantify. Investments in climate and nature solutions, for example, make a relatively modest contribution to reductions in financed emissions from the portfolio, but in practice they also help to displace fossil energy. This is a contribution to emissions cuts which is not included in this report. Another example is climate-based divestments in high-emission sectors. In purely technical terms, these measures entail a re-allocation of investment funds in KLP’s portfolio, which does not contribute directly to actual cuts in greenhouse gas emissions in the economy. However, the aim of the measure is to contribute to a positive dynamic in high-emission sectors, which can indirectly contribute both to major emissions cuts and to reductions in financed emissions. These last measures are expected to start in 2025 and cannot point to any emission reductions so far.
Figure 2 shows how KLP expects to increase the share of the portfolio with SBTi-approved climate targets broken down by measures. We assume that 30 per cent of the portfolio will have set science-based climate targets by 2030 without active allocation measures from KLP (base year + reference path). The remaining 25 percentage points are expected to be realised through active measures from KLP. The measures are also expected to have a positive market effect on other investors’ restructuring requirements for their investments and the companies’ transition strategies.
KLP’s plan to increase the share of science-based targets (2022-2030)
Figure 3. KLP’s plan for increasing the share of the portfolio with climate targets approved by the Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi) by 2030.
There is great uncertainty in the assumptions KLP on which bases both goals and strategy. First, there is considerable uncertainty in the data KLP uses to set climate targets and report progress. This is especially true of the way in which companies report emissions from input factors in their own production and the use of the products they make (scope 3 emissions). Secondly, it is not sufficient for KLP alone to have the resources to implement the climate strategy and take active steps to contribute to a positive movement towards restructuring. In order to influence effectively as a financial operator, we are also dependent on the portfolio companies’ willingness to change, which in turn depends on factors beyond KLP’s control, including political conditions, geopolitical changes, and increasingly visible consequences of climate change itself.
KLP has decided not to invest in companies with revenues from coal (since 2014) and oil sands (since 2018). The measure applies to all funds managed by KLP. This alone helps to reduce our transition risk associated with financing locked-in greenhouse gas emissions and the risk of ending up with “stranded assets”. However, KLP has NOK 28.7 billion invested in the oil and gas sector, which faces many of the same challenges as coal. Of this, customer-owners’ investments in the oil and gas sector amount to 17.7 billion. As of 2024, the oil and gas sector accounts for 2 per cent of KLP’s investment portfolio, and stands out in a particularly negative light in terms of the risk of ending up as “stranded assets” in various net-zero scenarios up to 2030 and 2050. Up to 2030, climate risk modelling in the “net-zero financial crisis” scenario shows a 30-50 per cent decline in value, and a 50-60 per cent decline in value up to 2050, compared with the scenario of continuing current climate policy (the baseline scenario). In order to reduce the risk of “stranded assets”, we make it clear in our discussions with the oil and gas companies that we believe they should not open any new oil and gas fields which will also require new infrastructure and remain in operation for a long time For the pension capital managed on behalf of KLP’s customer-owners, as part of our escalation strategy, we will also pursue gradual divestments in the sector based on those companies that do not show the willingness or ability to restructure in line with the ambitions in the Paris Agreement. KLP has no investment expenditure (capex) on its balance sheet related to coal, oil or gas.
KLP’s climate strategy means that we will aim to cut financed emissions by 45 per cent by 2030. This corresponds to a linear reduction of 5.6 percentage points from 2022 levels each year. The intensity will decrease more than this as the portfolio is expected to grow in the future.
KLP has holdings in oil and gas companies, which is not in line with the EU Paris-aligned benchmark. Here, our primary strategy is to follow up through dialogue and voting. For companies that are not working towards science-based restructuring goals, we will consider climate-based divestments.
Results achieved
E1-5, MDR-M
In the table below, all references to notes relate to section 7, “Notes to the sustainability report”.
Note
2024
2023
2022 (base year)
Target
11
Change in financed emissions from KLP’s investment portfolio, adjusted for KLP’s share of the capital markets
-5.2%
-4.8%
19,103,000
-45% by 2030
13
Proportion of companies with science-based climate targets
31%
18%
12%
55%
14
Annually invested amount in climate-friendly investments* (NOK billions)
17.4
7.6
9.5
6.0
* In 2024, we changed the target to focus on climate and nature solutions, which have a narrower definition than climate-friendly investments. The figure reported here is therefore higher than the figure reported under target attainment for investments in climate and nature solutions
From 2022 to 2024, financed emissions from KLP’s investment portfolio fell by 5.2 per cent. Further analysis shows that the reduction arises from lower reported emissions figures from portfolio companies. Viewed in isolation, buying and selling securities, including an increase in ownership interests, contributed to a marginal increase in financed emissions. Overall, the carbon footprint in KLP's portfolio has been reduced by 26 percent over the same period, and reduced by 12 percent since last year. However, the share of the portfolio with SBTi-approved climate targets increased by 13 percentage points. As the companies with climate targets and restructuring plans implement measures and reduce emissions, we expect that KLP’s financed emissions to fall faster in the long term too. In the period prior to the current base year, from 2019 to 2022, the financed emissions from KLP's investment portfolio were more or less unchanged (financed emissions from government bonds are excluded from the calculation as the first measurement year for these is 2021).
The target of at least NOK 6 billion in net new climate-friendly investments per year was achieved as early as 2018, which means that climate-friendly investments constitute a significant share of the portfolio today. As part of the revision of climate strategy in 2024, it was decided to increase the level of ambition by specifying that the 6 billion target in should in future apply only to investments in ‘climate and nature solutions’. This means that “transitional investments” are no longer included or counted in the target attainment.
Climate accountsE1-6
KLP is working to reduce emissions related to the whole of our business. We therefore aim to have as complete climate accounts as possible to cover all of our significant emissions. KLP has prepared climate accounts for operations since 2009 and has constantly expanded them to include more sources of emissions. To highlight the differences between the sources of KLP’s emissions, we first show an overall climate account with a focus on operational emissions, before going into more detail in KLP’s financed emissions.
The KLP Group's climate accounts for direct (scope 1) and indirect (scope 2 and 3) emissions show KLP's direct and indirect contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. The most significant contribution to climate change is emissions from KLP’s investment portfolio (scope 3 category 15).
In the table below, all references to notes relate to section 7, “Notes to the sustainability report”.
Retrospective
Milestones and measurement years*
Note
TONNES CO2e
Change from 2023 to 2024
2024
2023
Base year 2022
2025
2030
2050
Annual % change from base year
11
SCOPE 1 EMISSIONS
Total scope 1 emissions
-25%
1.1
1.4
2.2
n/a
-50%
n/a
-26%
11, 12
SCOPE 2 EMISSIONS
Total location-based emissions
-75%
21
85
78
n/a
n/a
n/a
-36%
Total market-based emissions
-4%
1,482
1,545
1,290
-100%
-100%
n/a
7%
SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS
11
1 Purchased goods and services
22%
15,342
12,580
11,693
n/a
n/a
n/a
16%
- of which: canteen operation
2%
59
58
29
52%
- of which: claims settlement
n/a
2,403
- of which: IT procurement
-1%
615
624
903
-16%
- of which: spend-based
3%
12,265
11,898
10,761
7%
2 Capital goods
11
3 Fuel and energy-related activities
n/a
11
0.0
0.1
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
4 Upstream transport and distribution
11
5 Waste from operations
12%
10
9
10
n/a
n/a
n/a
-1%
11
6 Business travel
12%
826
740
551
n/a
n/a
n/a
25%
7 Commuting
8 Upstream leased assets
9 Downstream transport and distribution
10 Processing of sold products
11 Use of products sold
12 Final processing of sold products
13 Downstream leased assets
14 Franchise
7, 11
15 Investments (excl. LULUCF)
4%
26,611,000
25,644,000
26,254,000
n/a
n/a
73%
1%
- Investments by customer-owners
0%
18,106,000
18,182,000
19,103,000
n/a
-45%
-95%
-3%
• Portion of total investments
n/a
68 %
71 %
73 %
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
- Investments by external customers
14%
8,505,000
7,462,000
7,151,000
9%
• Portion of total investments
n/a
32 %
29 %
27 %
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Total scope 3 emissions (excl. LULUCF)
4%
26,627,188
25,657,328
26,266,254
1%
Total greenhouse gas emissions (location-based excl. LULUCF)
4%
26,627,211
25,657,415
26,266,334
1%
Total greenhouse gas emissions (market-based excl LULUCF)
4%
26,628,672
25,658,875
26,267,546
1%
Total operational emissions (location-based)
n/a
16,211
13,415
12,334
n/a
* LULUCF stands for “Land use, land-use change and forestry” and is used to state whether or not GHG emissions and removals from forestry and other land use are included.
For milestones and target years in the table above, see our overview of KLP’s climate targets in the table in Transition plan and goals for climate change mitigation.
The greenhouse gas emissions from KLP’s own operations are converted into tonnes of CO2 equivalents in line with the standard from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Greenhouse gas emissions include emissions from the use of diesel vehicles (scope 1), energy consumption (scope 2), and emissions within scope 3 category 1: Purchase of goods and services, category 3: Emissions from fuel and energy, Category 5: Waste disposal, category 6: Business travel and category 15: Investments
KLP does not report on emissions related to scope 3 category 4 and category 7-14. The reason for this is that the amount of emissions from these activities has been found to be non-material for KLP's indirect emissions, so it is not a priority to map them in detail. The table below provides an overview of the emission categories included in the KLP climate accounts.
Scope
Category
KLP's climate accounts
Scope 1
Included
Scope 2
Included
Scope 3
1 Purchased goods and services
Included
2 Capital goods
Not included
3 Fuel and energy-related activities
Included
4 Upstream transport and distribution
Not included
5 Waste from operations
Included
6 Business travel
Included
7 Commuting
Not included
8 Upstream leased assets
Not included
9 Downstream transport and distribution
Not included
10 Processing of sold products
Not included
11 Use of products sold
Not included
12 Final processing of sold products
Not included
13 Downstream leased assets
Not included
14 Franchise
Not included
15 Investments
Included
The emissions reported within scope 1 and 2 are fully comparable over time. Within scope 3 category 1-14, KLP’s climate reporting has gradually become more comprehensive and included more categories so the basis for calculation is larger. For example, in 2024, KLP reported for the first time on emissions related to claims settlements in KLP Skadeforsikring. In 2024, KLP also acquired a new system for estimating emissions based on procurement data, which has provided increased coverage of emissions from purchased goods and services (spend-based). These emission figures have been back-dated so the figures for the period 2022-2024 are comparable.
Otherwise, it is worth noting that KLP’s total financed emissions increased from 2022 to 2024. These emissions also include financed emissions related to external assets, which are not part of KLP’s climate targets. For more details on KLP’s climate targets and results, see E1-1 and E1-4.
51 per cent of KLP’s overall reported scope 3 GHG emissions are based on self-reported data. The greenhouse gas emissions are expressed in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) and cover all seven greenhouse gases under the Kyoto Protocol.
Within the emissions related to KLP’s investment activity (scope 3 category 15), we have a consistent estimation method over time, but it is hard to assess whether the companies’ self-reporting is consistent over time.
Financed emissions
KLP aims to measure direct and indirect emissions from all investments in the KLP Group.
KLP follows the recommendations from the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials (PCAF) on how financial companies should report financed emissions. In line with these recommendations, KLP is working hard to increase the share of the portfolio where financed emissions are reported. To do this, KLP uses its own estimates for emissions from companies where we do not have the necessary data to calculate financed emissions. We also include financed emissions via government bonds and residential mortgage lending to private individuals. To be transparent about the proportion estimated, KLP has calculated the degree of coverage for the various indicators. This includes the share of publicly traded stocks, government and corporate bonds, and the mortgage portfolio, which reports actual emissions figures. In line with the recommendations from the PCAF, KLP’s reporting on financed emissions includes both direct (scope 1) and indirect emissions from the investments (scopes 2 and 3). This results in significantly higher reported emissions from KLP’s portfolio compared to reporting that only includes scopes 1 and 2.
In the table below, all references to notes relate to section 7. “Notes to the sustainability report”. For real estate investments, there has been an adjustment in the method. See Note 1 "Changes from earlier sustainability reporting" for this.
Note
TONNES CO2e
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
7
PROPERTY INVESTMENTS
Scope 1
35
27
24
1
1
Scope 2 (location-based)
2,631
3,237
3,404
4,499
6,965
Scope 2 (market-based)
55,913
63,522
52,582
27,748
35,404
Scope 3
33,563
30,321
29,014
842
901
Emission intensity, scopes 1 and 2 (kg CO2e per sqm, location-based)
2.8
3.0
3.3
new
new
Emission intensity, scopes 1, 2 and 3 (kg CO2e per sqm, location-based)
39.1
30.9
31.5
new
new
Total emissions (location-based)
36 230
33 585
32 441
5,343
7,866
Total emissions (market-based)
89 512
93 871
81 619
28,591
36,306
7
SECURITIES INVESTMENTS
Scope 1
2,006,000
2,019,000
2,214,000
2,305,000
2,653,000
Scope 2
612,000
604,000
629,000
634,000
654,000
Scope 3
23,339,000
22,312,000
22,548,000
19,792,000
19,277,000
13
Carbon footprint, scopes 1 and 2 (tonnes CO2e per million invested)
3
4
5
5
6
13
Carbon footprint, scopes 1, 2 and 3 (tonnes CO2e per million invested)
31
35
42
36
41
13
Carbon footprint, scopes 1 and 2 (tonnes CO2e per million invested)
10
11
13
13
14
13
Carbon footprint, scopes 1, 2 and 3 (tonnes CO2e per million invested)
90
100
124
109
99
Total emissions
25,957,000
24,935,000
25,391,000
22,731,000
22,584,000
7
GOVERNMENT BONDS
Scope 1 (including LULUCF*)
341,000
393,000
466,000
609,000
new
Scope 1 (excluding LULUCF*)
389,000
453,000
547,000
741,000
new
Scope 2
5,000
5,000
6,000
9,000
new
Scope 3
222,000
251,000
309,000
449,000
new
Total emissions (excl. LULUCF)
568,000
649,000
781,000
1,067,000
new
Total emissions (excl. LULUCF)
616 000
709 000
862 000
1 199 000
new
7
MORTGAGES
Scope 2 (total lending portfolio)
3,000
10,000
8,000
8,000
9,000
Emission intensity (kg per sq)
Total financed emissions (location-based and incl. LULUCF)
26,564,230
25 627 585
26 212 441
23 811 343
22 600 866
Total financed emissions (location-based and excl. LULUCF)
26 612 230
25 687 585
26 293 441
23 943 343
22 600 866
* LULUCF stands for “Land use, land-use change and forestry” and is used to state whether or not GHG emissions and removals from forestry and other land use are included.
Energy consumption and mixE1-5
KLP Eiendom is the company in the KLP Group that is defined as being in a sector with high climate impact. Its activities are included in the calculation of KLP's energy intensity, as shown in the table below. We have used the same revenue base to calculate the energy intensity from property investments as in the taxonomy calculations. In the table below, all references to notes relate to “Notes to the sustainability report”.
Note
ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN MWH
2024
2023
2022
2021
7, 12
Total energy consumption from own operations
4,122
4,240
3,862
4,183
In KLP’s own offices (KWh/m2)
144
134
125
137
7, 12
Total energy consumption from the property portfolio
138,520
167,600
153,455
159,370
In KLP’s property portfolio (KWh/m2)
145
141
143
150
From renewable sources
130,367
154,922
new
new
Proportion from renewable sources
94%
92%
new
new
Total energy consumption from fossil sources
5,236
6,529
new
new
Proportion of total energy consumption from fossil sources
4%
4%
new
new
Total energy consumption from nuclear power
2,909
3,118
new
new
Proportion of total energy consumption from nuclear power
2%
2%
new
new
FUEL CONSUMPTION IN MWH
From renewable sources
5
4
new
new
From coal and coal products
0
0
new
new
From crude oil and petroleum products
0
0
new
new
From natural gas
4
0.3
new
new
From other fossil sources
0
0
new
new
CONSUMPTION OF ELECTRICITY, HEAT, STEAM AND COOLING IN MWH
From renewable sources
130,362
154,918
new
new
From fossil sources
5,147
6,525
new
new
ENERGY PRODUCTION IN MWH
Total in KLP’s property portfolio
1,301
1,177
1,048
652
Consumption of self-generated renewable energy (which is not fuel)
1,301
1,177
1,048
652
Non-renewable energy production
0
0
0
0
ENERGY INTESSITY
Energy intensity for property investments
0.02
new
new
new
Carbon removal and credits E1-7
KLP has no projects of its own for the capture and storage of greenhouse gases, but chose in 2024 to purchase carbon credits to compensate for KLP's remaining direct emissions from its own operations (scope 1). The purchase of credits covers capture and storage equivalent to 3 tonnes of CO2e. The carbon credits represent carbon sequestration for at least 1,000 years. All of the storage (100 per cent) is in the North Sea, within the EEA area, through Northern Lights, which is part of the Langskip CCS project. The purchased credits represent net CO2 removal. This means that the total volume is calculated by subtracting CO2 emissions generated directly or indirectly from the production process or from the materials used to store the CO2, e.g. related to logistics. 100 per cent of the credits will be certified by recognised third parties: Puro.earth or equivalent.
The carbon credits that compensate for KLP’s scope 1 emissions in 2024 are linked to the capture and permanent storage of greenhouse gas emissions from burning biological waste, developed by the Norwegian climate credit company Inherit. This means that the carbon credits will contribute to net-negative emissions with a very high degree of certainty. The capture and storage project is in development and is expected to be completed in 2026. The credits will be cancelled when they are received in 2026 and will offset KLP’s scope1 emissions for 2023 and 2024. The credits are covered according to what we do not know from Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. The limited scope of carbon credits to compensate for emissions from our own operations is a result of KLP working systematically to cut emissions from its own operations over time. KLP buys guarantees of origin for our scope 2 emissions, which means there are no residual greenhouse gas emissions to compensate for related to electricity consumption.
KLP has not produced a general overview of the scope of voluntary carbon credits related to carbon capture and storage from our value chain (scope 1-15). Through KLP’s investment portfolio, we are indirectly involved in the development of greenhouse gas capture and storage facilities.
KLP believes that the most effective way to scale solutions for the capture and storage of emissions is for the individual players in the economy to take responsibility for compensating for direct emissions from their operations. So KLP does not compensate for its scope 3 emissions through its own capture and storage projects or the purchase of carbon credits. KLP’s purchase of carbon credits is not part of our emission reduction targets, but comes in addition to our reduction target of 50 per cent for scope 1 emissions from 2022 to 2030.
Category
Value chain
Tonnes CO2e (% share of total emissions)
Tonnes CO2e (% share of total emissions)
Description
2024
2023
Contribution to CO2e removal and storage
Own company
0 tonnes (0%)
0 tonnes (0%)
Upstream value chain
0 tonnes (0%)
0 tonnes (0%)
Downstream value chain
0 tonnes (0%)
0 tonnes (0%)
Carbon credits financed
Reductions outside the value chain
1.1 tonnes (100%)
1.4 tonnes (100%)
Compensation for KLP’s scope 1 emissions in 2023 and 2024.
Permanent underground storage (technological solution).
Future cancellations
1.1 tonnes (100%)
1.4 tonnes (100%)
Capture and storage will take place in 2026.
Carbon priceE1-8
KLP does not currently operate with an internal price for carbon. KLP is considering establishing an internal carbon price related to activities that are not exposed to effective carbon prices in the market, such as flights outside the EEA. However, KLP does not want to operate with an internal carbon price on activities already covered by quota systems or CO2 taxes, as this would entail “double taxation” of these activities, with an unhelpful distortion of behaviour.
Climate riskE1-9, E1 IRO-1
The core of KLP’s business model is to provide for secure pension savings for our owners with public-sector occupational pensions. The key question for KLP’s resilience to climate risk is therefore how resilient the pension savings are to climate risk, and what measures we have to strengthen resilience. This is operationalised by analysing the investment portfolio related to public-sector occupational pensions, the impact that climate risk could have on it, and how KLP’s climate strategy affects its resilience.
KLP's resilience to physical climate risk
To assess how resilient KLP is to climate risk, we have conducted climate scenario analyses. The analyses, carried out in 2024 using an externally developed model framework, indicate that KLP’s investment portfolio is significantly exposed to physical climate risk. In the scenarios where the world moves towards 2.6-3.7 degrees of warming in the year 2100, the return on KLP’s investment portfolio is estimated to be 10-20 per cent lower in the 15-25 year horizon compared to the scenarios where the world succeeds (under 2 degrees of warming). This will also be the case for other broadly diversified investors. Analyses indicate that, in the scenarios with 2.6 and 3.7 degrees of warming, the world’s capital markets will be worth less, with lower economic output due to higher temperatures, more extreme weather, and social instability resulting from demanding working and living conditions in exposed places. The analysis period extends 40 years into the future, where we define the short term as up to 5 years, the medium term as 5-15 years and the long term as more than 15 years.
If returns in the financial markets are significantly weakened as a result of climate change, this will result in higher pension costs for undertakings with public-sector occupational pensions, and associated negative economic consequences for public budgets and the ability to provide other welfare services.
The aim of KLP’s climate strategy is to make a real contribution to reducing global physical climate risk, In the interests of society and of KLP’s financial returns. Through our climate goals and related measures, KLP aims to help accelerate the pace of transition, thereby reducing emissions, which will in turn help to reduce physical climate risk. Only if a critical mass of market operators, companies and regulatory authorities contribute to the transition can we reduce global physical climate risk. KLP is therefore committed to transparency with regard to our initiatives, in the hope that others will follow us in responding to the challenge that we all face. With the exception of the property portfolio, KLP has so far made only minor adjustments to counter increasing physical risk, but will assess this on an ongoing basis going forward.
KLP's resilience to transition risk
The analyses indicate that KLP’s business model is resilient to the transition to a low-emission economy. The assessment is based on three different scenarios, all heading towards net zero emissions from the world economy in 2050, but where the transition follows different paths with differing levels of transition risk on the way there. Net zero scenarios all assume moderate economic growth across countries, rapid technological progress, and measures for social inclusion and distribution in connection with restructuring. The scenarios include the introduction of global carbon pricing for the vast majority of sectors, like the EU quota system. This provides incentives to transition to clean energy, including biofuels for sectors that cannot be electrified, improved energy efficiency, carbon capture and storage, and significantly lower consumption of non-renewable resources. KLP’s broadly diversified portfolio means that we are exposed to both losers and winners from a tighter climate policy, and the analyses confirm that KLP’s financial returns are resilient to different scenarios for transition risk. KLP’s climate strategy also contributes to a further reduction of transition risk. Analyses also show that KLP’s financial strength equips the business for scenarios with more drastic and unexpected tightening of climate policy, with associated negative consequences for the financial markets in the short term.
We have also made a qualitative assessment of KLP’s climate-related transition risk related to reputation and the risk of litigation. Our assessment is that the financial risk associated with litigation from companies KLP is invested in is relatively limited, as we manage much of this risk through diversification. However, a negative climate reputation for KLP as a company could potentially have a material impact on KLP’s competitiveness and lead to a reduction in attractive investment opportunities.
Climate risk in KLP’s securities investments
To analyse climate risk in KLP’s investment portfolio, we look at the impact on returns in five different climate scenarios. The following climate scenarios form the basis for the analysis:
Net-zero (NZ): Moderate transition risk and low physical risk. 50 per cent likelihood of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees by 2100 given an ambitious climate policy, strong social sustainability and moderate economic growth.
Delayed net-zero (DNZ): Similar to NZ, but with delayed climate policy and achievement of net zero emissions after 2050, posing a moderate physical climate risk. Global temperatures stabilise at 2 degrees of warming by 2100.
Net-zero financial crisis (NZFC): Similar to NZ, but with high transition risk. Climate policy suddenly tightened in 2025, leading to extensive repricing and uncertainty in the financial markets.
Limited action (LA): Similar to the baseline scenario, with high physical risk and some transition risk. 2.6 degrees of warming expected by 2100, with moderate economic growth and limited climate action.
High warming (HW): Very high physical risk and no transition risk. 3.7 degrees of warming expected by 2100, with increased social inequalities, lack of cooperation, low productivity and more extreme weather events that have a negative impact on the capital markets
The scenarios describe a range of global warming from 1.5 to 3.7 degrees up to 2100, including policies and market changes over the next 40 years consistent with such climate developments. The scenarios from Ortec are based on physical and socio-economic scenarios in the 5th and 6th synthesis reports from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The scenarios are not the same as those developed by the central banks’ and supervisory authorities’ Network for Greening the Financial System (NFGS), although both are based on the IPCC reports and the basic idea is the same.
The scenarios are analysed using the ClimateMAPS climate risk model based on KLP’s investment portfolio. The model was developed by Ortec Finance in collaboration with Cambridge Econometrics. The model provides results at the sectoral and regional level broken down by asset class. KLP's financial accounts are based on market valuations. The results of the scenario analysis are shown as deviations from a baseline scenario, reflecting 2 to 3 degrees of global warming, with an assumption that climate risk is undervalued in the capital markets. This assumption also suggests that the physical climate risk is not adequately captured in KLP's financial accounts. The results from the scenario analyses nevertheless provide a basis for identifying which sectors within particular asset classes are most exposed to both transitional and physical climate risk. They also show which sectors have great opportunities.
The results indicate that a typical portfolio of an institutional investor such as KLP is heavily exposed to both chronic and acute physical climate risk, and that this is increasing over time. Chronic physical climate risk is estimated from the research articles Burke and Tanutama (2019) and Nelson et al. (2014). These articles are used to model the relationship between higher temperatures, GDP and inflation. The economic consequences of increased acute physical climate risk are estimated with the ClimatePredict model. ClimatePredict estimates the relationship between the increased frequency of various forms of extreme weather and national GDP growth. The economic shocks associated with climate change, in the form of changes in GDP and inflation at the national level and value creation at the sector level, form the basis for estimating effects on the financial markets. This is done via Ortec Finance’s stochastic modelling of the financial markets, which assumes that the value of the assets is equal to the present value of expected earnings over the lifetime of the asset, based on an assumption of what information is available to the market at any given time.
The transition risk in ClimateMAPS is modelled using the E3ME macroeconomic model developed by Cambridge Econometrics. E3ME models the relationship between value chains in the economy, energy systems and the environment. The model is based on statistical relationships without any added assumptions about rational actors and general equilibrium in the economy. This allows E3ME to capture realistic real economic effects of policy changes in the short and medium term related to e.g. bottlenecks in the economy, involuntary unemployment and the spread of innovative technologies.
Our assessment is that all companies and projects in KLP’s investment portfolio (100 per cent), across regions and sectors, are exposed to physical climate risk over the long term. KLP’s investment portfolio totalled more than NOK 800 billion at the end of 2024.
KLP’s climate risk modeling has a portfolio perspective. This means that we do not have location- and company-specific climate risk estimates, with the exception of the property portfolio (see separate discussion). Until now, KLP has not implemented any climate change adaptation measures for the investment portfolio, but this is something we will consider in more detail in the future. KLP has significant physical climate risk in its investment portfolio, but has no revenue from businesses that are seriously exposed to physical climate risk.
In the short term (1-5 years), unexpected tightening of climate policy, with associated turmoil in the financial markets, poses the biggest transition risk to KLP’s portfolio. In the short term, exposure to oil and gas produces weak returns in the scenarios with progressive climate policies, while low-emission electricity production produces a relatively high return. In the longer term, when the turmoil has settled, the transition risk is less important. This is because the effects of policy changes level out in a broadly diversified portfolio like KLP’s, with both winners and losers in the market. The assets exposed to high transition risk, defined as differences of 10 per cent or more in returns on the upside or downside in the scenario with the greatest transition risk up to 2030 (the “Net zero financial crisis scenario”), have a value of approximately NOK 230 billion, corresponding to about 30 per cent of KLP’s investment portfolio (2023 figures). The analysis clearly indicates that the oil and gas sector is very risk-exposed in a scenario where climate policy is tightened so we can limit global warming to 1.5 degrees. KLP’s shares in the oil and gas sector, and its value chain, have a value of approximately NOK 18 billion, equivalent to 2 per cent of KLP’s investment portfolio. All sectors with high transition risk (100 per cent) are covered by KLP’s measures to reduce climate risk, including measures for increased investments in climate and nature solutions and climate-based divestments within high-emission sectors within the equity and short-term bond portfolios.
A simplified calculation of the impact of these scenarios on KLP’s capital adequacy has also been carried out for the short term. Only in a “Net-Zero financial crisis” scenario, where climate policy is tightened hard and unexpectedly, do we see a noticeable effect on capital adequacy. In this scenario, an event of this kind is presumed to have occurred when the countries report to the UN on the status of their climate targets in 2025, where it is clear that the transition is happening too slowly, resulting in increased prices and regulation of greenhouse gas emissions.
Thanks to its financial strength, KLP will be able to absorb the loss in such a transition risk scenario without having to take action to safeguard its capital adequacy.
Climate risk in KLP’s property investments
KLP Eiendom manages assets covering around 15 per cent of KLP's investment portfolio. Two levels of climate risk analysis have been carried out for the property portfolio.
As with other asset classes, we have used the ClimateMAPS climate risk model to assess returns for five different climate scenarios, relative to a baseline scenario. The analysis indicates that the climate risk in the property portfolio is moderate, midway between equities and lending, which is because the property portfolio is located in regions with a high building standards, while the demand for property services is not much affected by climate change. In the longer term, the model estimates that, in climate scenarios with high global warming (3.7 degrees of expected warming by 2100), the value of the property portfolio is about 20 per cent lower in the 15-25 year term, which corresponds to a possible drop of about NOK 20 billion measured against the value of today’s property portfolio. This follows from both chronic and acute chronic climate risk. Climate risk in the short term, both physical and transitional risk, is considered to be low for the property portfolio.
KLP Eiendom has also produced a separate mapping of physical climate risk for all properties, apart from leasehold sites and development properties. The mapping is based on a template developed by the Danish “Rådet for Bæredygtigt Byggeri”, available through https://taksonomiportalen.dk/.
The climate risk assessment looks at climate change up to the year 2100 and provides an assessment of each property with regard to exposure to, and consequences of, sea level rise, water accumulation, flooding, wildfires and landslides. For each of these factors, a scale from very low (1) to very high (5) is used to assess the likelihood of the event occurring (exposure) and the impact if it does occur (risk level). See table below for further details.
Risk level
Description
1
The property will not be adversely affected by the natural hazard.
2
The property may be adversely affected by the natural hazard, but the probability is very low or the consequence is very limited.
3
The property may be adversely affected if the natural hazard is more powerful than expected. Property is sensitive to changes in the ground beneath and should be monitored. Actions may be considered.
4
The property will be adversely affected with a “possible” or “high” degree of likelihood or impact. KLPE should consider measures to limit the impact.
5
The property will be negatively affected with a “high” or “very high” degree of likelihood or impact. KLPE must consider measures to limit the impact.
Moderate physical climate risk (risk level 3) covers properties that cannot be excluded from risk, but where there no significant likelihood or impact. These are properties that could be exposed and need to be monitored. Examples of a moderate risk are storm surges that could affect KLP's headquarters in Dronning Eufemias gate in Oslo. The expected rise in sea levels in the future mean that the sea level will not reach the property, but will come very close. This means that the property is not expected to be affected (equivalent to risk levels 4-5), but we cannot rule out sea levels getting very close to the property (equivalent to risk levels 1-2). If we allow for uncertainty in the base data, and assume that the sea level could get slightly higher than the data suggest (e.g. due to wind and waves), the property will be affected, bringing it up to risk level 3.
The overall conclusion is that the average risk level in the property portfolio is low to moderate, in line with the findings from the overall risk analysis in ClimateMAPS. However, there are some properties with a moderate to high risk from acute natural hazards such as flooding, sea level rise and storm water (see overview in the table below).
Region
Oslo
Trondheim
Sweden
Denmark
Total
Number of properties analysed
46
31
8
10
95
Heat wave
13%
6%
0%
0%
8%
Cold wave
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Forest fire (forest, grass, lightning strike)
7%
3%
0%
0%
4%
Cyclone, hurricane, typhoon
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Storm (also snow, dust and sand storms)
0%
0%
0%
100%
11%
Tornado
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Drought
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Heavy precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice)
11%
29%
50%
100%
29%
Flooding (sea/tide, river, rain, groundwater)
4%
45%
13%
70%
25%
Flood wave from meltwater (glaciers etc.)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Avalanche
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Landslide (loose soil, rock falls, quick clay)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Lowering/subsidence (sink hole)
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Acute events related to heavy rainfall and flooding are the biggest single factors, covering 29 and 25 per cent of the properties in the portfolio respectively. A property may be exposed to several natural hazards, so the percentages do not add up to 100. Among the persistent natural hazards, increased temperatures may be expected to call for increased investment in cooling and ventilation systems in the properties, but this will happen over time. The analysis also indicates that the property portfolio in Denmark is particularly exposed to climate risk.
Climate risk in KLP Banken’s portfolio
KLP Banken has collected data on physical climate risk (flood, sea level rise, stormwater and landslides) for the mortgage portfolio. From 2024 we have also gathered data on stormwater. This means that the share of the portfolio more or less exposed to physical climate risk has increased from 19 to 40 per cent, including due diligence areas to be investigated in more detail. We have gained access to more data, while more areas have been mapped and data quality has improved. The direct exposure to climate risk is covered through insurance on the homes, but the bank has a risk associated with impairment of the mortgage as a result of climate risk. However, it must be stressed that most of the bank’s mortgages have a low risk score related to climate risk overall.
The financial climate risk for KLP related to the loans to private homes and financing of investment activity in municipalities and county authorities is considered low.
Climate risk in KLP Skadeforsikring
Through KLP Skadeforsikring, KLP has an impact on, and risks related to, climate change adaptation and climate risk. The non-life company’s risk related to extreme weather and natural perils is assessed as part of the company’s overall risk profile. In the non-life company’s ORSA for 2024, we analysed a scenario with four major natural disasters over the course of one year. The conclusion from this analysis was that climate-related risk does not jeopardise the company's financial position at this time. However, a good understanding of climate-related risks, especially the risks associated with false natural perils claims, is important in maintaining the desired profitability of the products. We are therefore working to strengthen the modelling of climate-related underwriting risk in line with the criteria for sustainable non-life insurance in the EU taxonomy.
These criteria place great weight on the use of climate risk information, both historical and forward-looking, in risk assessments and premium-setting. As part of this, we are incorporating a variable for the risk of stormwater damage into the tariffs for the core property products from 1 January 2025. In parallel, we are establishing incentives to reduce climate-reduced risk in insurance terms, starting with the Kommuneeiendom (municipal property) product. The non-life company makes a point of being a partner to municipal customers in the face of climate change, and participates in the EU-funded research project SOTERIA, where the aim is to map best practices and come up with possible new solutions to take account of climate risk in municipalities’ insurance cover, both on the product development side and in pricing/data-based risk assessment.
KLP Skadeforsikring accounts for a small share of KLP's investment portfolio and income, and so also represents a limited financial exposure. The level of climate risk for KLP Skadeforsikring is judged to be limited in any case
Uncertainty factors and strategic adaptation
An important element of KLP’s asset management strategy is that the allocation of funds should reflect the long-term nature of the pension obligations. There is great uncertainty about what kind of climate scenario will actually play out in the future at the time when the pensions have to be paid out. Political and technological developments will determine whether we are closer to a net-zero scenario for 2050, or whether emissions will remain at current levels and global warming will continue to increase. The desire to avoid major fluctuations in returns over time means that KLP focuses on building a portfolio that is resilient to the climate transition and to future climate change, while contributing to the lowest possible temperature increase through our operations. For example, the physical climate risk varies widely between asset classes. Climate risk is clearly greatest in the equity portfolio, but more moderate in the fixed-income portfolio. KLP will assess this risk more closely going forward, including measures to reduce the transition risk associated with high-emission sectors, such as prioritising companies that have set themselves science-based climate targets. KLP has a high degree of flexibility when it comes to adapting the portfolio to these risk factors with a view to reducing our customers’ pension costs.
Biodiversity and ecosystems ESRS E4
Material impacts, risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems. SBM3
The table below provides an overview of identified material impacts, risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis, and section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities - Stakeholders and stakeholder dialogue" for a discussion of stakeholders and communities.
Description of impact, risk or opportunity
Time horizon
Relevant activity in KLP
Stage in the value chain
Direct influencing factors for biodiversity loss
Changes in land use, changes in freshwater and ocean use
Negative impact
Contributes to financing of nature loss through investments and changes in land use resulting from property development
Nature loss as a part of systemic market risk, and reputational loss associated with financing environmental degradation.
Long
Securities investments
Banking
Downstream – Investments
Risk
Restrictions on land use for new buildings.
Long
Property investments
Own operations
Opportunity
Restrictions on land use for new buildings produce good returns on existing buildings in a central location
Long
Property investments
Own operations
Policies E4-2
The table provides an overview of the key Policies for KLP’s work on biodiversity and ecosystems and the management of the material impacts, risks and opportunities described in the table above. There is also an overview of overall sustainability guidelines below.
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
Nature strategy
Transition plan for nature with respect to impact on nature and nature risk.
Also covers goals and measures to halt and reverse nature loss.
Investments
CEO
Group chief financial officer
Nature Agreement
CBD
Not applicable
Internal strategy document. To be published at klp.no.
The strategy is summarised in this section.
KLP’s expectations for companies with respect to climate change and the natural environment
Expectations for companies KLP is invested in terms of impact on nature and nature risk.
Covers climate change, land use in particularly vulnerable areas, pollution of freshwater, the spread of alien species and pollution. explicit expectations of selected high-risk sectors
Also covers our expectations that companies will take account of the social consequences of their impact on nature and ecosystems.
Investments
CEO
Group chief financial officer, managing director KLP Kapitalforvaltning
UN Sustainable Development Goals
UNFCCC
CBD
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Transition plan and safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystems in the strategy E4-1
As general goal for the work on nature, KLP aims to halt and reverse nature loss, based on the material impacts, risks and opportunities identified through the materiality analysis. KLP’s nature strategy applies to the whole Group and has to be integrated into all areas of business.
With a broadly diversified portfolio of investments in over 9,600 companies, KLP has indirect exposure to all types of natural impacts and dependencies. The strategy therefore focuses particularly on sectors where our investment portfolio carries the greatest impact and risk. These are referred to as high-risk sectors and are identified through the nature risk analysis;, see note 14 “Nature risk”. However, the measures taken in KLP’s portfolios do not involve any significant investment expenditure (capex) on KLP’s balance sheet.
Through dialogue with companies, voting at general meetings and cooperation in investor initiatives, KLP works to reduce negative impacts on nature and ecosystems, as well as promoting responsible corporate behaviour.
To achieve the goal of halting and reversing nature loss, KLP’s nature strategy has defined the following three targets, with prioritised high-risk sectors within each of them:
Stop deforestation: The nature strategy focuses on efforts to counter tropical deforestation. KLP prioritises companies in sectors with a high risk of deforestation, either directly or via supply chains. This applies especially to those that contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and damage to nature through cattle farming, which is a major driver for deforestation
Net zero nature loss: KLP’s nature strategy includes an expectation that companies in the oil, gas and mining sectors should avoid extraction in biologically vulnerable areas, where this activity has a significant negative impact on natural diversity.
Sustainable use of marine resources: KLP monitors the aquaculture sector and expects companies to provide for traceability in their products to counter unreported and unregulated fishing. We also expect companies to avoid the use of fish feed that contributes to deforestation or can lead to over-exploitation of fish stocks through the use of marine resources in the feed.
We follow up on these targets based on the following aspects, which indicate the companies’ awareness of their impact and dependence on nature, and hence their nature risk:
Commitment: Has the company made a public commitment and/or supported any biodiversity initiatives?
Value chain: Does the company assess the impact on biodiversity through its own value chain?
Action: Has the company taken measures during the reporting period to meet its biodiversity commitments?
Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystemsE4-4
To halt and reverse nature loss, we must help in restructuring the sectors with the greatest impact on and dependence on nature. KLP’s nature goals are therefore focused on exactly that.
Description of goals
Relevant goal in the sustainability strategy
Scope
Base year and benchmark value
Timeline
Stop deforestation
100% of companies should have defined nature goals and a strategy to achieve these goals, and report on progress
“Achieve UN Sustainable Development Goals”
Securities investments in the agriculture, forestry and paper production sectors
Base year: 2024
Benchmark value: 2024 is the first year of reporting and will constitute the future benchmark value. See table under “Results achieved” for 2024 figures.
Not scheduled
Net zero nature loss
100% of companies should have defined nature goals and a strategy to achieve these goals, and report on progress
“Achieve UN Sustainable Development Goals”
Securities investments in the mining and oil and gas sectors
Base year: 2024
Benchmark value: 2024 is the first year of reporting and will constitute the future benchmark value. See table under “Results achieved” for 2024 figures.
Not scheduled
Sustainable use of ocean resources
100% of companies should have defined nature goals and a strategy to achieve these goals, and report on progress
“Achieve UN Sustainable Development Goals”
Securities investments in the fisheries and animal farming sectors
Base year: 2024
Benchmark value: 2024 is the first year of reporting and will constitute the future benchmark value. See table under “Results achieved” for 2024 figures.
Not scheduled
The targets are rooted in and support the Nature Agreement by promoting the integration of concerns for nature into financial decisions and capital flows, in line with Goal 14 in the Nature Agreement (which is about integrating concerns for nature into all policies and management) and Goal 15 (which focuses on reporting the dependence and impact on nature). The targets have been drawn up with the intention of helping to halt the loss of nature and biodiversity and reduce negative impacts, and to restore ecosystems (see nature solutions under climate-friendly investments). The targets are not explicitly based on a science-based methodology as there is none available. Ecological threshold values and nature credits have not been used in drawing up nature targets and strategy.
KLP’s property portfolio and direct investments in infrastructure, including loans to municipalities within the same areas, are also included in the objective of helping to halt deforestation and achieve net zero nature loss. These sectors are followed up through separate risk assessments and bilateral dialogue.
Actions and resultsE4-3, MDR-A
KLP's climate and nature efforts are closely linked. Climate change is one of the main drivers for impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems, so KLP’s climate strategy, with associated measures, is indirectly part of the effort to reduce our negative impact on nature.
At the same time, KLP has identified risks and opportunities related to nature and is working systematically to define goals and measures to address these.
To manage nature risk in the investment portfolio, KLP conducts risk assessments according to the do no significant harm principle (DNSH) in all direct investments, lending, long-term bonds and property acquisitions. We are also strengthening our focus on climate and nature solutions, not only to reduce environmental impact, but also to create long-term value. Sustainable investments that integrate climate and nature considerations contribute to a more robust and resilient economy and reduce the transition risk in KLP’s portfolio. The criteria for green loans for new buildings have also been tightened up to ensure that they do not contribute to deforestation or ecosystem loss.
Impact work for restructuring also covers nature. This includes company dialogues and voting, as well as clearly communicating our expectations regarding conditions for sustainable business development to authorities and other stakeholders. The nature goals we have set, as described in the previous section, are an important part of this work. However, monitoring nature goals is challenging, as the quality of the available indicators varies. So KLP is always on the look-out for the best indicators for company follow-up and will adapt its approach in line with developments in this field.
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Impact work for restructuring:
Impact work for restructuring also covers nature. This includes company dialogues and voting, as well as clearly communicating our expectations regarding conditions for sustainable business development to authorities and other stakeholders.
All asset classes
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Investments in climate and nature solutions:
Investments in the development of new projects or technology, and purchase of shares and bonds in the secondary market related to renewable energy.
All asset classes
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Property
All new building and refurbishment projects should produce a net improvement in biodiversity.
Property portfolio
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Risk assessment:
Risk assessment on the “do no significant harm” (DNSH) principle in all direct investments, lending, long-term bonds and property acquisitions.
Direct investments, lending, long-term bonds and property acquisitions
In development
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Green loans
The criteria for green loans for new construction are also being tightened up to cover nature.
Lending portfolio
In development
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Results achieved
The table below refers to note 15 “Nature transition”.
Note
Goal 1) Stop deforestation
Goal 2) Net zero nature loss
Goals 3) Sustainable use of marine resources:
15
Forestry, paper production and agriculture
Mining and Oil & gas
Fisheries and aquaculture
Have committed to or signed up to initiatives
Number of companies
173
114
5
Share of companies
80%
41%
83%
Assess impact through their value chain
Number of companies
46
46
3
Share of companies
21%
17%
50%
Have taken steps to meet commitments
Number of companies
80
75
4
Share of companies
37%
27%
67%
The table shows the number of companies that have set targets or taken action under the headings of commitment, value chain and action taken. The proportion of companies indicates their share of the total number of companies in the high-risk sectors presented in the table.
There is great variation between the sectors in terms of their commitments and measures related to deforestation, impact on nature and sustainable use of marine resources. Fisheries and farming stand out as the sectors with the highest proportion of companies that have committed to relevant initiatives. Among the portfolio companies in this sector, five out of six have reported via CDP, and all have committed to initiatives related to sustainable use of marine resources. Half of them have also assessed their impact through the value chain (e.g. via feedstuffs), and two thirds have taken steps to meet their commitments.
In forestry, paper production and agriculture, a high proportion of companies (80%) have also reported via CDP and committed to measures to stop deforestation. A smaller proportion of them have assessed their impact through the value chain (21%), and only 37% have taken concrete steps to meet their targets.
In the mining and oil and gas sectors, there is a lower proportion of companies reporting via CDP and committing to measures to reduce nature loss. Only 41% of companies in these sectors have made public commitments, and 27% have implemented measures to comply with these. This suggests a generally weaker focus on assessing and managing the impact of these sectors on nature and ecosystems compared to the other sectors. At the same time, the quality of these indicators can vary, and they mainly give a general indication of the companies’ work on nature-related issues. To ensure better follow-up and understanding of actual measures and commitments, companies are followed up through active ownership and dialogue. This is particularly important as nature-related indicators are still in development and are characterised by methodological challenges.
KLP’s property portfolio and direct investments in infrastructure, including lending to municipalities within the same areas, are also included among the company’s risk sectors. These sectors are not exchange-listed and are therefore not included in the figures we have access to. See note 15 “Nature transition” for details of the calculations.
Resource use and circular economy ESRS E5
Material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy SBM3
The table below outlines the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy. These have been identified across activities and value chains related to claims settlements and property investments. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
Description of impact, risk or opportunity
Time horizon
Relevant activity in KLP
Stage in the value chain
Resource inflows, including resource use
Positive impact
Offer products that provide incentives for re-use in claims settlements
Short
Claims settlements
Upstream – Suppliers
Downstream – Customers
Negative impact
Material and resource use in claims settlements and property operation and development
Short
Claims settlements
Property Investments
Upstream – Suppliers
Risk
Reduced access or increased price of input factors
Long
Claims settlements
Upstream – Suppliers
Opportunity
Ensure reuse of residual assets in the event of damage to property
Medium
Claims settlements
Upstream – Suppliers
Downstream – Customers
Policies E5-1
The table provides an overview of the key Policies for KLP’s work on resource use and circular economy and the management of the material impacts, risks and opportunities described in the table above. There is also an overview of overall sustainability guidelines under Policies on sustainability..
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
Claims settlements
Goal: Push for a circular economy in non-life insurance
Sets out goals, measures and KPIs to deliver on the targets in the Group strategy related to circular economy.
KLP Skadeforsikring
MD KLP Skadeforsikring
Director for claims settlements, KLP Skadeforsikring
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of the goal is given in this section.
Goal: Partner to the municipalities in the climate transition
Sets out ambitions, measures and KPIs related to how KLP can help municipalities in the transition
KLP Skadeforsikring
MD KLP Skadeforsikring
Director for products, KLP Skadeforsikring
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of the goal is given in this section.
Procurement strategy for KLP Skadeforsikring 2024-2027
Operationalises the Group strategy for purchases related to claims settlements within property and motor insurance. Annual action plans.
Introduces KPIs related to sustainability and circularity. Overall aim to develop circular settlement processes and value chains to reduce the consumption of virgin raw materials.
Currently no Policies at the overall level on sustainable extraction and use of renewable resources.
Purchasing, claims settlements in Property and Motor
MD KLP Skadeforsikring
Director for claims settlements, KLP Skadeforsikring
Interviews with a municipal customer and a supplier
Internal strategy document, business-sensitive
Claims manual
The case-handlers’ procedure in a claims case. Stipulates that one should always consider whether it is possible to carry out a cost-effective repair instead of replacing with a new part.
Claims settlements, damage to buildings
MD KLP Skadeforsikring
Director for claims settlement
n/a
Collaborate with other companies to exchange experience, take input from loss adjusters, case-handlers, and regulatory requirements from authorities
Internal procedure document, no public interest
Insurance terms, damage to property
The terms state that the company prioritises sustainable and circular settlement methods.
Municipal property and property damage in the retail market (homes, contents, travel, etc.)
MD KLP Skadeforsikring
Director for product
n/a
Discussion with multiple stakeholders, especially customers
Terms and conditions for municipal property: internal document, business sensitive
Terms for private property: available at klp.no
Property operation and development
Goal: Driver for circular economy in tenant alterations
As above
KLP Eiendom
MD KLP Eiendom
Head of sustainability in KLP Eiendom, buyers in KLP Eiendom and maintenance departments
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of the goal is given in this section.
Goal: Driver for circular economy – newbuilds and refurbishments
As above
KLP Eiendom
MD KLP Eiendom
Head of sustainability, buyers and project managers at KLP Eiendom
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of the goal is given in this section.
Sustainability strategy for KLP Eiendom
KLP Eiendom’s sustainability ambitions. Limit the use of material resources, and use materials with the smallest possible footprint
Property portfolio
MD KLP Eiendom
Head of sustainability, KLP Eiendom
BREEAM, CREEM
Interview key personnel internally and externally, suppliers and customers
Available at klp.no
Guidelines for environmentally-friendly procurement and materials in KLP Eiendom
Describes the obvious factors to consider, what regulatory requirements apply and how the material selection process is carried out. Expectations for how suppliers should handle resource use and circular economy in their supply chain, such as implementing measures to minimise emissions, promote efficient and sustainable resource use and minimise greenhouse gas emissions in production and transport.
Acquisitions in KLP Eiendom
Head of sustainability, KLP Eiendom
Head of sustainability, KLP Eiendom
n/a
Not applicable
Internal procedure document, no public interest
Materials document
Requirements for materials that KLP Eiendom wants in its properties. The aim is to reduce the climate impact of our projects.
Materials
Administration department, KLP Eiendom
Administration department, KLP Eiendom
n/a
Interview stakeholders internally and externally, suppliers and customers.
Available at klp.no
Claims settlements
Description of resource flow E5-4
As a non-life insurance company, there are two main value chains behind our claims settlement process that involve a substantial use of resources:
Remediation of damage to property: Major groups of materials and products involved in repairing property damage are timber, glass, plaster, mineral wool and rock fibre, parquet and laminate, MDF and chipboard. In the case of serious damage where steel and concrete structures are not reused, steel and concrete are also included as important components. Products that are used in smaller volumes, but still have an environmental impact, include paint, disinfectants, silicone and acrylic.
Repair of damage to vehicles: Consumes mainly plastic (in various compositions), glass, aluminium and steel. Lower volume but with an environmental impact; materials include paints, adhesives and primers, tectyl and rust protection.
Targets for resource use and circular economy E5-3
Description of goals
Relevant goal in the sustainability strategy
Scope
Base year and benchmark value
Timeline
Goal attainment
Residual assets from property
Document 100 per cent of property damage with claims costs greater than NOK 10 million.
“Driver for circular economy in non-life insurance”
Claims settlements in property damage cases, where the cost of the claim is greater than NOK 10 million. Only includes settlement processes managed by KLP, not processes managed by the policyholder.
n/a – new target for 2024
Goals for 2024
Status: Goals introduced late in the year, no relevant claims as yet.
Repairs to glass damage in cars
At least 40 per cent of glass damage should be repaired rather than replacing the window
“Push for a circular economy in non-life insurance”
Insurance products for cars. Applies to glass workshops with which we have a framework agreement. Only windscreen damage can be repaired and is included in the ratios.
n/a – new target for 2024
Goals for 2024
Status: 46%
This was a focus area in the motor insurance area in 2024, and the target has been overfulfilled as a consequence. However, the trend towards more technology integrated into windscreens is leading to fewer windows being repaired, which makes it hard to achieve such a high repair ratio going forward.
The targets are included in the company’s sustainability goals, which the board and owners have been involved in designing. The goals in the table are activity goals, so no special methods or assumptions have been used in the design of the goals or measurement of target attainment. The targets are also not based on any specific scientific foundations. The targets are voluntary and so not based on national goals or requirements. We will continue to work on developing targets and initiatives in 2025. For example, we are introducing a target of 80 per cent waste sorting for waste from frequent damage to property. As this is the first year we have reported on these targets, there are no changes to the targets, measurements or underlying assumptions from previous years.
Several of the targets for 2024 are about reducing the need for new input factors in the claims settlements, by repairing rather than replacing what has been damaged, and promoting re-use of what can be re-used (residual assets) in the case of serious damage to property. This results lower resource use and generates less waste. It also creates demand for repair services and re-use from players in our value chain for claims settlement. According to the Waste Hierarchy, where the goal is for resources to be processed as high as possible up the chain, the targets are aimed at level 2 (re-use and repair) and level 1 (preventing waste).
Our efforts to re-use concrete structures in major claims cases, among other things, reduce the need for fresh cement and concrete production. This is a very emission-intensive industry which can also have a negative impact on nature and ecosystems, including through the removal of sand. We did not have any specific goals for sustainable withdrawal and use of renewable resources in 2024, but this will come in 2025. Apart from what is mentioned here, our targets do not address other aspects of circular economy and resource use.
Actions and resultsE5-2, MDR-A
Our actions are about conserving the resources already recovered and used by encouraging and incentivising the maintenance of assets and avoiding claims. We also believe that insurance terms that prioritise repairs in the event of damage can help to reduce the number of claims and, more specifically, the extent of the damage caused.
Description of measures
Scope
Results
Time horizon
Systematic efforts to re-use residual assets (steel and concrete structures and buried infrastructure) in the case of major damage to buildings
Claims settlements Major damage to property
Ongoing.
We are constantly improving our own processes of enabling re-use of residual assets, but are also dependent on working with the customer to recover the residual assets.
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Politikerdashboard.no; for decision-makers in municipalities. Work with the Norwegian Municipal Technical Association (NKF) to highlight the benefits of better maintenance.,
n/a
Ongoing, with good feedback from trial users
The dashboard will be rolled out to all municipalities that want it in 2025.
Decision carried forward for four years from 2024.
Terms and claims settlement procedures that prioritise circular claims settlement
Insurance products for property, mainly property insurance for the retail market, along with municipal property insurance. Claims settlement procedures apply to property damage in general.
Completed.
Retail market: in force from 01.01.2024; allows us to repair about 85% of damaged mobile phones received in 2024. Municipal property: comes into effect on 01.01.2025.
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Engage in new partnerships with providers of repair services
Claims settlements Damage to consumer electronics, high-voltage installations, machinery etc. for industry
Ongoing. An important partnership entered into in 2024 was with a repairer of mobile phones and other consumer electronics (see above).
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Incentives for claims prevention in terms and conditions
Municipal property
Planned. Changes to terms will take effect on 01.01.2025.
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Claims prevention activities
Customers in the retail and corporate segments.
Completed.
Completed 86 inspections and 95 other claims prevention courses and activities in 2024, with a total of 1,115 participants. This is a solid increase from 2023, when we registered 773 participants for such events.
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Incentives and requirements to increase the proportion of repairs (vs. replacements) in supplier agreements within property and motor insurance.
Suppliers with framework agreements involved in claims settlements for property damage
Completed.
Actions including incentives to group materials to be taken to the damage site, remote monitoring of drying in the case of water damage, and requirements for the proportion of window repairs in the case of glass damage.
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Most of the measures in the overview are activities carried out as an integral part of KLP Skadeforsikring's normal operations, and therefore not split off as separate budget items or given specifically allocated funds. The company has two employees who coordinate and follow up on measures related to circular economy and sustainability, one in the Product department and one in the Claims Settlement department, while the work is carried out in the line structure. The measures relating to repair or re-use in damage cases are carried out by our suppliers and their subcontractors, on the basis of the suppliers’ agreements with us and the requirements contained in the agreements. These suppliers and subcontractors include loss adjusters, damage limitation companies, tradesmen, auto repair shops and so on. Through clear guidelines for repair and re-use addressed to our suppliers, we contribute to a more circular development in the claims settlement value chain. In many cases, it is difficult to measure the results of such measures in the short term because it is demanding to set up a realistic alternative scenario. For example, it is hard to know whether a supplier in a claims case would have torn up a whole kitchen floor and replaced it with a new one if we had not provide incentives to repair the old. As this trend is monitored over time and we obtain better measurements of what is being repaired rather than replaced, we expect to see that our measures are having an effect. Some of the measures within claims settlements have an additional cost compared to the most economical settlement option. These additional costs are assessed on a cost-benefit basis from one type of claim to another, or case-by-case for large claims, and the additional cost is covered by the ordinary operating budget. We believe that the cost of such services and solutions will come down in the long run, as the services are further developed and scaled up. We see it as part of our social responsibility to contribute to the demand for such services at an early stage too.
This is the first year we have reported on these measures, and many of the actions and/or measurements related to them are themselves new. So we have not included details of results in previous years, except for the “Claims prevention” initiative.
Our biggest negative impact in the area of resource use and circular economy is the resource footprint of our claims settlement processes. We have not identified any specific matters that it would be natural for KLP Skadeforsikring to correct or try to eliminate.
Property operation and development
Description of resource flow E5-4
KLP Eiendom's resource flow consists of own property, tenant alterations, development projects and new construction. Upstream resource use consists mainly of building materials such as concrete, steel and wood, and technical equipment needed for the construction and maintenance of properties. The use of resources is included in KLP Eiendom as direct purchases of goods, or indirectly through purchases of services.
Targets for resource use and circular economy E5-3
Description of goals
Relevant goal in the sustainability strategy
Scope
Base year and benchmark value
Timeline
Goal attainment
Reduce material emissions and increase circularity
Reduce material emissions by 50% by 2030 and 80% by 2035
“Driver for a circular economy in property” – both tenant alterations and newbuilds/refurbishments
All tenant alterations, development projects and new construction
2020
2035
Work to establish routines and systems for calculating and compiling material emissions in tenant alterations, development projects and new construction.
Material recycling
Material recycling rate of 70%
“Driver for a circular economy in property” – both tenant alterations and newbuilds/refurbishments
As above
2020
2030
Planned development of an internal platform to document the degree of material recovery from tenant alterations, development projects and new construction during 2025
Increased waste sorting rate
Sorting rate of at least 65% for KLP-operated buildings and at least 90% for tenant alterations, development projects and new construction
“Driver for a circular economy in property” – both tenant alterations and newbuilds/refurbishments
All KLP-operated buildings, tenant alterations, development projects and new construction
2020
2030
Waste sorting rate in KLP-operated buildings: 62%
Planned development of internal platform to compile waste data from tenant alterations, development projects and new construction during 2025
The targets are set out in KLP Eiendom's sustainability strategy, which is anchored in the management group and the board of KLP Eiendom. No special methods or assumptions have been used in the design of goals or measurement of target attainment. The targets are not based on any specific scientific foundations and do not directly correspond to national goals or requirements, beyond the government target for waste sorting. This is the first time we have reported on these targets, so there are no changes to the targets, measurements or underlying assumptions from previous years.
The targets for 2024 are to reduce the need for new input factors, through proactive maintenance to extend the life of all buildings and their components, and to facilitate re-use and increased circularity. In all projects, KLP Eiendom aims to minimise the amount of waste and always considers refurbishment rather than demolition. The use of the Material Document highlights high quality materials with a long service life and reusability. Flexibility is important, to minimise the need for future refurbishment, thereby contributing to increased re-use. In projects, KLP Eiendom always aims to choose responsible suppliers, and sets requirements for material qualities to reduce our footprint from the use of primary resources. Apart from what is mentioned here, our targets do not address other aspects of circular economy and resource use.
Actions and resultsE5-2, MDR-A
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Analyse re-use and assess the possibility of internal and/or external re-use
All refurbishment and demolition projects over 100 m2, or where the demolition waste exceeds 10 tonnes
Ongoing.
This mapping has been carried out for all development projects started in 2024.
2020-2030
Implement material requirements: use standardised products and materials with low GHG emissions to increase re-use and reduce material procurement
All tenant alterations and development projects
Ongoing.
The Material document is used for all tenant alterations to office properties. We are alsoworking to include the document in ongoing development projects.
2020-2030
Adapt properties for future re-use
All tenant alterations, development projects and new construction
Ongoing.
Pilot project for tenant alterations.
For development projects, we looking at what has to be done to find solutions for increased reusability and adaptability (flexible solutions) over time.
2020-2030
Calculate emissions from tenant alterations to highlight the effect of limiting the alteration or selecting materials from the Material Document
Selected tenant alterations
Ongoing pilot project, calculations so far produced for 3 different tenant alterations.
2020-2030
Calculate greenhouse gas emissions associated with development and new construction projects
All development and new construction projects
Ongoing. Completed for all development projects started in 2024.
2020-2030
Improve waste sorting guide and optimise the type and number of waste ratios
All KLP-operated buildings
Ongoing. From 2024, we have arranged for separateratiofor textiles and leather at all our shopping centres that respond to the EU Framework Directive on sorting of thisratiofrom 2025.
2020-2030
Develop platform for automating waste data
All tenant alterations, development projects and new construction
Planned
2020-2030
Calculate greenhouse gas emissions from purchasing
All purchases related to tenant alterations, development projects and new construction
Planned and ongoing. Work to find methods and/or systems to address this effectively.
2020-2030
Internal/external re-use platforms for materials and components with remaining service life
All properties
Planned
2020-2030
Proactive maintenance to extend the life of all buildings and their components by preparing and following up on maintenance and environmental action plans
All properties
Ongoing. All properties have maintenance plans that are updated each year. KLP-operated properties are inspected every three years. Properties operated by tenants are inspected each year. All properties have been given a maintenance index based on the condition of the property. The maintenance plans form the basis for budgeting and implementation of maintenance measures.
Environmental action plans for each building are in the start-up phase, with the aim of mapping two buildings per month.
2020-2030
This is the first year we have reported on these measures, and many of the actions and/or measurements related to them are themselves new. That is why we have not included any information about results from previous years.
KLP Eiendom has a list of maintenance and environmental measures, but currently no current action plan to account for the allocation of current and future financial resources. We are working to put this in place.
3.6. Social matters
Own workforce ESRS S1
Material impacts, risks and opportunities associated with own workforce S1 SBM3
The table below outlines the identified material impacts, risks, and opportunities associated with own workforce. The reporting in this section covers all KLP employees. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
Description of impact, risk or opportunity
Time horizon
Relevant activity in KLP
Stage in the value chain
Working conditions
Work-life balance
Positive impact
Offer flexible working hours to employees
Short
All
Own operations
Opportunity
Flexible working hours can increase satisfaction and reduce employee stress
Short
All
Own operations
Working environment
Negative impact
Long-term sickness absence makes it hard to come back to work
Long
All
Own operations
Equal treatment and equal opportunities for all
Equality and equal pay
Negative impact
Gender balance in executive posts and higher-paid positions
Short
All
Own operations
Risk
Challenging to recruit women into some positions and disciplines, because fewer women are qualified and many firms are competing for the same resources.
Short
All
Own operations
KLP relies on having a competent, motivated and engaged workforce to deliver quality and efficiency in all business activities. If we are to be an attractive employer and attract the best candidates, it is important to develop employees and managers, learn from each other and take responsibility for our own development in line with the Group’s business goals and ambitions.
KLP is responsible for providing a safe and inclusive physical and psychosocial working environment for its own employees, temps and contract staff. To avoid any negative impact from sickness absence and a poor psychosocial working environment, KLP has a strong focus on being a responsible employer and safeguarding fundamental human rights, privacy, the environment and health and safety for our employees.
KLP provides decent employment through fair pay and working conditions, personal development throughout the period of employment, gender equality and equal treatment in an inclusive working environment.
In general, our employees have a low risk of work-related injuries. Employees in KLP Eiendom who deal with the operation of our buildings have more risk factors than the office employees. Every other year, therefore, a risk assessment is carried out to capture risk factors related to work performance, equipment, chemicals, etc. and ensure that we have procedures and measures to keep risk to a minimum. Regular health checks are carried out for this employee group.
PoliciesS1-1
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
HR strategy
Overall guidelines on how to achieve the goals in the Group strategy and the strategic objectives for the business areas from a human and organisational perspective
All employees
Executive vice-president, People and Organisation
People and Organisation, managers in KLP
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Dialogue with managers, employees and staff representatives to shape the way we work and to implement changes
Internal strategy document, no public interest.
Corporate agreement and special agreements
KLP is a member of the employers’ organisation Finance Norway, and is affiliated with its Basic Agreement and General Agreement with the Finansforbundet trade union. Our local corporate agreement and special agreements supplement these with local guidelines
All employees, apart from senior management and managers who report to them, and temporary staff in short engagements
Executive vice-president, People and Organisation
People and Organisation
UN Sustainable Development Goals, general agreement and basic agreement between Finance Norway and the Finansforbundet union
The agreements are negotiated between management and local representatives from Finansforbundet
Internal documents
Goal: Equality and diversity
Covers the key objectives, actions and KPIs associated with this area.
All employees
Executive vice-president, People and Organisation
People and Organisation
Duty of activity and disclosure in the Equality and Discrimination Act
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of the goal is given in this section.
Policy for salaries and other remuneration
Ensure regulatory compliance, and with the intention of rewarding behavior and influencing culture to ensure long-term and sustainable value creation
All employees
Executive vice-president, People and Organisation
People and Organisation, managers in KLP
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Prepared in collaboration with the remuneration committee and adopted by the board of directors
Internal governance document, no public interest
Rules for dispute resolution in KLP
Description of different types of conflict, what an employee is protected against under the Working Environment Act, procedure for reporting a conflict, when and how the manager should address a situation and where employees can seek advice and help
All employees
Executive vice-president, People and Organisation
People and Organisation
Prepared in collaboration with staff representatives and safety officers
Internal governance document, no public interest
Policy for equality and diversity
Describes how KLP should work to promote gender equality and prevent discrimination, harassment and gender-based violence
All employees
People and Organisation
People and Organisation
UN Sustainable Development Goals
In collaboration with the gender equality and diversity committee
Available at klp.no
Position note on Equality and diversity
Summarises the content of the Policies and describes KLP’s approach to gender equality and diversity in KLP, in the workplace, in procurement, with our owners and customers, and as a responsible investor
All employees
CEO
People and Organisation
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Process for employee follow-up and involvementS1-2
The management has a good relationship with the employees’ representatives through the working environment committee and various works councils. We regularly arrange joint sessions where elected representatives and the safety offers meet with management to support cooperation and discuss relevant issues.
Gender equality and diversity committee: Established overall goals and action plans with actions aimed at marginalised groups defined within diversity. Consists of representatives from management, HR and employees. Quarterly meetings.
Working environment committee (AMU): The central AMU deals with matters relating to the company as a whole. The senior employee representative and the chief safety officer attend together with the CEO, senior managers, the occupational health service and HR. Matters of local interest are dealt with in local AMUs. The managing director of the relevant subsidiary will attend together with HR and local staff representatives and safety officers. There are also quarterly cooperation meetings with management and elected representatives as well as the chief safety officer.
AKAN committee: A bilateral sub-committee to the AMU. Responsible for information and opinion-forming work, planning, organising and carrying out drug-prevention work in KLP.
Employment commitee: DIscusses new hires that normally fall within the wage settlement. Bilateral committee with two representatives from management and HR and two from the staff.
In the wage settlement, management and staff representatives come together to discuss the forthcoming wage settlement at the local level. The parties exchange information and discuss matters that are specifically raised.
KLP conducts an annual survey among its managers on matters related to health, safety and environment. The survey covers the following areas: monitoring and support of employees on sick leave, overtime rules, involuntary part-time working, follow-up on the employee survey, special initiatives, reporting matters of concern and non-conformances, and preventing substance abuse. The results of the survey are included in the company’s systems audit in accordance with the Internal Control Regulations, together with the HSE goals approved by the working environment committee. This helps to provide for a decent working environment and to reduce and prevent risk factors.
In KLP Eiendom Denmark, the employees are involved through a locally elected staff representative who has regular scheduled meetings with management to discuss matters related to the organisation and the working environment. KLP Eiendom Sweden has similar meetings on the same subject, and involves the employees through regular joint meetings.
Processes for whistleblowing and remediationS1-3, S1-17
We have written procedures for dealing with complaints, harassment and other unacceptable conduct. See Policies on sustainability for a description of the Rules for whistleblowing and Rules for conflict resolution.
All employees can use KLP's internal whistleblowing channels to report matters of concern. The whistleblower is quickly informed that the notification has been received and how the process will be taken forward. The notification should be investigated as soon as possible. An independent whistleblowing channel has also been created in which an external service provider processes the notification in the first instance. The whistleblowing channel is available to all employees – permanent, temporary and consultants – via klp.no and is set up for anonymous reporting. KLP has a whistleblowing ombudsman, and a whistleblowing council which includes the chief health and safety officer. The whistleblowing council and the whistleblowing ombud work closely together with the elected representatives. This helps to ensure that employees are looked after in whistleblowing cases.The table below refers to section 7 "Notes to the sustainability report" and note 16 "Own workforce".
Note
2024
2023
2022
16
Number of cases of discrimination
1
0
0
16
Number of notifications received via internal whistleblowing channels
1
3
2
Number of complaints to OECD contact points
0
0
0
Fines, penalties and compensation for complaints related to discrimination
0
0
0
There was one whistleblowing case reported in 2024, which was handled in accordance with KLP’s notification procedures. The case has been concluded and closed. No cases of discrimination, complaints or violations of social or human rights were recorded in the workforce.
About KLP's employees S1-6, S1-11
All of the text and all the figures reported relate to the KLP Group’s permanent workforce in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, unless otherwise specified.The tables below refer to note 16 “Own workforce”.
Note
Total no of employees
2024
2023
2022
2021
21
Norway
1,153
1,148
1,115
1,082
16
Denmark
22
22
20
17
21
Sweden
11
12
7
9
Note
2024
2023
2022
2021
16
Permanent employees
Women
561
544
525
493
Men
606
589
568
555
Total
1,167
1,133
1,093
1,048
16
Temporary employees
Women
11
8
11
18
Men
8
7
11
16
Total
19
15
22
34
16
Part-time employees
Women
36
new
new
new
Men
12
new
new
new
Total
48
48
59
50
16
Employees without guaranteed working hours
Women
0
new
new
new
Men
0
new
new
new
Total
0
new
new
new
16
All employees
Women
572
552
536
511
Men
614
596
579
571
Total
1,186
1,148
1,115
1,082
No employees at KLP work part-time against their will, and all staff are employed in full-time positions. Part-time working occurs only when the employee requests it in connection, for example, with parental leave, education or other personal circumstances which cause them to prefer a reduced workload for a period. In 2024, 4.1 per cent of permanent employees worked part-time; this is a decrease from last year, and lower than previous years. 6.4 per cent of women and 2 per cent of men worked part-time in 2024. There is a decrease for women, and unchanged for men compared to last year.
All employees are covered by social security schemes offered by KLP or from the public sector, which insure employees against loss of income due to illness, unemployment, disability, parental leave and retirement.The tables below refer to note 16 “Own workforce”.
Note
2024
2023
2022
2021
16
Turnover, number
69
78
78
new
Turnover, per cent
6%
7.0%
7.3%
6.4%
16
Total number of new hires
98
113
new
new
Women
49
52
new
new
Men
49
61
new
new
6 per cent of the employees left us in 2024, 1 percentage point less than in 2023.
Equality and diversity
GoalsS1-5
HR prepares an annual risk assessment related to gender equality and diversity in cooperation with the gender equality and diversity committee. Based on the risk assessment, targets are drawn up to address the risks.
Description of goals
Relevant goal in the sustainability strategy
Scope
Base year and benchmark value
Timeline
Gender balance in executive positions and on the board
minimum 40% of each gender at all management levels and on the board
Equality and diversity
Managers and the board
All management levels:
Benchmark value: 40/60 (women/men)
Base year: 2023
Board of directors:
Benchmark value: 43/57 (women/men)
Base year: 2023
SHE-index:
Benchmark value: 11th place
Base year: 2023
By 2026
Gender balance in higher-paid roles
Min. 40% of each gender in higher-paid positions
Equality and diversity
Higher-paid positions
Benchmark value: 30/70 (women/men)
Base year: 2023
By 2026
Work systematically to achieve a pay balance
Carry out salary analyses to identify any unjustified imbalances between women and men
Equality and diversity
All employees
Benchmark value: Women’s earnings relative to men’s, total: 85%
Base year: 2023
By 2026
Ensure good follow-up and development at all stages of life
Maintain arrangements for flexible working and high job satisfaction
Equality and diversity
All employees
Job satisfaction
Benchmark value: 77 points
Base year: 2023
By 2026
Actions taken S1-4, MDR-A
To follow up on the objectives, an action plan is prepared with different measures. We take steps to reduce risk and exploit opportunities. No earmarked funds have been set aside to implement these measures, but the costs are charged on an ongoing basis and set aside by several companies and taken from various accounts.
The measures are followed up each quarter by extracting statistics and conducting studies in the wake of training activities and the employee survey. The results of the employee survey are presented to Group senior management and the central working environment commitee, and the managers are responsible for follow-up measures.
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Gender balance in KLP’s leadership development programme.
All managers in KLP
Ongoing
Every six months, ongoing with no end-date
Adapt language, job ads and interview process to capture female candidates and provide for gender balance in management and higher-paid positions
All recruitment processes
Ongoing
Ongoing action with no end-date
Partnering with Women in Finance to increase the proportion of women in the finance industry
All women working in finance
Ongoing
Annually
Focus on equal pay in payroll processes
All employees
Salary settlement
Annual, with no end-date
Training and development plans
All employees
Ongoing
Applies annually and evaluated every six months
Internships in areas where it can be hard to recruit women
Technology and asset management
Annually
Ongoing action with no end-date
Marking special occasions to promote an inclusive working life. Organised by People and Organisation, equality and diversity committee
All employees
Ongoing
Annual, with no end-date
Offer a home working agreement where the work tasks allow this
All employees
Ongoing
Applies annually and evaluated every six months
Good and appropriate HR policy. Employees are offered flexibility through flexitime, senior schemes, leave for various purposes, time off for nursing mothers, etc.
All employees
Ongoing
Annual, with no end-date
ResultsS1-9, S1-15, S1-16
The table below refers to section 7 "Notes to the sustainability report" and note 16 "Own workforce"
2024
2023
2022
2021
Note
Gender balance
Number
Proportion
Proportion
Proportion
Proportion
16
Board of directors
Women
4
50%
43%
50%
43%
Men
4
50%
57%
50%
57%
16
Group senior management
Women
5
56%
56%
40%
30%
Men
4
44%
44%
60%
70%
16
Management level 1
Women
7
54%
46%
40%
30%
Men
6
46%
54%
60%
70%
16
Management level 2
Women
30
42%
43%
39%
38%
Men
41
58%
57%
61%
62%
16
Management level 3
Women
33
43%
35%
41%
42%
Men
43
57%
65%
59%
58%
16
Total for all management levels
Women
73
41%
40%
40%
38%
Men
104
59%
60%
60%
62%
16
Higher-paid positions
Women
72
31%
30%
28%
27%
Men
159
69%
70%
72%
73%
16
Employees at senior management level*
9
1%
0.8%
0.9%
1.0%
*Employees at top management level as a proportion of total number of employees
In some disciplines it is particularly hard to recruit women, especially in the fields of technology and finance where there are significantly fewer women than men applying. We note that we have reached the goal of at least 40 per cent of each gender in total for all management levels together and at the different levels. In higher-paid positions, we are seeing a positive trend, but developments are slow and will therefore be an important focus area for 2025.
In 2024, we achieved second place in the SHE-Index survey of gender balance in the financial sector, which measures the gender balance among managers, employees and directors and in processes. The tables below refer to note 16 “Own workforce”.
2024
2023
2022
2021
Note
Age distribution
Number
Proportion
Number
Proportion
Number
Proportion
Number
Proportion
16
Under 30
89
8%
85
8%
82
7%
78
7%
16
Between 30 and 50
601
51%
591
52%
585
51%
570
55%
16
Over 50
477
41%
457
40%
425
42%
399
38%
Note
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
16
CEO’s salary relative to median salary in the Group
7.0
6.6
6.5
6.2
6.0
16
Women’s earnings relative to men’s (all employees at KLP)
85%
85%
83%
84%
84%
Women’s earnings relative to men’s at management level 1
76%
74%
64%
76%
77%
Women’s earnings relative to men’s at management level 2
84%
84%
88%
87%
86%
Women’s earnings relative to men’s at management level 3
86%
89%
93%
92%
91%
Women’s earnings relative to men’s, higher-paid positions
95%
95%
93%
93%
95%
Women’s earnings relative to men’s, other employees
98%
96%
94%
96%
95%
With regard to the salary balance, which measures women’s share of men’s pay, we have seen a positive development among other employees and at the top management level. However, we have a decline at management level 3.
In 2025, it will be particularly important to continue our work on developments in pay and gender balance in higher-paid and executive positions, and to maintain a good and inclusive working environment that is seen to be attractive.
Parental leave
2024
2023
2022
2021
Proportion of women entitled to and taking parental leave
6.6%
new
new
new
Proportion of men entitled to and taking parental leave
4.0%
new
new
new
Gender distribution, parental leave taken (women/men)
69 / 31%
75 / 25%
74 / 26%
75 / 25%
Health, safety and environment (HSE)
GoalsS1-5
HR prepares the risk assessment for the HSE area in collaboration with the chief safety officer and the senior staff representative. The risk assessment is approved by the central working environment committee. Based on the risk assessment, targets are drawn up to address the risks. An annual system audit is conducted for the HSE area, where we see whether the targets have been met and whether we have had any non-conformances. Based on the system audit, we set new targets and develop measures to achieve the goals.
Description of goals
Relevant goal in the sustainability strategy
Scope
Base year and benchmark value
Timeline
Absence due to illness
Annual sickness absence below 4% on average
“Equality and diversity”
All employees
Base year: 2023
Benchmark value: 4.48%
2024
Actions taken
S1-4, MDR-A
No earmarked funds have been set aside to implement these measures, but the costs are charged on an ongoing basis and set aside by several companies and taken from various accounts.
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Course for managers in follow-up of sickness absence
Managers in KLP
Ongoing
Autumn 2024
Follow-up of sickness absence
All employees
Ongoing
All year round
Risk assessment of technical operations in KLP Eiendom
Employees in the Technical department in KLP Eiendom
Completed
Autumn 2024
Health checks for operations staff at KLP Eiendom
Operations staff at KLP Eiendom
Completed
Autumn 2024
Risk assessment for HSE in KLP
All employees
Ongoing
Autumn 2024
Webinar on mental health
All employees
Completed
Autumn 2024
Lunchtime course on women's health and the menopause
All employees
Completed
Autumn 2024
Follow-up on overtime
KLP managers and employees
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Follow-up of support for pregnant employees from the occupational health service
All pregnant employees
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Framework agreement for mental health services, offer to employees
All employees
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Support from the occupational health service
All employees
Ongoing
Ongoing, no defined end-date
ResultsS1-14
2024
2023
2022
2021
Total sickness absence
5.1%
4.5%
4.5%
3.3%
Short-term sickness absence
1.6%
1.8%
2.0%
1.1%
Long-term sickness absence
3.4%
2.7%
2.5%
2.2%
Sickness absence, women
6.7%
5.7%
5.7%
4.3%
Sickness absence, men
3.5%
3.3%
3.5%
2.5%
Number of personal injuries
0
3
0
1
Gender distribution, absence for sick children (women/men)
59 / 41%
51 / 49%
52 / 48%
49 / 51%
In 2024, the total sickness absence was 5.06 per cent, which is higher than in 2023. The results for 2024 show a slight fall in short-term absence and an increase in long-term absence. Based on these figures, sickness absence is be an area we will be working on, with various other measures beyond 2025
No serious injuries to staff or other major incidents were reported in the company in 2024. There have been no work-related fatalities.
Consumers and end-users ESRS S4
Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users SBM-3
KLP’s key topics under “consumers and end-users” are privacy and sustainable working life.. These are two different topics which are followed up differently in KLP, and will therefore be described separately in this section. The table below summarises the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to these two topics. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
Description of impact, risk or opportunity
Time horizon
Relevant activity in KLP
Stage in the value chain
Information-related impacts on consumers and/or end-users
Privacy
Negative impact
Possible breaches of privacy and release of sensitive information
All
Pensions
Banking
Non-life insurance
Own operations
Risk
Release of sensitive information can lead to extensive reputational damage, loss of customers and fines
All
Pensions
Banking
Non-life insurance
Own operations
Access to (quality) data
Positive impact
Share information so members can make conscious choices and stay at work longer
Medium
Pensions
Downstream – Customers
Data protection
PoliciesMDR-P
The table below provides an overview of the key Policies for KLP’s work on privacy and managing the material impacts, risks and opportunities described in the table above. There is also an overview of overall sustainability guidelines under Policies on sustainability..
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
Privacy and Information Security Policy
Ensure that companies in the Group establish good procedures for safeguarding the privacy of the people whose personal data we process, information security requirements, stable operations and control of information flows, and safeguarding our reputation and public trust in the Group
Group
Board of directors
CEO
EU General Data Protection Regulation
European Convention on Human Rights
UN Conventions on Human Rights
Not applicable
Internal governance document, no public interest
Privacy policy
Ensure that the personal data on KLP’s members, customers and employees is safeguarded in a secure and proper manner and elaborate on requirements set out in the Policy for privacy and information security.
Group
CEO
Data protection officer
EU General Data Protection Regulation
European Convention on Human Rights
UN Conventions on Human Rights
Not applicable
Internal governance document, no public interest
Rules on information security
Ensure that information security in KLP and its subsidiaries is maintained in a reliable and proper manner and elaborate on requirements set out in the Policy for privacy and information security.
Group
CEO
Security manager
Not applicable
Internal governance document, business-sensitive
KLP’s strategy and policy for information security
KLP's information security strategy is designed in line with regulatory requirements, encompassing requirements for personal data security in data protection law. Management requirements and plans to ensure compliance with the privacy regulations in areas other than security are covered by other Policies and procedures.
Group
Security manager
Security manager
Not applicable
Internal governance document, no public interest
KLP has guidelines in policies regulations that set out the privacy principles to be followed stressing that there is a low risk appetite for breaches of the regulations and stating who is responsible for ensuring compliance in practice. A number of Group-wide procedures and templates have also been provided to ensure compliance in practice, including a procedure for handling inquiries from customers and members who wish to exercise their rights. Policies are in line with the EU General Data Protection Regulation, which ensures the protection of the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, along with the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Conventions on Human Rights.
Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users S4 SBM-3
In order to provide our services and products, KLP has to collect and process personal data about pensioners and members of the public-sector occupational pension scheme, customers within banking, property, funds and insurance, and our own employees. KLP also processes personal data on other people, such as visitors to our website, contact persons at our suppliers and external partners. It is therefore essential for KLP to process personal data in a responsible and secure manner, in line with the personal data regulations. This is important to retail our customers’ and members’ trust. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
KLP's main product, public-sector occupational pensions, includes disability pensions that may involve processing of health information. Health data and other so-called special categories of personal data are subject to special safeguards in the personal data regulations. All processing of personal data carries a certain risk, and we are therefore committed to following the requirements for secure and proper processing. We have implemented appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure that we comply with the regulations, such as procedures, access management and secure communications. This reduces risk and safeguards the privacy of our customers and members. KLP hardly ever uses personal data for marketing purposes and does not use marketing services from Facebook.
KLP meets its obligations under the privacy regulations on its own initiative. Customers and members are not dependent on product and service-related information to protect their privacy rights. Customers and members can use the consent feature in MinSide to choose whether personal data about them can be shared between the companies in the Group, whether they wish to receive marketing material from KLP and if so, how much and through what channels.
Many of those whose data KLP processes are elderly and in what we might call a dependency relationship with KLP as their pension provider. Risks and possible negative consequences of this are identified in privacy impact assessments and are taken into account in the design of communications and self-service solutions. We also discharge obligation in the privacy regulations to maintain a processing log. This provides a good overview of our processing of personal data, including data on vulnerable groups, and provides good control over the lawfulness of the processing.
Processes for customer involvement and remediationS4-2, S4-3
KLP discharges its obligations under the personal data regulations, including thorough privacy assessments prior to introducing measures or entering into agreements that involve new processing of personal data. The requirement to carry out thorough privacy assessments, and take appropriate measures to mitigate possible adverse consequences, also applies to the processing of personal data for marketing purposes. KLP has considers the views and rights of its customers and members in these assessments.
To make good assessments of privacy consequences and remedial measures, both legal and technical expertise are often required, and not least knowledge of the needs of the business. As a rule, there will be several people participating in these assessments. The data protection officer always participates in privacy impact assessments and often assists in other ways as well. We have procedures and templates to ensure that the assessments are made correctly, and that measures are taken to remedy any negative consequences for those affected by the action in question. This is especially true where those affected by the measure are in an position of financial dependence on KLP because we are a provider of pension benefits. These impact assessments and remedial actions also follow from Policies.
According to the guidance from the supervisory authorities, privacy impact assessments must also consider the views of the data subjects. Customers and members are rarely involved directly in such assessments, but a record should always be kept of whether the subjects have been involved, with an explanation if they have not. No specific role has been designated in the company to be responsible for this; the manager responsible for the individual assessment has to take a view on this. The fact that the data protection officer is always involved in privacy impact assessments at KLP helps to ensure that risks and requirements are looked at from the point of view of the data subject, Staff representatives will be involved if there are actions affecting employees’ privacy.
Transparency and readily available information on the way in which KLP processes personal data concerning its end-users is important in building trust and fulfilling the duty of disclosure in the data protection regulations. We are therefore committed to ensuring that the data protection statement at klp.no is up-to-date and accurate. Contact information for KLP and the data protection officer can be found here if customers and members have questions or complaints or wish to exercise their privacy rights. We respond to such requests on an ongoing basis, and within statutory deadlines, in order to safeguard the rights of customers and members and correct any errors and damage that have arisen. We also state that complaints can be addressed to the Norwegian Data Protection Authority if anyone wishes to appeal to an independent supervisory function. Customers and members who wish to report matters of concern can use our whistleblowing channel, and this can be done anonymously. See table of “Policies on sustainability” for information on the whistleblowing provisions. Customers and members can find information on how to report their concerns on KLP’s website.
The data protection officer is notified of all issues entered in the incident reporting system and keeps track of the incidents. One of the tasks of the data protection officer is to check whether KLP is complying with the privacy regulations. The Compliance function also makes assessments of compliance and how we handle the risk of breaches of the data protection rules, as we do for other regulations that KLP is required to follow.
Customers and members contact us all the time, but KLP only receives a small number of requests for access or similar. We do not have any exact figure for how many people contact us. However, we must assume that KLP’s customers and members are aware of the privacy rules and their rights, as we actively publish these on several channels, including our website and decision letters. We have a statutory duty of confidentiality in relation to our contact with customers and members under the Financial Institutions Act, and we have procedures to ensure that inquiries are handled properly and that customers’ and members’ rights are safeguarded.
GoalsS4-5
The policy and other guidelines lay down requirements for the organisation to ensure compliance, but it has not so far been considered natural to set measurable, results-oriented targets in this area. This is also not a requirement in the personal data regulations, and the key here is that the company recognises its actual responsibility and takes the necessary measures and actions to ensure and demonstrate that the requirements are being followed in practice. How we have done this is described below.
The ambition level is expressed by setting the risk appetite for breaching the rules to low. In the autumn of 2024, there was an audit of management and control guidelines in the Group, and in this connection, the risk appetite with respect to information security and privacy was specified in more detail. In practice, this will involve clarifying of goals, to make it clearer what will not be accepted in terms breaches of confidentiality, such as personal data going astray, integrity and availability. The strategy for information security will also be updated in connection with the introduction of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
Actions and resultsS4-4, MDR-A
Over time, a number of procedures, processes and technical solutions have been implemented to prevent, limit and remedy potential negative consequences related to breaches of the privacy regulations. The table below summarises some of the measures taken in 2024.
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Keeping the data protection statement up to date
All processing of personal data
Initiated.
To be amended as needed and following scheduled reviews.
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Keep the processing log up to date
Changes as needed and as part of annual check and update
Last Group-wide audit was in Q2 2024
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Training and raising awareness
1) Mandatory e-learning courses
All employees
1) New e-learning module launched in 2024
Ongoing, no defined end-date
2) Security Day and Security Month, with a number of events on various topics around security and privacy. In 2024, this included talks from the Norwegian Data Protection Authority on personal data security.
All employees
2) Completed
Ongoing, no defined end-date
3) Introduction of training tools where employees receive emails to test if they detect phishing attacks.
All employees
3) Completed
Ongoing, no defined end-date
Secure communication
Established new channels for secure communication to prevent personal data from going astray
Completed.
2024
KLP has not reported in detail on privacy measures in previous years. It is therefore not natural to compare the effects or results from the measures taken with previous years. The measures taken in relation to training appear to have had a good effect, but it is hard to measure concrete results from this type of measure.
Work to ensure that anyone affected by a breach of the personal data regulations is treated as described earlier. There have been no breaches of privacy that have had a material adverse impact. Therefore, it has not been necessary to offer legal remedies or take corrective measures. Nor has KLP had any cases referred to the supervisory authorities or incidents related to human rights violations. We work with other businesses through Finance Norway to ensure that our practice is in line with best practice in the industry.
The Group’s risk appetite related to compliance with the privacy regulations, including requirements for personal data security, is low. We have implemented the measures we believe are fit and necessary to comply with the requirements and to enable us to safeguard the privacy of those whose personal data we process, meet information security requirements and maintain stable operations.
The work to safeguard the privacy and information security of our customers and members is extensive, and significant operating expenses are therefore incurred for this. There are many ongoing measures, especially in safeguarding information security and meeting the requirements for stable operations, so many people are involved in the work. It is also resource-intensive to conduct privacy assessments. As this is an integral part of the business, and is related to other costs of providing our services, it is hard to quantify the cost of this work.
We expect privacy and information security protection requirements to increase. The introduction of the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), rapid technological developments, including artificial intelligence, and the security situation in the world, are likely to cause costs to increase. KLP must expect to expend a lot of resources going forward to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and protect our reputation, but this is hard to quantify.
Complaints received
KLP aims to operate in a responsible manner to ensure that our customers receive the pensions and services they are entitled to. It is important to us for our owners and their employees to be satisfied, which is why we are open about receiving complaints. The table below refers to note 17 “Customer Complaints” and Note 18 “Whistleblowing”.
Note
2024
2023
2022
2021
18
Notifications received from third parties
0
3
2
0
17
Complaints about pension cases received via KLP’s contact points
1,106
1,159
1,082
991
17
Cases dealt with by the National Insurance Court
59
34
29
37
Cases dealt with by the National Insurance Court where the complaint was upheld
4
2
1
3
17
Complaints received about banking, non-life insurance and funds via KLP’s contact points
162
152
155
155
Complaints about banking, non-life insurance and funds received via KLP’s contact points where the complaint was upheld
40
33
30
55
17
Cases dealt with by the Financial Complaints Board
126
98
85
94
Cases dealt with by the Financial Complaints Board where the complaint was upheld
21
12
9
16
Sustainable working life
Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users S4 SBM-3
Early dropouts from the workforce have many consequences, for the individual, for our owners, for society and for KLP. A sustainable working life where employees have a good working environment and occupational health can delay retirement and have a positive impact in terms of staffing and reduced pension costs. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
The staffing situation is a big challenge for our owners and the situation will get even tighter in the future. This is related to demographic trends with an increasing number of older people and fewer people in work. It is important to work to promote a good working environment to keep the staff we already have and reduce sickness absence and staff turnover. A good working environment is important for recruiting new staff.
KLP’s efforts for a sustainable working life are directed at members, managers, HR/HSE employees, staff representatives, safety officers and politicians in the Norwegian local government and healthcare sector. KLP offers courses, professional days and tools for use in processes around working life. We have relevant data, figures and insights that can be used in analysis and planning of measures. KLP passes on knowledge from research and shares experience from projects carried out by others. There may be a risk of misinformation in the research we receive or of reproducing it incorrectly. In various networks, we facilitate exchanges of experience across municipalities and health trusts. Through information sharing, KLP aims to help our owners keep their employees in work for longer. This will ease their pension burden. The effects of the work may therefore affect all members of KLP.
It is important to increase the pension knowledge of individual members and employers, particularly the value of being staying in work, so they can make informed decisions about pensions. Through an active customer dialogue in “Worth knowing” courses, information meetings and personal consultations, KLP contributes to insight and understanding about pensions and sees the connection between pension finance and working life.
Policies
The table provides an overview of the key Policies for KLP’s work on sustainable working life and managing the material impacts described in the table above. There is also an overview of overall sustainability guidelines under Policies on sustainability..
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
Goal of a sustainable working life
Covers goals, measures and KPIs to deliver on the targets in the Group strategy related to this topic.
KLP’s customer work aimed at members and the management of our customers and owners
Executive vice-president, Life and Pension
Department of Strategy, Analysis and Working Life
UN Sustainable Development Goals
“Sustainable employment” was identified as a key topic after explicit feedback from the board. We have had discussions with owners and members to determine what KLP should include in a sustainable working life
Internal strategy document. A summary of the goal is given here.
Action plans
Annual plan with description of all activities
All relevant activities related to customer work on sustainable working life
Executive vice-president, Life and Pension
Department of Strategy, Analysis and Working Life
UN Sustainable Development Goals,
Based on feedback and input from customers and members
Internal procedure documents, no public interest
Operating concept
Breakdown of KLP's customers by size, segment, priority
Part of KLP’s customer strategy
Executive vice-president, Life and Pension
Department of Strategy, Analysis and Working Life
UN Sustainable Development Goals,
Based on feedback and input from owners
Internal document, business-sensitive
Process specifications
Description of customer meetings, personal guidance
Life and Pension division
Executive vice-president, Life and Pension
Advice and information centre, Customer
None
Based on customer feedback and experience
Internal procedure documents, no public interest
Processes for customer involvement and remediationS4-2, S4-3
The offering relating to working life is an integral part of the service around public-sector occupational pensions directed at both members and employers. As well as taking the initiative and arranging regional information days, courses and monthly webinars, KLP has regular direct contact with customers about pensions and working life, where we can provide guidance on specific issues.
All offerings are evaluated together with customers in terms of value and relevance.
KLP develops products and services linked to our core business which respond to some of the sustainability challenges our customers and owners face, and thereby benefit society as a whole.
Even now there is a record shortage of skilled labour all over Norway. It is important for employees in the local government and healthcare sector to feel that their job is meaningful, and to have the health and motivation to work for as much as possible of the years when they are of working age. Through projects and processes supported by KLP, several municipalities and health trusts have developed measures to promote a health-promoting work environment that contributes to lower sickness absence. KLP’s working environment network is an example of this.
If the customers are not satisfied with the “working life” offering, this may be reported to the account manager in the life company, who also helps to prioritise and coordinate the customer activity around working life with the owners. All activities are also evaluated and it provides a channel for assessing quality of service. Through various forums such as resource group meetings and owner meetings with top management, KLP discusses the challenges facing customers and collects input to collaborative efforts in this area.
GoalsS4-5
A sustainable working life is essential for KLP’s owners to discharge their social mission. Staffing is a big challenge for our owners and the situation will get even tighter in the future. This challenge is related to KLP’s core product and our role as a pension provider. The board of directors of KLP has highlighted this topic and wants KLP to assist our customer-owners in addressing the challenges they face. This is also evident in other discussions KLP has with customers. In light of this, KLP explored possible ways of promoting a sustainable working life based on our role as a pension provider.
Description of goals
Relevant goal in the sustainability strategy
Scope
Base year and benchmark value
Timeline
Integrating sustainable working life into customer work
2 development projects
“Sustainable working life”
All account managers
Base year: 2024
No benchmark value
2024
Actions and resultsS4-4, MDR-A
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Offer information days and webinars on working life topics for customers/owners
Held for managers, HR, HSE, staff representatives and safety officers at all of KLP’s owners
Ongoing
Ongoing
Compile demographic data related to disability and retirement dates, in KLP’s working life report and through seminars, to help our owners plan and implement measures related to recruitment and pension costs in the future.
Applicable to managers, HR, HSE, staff representatives and safety officers at all of KLP’s owners
Ongoing
Ongoing
Integrate sustainable working life into the core offering from KLP, including projects in the Customer and Advice Centre to help communicate the value of staying in work in conversations with KLP’s members
Help all members they are in contact with
Ongoing
Ongoing
Develop and enter into strategic partnerships related to sustainable working life with external stakeholders.
With KLP’s owners, the employers and trade unions, academics and research institutions
Ongoing
Ongoing
Anchor the work on sustainable working life within KLP through regular status meetings with key stakeholders. Also through contributions to the development of corporate strategy, member strategy, customer strategy and insight work on customer value.
Collaborate across KLP, and in discussions with our customers and owners
Ongoing
Ongoing
Personal guides on what pensions are, what is needed to stay in work longer, and what this affects.
Held to explain the different choices members have, so they will be able to make conscious choices about their own future
Ongoing
Ongoing
“Worth knowing” course about what pensions are, what is needed to stay in work longer, and what this affects.
Held to train people concerned with pensions at our customers and owners across the country so they can advise their own employees
Ongoing
Ongoing
Information meetings about what pensions are, what is needed to stay in work longer, and what this affects.
Covered in joint meetings for the management and members of our customers and owners across the country.
Ongoing
Ongoing
Sustainable working life is a strategic focus area for KLP. In 2024, KLP established a separate goal which clarifies the role KLP has in relation to customers and society in the area of working life. Systematic efforts have been made to ensure that the measures we implement are a natural part of KLP’s core activities of and our customer work. This leads our owners to see us as a central and visible partner promoting a sustainable working life, where we clarify the relationship between the value of staying in work and the value of the pension. The goal is to keep people in work. The work is systematised and continuously developed.
The activities for KLP are continuously evaluated and improved so the content of the offering is knowledge-based and in line with the latest research. The projects KLP provides support for report in accordance with the contract and project plan, and KLP publishes the results of the work at the end of the project. KLP supports selected customer projects and uses the resources of the pension community in this collaboration. In the contracts we enter into, sharing experience in various forums is an important part of this collaboration.
3.7. Business conduct
Business conductESRS G1
Material impacts, risks and opportunities related to business conductSBM3
The table below provides an overview of the identified material impacts, risks and opportunities related to financial crime, which is KLP’s key concern under “business conduct”. See section 3.3 “KLP’s material impacts, risks and opportunities – Double materiality analysis” for a more detailed description of the materiality analysis.
Description of impact, risk or opportunity
Time horizon
Relevant activity in KLP
Stage in the value chain
Corruption and bribery
Positive impact
Help detect, combat and reduce the facilitation of financial crime
Short
Banking
Downstream – Investments
Negative impact
Enable financial crime through investments and own transactions
Short
Banking
Non-life insurance
Securities investments
Downstream – Investments
Downstream – Customers
Risk
Involvement in fraud, money laundering or other financial crime through own transactions or in the investment portfolio which could result in financial losses
Medium
Banking
Non-life insurance
Securities investments
Downstream – Investments
Downstream – Customers
Policies G1-1, MDR-P
Our zero tolerance of financial crime is covered in the corporate strategy, and is supported by both guidelines and underlying procedures. The table provides an overview of the key Policies for KLP’s work on financial crime and handling the material impacts, risks and opportunities described in the table above. There is also an overview of overall sustainability guidelines under Policies on sustainability..
Governing document
Summary of content
Scope
Owner
Responsible for implementation
Compliance with standards or initiatives
Interests of stakeholders
Availability
Goal: Fight financial crime
Through measures against financial crime, KLP aims to protect its own business against adverse events and exploit its position to encourage stakeholders and society in general to protect themselves against such crime.
All employees
Executive vice-president, Corporate Governance
Director, Financial Crime
Not applicable
Internal strategy document.
A summary of the goal is given in this section.
Policy for conflicts of interest
Describes KLP’s expectations for mapping, assessing and managing conflicts of interest.
All employees
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Not applicable
Internal governance document, no public interest
Policy for compliance in the anti-money laundering and sanctions area
Describes the KLP’s overall measures against money laundering and terrorist financing, in the sanctions area.
All employees
Board of directors
CEO
UN Sustainable Development Goals FATF recommendations
Not applicable
Internal governance document, no public interest
Regulations on measures against financial crime
Elaborates on KLP's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing measures, as well as the sanctions area. Sets the framework for preventing, detecting and handling financial crime. Periodic reporting to the CEO and the board of directors provides a status update in these areas and explains what measures are necessary to manage the risk in line with the risk appetite adopted by the board.
All employees
CEO
Executive vice-president, Corporate Governance
UN Sustainable Development Goals FATF recommendations
Not applicable
Available at klp.no
Handbook for action against corruption
Sets the framework and elaborates on the content of KLP’s anti-corruption programme.
Professionals and functions/roles with responsibilities within anti-corruption.
CEO
Executive vice-president, Corporate Governance
UN Sustainable Development Goals
Not applicable
Internal document, no public interest
No roles and functions have been identified in KLP that are at significant risk of corruption and bribery, but it has been found that purchasing and allocation on a general basis could pose an increased risk.
Processes related to financial crime G1-3
An anti-corruption programme has been established to help prevent and detect corruption and bribery in and towards our business. The programme includes the following items:
management must speak up for anti-corruption
risk assessments, routines, clear policies and procedures
training and employee awareness
whistleblowing systems, background checks, control and monitoring
sanctions and consequences
verification of compliance and continuous improvement
Information is provided outside the Group on any charges, fines or convictions for corruption and bribery. KLP was not the object of any such charges, fines or convictions in 2024.
We keep abreast of the latest threats Resources are focused on the risks with the highest likelihood and impact. This includes monitoring and control of tolerance limits and reporting on the areas involved in financial crime. Through our risk assessments, we map our own control environment as a basis for improving measures to prevent, detect and handle financial crime.
In 2024, mandatory e-learning on anti-corruption has been provided for all employees, including managers. Classroom instruction has been given to particularly exposed roles and functions. This includes information on how to prevent and detect corruption. Requirements for the degree of completion of mandatory training for all employees, as well as selected roles and functions, have been met. Employees who do not complete the training are followed up.
The table below shows how anti-corruption training is handled for the relevant functions.
Function
Purpose of training
Form of training
Degree of completion
Frequency
Top management: Board of directors
Understand the risks to the company. Possess sufficient knowledge to manage and control enforcement of the anti-corruption programme by management
Classroom training
Planned for 2025
Periodically and as needed
Top management: CEO and Group senior management
Understand the risks to the company. Possess sufficient knowledge to enforce the anti-corruption programme.
E-learning for employees
Classroom training
100 per cent
Scheduled in 2025
Periodically
Specialist function: Financial Crime department and designated contact persons in the company.
Understand the risks to the company. Possess sufficient knowledge to design and implement the anti-corruption programme.
Be able to carry out all relevant actions in a way that demonstrates the ability to identify, anticipate and prevent errors and mitigate risk.
Decide on and design training activities relevant to the different roles and functions.
E-learning for employees.
Information meetings under the auspices of Finance Norway and other industry associations.
Regular participation in relevant training measures arranged by third parties.
100 per cent
100 per cent
100 per cent
Periodically
Ongoing
Ongoing
All employees (including new hires, contract staff and temps)
Basic knowledge of risk and the anti-corruption programme.
Enabled to recognise situations that could indicate corruption.
E-learning for employees.
81 per cent
Periodically and as needed
Exposed roles and functions
Basic knowledge of risk and the anti-corruption programme.
Enabled to recognise situations that could indicate corruption.
E-learning for employees.
Classroom teaching
100 per cent
90 per cent
Periodically and as needed
Those responsible for KLP’s anti-corruption programme are not involved in investigating incidents that could include corruption or bribery, as these could take in the quality of the contents of the anti-corruption programme itself. The CEO and the board of directors must be informed of the status of the anti-corruption work and notified of any serious matters.
Actions and resultsG1-4, MDR-A
Annual risk management and internal controls, and the evaluation of the anti-corruption programme, identify measures needed to address the risk of corruption and bribery.
In 2024, we strengthened our work against financial crime by implementing several measures to ensure that our business is conducted in a manner that is responsible, transparent and in line with our values and the expectations of society (see table). The most important measure is the purchase of a new anti-money laundering solution. We expect the solution to enhance several processes within measures against financial crime.
Description of measures
Scope
Status
Time horizon
Update the anti-corruption programme to reflect the requirements in the Sustainability Directive:
The programme contains measures to prevent, detect and handle corruption. These are communicated to all employees and integrated into our business processes. Includes an expectation that administrative managers will highlight the importance of anti-corruption work.
Whole of the Group
Implemented
Ongoing
The anti-corruption programme is evaluated and verified each year so improvement measures can be implemented if needed.
Establish a request form for reviews: The form sets out requirements for a proper approach to review activities
Whole of the Group
Implemented
Ongoing
Establish procedure to investigating fraud and other financial crime: The procedure sets out requirements for a proper procedure for investigation activities.
Whole of the Group
Implemented
Ongoing
Training and awareness:
All employees have undergone mandatory training in anti-corruption and measures against money laundering and terrorist financing.
Changes in the risk profile, regulatory requirements and procedures are covered by the training.
Whole of the Group
Implemented
Ongoing
Monitoring and reporting:
We have implemented systems to continuously monitor and manage the risk of financial crime. This includes the tolerance limits that have been set for compliance with the risk appetite adopted by the board in the areas included in financial crime. The results of this monitoring are regularly reported to the board.
Whole of the Group
Implemented
Ongoing
Membership of trade associations and interest groups:
Through membership of the committee in Finance Norway, we keep abreast of the threat situation and operational measures to prevent and detect financial crime. Here we also provide input on risk mitigation measures and public/private cooperation.
KLP is a member of Transparency International Norway – which we believe is an important contributor to the fight against financial crime.
Whole of the Group
Implemented
Ongoing
New anti-money laundering solution:
We have invested in a new solution that will strengthen efforts to prevent and detect money laundering and terrorist financing. Work to implement the solution started in autumn 2024 and will be completed in 2025.
Parts of the Group
To enter production in Q2/2025
Ongoing
No instances of corruption and bribery involving our employees were recorded in the 2024 financial year. We had no suspicions of any contract partners and did not terminate any contracts because contract partners might be involved in corruption and bribery. So no action has been taken as a result of actual cases of corruption and bribery.
KLP’s systematic countermeasures have uncovered 324 instances of fraud against KLP. We have prevented financial losses both for our own business and to other financial institutions. In 2024, no reports on our own employees related to internal fraud were received or processed.
The KLP Group reported 99suspicious matters to the National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime (Økokrim) in 2024 and suspended transactions related to tax evasion, racketeering, fraud and misappropriation of funds. No sanctions violations were detected in relation to our company, customers, transactions or business associates.
4. Income and allocations
Kommunal Landspensjonskasse Gjensidig forsikringsselskap (KLP) submits consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS® reporting standards, while the company accounts are presented in accordance with Norwegian General Accepted Accounting Principles (NGAAP) for life insurance companies. The consolidated accounts for mutual insurance companies submitted under IFRS have zero profits as all value creation accrues to policyholders and thus constitutes a liability to them. The results from the different areas of the Group are commented on below based on the company accounts, set out in accordance with the respective companies' accounting rules for the type of business in question. The following business areas are defined:
Profit/loss before tax
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Collective pension scheme, public sector
2,169
-20
Non-life insurance
386
273
Banking
325
285
Securities management
103
55
Other and elimination
-2,324
-286
Group
-61
-254
The parent company KLP operates the public occupational pension business itself, and is the owner of the other business areas. The results from public-sector occupational pensions thus also include the results from other business areas, as the profits from these are included as income in KLP according to the equity method.
Public-sector occupational pensions (NGAAP) / Parent company financial statements
Financial results
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Premium income for own account
60,883
70,326
Income from investments in the common portfolio.
65,265
42,500
Income from investments in the investment options portfolio.
304
212
Compensation payments
-30,200
-28,261
Change in premium reserve (I)
-42,144
-54,870
Change in buffer fund (II)
-13,556
-7,949
Change in premium fund (III)
-711
-550
Total changes in insurance liabilities taken to profit/loss – contractual obligations (I+II+III)
-56,412
-63,368
Change in pension capital (I)
-117
-173
Change in premium fund (II)
-6
-6
Change in other provisions (III)
-75
-136
Total changes in insurance liabilities taken to profit/loss – special investment portfolio (I+II+III)
-197
-315
Surplus from the investment result
-36,747
-20,039
Risk result attributed to the insurance contracts
-790
-594
Total funds allocated to the insurance contracts – contractual obligations
37,537
-20,632
Insurance-related operating expenses
-1,693
-1,512
Other insurance-related income/expenses
2
7
Technical profit/loss
416
-1,043
Net income from investments in the corporate portfolio
1,989
1,282
Other income and expenses related to the corporate portfolio
-236
-258
Non-technical profit/loss
1,753
1,024
Profit/loss before tax
2,169
-20
Taxes paid
-356
-82
Profit/loss before other income and expenses
1,812
-101
Other income and expenses
329
-111
Total comprehensive income
2,142
-213
Allocations and transfers:
Transferred to equity contributions
-1,050
-428
Transferred to risk equalisation fund
-325
969
Transferred to other retained earnings
-766
-329
Total allocation of profit and transfers
-2,142
213
KLP also monitors the company in this alternative income statement:
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Reference to official accounts
Investment result
51,090
29,465
Financial income from common and investment options portfolios minus return guarantee (share of changes in liabilities taken to profit/loss)
Risk result
790
648
Expected compensation payment (share of changes in insurance liabilities taken to profit/loss minus compensation payments)
Customers’ share of investment and risk results
-51,554
-29,819
Funds allocated to insurance contracts and share of changes in insurance liabilities taken to profit/loss (common and investment options portfolios)
Interest guarantee premium
14
291
Share of premium income
Other income from technical accounts
0
-1,773
Administration result
77
144
Proportion of premium income, share of changes in insurance liabilities and insurance-related operating costs taken to profit/loss
Other income/expenses
1,752
1,024
Net income from investments in the corporate portfolio and other income/expenses in non-technical accounts
Tax
-356
-82
Other profit/loss elements
329
-111
Total comprehensive income
2142
-213
Investment result
The investment result consists of returns achieved in excess of the guaranteed return on the customer portfolios. The customer portfolios are dominated by the common portfolio. It was worth NOK 790.2 (718.2) billion at the end of 2024. This section shows how the portfolio was invested as at 31/12, along with as returns obtained from the various assets:
Shares and alternative investments
Total exposure in shares and alternative investments, including equity derivatives, was 35.1 per cent at the end of the year. The total return on shares and alternative investments in 2024 was minus 19.2 per cent. KLP’s global exchange-listed shares produced a return of 23.7 per cent, while the Norwegian listed equity portfolio gave a return of 12.4 per cent for the year The currency hedging ratio for equities in developed markets and the most liquid currencies in emerging markets was between 40 and 60 per cent through the year. In the course of 2024, the Norwegian krone depreciated against the US dollar, among other currencies.
Long-term bonds
Investments in long-term bonds made up around 26.5 per cent of the common portfolio at the end of the year. Unrecognised decreases in value in the common portfolio amounted to NOK 10.5 billion at the end of 2024. The portfolio is well diversified and consists of securities issued by creditworthy borrowers. The return measured at amortised cost was 3.6 per cent for the year.
Property
Property investments, including Norwegian and international real estate funds, made up 12.9 per cent of the common portfolio.
Property investments in the common portfolio achieved a return of 4.7 per cent in 2024. The returns include currency hedging.
Lending
Loans in the common portfolio amounted to NOK 87.6 billion at the end of the year. This is split between NOK 77.9 billion in loans to the public sector, NOK 3.4 billion in secured mortgage loans and NOK 6.1 billion in loans outside Norway secured against mortgages or government guarantees.
The lending portfolio is of high quality, with no losses on municipal loans and very modest provisions for losses on mortgage loans. Unrecognised decreases in value in the lending portfolio (fixed-interest loans) totalled NOK 1.1 billion at year-end.
The return for 2024 came to 4.7 per cent.
Short-term bonds and the money market
Short-term bonds accounted for 10.8 per cent and money-market instruments 3.7 per cent of the assets in the common portfolio at the end of the year. Long-term government rates in Norway and around the world rose through 2024. KLP’s global government bond index achieved a currency-hedged return of 0.6 per cent, while the Norwegian government bond index had a 1.1 per cent return for the year.
Global credit margins fell through the year. The return on KLP’s global credit bond index was 2.4 per cent, while the return on the Norwegian bond index was 2.7 per cent. Short-term bonds produced a total return of 4.1 per cent in 2024. The money market return was 5.4 per cent for the year.
Risk result
The risk result is an expression of how mortality and disability have developed in the insured population in relation to the assumptions used in the annual setting of premiums. For the whole of 2024, the risk result is NOK 790 (648) million.
The risk result for longevity and death amounts to NOK 795 (928) million. In 2024, as in 2023, mortality rates were higher than normal. The exception was the Pension Scheme for Hospital Doctors. There, the tariffs were strengthened on 31.12.2023 in response to low mortality rates, and this contributed to a positive margin in 2024 for this group also.
The risk result for disability amounts to NOK -5 (-280) million. There are two factors that affected the disability result. Firstly, the disability payments and provisions rose after KLP contacted NAV to investigate whether there were people receiving a disability pension from NAV who had not applied for one from KLP even though they have accrued rights with us. Encouraging these people to apply for a disability pension from KLP has led to a backlog of cases, which has affected the disability payments and provisions in 2023 and 2024. There will be an annual check against NAV to prevent such a backlog of disability cases in the future, and people qualifying for a disability pension will receive what they are entitled to as quickly as possible.
Secondly, disability rates increased, both in KLP’s population and in society as a whole, during the coronavirus pandemic. Disability has remained at a higher level than before the pandemic.
Interest guarantee premium
The interest guarantee premium amounts to NOK 13.7 (291) million. The interest guarantee premium is a function of interest rates, buffer fund and risk-taking. Higher buffer and interest rate levels have resulted in a reduced interest guarantee compared to 2023.
Administration result
The difference between the cost elements within premium income, withdrawals from management reserves and insurance-related operating expenses constitutes the administration result. This shows a surplus of NOK 77 (144) million for 2024. Insurance-related operating costs came to NOK 1,693 (1,512) million in 2024.
Net income from investments in the corporate portfolio and other income/expenses in non-technical accounts
Of the income of NOK 1,753 million, NOK 1,989 million is due to the return on the assets in the corporate portfolio. The corporate portfolio covers assets financed by owners’ equity and subordinated loans/hybrid Tier 1 and Tier 2 securities.
The corporate portfolio is managed with a moderate-risk long-term investment horizon, with the objective of stable returns. Investments in the corporate portfolio achieved a return of 4.8 per cent in 2024.
Balance sheet and market development
At the end of the year, the premium reserve for public-sector occupational pensions amounted to NOK 615.8 (573.5) billion. This growth is due to an increase in accrued pension rights through the year.
The buffer fund amounted to NOK 123.2 (109.5) billion at the end of the year. The buffer fund thus makes up 20.0 per cent of the premium reserve. The buffer fund represents previous surplus returns on insurance contracts, and can be used to cover a shortfall from the management of the pension assets. The fund thus increases the risk capacity in the management of the pension funds, and raises the expectation of higher returns without the need to pay high interest guarantee premiums. The return on the pension assets is important because the more of the pension liabilities are financed from returns, the less customers need to pay in premiums.
KLP is the leading provider of public-sector occupational pensions as an insured scheme. This is a relatively stable market, but during 2024, customers with premium reserves of around NOK 2.4 billion chose a different provider from KLP with effect from 2025 onwards.
Key figures, public-sector occupational pensions
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Premium income
60,883
70,326
Compensation payments
-30,200
-28,261
Net premium reserves transferred out
-2,035
-1,704
Premium reserve
615,834
573,573
Buffer fund
123,236
109,466
Buffer fund as a percentage of premium reserve
20.0%
19.1%
Average return guarantee
2.3%
2.3%
Return on the common portfolio
9.0%
6.4%
Allocation of profit for the year to customers and total comprehensive income
Customer result:
NOK MILLIONS
Investment result
Risk result
Total
To the premium fund
36,747
790
37,537
To the buffer fund
14,018
14,018
Total allocated
50,765
790
51,555
Corporate result:
NOK MILLIONS
Company
To the risk equalisation fund
325
To owners’ equity contributions
1,050
To retained earnings
766
Total allocated
2142
Of the company’s profit, NOK 325 million is allocated to the risk equalisation fund. This consists of the return on the fund, which the rules require to be transferred to the risk equalisation fund. Other company profits are allocated pro rata to equity contributions and other retained earnings (minus risk equalisation fund). Equity has increased through the year as a result of net equity contributions paid in the amount of NOK 1,248 (1,162) million.
Liquidity situation
The cash flow statement shows that KLP increased its holdings of cash and bank deposits from NOK 1,141 million to NOK 1,430 million during the year. It also appears that more premiums are being paid than are the amounts used for compensation payments. This is because the premiums are paid in advance, while the compensation is only payable later, sometimes far ahead in time. KLP has invested this surplus liquidity in property and securities through the customer portfolios (common and investment options), and several of these investments provide ongoing liquidity from interest payments, dividends and rental income. These can be used to cover compensation payments or reinvested. Moreover, a large proportion of the investments are themselves liquid and can be realised at short notice if needed. A significant proportion of the corporate portfolio is invested in financial assets that provide regular interest payments and so replenish liquidity which can be used to meet liquidity needs or reinvested. There is also a significant proportion of assets that can be realised at short notice to create additional liquidity if needed. The liquidity situation is therefore considered to be satisfactory.
Non-life insurance (IFRS in the company accounts)
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Insurance income on own account
2758
2505
Insurance costs on own account
-2132
-2092
Operating expenses
-360
-351
Underwriting result after reinsurance
-178
-71
Underwriting result on own account
88
-9
Financial income
380
313
Net financial result from insurance and reinsurance
-84
-42
Other insurance-related income/expenses
2
10
Profit/loss before tax
386
273
Financial results Insurance income on own account increased in 2024 by NOK 253.2 million, or 10.1 per cent, to NOK 2,758.4 (2,505.2) million. This growth is due to a combination of growth in all segments (retail, public-sector and corporate) and an adjustment of premium rates in response to increased material costs and claims frequency within the motor segment. The company strengthened its position as market leader in the public sector following the tenders in the fourth quarter, and has a market share of 31.4 per cent at the start of 2025.
Insurance costs increased by 1.9 per cent in 2024, to NOK 2,132.5 (2,092.4) million. There were many winter-related claims at the start of the year, but the claims situation improved through the year. Higher settlement costs are still resulting in high claims costs within the motor segment.
The number of claims submitted for Covid-19 related occupational illnesses continued to decline in 2024. The claims are mainly related to long-term effects of the disease for employees in particularly exposed professions. This may result in increased future payments.
Storm Ingunn, which struck northern parts of western Norway, Trøndelag and northern Norway between the end of January and February, was the largest single weather-related event in 2024. Our share of the claims payments is estimated at NOK 30 million.
The total claims and reinsurance ratio ended at 83.7 per cent for the year, 2.6 percentage points lower than in 2023. The lower claims ratio in 2024 is largely due to a lower proportion of costs associated with natural events, along with increased premiums in 2024. Reinsurance costs were also slightly lower in 2024 than in 2023. Over the last few years, insurance segments with long settlement periods have grown, while property insurance in the public-sector and corporate markets in particular has poor profitability.
Operating costs for the year amounted to NOK -359.7 (-351.3) million and resulted in a cost ratio of 13 (14) per cent in 2024. The cost ratio has been falling for several years, and now seems to have stabilised at the level of the market in general. The decrease in recent years is mainly due to the growth in insurance income.
Financial income amounted to NOK 379.8 (313.4) million. This represents a return of 6.2 (5.5) per cent.
Key indicators for non-life insurance
2024
2023
Claims ratio
77.3%
83.5%
Reinsurance ratio
6.4%
2.8%
Cost ratio
13.0%
14.0%
Total cost ratio
96.8%
100.4%
Insurance income
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Retail market
1,146
1,009
Public sector
818
755
Corporate
794
741
Total insurance income
2,758
2,505
Banking (IFRS)
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Net interest income
520
465
Net fee and commission income
33
28
Other fee income
63
61
Net financial income
-7
2
Operating expenses
-284
-271
Operating profit/loss before tax
325
285
Financial results Net interest income increased by NOK 55 million (11.8 per cent) to NOK 520 million in 2024. The general level of interest rates was stable and relatively high through 2024. The bank has adapted its lending to this interest level, and on average had about the same lending margins in 2024 as the previous year. The increase in net interest income is thus mainly due to the persistently higher interest rates through 2024 providing a higher margin on loans financed with equity.
Loan loss provisions of NOK 1.0 (0.9) million related to the mortgage portfolio were taken to profit/loss in 2024. The loss provisions thus amounted to NOK 7.7 (6.2) million at the end of the year. Individual losses and loan loss provisions are associated with investments in the retail market. There were no losses related to public-sector loans.
Net fee and commission income generally follows changes in the volume of outstanding loans in the retail market. Slightly higher lending volume, adjustments to some fee rates and increased income from credit cards increased net fee and commission income by NOK 5 million to NOK 33 million. This is an increase of 17.9%.
The banking business also manages the lending portfolio financed with customer assets from public-sector occupational pensions. Fees for this activity are included in the item for “Other fee income”. This income is internal to the Group and is eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Operating costs amounted to NOK -284 (-271) million. The increase is due to general price and wage growth, as well as increased costs for IT operations and digitalisation projects.
Balance sheet and market development
Demand for mortgages was high throughout 2024, and the volume increased by NOK 0.5 billion to NOK 24.2 billion through the year. Including mortgages financed with pension assets, the Group’s total mortgage portfolio amounts to NOK 27.6 billion. This is an increase of NOK 0.5 billion, or 1.9 per cent. Fixed interest loans accounted for 10 (7) per cent of outstanding mortgage loans at the end of the year.
In the public sector, the volume was reduced through the year by NOK 0.3 billion to NOK 18.7 billion. If public loans financed with pension assets are included, total lending to public-sector borrowers and businesses amounted to NOK 96.1 (91.4) billion at the end of 2024. This is an increase of NOK 4.7 billion, or 5.1 per cent. Fixed-interest loans accounted for 28 (27) per cent of total lending at the end of the year.
Key figures
Results by area
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Profit/loss, retail market
252
199
Profit/loss, public-sector market
74
86
Total
325
285
Lending volume
NOK BILLIONS
2024
2023
Mortgages
24.2
23.5
Public-sector loans
18.7
19.0
Total lending, KLP Banken
42.8
42.5
Mortgages
3.4
3.6
Public-sector loans
77.4
72.4
Foreign currency loans
6.7
6.4
Total loans managed for KLP
87.6
82.4
Grand total
130.4
124.9
Securities management (NGAAP)
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Fee income
593
560
Operating expenses
-520
-528
Net financial income
29
23
Profit/loss before tax
103
55
Financial results Fee income increased by NOK 33 million to NOK 593 million as a result of increased assets under management, due partly to value increases and partly to increased net sales. Fee income from internal customers is eliminated in the consolidated accounts.
Operating costs were down NOK 8 million to NOK 520 million. The withdrawal of major customer discounts reduced costs by NOK 40 million while other costs increased by NOK 32 million.
Balance sheet and market development
Securities management is generally tailored to the needs for management of funds from the Group’s contracts for public-sector occupational pensions. However, the asset management services are also available to other customers who want the same products. At the end of 2024, the company managed securities worth NOK 879 billion. This is an increase of NOK 118 billion, or 15.5 per cent, since the beginning of the year. Net new subscriptions for customers outside the Group came to NOK 20 billion.
Key figures for securities management
Volume managed
NOK BILLIONS
2024
2023
Intra-Group customers
640.8
581.3
Other customers
238.1
179.2
Total assets under management
878.9
760.5
Consolidated financial statements (IFRS)
Financial results
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Insurance income
2,788
1,780
Insurance expenses
-4,230
-3,986
Income and expenses from reinsurance
-178
-71
Profit/loss from insurance services
-1,620
-2,277
Net investment income
66,598
47,480
Policyholders’ share of changes in the fair value of underlying assets
-63,663
-44,179
Other insurance-related financial income and expenses
-84
-42
Net result from insurance services and insurance financing
1,231
982
Other income and expenses
-1,292
-1,236
Tax expenses
-1,634
-1,031
Profit
-1,695
-1,285
Posted to other comprehensive income
1,531
1,784
Total comprehensive income
-163
499
The insurance income represents income from the insurance services provided in the period. Insurance income increased by NOK 1,008 million to NOK 2,788 million in 2024. Of this increase, NOK 539 million is due to the release of risk adjustments for non-financial risk in the contracts for public-sector occupational pensions. NOK 253 million is due to premium and volume growth in non-life insurance, while NOK 216 million is linked to revenue from the provision of services under the contracts for public-sector occupational pensions.
The insurance expenses were NOK 4,230 million, which is an increase of NOK 244 million from NOK 3,986 million in 2023. NOK 195 million is due to increased costs on the provision of insurance services related to public-sector occupational pensions, while NOK 49 million is due to costs related to the provision of insurance services on the non-life contracts, mainly increased settlement costs in the motor segment.
The Group achieved net investment income of NOK 66,598 (47,480) million in 2024. This is an increase of NOK 19,118 million, or 40.3 per cent, from 2023. Favourable developments in the financial markets, especially the equity markets, helped raise investment revenues compared to 2023.
KLP is owned exclusively by customers with public-sector occupational pensions, and is therefore a mutual insurance company. All value creation accrues to current or future policyholders. Changes in the value of net assets contribute to financing the best estimate of the insurance liabilities, including risk adjustment. If the value of net assets exceeds the best estimate including risk adjustment, the remainder is set aside as a residual value. The residual value is a debt to current and future policyholders and forms part of the insurance liability on the balance sheet. This means that the Group has no profits or equity.
Net assets transferred to policyholders are measured at market value, and if market value differs from book value a measurement difference will arise. This measurement difference will constitute the Group’s equity, while the change in measurement difference in the period will constitute the profit/loss for the period
The policyholders’ share of changes in the fair value of underlying assets grew by NOK 19,484 million from NOK 44,179 million in 2023 to NOK 63,663 million in 2024. This is mainly due to increased financial income.
The total comprehensive income is NOK -163 (499) million. This means that changes in the fair value of net assets added to the insurance liability increased more than changes in the book value of net assets during the period.
Key figures
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
Estimated present value of future cash flows from outstanding cover, public-sector occupational pensions
411,318
377,742
Estimated present value of future cash flows from claims received, non-life insurance
2,808
2,944
Provisions for outstanding cover, non-life insurance
364
320
Total best estimate of the present value of insurance liabilities
The best estimate of the present value of insurance liabilities increased by NOK 33,484 million to NOK 414,490 million. Of this, NOK 33,575 million relates to public-sector occupational pensions. Changes in discount rates reduced the best estimate for public-sector occupational pensions by NOK 28,425 million in 2024, while changes in the premium fund increased the best estimate by NOK 39,330 million. Accrued interest increased the best estimate by NOK 16,492 million, while other changes increased it by NOK 6,178 million.
Residual value increased by NOK 39,841 million through 2024 to NOK 395,820 million. This is because the rise in the value of net assets was greater through 2024 than was necessary to finance the best estimate for the insurance contracts, including risk adjustment.
Equity amounts to NOK -3,303 (-3,140) million, and consists of the book value of net assets minus the fair value of net assets.
Financial strength and capital-related matters KLP is subject to the Solvency II Regulations through the Norwegian Financial Institutions Act, . The rules specify a solvency capital requirement to be calculated from the total risk exposure the company has within underwriting risk, market risk, operational risk, etc. All of the solvency capital requirement must be covered by regulatory capital. The buffer fund, which comprises previously earned investment results, will reduce the solvency capital requirement from market risk.
Solvency II divides the regulatory capital into three tiers according to loss-absorbing capacity. Regulatory capital in tier 1 is not subject to any restrictions when it comes to covering any losses in the business. The difference between the fair value of the company’s assets and liabilities is classified as regulatory capital in tier 1. For assets that are recognised at a different value in the accounts, the value is adjusted to represent fair value in the Solvency II balance sheet. For KLP’s insurance obligations, there are no observable market values. These are calculated using a best estimate based on actuarial assumptions. There is also a risk margin to reflect the capital costs that would be incurred by a third party in assuming the obligations.
The solvency capital was increased with the payment of the planned and advertised annual owners’ equity contributions of NOK 1.2 billion. Of the profit for the year to the company of NOK 2,142 million, NOK 1,050 million goes to owners’ equity contributions and NOK 766 million to other retained earnings. The risk equalisation fund increased by NOK 325 million and amounted to NOK 3,999 million at the end of 2024. Over the year, the buffer fund increased from NOK 109.5 billion to NOK 123.2 billion.
KLP’s mutual status and creditworthy owners provide assurance that the company can meet its future obligations. The Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway has agreed that KLP’s recall rights established in its articles of association can be classified as supplementary capital in an amount equal to 2.5 per cent of the company’s premium reserve. The current approval was renewed for four new years in 2023, and now runs to 31 December 2027. Because the capital is not paid-up, it ranks as tier 2 or supplementary capital. As KLP’s premium reserve grew throughout the year, the supplementary capital increased by NOK 1.1 billion to NOK 15.4 billion. However, eligible capital in capital group 2 will be limited to a maximum of 50 per cent of the capital requirement, equivalent to NOK 7.3 billion at the end of 2024.
The solvency capital requirement for KLP amounted to NOK 14.7 (14.3) billion at 31 December 2024. The eligible solvency capital increased by NOK 3.4 billion to NOK 53.0 billion. Without applying transitional rules, the company’s capital adequacy is 361 (346) per cent. Taking account of the transitional arrangement for technical provisions, capital adequacy is 361 (346) per cent. Capital adequacy is thus well above the internal target of at least 150 per cent and the regulatory requirement of 100 per cent. For the Group, the solvency margin is 298 (285) per cent. Good financial strength helps KLP to tailor its asset management to a long-term horizon.
KLP’s financial position is rated A2 by Moody’s Investor Service, with supplementary information on expected stable ratings.
Going concern assumptions
The board of directors of KLP considers that the income statement and balance sheet for 2024 with notes, cash flow statement and
statement of changes in equity, give a fair picture of operations through the year and the company’s
financial position at the end of the year. The accounts have been drawn up on the assumption of a going concern and the board of directors confirms that the conditions for this are in place. The board considers the risk to the company’s business to be reasonable. The company financial statements for KLP are presented in accordance with the Norwegian Annual Accounts Regulations for life insurance companies. The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with IFRS Accounting Standards, as approved for use in the EU/EEA.
5. Regulatory framework
In 2020, the rules on public-sector occupational pensions were changed for the cohorts after 1962, but the last rule changes were only clarified in 2024 (related to early retirement (AFP) and special retirement pensions). The Storting white paper on “An improved pension system with a strengthened social profile” provides the basis for further adjustments to the pension scheme, including raising age limits, which will affect our customers and members. The changes apply from 2025 onwards, when the 1963 cohort will be the first to be able draw their pensions under the new rules. The short deadline for implementation makes it challenging to adapt systems and information and advice to members, but KLP is working closely with customers and authorities to ensure a successful implementation.
Storebrand has filed a complaint against Norway with the EFTA monitoring body (ESA), alleging that KLP is receiving unlawful state aid, and that Norwegian municipalities and health trusts have breached the rules on public procurement. The government has rejected both complaints. Both cases are still under consideration at the ESA. The Norwegian Competition Authority’s investigations into whether KLP may have breached Section 11 of the Competition Act on improper exploitation of a dominant position are still ongoing. Since the case was raised, KLP has cooperated with the Competition Authority in its investigations, particularly by responding to regular information requests.
6. The way forward
The pension reform
The pension reform will help to increase the sustainability of the pension system by helping more people to work longer. In 2025, the first cohorts can draw their pensions under the new rules for public-sector occupational pensions. The rules provide increased flexibility and will help to make it easier and more profitable to stay in work longer. If the reform is to succeed, both employers and their employees need to understand the incentives and opportunities in the regulations, and to make informed choices about their pensions. Enabling the members within KLP’s customers and owners to do this was a key task for KLP in 2024 and will continue to be in the years to come. All members must take greater responsibility for their own pensions and work situation, given the increased flexibility that is now available. This means that KLP must be better able to advise based on the situation of the individual member. This places great demands on the services KLP offers to its customers and members in their choice of pensions and continued work. The pension platform that KLP has developed in recent years is a market-leading, forward-looking and powerful platform with a high degree of automation and self-service. The platform provides customers, owners and members with high-quality, effective services related to public-sector occupational pensions.
Collaboration
In order to give members advice on pensions, all providers of public-sector occupational pensions are dependent on obtaining information from other players in the ecosystem for public-sector occupational pensions. The digitalisation delivered through 2024 provides for sharing of information across all pension providers, and from 2025 also includes retirement pensions for those born in 1963 and later. The cooperation means that members receive an immediate response to their applications for retirement pensions thanks to KLP obtaining the necessary information from all operators in the ecosystem by digital means.
Sharing data contributes greatly to increased data quality and enables KLP to offer even better services to its customers and their employees. Digitalisation will continue in the years ahead and will become an important part of the future development of the services KLP offers its customers and members.
Introduction of new regulations
The introduction of new regulations has been ongoing in KLP for a long time and continued throughout 2024. Many of the services KLP offers its customers and members are completely new or enhanced. KLP has developed a new pension platform which includes a completely new pension calculator and the option to draw a retirement pension for those born in 1963 and later. Combined with the offer of individual advice, the new pension calculator allows the individual member to see the implications of different choices for their situation. National Insurance-based, private and public-sector occupational pensions are shown through the KLP pension calculator. The calculator helps to show the financial consequences of working longer and combining work and pension, and KLP is well prepared to assist its members with good guidance in the future, whether via self-service through digital solutions or through consultations with KLP’s pension advisors.
Through this same pension calculator, members can ask to draw their pensions, and the first payments will be made in February 2025.
Although most of the rules for retirement pensions for those born in 1963 and later now have been resolved, some clarifications and adjustments have still to be made for those with special age limits. In KLP, members with a special age limit make up a large share, close to 40 per cent. This group mainly consists of nurses with an age limit of 65 years, and is therefore an area that KLP is focusing on finding good solutions for, not least good advice services that will enable members to make informed choices about their pension.
Use of artificial intelligence (AI)
Artificial intelligence is increasingly talked about as an important tool for streamlining and creating better services in the public sector. AI is still at an early stage and KLP is working to see how it can be used to streamline processes, increase data quality and improve services to customers and members. In order to make the best use of AI, data quality and control of our own data will be crucial to exploiting it to the full. KLP is therefore working hard to increase data quality and structure insights to become more and more data-driven.
Technological choices
KLP is making strategic efforts to provide efficient and user-friendly services in public-sector occupational pensions by leveraging modern technologies and synergies within the industry and the Group. There is a focus on digital transformation through the use of cloud technology, strengthened IT security and cost savings from enhancing and modernising legacy solutions. In the future, KLP will continue to deliver innovative solutions to support the Group’s strategic objectives and add value forcustomers, owners and others. By focusing on digital resilience and automation, KLP seeks to reduce costs and risk, and increase operational efficiency. KLP will continue to improve the user experience with intuitive digital solutions and ensure good data management, which will in turn strengthen its reputation and the trust of members and customers. KLP will also invest in employee engagement and technological expertise to create a robust and forward–looking organisation.
The strategic technological choices for KLP can be summarised as follows:
Provide effective and user-friendly public-sector occupational pension services
Seek standardised solutions and leverage synergies in the industry and the Group
Have forward-thinking and robust technology solutions
Strengthen digital resilience
Buffers secure the pension assets
To face an uncertain world, KLP has developed solid buffers that facilitate stable and effective management of the pension capital going forward. This is important because this returns help to finance the pension savings and reduce employers’ pension costs. This is important as it will allow for more to go into health, care, schooling and better and safer communities.
Sustainability is becoming increasingly important
The global situation and weakened international cooperation limit the possibilities for sustainable development across all dimensions: environmental, social and economic. In 2024, new records were broken that no one wants to see; greenhouse gas emissions were higher than ever, and the year was the hottest in history. The consequences of climate change are already painful for many. If we are to achieve the climate targets and stop global warming, the whole of the global economy has to move towards zero emissions. In this perspective, all actors may be regarded as small players with limited individual power to change things.
Everyone must still do what they can to help drive change by utilising their own situation and abilities, right now. KLP will continue its efforts to accelerate the pace of change, and to ensure good management of climate and other sustainability risks for the benefit of the pension capital for our customers and owners. We want our management of the substantial assets in the Norwegian local government and healthcare sector to create sustainable growth and development both in Norway and internationally.
Important clarifications related to public-sector occupational pensions
KLP is waiting to see whether the ESA will open a case against Norway based on Storebrand's complaints. Regardless of the outcome, the most important thing for KLP will always be to deliver the lowest pension costs and the best service to its customers. KLP will then be able to maintain its strong market position.
The needs of customers and members are important criteria for further development
Customers’ and members’ need for financial services affects KLP. KLP will further develop its services in banking, fund management and insurance, to strengthen its position as a full-servicepartner to the public sector and its employees. We will listen to our customers’ concerns and develop services that make their lives easier.
Oslo, 21 March 2025
The board of directors of Kommunal Landspensjonskasse gjensidig forsikringsselskap
TINE SUNDTOFT Chair of the board
TERJE ROOTWELT Deputy chair of the board
ODD HALDGEIR LARSEN
KJERSTIN FYLLINGEN
TORKILD SINNER VARRAN
ELI ARNSTAD
VIBEKE HELDAL Elected by and among employees
ERLING BENDIKSEN
Elected by and from among the employees
SVERRE THORNES Group CEO
This document has been signed electronically
7. Notes to the sustainability report
ESRS 2 General information
Note 1. Changes from earlier sustainability reportingIRO
Changes in the preparation and presentation of sustainability data
As KLP produced a trial report according to the CSRD in the 2023 annual report, the structural changes in the sustainability report itself are relatively small.
The following indicators have been removed from the report:
Paris alignment percentage KLP has previously reported on the Paris alignment percentage in the investment portfolio. This is a custom indicator which describes the proportion of companies in the portfolio that have emissions in line with the 1.5 degree target. In the revision of KLP's climate strategy, the indicator was removed as a control parameter, and it has therefore been removed from the sustainability report.
Weighted carbon intensity and carbon intensity. KLP previously reported on all of the recommended TCFD indicators (weighted carbon intensity, carbon intensity and carbon footprint), but this year is reporting on carbon footprint only. The carbon footprint is an intensity indicator and is calculated relative to the amount invested, while the weighted carbon intensity and carbon intensity are calculated relative to turnover in the portfolio companies, where KLP has insufficient data. KLP has therefore chosen to include the carbon footprint only.
Seedcorn investments To contribute to innovation and social development, KLP has built up its own portfolio of investments in seedcorn funds, most of which are associated with Norwegian research bodies. KLP will continue with these investments, but the indicator has been taken out of the sustainability report as it is not defined as material in the double materiality analysis.
Investments in banking and finance in developing countries By investing in banking and finance in developing countries, KLP aims to contribute to economic growth and better living conditions by providing more people with access to financial services such as savings, loans and insurance. KLP will continue with these investments, but the indicator has been taken out of the sustainability report as it is not defined as material in the double materiality analysis.
Expanding renewable energy and avoiding emissions. Developing more renewable energy is a prerequisite for success in the energy transition and achieving the goals in the Paris Agreement. KLP previously reported on our contribution to the expansion of renewable energy, including helping to avoid emissions through new renewable projects that have been developed. These indicators have been taken out of the sustainability report pending a agreed standard and method for how to report on these types of effect.
The following indicators have been incorporated or changed their methodology:
Companies with restructuring plans for nature. KLP has improved the methodology and uses other data for the calculation. This means that we do not have comparable historical figures, but will build up history going forward. See note 15 “Nature transition” for details.
Emissions from energy consumption. KLP has used the climate module in a new supplier follow-up system to estimate emissions from energy consumption. Historical figures have been updated with the same methodology so they are comparable. The historical figures will therefore differ from the figures that were reported previously.
Emissions from claims settlements. KLP has worked with suppliers to access emissions data from claims settlements. This allows us to include this emissions category in the climate accounts for 2024. See note 11 “Climate accounts” for details.
Emissions from purchasing. The new supplier follow-up system has its own climate module for estimating emissions from purchased goods and services. This allows us to include several types of purchase in the climate accounts for 2024. See note 11 “Climate accounts” for details.
Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. KLP has changed the methodology because we have switched systems from Cemasys to Ignite Procurement. The most significant changes are a substantial improvement in the coverage of procurement data, updated emission factors for Scope 3 categories, and a transition from the Nordic mix to location-based emission factors for Scope 2. To ensure comparability over time, historical emission figures have been recalculated using the same methodology.
Real Estate Investments. Historical values from before the base year 2022 have been included, calculated using the Cemasys methodology. This ensures a longer history to refer to. However, readers should be aware that the figures before 2022 are not fully consistent with the figures from 2022 onwards.
Note 2. Composition and competence of the board of directors and senior managementGOV-1
Board of directors
The corporate assembly elects five board members, including the chair and deputy chair of the board. The employee organisation that has the most members with pension rights in KLP elects one board member with a personal deputy. Two board members are elected by and from KLP’s employees.
The board has three sub-committees: the risk committee, the audit committee and the remuneration committee. These prepare matters for discussion and make their recommendations to the board, but do not make decisions. The composition of the committees is governed in the Financial Institutions Act and Regulations. The audit committee covers the whole Group, while the banking group has its own risk committee consisting of members from the board of KLP Banken.
The risk committee and the audit committee consist of three board members and one deputy member. The same people sit on both committees, and they hold their meetings a few days before the board meeting. In 2024, the risk committee held 10 meetings and the audit committee held 11.
The remuneration committee is a committee for the board of directors of KLP and for the subsidiaries that are required to have such a committee. The remuneration committee is a preparatory and advisory working group supporting the board’s handling of remuneration questions, leadership development at Group management level, and HR strategy for the Group. The remuneration committee consists of four board members, and usually has two meetings a year. In 2024, the remuneration committee held one meeting.
The board’s work on sustainability issues
The board has overall responsibility for financial and sustainability reporting. The board’s audit committee advises the board on this matter.
The board has one strategy meeting per year and also has regular discussions on strategic questions for KLP. KLP’s sustainability strategy is an integral part of the corporate strategy and part of the board’s strategy discussions. The board deals with double materiality analysis, and regularly addresses topic-specific strategies or matters of a strategic or fundamental nature related to sustainability.
The board also deals with sustainability topics through ongoing activities, such as reporting and follow-up of strategic goals, risk reporting, policies, internal audits where sustainability is relevant, and compliance reporting.
The board has an annual study trip, where relevant and topical issues are discussed, often with external facilitators. In 2024, the board learned about a Swedish insurance company’s sustainability work in its investment activities.
In 2024, the board and its committees had sessions on the following impacts, risks and opportunities:
KLP's double materiality analysis, including all material impacts, risks and opportunities
KLP’s corporate strategy, including all material impacts, risks and opportunities
Revised climate strategy for KLP’s investment portfolio
Climate and nature risk analysis
ORSA for 2024
Report on due diligence assessments under the Norwegian Transparency Act
Disclosure on KLP's duty of activity under the Act on Equality and Prohibition of Discrimination
Periodic reporting on the status of work to counter financial crime
Competence of the board
The authorities set requirements related to suitability and fitness for directors of an insurance company. All directors must be assessed and notified to the Financial Supervisory Authority. Suitability requirements relate, among other things, to education, experience, financial matters and conduct. In assessing the qualification requirements for a director’s competence, the key point is that the board members collectively should meet the competence requirements. A concrete assessment of the board’s overall competence has to be made against the business the company is running, and it must take account of the latest evaluation of the board’s work.
The board of directors of KLP has determined what types of competence the overall board needs to have, in the guidelines for suitability. The regulatory requirements are set out in this guideline, where the board has also included societal understanding and sustainability expertise as topics that are important to KLP’s business and areas of expertise that need to be covered.
Among other things, the board has expertise on KLP's customers and its main product, public-sector occupational pensions. The board also has expertise in technology, asset management and sustainability, among other things. KLP is located in Norway, and the board possesses good knowledge of Norwegian conditions and Norwegian society.
When they join the board, new members are offered an introduction to KLP, its products and management, and important regulations and processes. After its annual self-assessment, the board identifies two topics that they would like a more detailed introduction to during the year. In 2024, the audit committee was trained on the provisions in the CSRD. The board receives annual training in anti-money laundering and anti-corruption.
The board evaluates its expertise and its own work each year, including the competence and factual basis behind assessments of the company's sustainability risk. In one meeting, the board assesses the basis on which they want to base their assessment (questions), with assessment and discussion in the following meeting. The outcome of the evaluation is shared with KLP’s nomination committee, and is important to the committee’s efforts to find suitable candidates for the board. The nomination committee works to propose candidates to the board who fulfil or contribute to the fulfilment of the requirements for the board’s overall competence. The board consists of people with management and board-level experience from different companies. In all these companies, sustainability has to be taken into account and followed up, giving board members experience that can be used in the sustainability work at KLP.
Directors’ liability insurance
Directors’ liability insurance has also been taken out for board members and the general manager of KLP. The insurance covers the insured’s liability for loss of assets from claims made against them during the cover period as a result of an act or omission on the part of the insured in their capacity as general manager or board member. The insurance is taken out with an external company.
Board members
Tine Sundtoft
Chair of the board since 2022.
Tine Sundtoft is county chief executive in Agder county. She was Minister of Climate and Environment in the Solberg Government (2013-2015), and before that business policy adviser to the Conservative Party’s Storting group (1995-1996), regional director of the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise (NHO) at Agder (1996-2005) and county councillor in Vest-Agder (2005-2013). Sundtoft has board experience from Agder Energi, Statens Lånekasse and Norsk Kulturminnefond, among others.
She graduated from BI Norwegian Business School.
Sundtoft provides the board with special expertise in general social understanding as well as customer and product knowledge. From her former role as Minister of Climate and Environment, and by virtue of her current leadership position in the public sector where sustainability requirements are increasing all the time, she provides the board with expertise on sustainability in general and climate and environmental issues in particular.
Terje Rootwelt
Deputy chair and board member since 2023.
Terje Rootwelt has been chief executive of the Helse Sør-Øst regional health trust since 2021. Before that, he was head of the Children’s and Youth Clinic at Oslo University Hospital health trust and Professor II of Paediatrics at the University of Oslo. He was also Vice President of Oslo University Hospital Trust (2015-2016). Rootwelt has board experience from Spekter-Helse and Oslo Science City.
Rootwelt is a qualified pediatrician, MD and healthcare manager and holds a PhD from the University of Oslo.
As a chief executive of an corporate group with over 80,000 employees, Rootwelt brings experience of managing large undertakings which is also relevant to large financial groups, including corporate governance, risk management and sustainability expertise. Rootwelt also brings important expertise in ICT strategy and digital understanding, and readiness and social understanding. His work as head of a health trust provides the board with knowledge relating to the customer and end-user perspective in KLP’s sustainability work.
Kjerstin Fyllingen
Member of the board since 2023.
Kjerstin Fyllingen is currently chief executive of Haraldsplass Diakonale Sykehus. She is former executive vice-president at Tryg Forsikring (2006-2013) and divisional director at Vital forsikring (2002-2006), and held management positions in the DNB Group (1986-2000). Fyllingen has board experience from e.g. Fana Sparebank, Landkreditt forsikring, the NSB Group, the Norwegian Financial Services Association and various board positions in the Tryg Group.
Fyllingen graduated from BI Norwegian Business School and INSEAD.
This expertise and experience makes her well-suited to chair the risk and audit committee. Fyllingen has experience from previous work in senior management in major finance groups, and brings expertise to the board in the areas of finance and insurance, as well as business understanding, strategy, corporate governance and risk understanding. She also provides the board with customer and end-user expertise relating, among other things, to KLP’s sustainability work, from her current position as chief executive at Haraldsplass.
Eli Arnstad
Member of the board since 2024.
Eli Arnstad has been mayor of Stjørdal municipality since 2022. She was previously a member of Nord-Trøndelag county council (1984–1991) and a permanent parliamentary representative for Nord-Trøndelag (1985–1986 and 1989–1990). Arnstad has been chief executive of Stiklestad National Cultural Centre and Stjørdal Næringsforum, and managing director of Enova and Sparebank 1 SMN. She has experience from a number of board positions, including Vattenfall, AF Gruppen, Posten Norge, Sparebank 1 SMN and NTE Holding.
Arnstad studied administration and management, public law and political science at Nord-Trøndelag University College.
Her experience as a leader in the public sector brings societal understanding to the board, as well as expertise on sustainability in general. Her background from the financial sector also contributes expertise on financial markets and governance issues.
Torkild Varran
Member of the board since 2024.
Torkild Varran was managing director of DNB NOR Kapitalforvaltning ASA (now DNB NOR Asset Management AS) from 2007 to 2018. Prior to this, he was investment director in the same company. From 2018 to 2023, he was an adviser at DNB NOR Kapitalforvaltning ASA. He has also held a number of other positions in the area of asset management, taking in Avanse Fondsforvaltning, K-Fondene (Nordea Funds), Christiania Bank and Folketrygdfondet. Varran is now self-employed. He has earlier board experience, and is currently a director of Landkreditt Management AS and DnB Scandinavian Property Fund DA.
Varran has a degree in economics from the University of Oslo and also holds a master’s degree in finance from NHH Norwegian School of Economics.
Varran’s background and experience in the Norwegian and European asset management markets contribute expertise in financial analysis, an understanding of financial markets and the way in which sustainability perspectives such as climate, environmental or governance issues can affect these and the management of KLP’s pension capital.
Odd Haldgeir Larsen
Member of the board since 2018.
Larsen is vice-chair of Fagforbundet (the Norwegian Union of Municipal and General Employees) and represents the employee organisation with the most members in KLP.
From his long career in union work, Larsen provides the board of KLP with particularly important social insight and understanding of KLP’s insurance customers.
Erling Bendiksen
KLP employee representative on the board since 2021.
Bendiksen been employed by KLP since 1981 and works as a customer and sales manager. He has many years of experience as an elected representative and is now the chief safety officer at KLP. Bendiksen has an advanced insurance qualification from Forsikringsakademiet.
Bendiksen completed the study programme on “Rhetoric, communication and management” at BI Norwegian Business School.
Bendiksen provides the board with important insurance, customer and product expertise, as well as insight into the employees’ conditions and interests in the KLP group.
Vibeke Heldal
KLP employee representative on the board since 2021.
Heldal has been employed by KLP since 2003 and works as IT business analyst in IT Contract Administration at our Bergen office. She has been the senior staff representative for KLP’s employees in Bergen since 2016. Heldal has a varied professional background, and worked in the oil and gas sector from 1989-1999.
She holds a BA in Finance and Administration from BI Norwegian Business School.
Heldal provides the board with insurance-specific product and ICT expertise, as well as insight into the employees’ conditions and interests in the KLP group.
Rune Simensen, 1st deputy member
1st deputy member since 2022, and has been a permanent director. In the period from when a board member stepped down on 10 September to the new director joining the board on 15 November, Simensen served as a full member of the board.
Simensen is director of technology and e-health at Helse Sør-Øst regional health trust. He has experience in the ICT area, in both the private and the public sector, and brings his expertise to the board in this area.
Tone Ikdahl
2nd deputy member
Tone Ikdahl is chief executive of Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital.
Group senior management
Group senior management work on sustainability issues
Group senior management regularly deals with sustainability-related issues, both in connection with strategy processes and in following up the goals in strategic focus areas. Group senior management also deals with regular issues such as the double materiality analysis, sustainability reporting and risk reporting. It also regularly deals with topic-specific issues based on relevance, ongoing development work or matters of principle that arise during the year.
Competence of Group senior management
As with the “fit and proper” requirements for board members, the authorities lay down similar standards for executives in financial institutions. In applying the “fit and proper” criteria to the individual managers, companies have make an objective assessment of each person’s qualifications in relation to the specific type of business the company runs, and the function and tasks the person is to take on.
The reporting standards require companies to state specifically whether suitable expertise is available or will be developed to oversee sustainability issues.
Group senior management builds this expertise mainly through its day-to-day handling of sustainability-related issues. Alongside fixed or ordinary agenda items related to sustainability, specific topics may be added when a need for special expertise arises. Over time, Group senior management has received training through internal and external talks and briefing sessions on various sustainability topics. Expertise is also built up through participation in courses, external forums and collaboration initiatives in the sustainability area.
The competence of Group senior management related to sustainability may be summarised as follows:
The CEO has extensive experience in sustainability work both from previous roles within the company’s investment activities and as a senior manager. He has built up this expertise over a long period. He takes an active part in the public debate through KLP’s dialogue with stakeholders.
The executive vice-president, Corporate Governance bears the overall responsibility for sustainability at the Group senior management level. The director for sustainability, the director for financial crime and the chief risk officer are part of her management team.
Group chief financial officer has extensive experience in sustainable finance, which is an integral part of his role in the investment business.
The executive vice-president, People and Organisation has expertise in a sustainable working environment, including good working conditions, gender equality and diversity.
The executive vice-president, Life and Pension is an expert on the scheme for public-sector occupational pensions, pension patterns, and customers’ needs and challenges – including the need for manpower and a sustainable working life.
Group senior management has access to expertise in the Group-level sustainability department which supports and advises the management. All of the Group’s business areas also have their own sustainability specialists for their products and services who contribute to the development work. The Group also has many key roles that are responsible for integrating sustainability into their areas in close cooperation with representatives from Group senior management.
Members of Group senior management
Sverre Thornes
CEO since 2008.
Prior to that, Thornes was executive vice-president responsible for life insurance in KLP, and from 2001 to 2006, he was head of KLP Kapitalforvaltning. He joined KLP as a fixed income manager in 1995.
Thornes has a BA in Business Administration from the American College in Paris.
Aage Schaanning
Group chief financial officer/executive vice-president, Finance since 2008
Aage Schaaning was head of KLP Kapitalforvaltning from 2006-2008. He previously worked with borrowing, finance management and administration in BNbank and Kredittkassen before joining KLP in 2001 as investment director in KLP Kapitalforvaltning.
Schaanning has an MBA from the University of Colorado and is an Authorised Financial Analyst.
Kirsten Grutle
Executive vice-president, People and Organisation since 2016
Kirsten Grutle joined KLP in 2011 as HR director, and has served in Group senior management since 2016. She came from the position of senior manager and HR director at Accenture Norway and has previously held management positions within HR at EDB Business Partner and Telenor. She has also been responsible for information and internal staff functions.
Grutle has a Bachelor’s degree from the University of Bergen.
Cathrine Hellandsvik
Executive vice-president, Life and Pension since 2023.
Cathrine Hellandsvik was director of the Customer department in KLP from 2012 to 2023. She was previously Director of business policy and analysis at KLP and also has many years of ministry experience.
Hellandsvik has a degree in Economics from the University of Oslo.
Hege Hodnesdal
Executive vice-president, Pension Operations since 2023.
Hege Hodnesdal came from the position of director of non-life insurance in Finance Norway, where she was responsible for business policy in that area for six years. Prior to this, she worked in various positions at Storebrand for over 20 years. Among other things, she headed customer service groups and product areas, and worked in business development. For a time, she was also managing director of Storebrand Skadeforsikring and part of its senior management.
Hodnesdal has a degree in Economics from BI Norwegian Business School, specialising in finance.
Rune Hørnes
Executive vice-president, Technology since 2016.
Rune Hørnes was head of IT (CIO) at Storebrand from 2011 to 2016. Prior to this, he held various IT management positions at Storebrand from 2005. In the period before Storebrand, Hørnes was a consultant at Accenture in banking, securities trading and insurance from 1995. As a consultant, he worked mainly on large mergers, startups and digitalisation projects. Through his various roles, he has experience from of working at the intersection between business strategy and development, technology, organisational development and process improvement.
Hørnes has a degree in Economics from the Norwegian School of Economics.
Ida Louise Skaurum Mo
Executive vice-president, Corporate Governance since 2023.
Ida Louise Skaurum Mo heads the Corporate Governance division, which includes the following departments: Group Legal Affairs, Sustainability, Strategy and Governance, Compliance, Risk Analysis and Control, and Financial Crime. Mo came from the position of general counsel and Group head of corporate governance at KLP, and joined KLP as a lawyer in 2006. She previously worked as a legal examiner at the Supreme Court, as a judge and in the Thommessen law firm.
Mo has a Master of Law degree from the University of Oslo and a degree in Economics from NHH Norwegian School of Economics.
Gro Myking
Executive vice-president, Communication and Markets since 2016.
Gro Myking was marketing director at Posten Norge AS from 2007-2016. Myking was previously executive vice-president, Markets, in the Hakon Group/ICA Norge, and ran her own consultancy company. She has board experience from several major Norwegian companies.
Myking has a degree in Economics from NHH Norwegian School of Economics.
Jarl Nygaard
Executive vice-president, Business Development since 2023.
Jarl Nygaard joined KLP in 2018 as director of business development in the Life division. Prior to that, he was head of business development for the corporate area in Storebrand Livsforsikring where he held various positions from 2005. In the time before Storebrand, Nygaard was a manager at Accenture, in banking and insurance. He has more than 25 years’ experience in business development and working at the interface between business and IT, primarily within the pension and insurance field in Norway and the Nordic region.
Nygaard has a degree in Economics from NHH Norwegian School of Economics.
Note 3. Active ownership
By being an active and engaged owner, KLP aims to align its investment portfolio with the ambitions set out in the Paris Agreement and to push companies to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Number of unique company dialogues refers to discussions KLP has had with companies during the year on ESG-related matters, either directly or led by KLP as part of various investor associations. KLP may engage in several dialogues with a company on a variety of topics during the year. KLP’s follow-up varies in scope, subject-matter and time frame. This is a way of exercising ownership in which KLP engages in a dialogue with companies to clarify how they handle sustainability issues and to communicate KLP’s expectations as an investor and owner.
General meetings. KLP uses services from ISS to vote at general meetings of companies in which we invest. At general meetings of Norwegian companies (domiciled or listed in Norway), KLP votes manually through ISS. At general meetings of non-Norwegian companies, KLP votes by proxy through ISS.
Exclusion criteria:
Behaviour-based exclusion criteria KLP excludes companies from investments where there is an unacceptable risk of the company contributing to or itself committing breaches of human rights, rights in war and conflict situations or labour rights, or engaging in activities harmful to the environment and climate, corruption, and other particularly serious violations of fundamental ethical standards and good business conduct.
Product-based exclusion criteria: KLP is not invested in any companies that deal with coal and oil sands, tobacco, cannabis for recreational use, alcohol, gambling or pornography. Nor do we invest in companies that develop or manufacture weapons or key components of weapons which violate fundamental humanitarian principles in normal use.
See “Policy for KLP as a responsible investor” for full details. Exclusion decisions are based on thorough reviews rooted in this policy.
Number of exclusions refers to the total number of companies KLP had excluded from investments at the end of the year because of breaches of the exclusion criteria in the Guidelines for KLP as a responsible investor.
Percentage excluded from the index shows the percentage of the reference index that KLP does not invest in because of exclusions, measured by the companies’ market value.
Number of companies re-included refers to companies whose exclusion has been rescinded during the year.
Note 4. Exposure in the investment portfolioSBM-1
The table below shows KLP’s exposure to the sectors specified in SBM-1 paragraph 40 d) as of 31.12.2024.
Sector
GICS
NACE
Market value
Oil and gas
10101020
10102010
10102020
10102030
10102040
28,684,705,246
Coal
Excluded
Chemical production
20.2
205,372,261
Controversial weapons
Excluded
Tobacco production
Excluded
Note 5. Organisation and implementation of reportingGOV-5
KLP's financial reports are prepared by the Finance department, which reports to the Group chief financial officer (CFO). The financial reports are based on extensive data from KLP's business systems. Control measures have been established to ensure the quality of reporting. A division of roles has been established whereby valuations are generally made by the business groups outside the Finance department, but by different organisation units from than those with asset management and product responsibility. Ahead of each reporting period, meetings are held between the Finance department and key business groups to identify risk factors, market conditions and other things that could have a bearing on financial reporting. Reconciliation and control procedures have been established to ensure completeness of data and quality in the securities prices and other variables used in valuations.
Sustainability reporting under the Norwegian Accounting Act is included in the annual report and is prepared in collaboration between the Finance department, the Sustainability department and the business areas within the Group. This calls for extensive collection of quantitative and qualitative data from both internal and external sources. In our view, the most significant risks associated with sustainability information are:
use of outdated data sources,
errors in estimates from manual retrieval and calculation of data
insufficient data to respond to the reporting points
KLP has risk assessment procedures and control instructions to reduce the risk. These include procedures for data extraction and calculations, double-checking of data and results, and automated and manual controls on major differences. The quality of quantitative data is also assessed for completeness and consistency, accuracy of estimates and timeliness.
KLP’s business is required by law to be audited, and external auditors carry out an annual audit of the financial statements and sign off the sustainability report. No external verification of the sustainability information from other third parties has been provided.
Note 6. Due diligenceGOV-4
The table below gives an overview of points in the sustainability report where we provide information on the various elements in the due diligence process.
Key elements of KLPs due diligence
Where to find them in the sustainability report
a) Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model
2.1 Strategy
2.2 Secure an dcompetitive pension savings
2.3 Corporate governance
3.3 KLP's material impacts, risks and opportunities
b) Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due diligence
3.3 KLP's material impacts, risks and opportunities - Stakeholders and stakeholder dialogue
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Material impacts, risks and opportunities
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Governing documents
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Transition plan and safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystems in the strategy
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy – Governing documents
3.6. Social matters - Own workforce - Material impacts, risks and opportunities associated with own workforce
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Data protection - Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Sustainable working life - Material impacts, risks and opportunities relating to consumers and end-users
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Data protection - Governing documents
3.7. Business conduct - Business conduct - Material impacts and opportunities
7. Notes to the sustainability report
d) Taking actions to address those adverse impacts
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Climate change – Actions and results
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Actions and results
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy - Claims settlement – Actions and results
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy - Property operation and development – Actions and results
3.6 Social matters - Own workforce - About KLP' emplyees - Equality and diversity - Actions taken
3.6 Social matters - Own workforce - About KLP' emplyees - Health, safety and environment (HSE) - Actions taken
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Data protection - Actions and results
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Sustainable working life - Actions and results
3.7. Business conduct - Business conduct - Actions and results
e) Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communication
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Climate change – Actions and results
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Biodiversity and ecosystems – Actions and results
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy - Claims settlement – Actions and results
3.5. Climate, environment and nature – Resource use and circular economy - Property operation and development – Actions and results
3.6 Social matters - Own workforce - About KLP' emplyees - Equality and diversity - Actions taken
3.6 Social matters - Own workforce - About KLP' emplyees - Health, safety and environment (HSE) - Actions taken
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Data protection - Actions and results
3.6. Social matters - Consumers and end-users - Sustainable working life - Actions and results
3.7. Business conduct - Business conduct - Actions and results
Climate, environment and nature
Note 7. Financed emissions
Financed emissions from securities investments
Calculated by obtaining data on emissions, revenue and enterprise value from MSCI and Stamdata. These indicators are calculated in line with the recommendations from the PCAF and Finance Norway’s guide to calculating financed emissions. We use the following methodology:
panies in portfolio.
For investments where there is no available data, emissions are estimated from the average emissions per krone in income from companies within the same sector in relevant indices. This estimation process takes a hierarchical approach, starting by looking at the most specific index level, which may be the national level (e.g., Norway), then gradually expanding the search to the regional, continental, and ultimately global level, if there are fewer than five companies within the specified sector. This hierarchical principle ensures that the emissions estimates are based on the most relevant and comparable data.
Reporting on climate data involves several challenges and limitations. One of these is the time lag, where climate data from portfolio companies is a year behind the accounting data. The carbon figures can also vary from year to year because of changes in data quality and methodology. For example, as things stand, not all companies include scope 3 emissions in their reports. Where we estimate emissions and receive reported data later, this will naturally lead to changes in the figures. These factors contribute to variation, so it is important not to interpret the climate indicators as hard figures, but as indicators to be supplemented with qualitative information to provide a more complete assessment. At KLP, we manually review the top 20 companies with the highest emissions to have better control over the trend in the indicators.
Financed emissions from the property portfolio
Prepared from procurement data via Ignite’s climate accounting module (see further discussion in note 11 “Climate accounts”) and from extracts of energy and waste data for KLP-operated buildings from KLP Eiendom’s environmental monitoring system. The emissions are converted into tonnes of CO2 equivalents in line with the standard from the Greenhouse Gas Protocol.
Financed emissions from the mortgage portfolio
Based on Finance Norway’s guide to calculating financed emissions, and the recommendations from the PCAF. The calculation of financed emissions is based on Eiendomsverdi's calculations of emissions for the homes on which the bank has mortgages. This calculation of emissions depends on the type of data we have on the financed objects:
For objects where Eiendomsverdi knows the energy band or has an estimated energy band, it uses this to estimate the expected energy consumption. Where the energy band is unknown, Eiendomsverdi uses a simulation of the energy consumption produced by its partner Simien. They use a combination of year of construction, location, housing type, area and heating information, assuming standardised use of homes.
For those objects where we do not get an estimate of GHG emissions from Eiendomsverdi, we look at the construction year. For properties built after 2010, we assume that they conform to regulation TEK-10 and have a C rating. If it was built after 2017, we assume that the building conforms to TEK-17 and has a B rating. We have good data on energy ratings for homes built after 2010, so there are relatively few homes where we make these assumptions based on the year of construction.
For properties where we do not get an estimate of emissions from Eiendomsverdi, but where we have details of floor area, we use estimates from the PCAF for homes in Sweden. KLP does not finance homes in Sweden, but as we have our own estimates for homes in Norway and we assume that energy consumption in Swedish housing is roughly the same as in Norway, we use these estimates to estimate energy consumption.
The emissions from the home are broken down according to the bank’s exposure to the home and the value of the home. We use the original value to calculate the loan-to-value ratio when we approve the loan, based on the guide for calculating greenhouse gas emissions from Finance Norway.
Financed emissions from lending to municipalities
As of today, we do not have a method for mapping financed emissions for loans to the local government sector. In 2024, we have been working on a solution to map financed emissions from this sector. We expect to have a solution in place for 2025.
Challenges and limitations Reporting on climate data involves several challenges and limitations. One of these is the time lag, where climate data from portfolio companies is a year behind the accounting data. The carbon figures can also vary from year to year because of changes in data quality and methodology. For example, as things stand, not all companies include scope 3 emissions in their reports. Where we estimate emissions and receive reported data later, this will naturally lead to changes in the figures. These factors contribute to variation, so it is important not to interpret the climate indicators as hard figures, but as indicators to be supplemented with qualitative information to provide a more complete assessment. At KLP, we manually review the top 20 companies with the highest emissions to have better control over the trend in the indicators.
KLP is not aware of any significant events related to emissions after the reported figures were obtained from the value chain. For financed emissions, the reported figures for 2024 are based on the companies’ emissions figures for 2023.
KLP has CO2 emissions from burning bio-oil within scope 3 in the property portfolio.
Note 8. Data coverage and quality
Coverage and data quality scores for the various indicators of financed emissions are shown in the table below in line with the methodology from the PCAF. The score tells us something about the quality of the numbers behind the calculations. The best score is 1, and is given in cases where the company itself has reported all the necessary data. Cases where the company’s emissions are estimated by the data provider get a score of 4, and cases where we ourselves estimate emissions based on other companies in the sector get a score of 5. The different quality scores are weighted together for the different emission groups based on their value in the portfolio.
Note
2024
2023
2022
2021
2024
2023
2022
2021
Coverage ratio
Data quality
12
Securities investments
Scope 1
61%
78%
72%
58%
2.9
2.7
2.9
3.2
Scope 2
59%
77%
71%
57%
3.0
2.7
2.9
3.2
Scope 3
52%
65%
59%
46%
2.9
2.6
2.9
3.2
12
Government bonds
Scope 1 excl. LULUCF
0%
0%
94%
99%
4.0
4.0
1.1
1.1
Scope 1 incl. LULUCF
0%
0%
94%
99%
4.0
4.0
1.1
1.1
Scope 2
0%
0%
0%
0%
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
Scope 3
0%
0%
0%
0%
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
12
Mortgages
96%
89%
94%
95%
3.6
3.0
3.5
3.6
12
Property
86%
0%
0%
0%
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
-2.0
For KLP Eiendom, the data quality score is equal to 1, which is the highest quality of data according to the PCAF standard. This is because the calculations are based on actual energy consumption data obtained from KLP Eiendom's environmental monitoring system, where the data is linked to specific emission factors.
A data quality score for mortgages has also been calculated. These are given a quality score of 3 in cases where emissions are estimated from the type of home and the energy rating, and 5 where we use data from the PCAF database for Swedish homes.
Some of the loans and associated collateral items have low data quality or lack information. It is not currently possible to make any calculations. For the report as at 31.12.2024, emissions have been calculated for 96 per cent of the mortgage portfolio.
Note 9. Science-based climate targets approved by the SBTi
Whether the companies have set a science-based climate target is an indicator of their willingness to adapt in line with the Paris Agreement. By setting and following a science-based climate target, companies will reduce their emissions over time. Persuading companies to do this is an important tool for KLP to achieve our own climate strategy and contribute to achieving the global climate goals. We therefore report the proportion of companies with climate targets approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), weighted by financed emissions. To identify companies with climate targets, we use data from MSCI and SBTi.
It is important to be aware that science-based climate targets approved by the SBTi are only one indicator of willingness to change, and will understate the level of ambition with regard to restructuring in the portfolio. We also monitor companies that have set targets that are science-based without necessarily being “certified” by the SBTi.
Note 10. Climate-friendly investments
Since 2018, KLP has had a target of NOK 6 billion a year in net new climate-friendly investments. Net new investments mean only new capital transfers for climate-friendly investments. Climate-friendly investments comprise the following types of investment:
Climate and nature solutions:
Renewable energy in Norway covers equity and bond investments in Norwegian electricity generation companies and grid operators. The power companies are broken down into hydro-electric, wind and biofuel-based producers. The figures also include loans to companies and projects in Norway within the power sector.
Renewable energy outside Norway covers investments in renewable energy projects. This includes both equity investments and project financing. The investments are made either through external fund managers specialising in energy or through other partners. The figures also include companies that derive more than 95 per cent of their revenue from the production of renewable energy.
Renewable energy in developing countries covers investments in new renewable energy projects. The investments are made partly as direct investments in cooperation with Norfund, and partly as fund investments through Climate Fund Managers.
Sustainable forestry covers investments in funds that invest in FSC-certified forests in Sweden, Finland and the Baltic states.
Transitional investments
Green buildings are defined as buildings that are aligned with the criteria in the taxonomy, which you can read more about in section 3.5 Climate, environment and nature - EU Taxonomy - Property". The market value of green buildings in KLP’s property portfolio and the total number of square metres are reported. The definition was changed for the reporting in 2023, in line with new interpretation of the Taxonomy Regulation. The historical figures have been updated according to the new definition.
Green loans are loans to municipalities, county authorities and entities with a public-sector affiliation. The loan must have a clearly positive environmental and climate effect and satisfy specific criteria according to the type of project. The criteria are based on the Green Bond Principles, the Climate Bond Initiative Taxonomy and the Nordic Public Sector Issuers Position Paper on Green Bonds Impact Reporting. The criteria are revised as and when required.
Green bonds are defined as bonds classified as green based on extracts from Bloomberg and Stamdata, where we match the securities against the criteria for external third-party verification. For extracts via Stamdata, third-party verification is mainly performed by DNV GL or Cicero, while Bloomberg covers more global issuers, where the verifying body can vary. These bonds do not include investments already included in KLP’s investments in renewable energy in Norway, as described above.
Infrastructure includes investments in funds for sustainable infrastructure in Europe.
In 2024, KLP revised the breakdown of “climate-friendly investments”. The revision means that from 2025, KLP will link the NOK 6 billion rule to “climate and nature solutions”. This group includes what were previously referred to as “zero-emission investments”, as well as nature solutions. Transitional investments will be expanded to include companies with science-based climate targets from 2025.
Note
NOK MILLIONS
2024
2023
2022
2021
At 31.12.2024
At 31.12.2023
At 31.12.2022
At 31.12.2021
Amount invested
Fair value
Climate and nature solutions:
10,981
1,823
5,063
1,484
53,785
39,035
37,579
31,680
14
Renewable energy
10,981
1,736
5,049
943
50,945
36,438
35,498
29,800
As a share of KLP’s investments
6.0%
4.7%
5.0%
4.2%
of which: renewable energy in Norway
8,246
-2,332
828
-80
28,095
19,543
21,449
20,051
of which: renewable energy abroad
2,271
3,522
3,970
894
19,821
15,325
12,515
8,581
of which: renewable energy in developing countries
463
547
251
129
3,028
1,569
1,534
1,168
14
Sustainable forestry
0
87
14
541
2,840
2,597
2,081
1,880
Transitional financing
6,394
5,753
4,482
11,094
57,227
45,134
39,401
33,276
14
Eco-friendly buildings
38
2,485
new
new
34,435
27,929
26,002
24,031
As a share of the market value of the portfolio
35%
28%
28%
27%
As a share of the total sqm in the portfolio
34%
26%
26%
27%
14
Green loans
864
984
212
488
4,642
3,737
2,753
2,541
14
Green bonds
3,182
1,261
3,992
4,290
13,855
9,703
9,095
5,813
14
Infrastructure
2,310
1,023
278
902
4,295
3,764
1,551
891
Total climate-friendly investments
17,375
7,576
9,545
12,578
111,012
7,576
9,545
12,578
As a share of KLP’s investments
13.0%
10.8%
10.9%
9.2%
Note 11. Climate accountsE1-6
Emissions from KLP’s operations (scopes 1 and 2 and scope 3 category 1-14)
Greenhouse gas emissions from KLP's own operations are calculated in tonnes of CO2 equivalents in line with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol standard. GHG emissions include emissions from the use of diesel vehicles (scope 1), energy consumption (scope 2), and business travel, waste from KLP’s own office premises, food served in the canteen in KLP-Huset, and purchasing (scope 3).
Scope 1
KLP’s scope 1 emissions come from the use of diesel vehicles. These emissions are calculated based on kilometres driven through the year using the emission factor provided by the vehicle manufacturer.
Scope 2
Emissions from electricity consumption (including scope 2 emissions) in the table are calculated using location-based emissions factors from Norway, Sweden and Denmark respectively. KLP also reports scope 2 emissions by a market-based method. In 2024, KLP’s market-based scope 2 emissions were zero (0), based on the 100 per cent purchase of guarantees of origin for renewable power. The guarantees related to power consumption in KLP’s offices in Norway are provided by the electricity company Entelios, and are related to the production of emission-free Norwegian hydropower. For KLP’s offices in Sweden, guarantees of origin for renewable energy have been purchased via the electricity company Boo Energi, and for KLP’s offices in Denmark guarantees from the electricity company Energi Denmark have been used for renewable energy from Danish wind farms.
KLP has calculated emissions via Ignite Procurement. To ensure comparability over time, historical figures are recalculated by the same method.
Scope 3
Emissions from purchases are estimated from purchasing costs through the Ignite Procurement service. This service estimates emissions by multiplying the financial amount of the purchase by an emission factor provided by Exiobase. The factor is set per supplier based on capitalisation, industry category and region. This can produce some inaccuracy in the estimates, in that the type of goods or services purchased is not taken into account. For example, it will not pick up whether KLP chooses a product with a lower carbon footprint than similar products. This can be estimated based on the specific goods or services, but this requires more granular invoicing data. We will continue our efforts to put this in place. The estimate for suppliers can also be replaced by emission figures from other sources if they have a higher degree of accuracy.
Emissions from flights are estimated from kilometres travelled using different emission factors collected via travel agencies. The estimates are produced in Ignite. They differentiate between short, medium and long haul, and cabin class, using different emission factors, and the calculation takes account of the fact that the emissions are released higher up in the atmosphere (the “relative forcing”, or RF factor). The calculation does not take account of the number of passengers on each flight or different aircraft types and does not differentiate by segment, which can lead to errors in the estimate. The methodology nevertheless follows market practice, and we consider that the estimates are of good quality.
Emissions from waste are estimated from weighed waste using different emission factors, differentiating between waste ratios. The estimates are produced in Ignite. The estimate includes waste from KLP’s own offices in Oslo, Bergen and Trondheim. For offices in Oslo, only paper waste and residual waste are weighed and recorded per user, while the other waste ratios are estimated based on an area key. This creates some uncertainty as to the accuracy of the waste figures used in the calculation. KLP will continue its efforts get better waste data in place.
Figures for emissions from the purchase of IT goods and services are not complete, but cover parts of this procurement area, including PCs, screens and server services. The emissions are estimated internally by KLP based on the numbers of individual products held by KLP and information on lifecycle emissions for products obtained from our suppliers. This provides good quality estimates, but it is a manual process and a resource-intensive task to include more products and services in the estimate.
Emissions from the canteen are related to hot meals served in the canteen in KLP-Huset. Currently, this is the only canteen where we have data. The emissions are estimated by KLP’s canteen provider using tools from Klimato. They have different emission factors for different foods based, among other things, on the country of production and the shipping method, and allow us to calculate emissions per dish. This differentiation provides good quality estimates. To find total emissions, emissions per dish are multiplied by the numbers of each dish sold.
Emissions from claims settlements are estimated from data from suppliers in the value chain, where this data is available. The greenhouse gas calculation has not been verified by a third party. The emission calculation includes remediation of physical damage to insured objects within the Property and Motor categories. The vast majority of our claims that involve a resource and greenhouse gas footprint to rectify them fall into these two categories. The figure includes claims cases closed in the financial year, regardless of when the costs were incurred or the GHG emissions took place. The greenhouse gas calculation consists of different emission sources and factors from a number of different actors and groups, and will necessarily entail some differences in quality, level of detail and assumptions for the areas where we have been given access to data. The result should therefore be interpreted with caution, and viewed in light of the coverage of the emission calculation, which we estimate at 22 per cent for 2024. That means that we have emissions data for 22 per cent of claims for physical damage within the Property and Motor categories that were closed in 2024, measured by claims costs. 2024 is the first year when KLP Skadeforsikring has compiled emissions data for claims settlements. Work to increase the scope and quality of the data will continue in 2025.
For estimation of financed emissions, see note 7.
Note 12. Energy mix and guarantees of originE1-5
Energy consumption is the 12-month average climate-adjusted specific energy use for KLP-operated buildings. “KLP-operated buildings” are the properties which KLP owns, operates and maintains, where KLP is able to implement environmental measures and measure their effects. These are buildings in Oslo, Trondheim, Copenhagen, and Stockholm. All of these buildings have energy monitoring systems in which energy and water consumption is recorded and monitored. In most of the buildings, tenants’ energy consumption is also included, so we have an overview of the total energy consumption for the buildings. Reported energy consumption is climate-adjusted in order to compare developments over time regardless of annual temperature variations.
The breakdown between different energy sources is based on information on the energy balance relating to electricity and district heating from the NVE and others, and from similar players in Sweden and Denmark. So we have not been able to calculate historical figures.
There may be various reasons why it is sometimes impossible to obtain correct figures, such as faults in meters or figures reported late by our sub-contractors. This is taken into account in that the reports only include KLP-operated buildings which have comparable operating conditions going back 12 months from the reporting date. However, this means that the buildings KLP reports on vary slightly from year to year, but we believe that this will still pick up the correct trends in the company’s property portfolio.
Renewable energy production in KLP’s property portfolio is kWh of renewable energy produced locally from solar energy at KLP’s properties. The production of heating and cooling from heat pumps is not included.
Own office premises include KLP’s offices in Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, Stockholm and Copenhagen.
In 2024, KLP’s market-based scope 2 emissions from its own offices were zero (0). This comes from the 100 per cent purchase of guarantees of origin for renewable energy. The guarantees related to power consumption in KLP’s offices in Norway are provided by the electricity company Entelios, and are related to the production of emission-free Norwegian hydropower. For KLP’s offices in Sweden, guarantees of origin for renewable energy have been purchased via the electricity company Boo Energi, and for KLP’s offices in Denmark guarantees from the electricity company Energi Denmark have been used for renewable energy from Danish wind farms.
Note 13. Intensity indicator
KLP has previously reported on all the recommended TCFD indicators (carbon footprint, carbon intensity, and weighted carbon intensity), but now reports only on carbon footprint and carbon intensity. The carbon footprint is an intensity indicator and is calculated relative to the invested amount, while both carbon intensity and weighted carbon intensity are calculated relative to the revenue of portfolio companies. KLP does not consider emission intensity based on the group's income as a relevant measurement variable, as this gives a misleading picture of the emission intensity of a financial group like KLP. However, KLP still reports on the carbon intensity indicator, as it is a requirement.
Note 14. Nature riskE4-1, E4-6
The targets and identification of high-risk sectors are based on the nature risk analysis we have conducted on the investment portfolio. The results of this analysis are presented below.
The sum of nature loss and associated impact on biodiversity poses a systemic market risk which can weaken economic growth and value creation across sectors by creating imbalances in supply and demand and aggravating resource shortages. Exposure to companies that contribute to environmental degradation also entails reputational risk, as greater demands for sustainability from customers and investors may weaken KLP’s competitiveness and investment opportunities. The risk is particularly relevant in sectors where KLP has large ownership interests, such as infrastructure projects in wind and solar power. However, KLP’s climate and nature strategy helps reduce this exposure. The transition to a more nature-positive economy also allows an increased focus on climate and nature solutions, where KLP can invest in projects that both reduce negative impacts on nature and create economic value. A specific transition risk is tightened environmental regulations, such as restrictions on land use in the property sector. This can limit development opportunities and affect the value of investments. However, this development also offers fresh opportunities. Strict requirements for new buildings can increase the value of existing properties in a central location, as new development becomes more challenging.
Although nature risk is a major long-term challenge, preliminary analyses show that nature risk in KLP’s portfolio is limited in the short term, partly because sectors with a significant negative impact on nature constitute a relatively small share of the overall equity and fixed income portfolio. As nature risk is often manifested locally and is context-specific, the risk will be spread in a diversified portfolio.
Based on an assessment of the direct impact and dependence on nature for different sectors, combined with KLP’s financial exposure to the sector, KLP identified five sectors in the portfolio as particularly significant (share of equity and bond portfolios in brackets):
Forestry and paper production (0.1 per cent). High physical risk associated with the quality of water and soil. Deforestation has a negative impact on biodiversity and the Earth’s natural ability to absorb carbon, affecting global warming. The sector includes GICS sub-sectors 15105010, 15103020 and 15105020.
Oil and gas industry (3.2 per cent). Risk of negative impact on biodiversity through air and water pollution from chemical emissions. Indirect impact through combustion of oil and gas leading to climate change, with consequent risk of loss of nature and biodiversity. The sector includes GICS sub-sectors 10102010 and 10102020.
Agriculture (0.1%). High risk associated with both impact and dependence on nature, especially water resources, land use and biodiversity, which affect pollination and soil fertility. The sector includes GICS sub-sector 30202010.
Fisheries and farming (0.5 per cent). High risk associated with both impact and dependence on nature. Vulnerable to climate change and acidification of the sea, as well as major impact on surrounding nature through emissions and pollution from fish farms, as well as overfishing and destructive fishing methods. Indirect impact through land use related to fish feed. The sector includes GICS sub-sector 30202030.
Mining (1.0 per cent). High risk of impact on biodiversity and ecosystem changes, dependent on large amounts of water and land. In particular, risks associated with pollution from heavy metals and other toxic substances that may have long-term effects on nature. The sector includes GICS sub-sectors 15104020, 15104010, 15104025 and 15104030.
Both property and infrastructure investments are also included in KLP's risk sectors because they use a lot of land, with an inherent risk of negative impacts on nature and biodiversity, combined with KLP having high exposure to these sectors.
We assume the following time horizons in the analysis: short term – up to 5 years, medium term – 5-15 years, and long term – over 15 years. We use an external analysis tool, the WWF’s Biodiversity Risk Filter (BRF), to assess the dependence and impact of KLP’s investment portfolio on nature. So KLP does not conduct direct consultations with potentially affected communities, but expects this to be done by companies in our investment portfolio where relevant. Feedback from stakeholders and communities is therefore not part of the analysis. However, dialogue with stakeholders is a key part of KLP’s work as a responsible investor through companies and participation in investor-led initiatives. The interests of local communities are assessed by evaluating how the companies we invest in manage impacts on ecosystem services relevant to the affected communities through their strategies, including how they seek to avoid negative impacts. When the impacts cannot be avoided, we consider companies’ plans to minimise them and implement measures to maintain the value and functionality of priority ecosystem services. If the measures taken are not judged to be sufficient, and dialogue does not lead to improvements, we consider divesting from the company.
Assessment of natural risk is an immature area of expertise, and there is as yet no analysis framework that can provide a precise and quantifiable understanding of the nature risk in our portfolio. Our current assessment of nature risk is limited to analyses based on general sectoral characteristics in the portfolio, without specific consideration of possible scenarios within markets, technology or politics. The analysis conducted does not capture the systemic risk posed by ecosystem collapse which would potentially hit financial markets across all sectors and regions. Another weakness of the analysis here is the assessment of exposure through value chains. In the future, KLP hopes to use scenario analyses to assess nature risk in the same way as climate risk. This will cover potential future challenges such as biodiversity loss and ecosystem collapse, as well as their impact on investments through direct damage, regulatory changes, market changes and altered investor behaviour. The analysis should also capture indirect impacts through the value chain. We will closely monitor the continued development of methods for assessing and measuring nature risk in KLP’s portfolio.
Note 15. Nature transition
We collect response data to questions C.15.2-C1, C.15.3-C1 and C.15.5-C1 to assess whether companies have made a public commitment, assess their impact through their value chain or have taken action, respectively. Companies that have replied to the CDP survey are identified and linked to our portfolio using ISIN codes. Based on reported information, the nature risk indicators for each sector are calculated, where the percentages in the table are based on the number of companies in each sector. Note that this data is self-reported by the companies and the nature-related commitments they have made may not be based on any externally approved framework. The categorisation of the sectors is based on GICS codes (see note 14 “Nature risk”). Note that KLP’s property portfolio and direct investments are not included here because of a lack of coverage in the figures.
We also supplement the data with indicators from our data provider MSCI to assess whether the companies have established strategies that support the aspect of commitments relevant to the various risk sectors and objectives. Each company can have a maximum value of 1 per aspect, regardless of the number of strategies that meet the criteria. This means that if a company has several strategies within the same objective, only one total value is given: 0 if the company does not have any relevant activity and 1 if it has.
Social matters
Note 16. Own workforce
Employee statistics
Number of employees refers to permanent employees in the KLP Group in Norway, Sweden and Denmark, and includes employees on leave of absence and those working part-time.
Part-time employees are permanent employees who work less than 100 per cent. Percentage of part-time employees shows the percentage of the total number of permanently employed women and men working part-time on a voluntary basis.
No employees at KLP work part-time against their will, and all staff are employed in full-time positions. Part-time working occurs only when the employee wishes it in connection, for example, with parental leave, education or other personal circumstances which cause them to prefer a reduced workload for a period.
Temporary employees are employees on temporary contracts who are paid by KLP.
Staff turnover is the number of permanent employees who have left the KLP Group in relation to the average number of employees in the year. People who have changed jobs internally within the KLP Group are not included.
Equality and diversity
KLP defines managers at three different levels. Management level 1 is Group senior management, including the CEO and.
managing directors of the subsidiaries. Management level 2 are the managers who report directly to an
executive vice-president (member of Group senior management). Management level 3 are the managers who report to managers at level
2.
Higher-paid positions are non-executive posts with an annual salary of more than NOK 1 million.
Other employees are permanent employees salaried in accordance with a standard pay scale, who are not in management or other higher-paid positions with an
annual salary over NOK 1 million.
The gender balance at the different management levels and in other higher-paid positions and among all employees is based on permanent
employees The gender balance for higher-paid positions is calculated as the proportion of women and the proportion of men who are not
managers and have an annual salary over NOK 1 million against the total number of employees. The figure reported shows
the gender balance at the end of the year, and not through the year.
Age distribution among employees is based on permanent employees .
Gender balance for parental leave taken is based on the total amount of parental leave taken by permanent employees, broken down by gender, and covers all employees.
Women’s earnings relative to men’s is based on the contractually determined salary for a 100 per cent position, not adjusted for the percentage of part-time working.
CEO’s salary relative to median salary in the Group. The CEO’s salary is a contractual fixed salary, not including benefits in kind. The median salary is defined as the median salary for permanent employees of the Group in Norway, and includes management level 1.
HSE
Sickness absence is self-certified and medically certified sickness absence among permanent employees. Short-term sickness absenc is defined as 1-16
days, and long-term absence is 17 days or more.
Gender balance for sickness absence is based the total sickness absence among permanent employees.
Personal injuries are self-reported injuries to employees and claims for actual and possible occupational injuries
submitted to KLP's non-life company. This does not included injuries suffered during employees’ leisure time.
We cannot publish figures related to disability because of the GDPR and
Norwegian personal data regulations.
The gender balance for absence to care for sick children is based on “sick child” leave days taken by permanent employees,
broken down by gender.
Note 17. Customer complaints
Complaints via KLP contact points
Most complaints to KLP come via our own contact points, such as the contact form on klp.no, e-mail, phone-calls and conversations with customer service staff in the different parts of the business. The number of complaints reported is the number reported to the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway and considered to be genuine complaints. For KLP Skadeforsikring, KLP Banken and KLP Kapitalforvaltning we also report the number of complaints where customers have had all or part of their complaint upheld after KLP reconsidered the matter.
The number of pensions-related complaints includes both complaints to KLP and appeals to the National Insurance Court. If a customer disagrees with the outcome of a complaints case, they can appeal. This appeal is processed and adjudicated by a legal affairs department. One complaints case may therefore be registered twice if it has been appealed. Because of limitations in the system, it has not been possible to obtain figures on how many pension-created complaints from customers are upheld.
Cases before the Financial Services Complaints Board
If one of our customers has submitted a complaint to KLP and is not satisfied with the response or the follow-up, the complaint can be referred to the Norwegian Financial Services Complaints Board. The indicator shows the number of cases dealt with by the Financial Services Complaints Board in the year and the number of cases where the customer received full or partial satisfaction where KLP Banken, KLP Kapitalforvaltning or KLP Skadeforsikring were the counterparty.
Cases heard by the National Insurance Court
The indicator shows the number of cases dealt with in the National Insurance Court in 2024 and the number of cases where the customer received full or partial satisfaction. The processing time in the National Insurance Court is 8 to 10 months, so the figure includes cases that were submitted to the Court in 2023 and 2024.
Note 18. Whistleblowing
KLP has an external whistleblowing channel where both employees and third parties can report matters of concern while remaining anonymous. Employees can also report their concerns via internal channels. The reported figure is the number of actual cases reported via all channels. In 2024, a total of 1 whistleblowing case was reported. The case was handled in accordance with KLP's whistleblowing rules. The case has been concluded and closed.